Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 1/2017

Open Access 01-01-2017

Techniques and short-term outcomes for total minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophageal resection in distal esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers: pooled data from six European centers

Authors: Jennifer Straatman, Nicole van der Wielen, Grard A. P. Nieuwenhuijzen, Camiel Rosman, Josep Roig, Joris J. G. Scheepers, Miguel A. Cuesta, Misha D. P. Luyer, Mark I. van Berge Henegouwen, Frans van Workum, Suzanne S. Gisbertz, Donald L. van der Peet

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Esophagectomy for cancer can be performed in a two-stage procedure with an intrathoracic anastomosis: the Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. A growing incidence of distal and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas and increasing use of minimally invasive techniques have prompted interest in this procedure. The aim of this study was to assess short-term results of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (MIE-IL).

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was performed from June 2007 until September 2014, including patients that underwent MIE-IL for distal esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer in six different hospitals in the Netherlands and Spain. Data were collected with regard to operative techniques, pathology and postoperative complications.

Results

In total, 282 patients underwent MIE-IL, of which 90.2 % received neoadjuvant therapy. Anastomotic leakage was observed in 43 patients (15.2 %), of whom 13 patients (4.6 %) had empyema, necessitating thoracotomy for decortication. With an aggressive treatment of complications, the 30-day and in-hospital mortality rate was 2.1 %. An R0-resection was obtained in 92.5 % of the patients. After neoadjuvant therapy, 20.1 % of patients had a complete response.

Conclusions

Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for distal esophageal and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas is an upcoming approach for reducing morbidity caused by laparotomy and thoracotomy. Anastomotic leakage rate is still high possibly due to technical diversity of anastomotic techniques, and a high percentage of patients treated by neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. An aggressive approach to complications leads to a low mortality of 2.1 %. Further improvement and standardization in the anastomotic technique are needed in order to perform a safe intrathoracic anastomosis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lewis I (1946) The surgical treatment of carcinoma of the esophagus: with special reference to a new operation for growths of the middle third. Br J Surg 34:18–31CrossRefPubMed Lewis I (1946) The surgical treatment of carcinoma of the esophagus: with special reference to a new operation for growths of the middle third. Br J Surg 34:18–31CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference McKeown KC (1976) Total three-stage esophagectomy for cancer of the esophagus. Br J Surg 63:259–262CrossRefPubMed McKeown KC (1976) Total three-stage esophagectomy for cancer of the esophagus. Br J Surg 63:259–262CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Scheepers JJ, van der Peet DL, Veenhof AA, Heijnen B, Cuesta MA (2009) Systematic approach of postoperative gastric conduit complications after esophageal resection. Dis Esophagus 23:117–121CrossRefPubMed Scheepers JJ, van der Peet DL, Veenhof AA, Heijnen B, Cuesta MA (2009) Systematic approach of postoperative gastric conduit complications after esophageal resection. Dis Esophagus 23:117–121CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Biere SS, Maas KW, Cuesta MA, van der Peet DL (2011) Cervical or thoracic anastomosis after esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Surg 28:29–35CrossRefPubMed Biere SS, Maas KW, Cuesta MA, van der Peet DL (2011) Cervical or thoracic anastomosis after esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Surg 28:29–35CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, Bonavina L, Rosman C, Garcia JR, Gisbertz SS, Klinkenbijl JH, Hollmann MW, de Lange ES, Bonjer HJ, van der Peet DL, Cuesta MA (2012) Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 379:1887–1892CrossRefPubMed Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, Bonavina L, Rosman C, Garcia JR, Gisbertz SS, Klinkenbijl JH, Hollmann MW, de Lange ES, Bonjer HJ, van der Peet DL, Cuesta MA (2012) Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 379:1887–1892CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ, Steyerberg EW, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Wijnhoven BP, Richel DJ, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, Hospers GA, Bonenkamp JJ, Cuesta MA, Blaisse RJ, Busch OR, ten Kate FJ, Creemers GJ, Punt CJ, Plukker JT, Verheul HM, Spillenaar Bilgen EJ, van Dekken H, van der Sangen MJ, Rozema T, Biermann K, Beukema JC, Piet AH, van Rij CM, Reinders JG, Tilanus HW, van der Gaast A, Group C (2012) Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med 366:2074–2084 van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ, Steyerberg EW, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Wijnhoven BP, Richel DJ, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, Hospers GA, Bonenkamp JJ, Cuesta MA, Blaisse RJ, Busch OR, ten Kate FJ, Creemers GJ, Punt CJ, Plukker JT, Verheul HM, Spillenaar Bilgen EJ, van Dekken H, van der Sangen MJ, Rozema T, Biermann K, Beukema JC, Piet AH, van Rij CM, Reinders JG, Tilanus HW, van der Gaast A, Group C (2012) Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med 366:2074–2084
7.
go back to reference Scheepers JJ, Mulder CJ, Van Der Peet DL, Meijer S, Cuesta MA (2006) Minimally invasive oesophageal resection for distal oesophageal cancer: a review of the literature. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl 243:123–134CrossRef Scheepers JJ, Mulder CJ, Van Der Peet DL, Meijer S, Cuesta MA (2006) Minimally invasive oesophageal resection for distal oesophageal cancer: a review of the literature. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl 243:123–134CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Palanivelu C, Prakash A, Senthilkumar R, Senthilnathan P, Parthasarathi R, Rajan PS, Venkatachlam S (2006) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position—experience of 130 patients. J Am Coll Surg 203:7–16CrossRefPubMed Palanivelu C, Prakash A, Senthilkumar R, Senthilnathan P, Parthasarathi R, Rajan PS, Venkatachlam S (2006) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position—experience of 130 patients. J Am Coll Surg 203:7–16CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO, Christie NA, McCaughan JS, Litle VR, Schauer PR, Close JM, Fernando HC (2003) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg 238:494–495 Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO, Christie NA, McCaughan JS, Litle VR, Schauer PR, Close JM, Fernando HC (2003) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg 238:494–495
10.
go back to reference Biere SS, Cuesta MA, van der Peet DL (2009) Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Chir 64:121–133PubMed Biere SS, Cuesta MA, van der Peet DL (2009) Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Chir 64:121–133PubMed
11.
go back to reference Nagpal K, Ahmed K, Vats A, Yakoub D, James D, Ashrafian H, Darzi A, Moorthy K, Athanasiou T (2010) Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 24:1621–1629CrossRefPubMed Nagpal K, Ahmed K, Vats A, Yakoub D, James D, Ashrafian H, Darzi A, Moorthy K, Athanasiou T (2010) Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 24:1621–1629CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Siewert JR, Stein HJ, Feith M (2006) Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. Scand J Surg 95:260–269PubMed Siewert JR, Stein HJ, Feith M (2006) Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. Scand J Surg 95:260–269PubMed
13.
go back to reference Low DE, Alderson D, Cecconello I, Chang AC, Darling GE, D’Journo XB, Griffin SM, Holscher AH, Hofstetter WL, Jobe BA, Kitagawa Y, Kucharczuk JC, Law SY, Lerut TE, Maynard N, Pera M, Peters JH, Pramesh CS, Reynolds JV, Smithers BM, van Lanschot JJ (2015) International consensus on standardization of data collection for complications associated with esophagectomy: Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG). Ann Surg 262(2):286–294CrossRefPubMed Low DE, Alderson D, Cecconello I, Chang AC, Darling GE, D’Journo XB, Griffin SM, Holscher AH, Hofstetter WL, Jobe BA, Kitagawa Y, Kucharczuk JC, Law SY, Lerut TE, Maynard N, Pera M, Peters JH, Pramesh CS, Reynolds JV, Smithers BM, van Lanschot JJ (2015) International consensus on standardization of data collection for complications associated with esophagectomy: Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG). Ann Surg 262(2):286–294CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibañes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196CrossRefPubMed Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibañes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Takubo K, Vieth M, Aida J, Sawabe M, Kumagai Y, Hoshihara Y, Arai T (2009) Differences in the definitions used for esophageal and gastric diseases in different countries: endoscopic definition of the esophagogastric junction, the precursor of Barrett’s adenocarcinoma, the definition of Barrett’s esophagus, and histologic criteria for mucosal adenocarcinoma or high-grade dysplasia. Digestion 80:248–257CrossRefPubMed Takubo K, Vieth M, Aida J, Sawabe M, Kumagai Y, Hoshihara Y, Arai T (2009) Differences in the definitions used for esophageal and gastric diseases in different countries: endoscopic definition of the esophagogastric junction, the precursor of Barrett’s adenocarcinoma, the definition of Barrett’s esophagus, and histologic criteria for mucosal adenocarcinoma or high-grade dysplasia. Digestion 80:248–257CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Japanese Esophageal Society (2009) Japanese classification of esophageal cancer; tenth edition—part 1. Esophagus 6:1–25CrossRef Japanese Esophageal Society (2009) Japanese classification of esophageal cancer; tenth edition—part 1. Esophagus 6:1–25CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Maas KW, Biere SS, Scheepers JJ, Gisbertz SS, Turrado Rodriguez VT, van der Peet DL, Cuesta MA (2012) Minimally invasive intrathoracic anastomosis after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for cancer: a review of transoral or transthoracic use of staplers. Surg Endosc 26:1795–1802CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Maas KW, Biere SS, Scheepers JJ, Gisbertz SS, Turrado Rodriguez VT, van der Peet DL, Cuesta MA (2012) Minimally invasive intrathoracic anastomosis after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for cancer: a review of transoral or transthoracic use of staplers. Surg Endosc 26:1795–1802CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference van Workum F, van den Wildenberg FJ, Polat F, de Wilt JH, Rosman C (2014) Minimally invasive oesophagectomy: preliminary results after introduction of an intrathoracic anastomosis. Dig Surg 31:95–103CrossRefPubMed van Workum F, van den Wildenberg FJ, Polat F, de Wilt JH, Rosman C (2014) Minimally invasive oesophagectomy: preliminary results after introduction of an intrathoracic anastomosis. Dig Surg 31:95–103CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Nguyen NT, Hinojosa MW, Smith BR, Chang KJ, Gray J, Hoyt D (2008) Minimally invasive esophagectomy lessons learned from 104 operations. Ann Surg 248:1081–1091CrossRefPubMed Nguyen NT, Hinojosa MW, Smith BR, Chang KJ, Gray J, Hoyt D (2008) Minimally invasive esophagectomy lessons learned from 104 operations. Ann Surg 248:1081–1091CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Huang HT, Wang F, Shen L, Xia CQ, Lu CX, Zhong CJ (2015) Clinical outcome of middle thoracic esophageal cancer with intrathoracic or cervical anastomosis. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 63(4):328–334CrossRefPubMed Huang HT, Wang F, Shen L, Xia CQ, Lu CX, Zhong CJ (2015) Clinical outcome of middle thoracic esophageal cancer with intrathoracic or cervical anastomosis. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 63(4):328–334CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Shah DR, Martinez SR, Canter RJ, Yang AD, Bold RJ, Khatri VP (2013) Comparative morbidity and mortality from cervical or thoracic esophageal anastomoses. J Surg Oncol 108:472–476CrossRefPubMed Shah DR, Martinez SR, Canter RJ, Yang AD, Bold RJ, Khatri VP (2013) Comparative morbidity and mortality from cervical or thoracic esophageal anastomoses. J Surg Oncol 108:472–476CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Klink CD, Binnebosel M, Otto J, Boehm G, von Trotha KT, Hilgers RD, Conze J, Neumann UP, Jansen M (2012) Intrathoracic versus cervical anastomosis after resection of esophageal cancer: a matched pair analysis of 72 patients in a single center study. World J Surg Oncol 10:159CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Klink CD, Binnebosel M, Otto J, Boehm G, von Trotha KT, Hilgers RD, Conze J, Neumann UP, Jansen M (2012) Intrathoracic versus cervical anastomosis after resection of esophageal cancer: a matched pair analysis of 72 patients in a single center study. World J Surg Oncol 10:159CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Xie MR, Liu CQ, Guo MF, Mei XY, Sun XH, Xu MQ (2014) Short-term outcomes of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 97:1721–1727CrossRefPubMed Xie MR, Liu CQ, Guo MF, Mei XY, Sun XH, Xu MQ (2014) Short-term outcomes of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 97:1721–1727CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Sihag S, Wright CD, Wain JC, Gaissert HA, Lanuti M, Allan JS, Mathisen DJ, Morse CR (2012) Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy at a single, high-volume centre. Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg 42:430–437CrossRef Sihag S, Wright CD, Wain JC, Gaissert HA, Lanuti M, Allan JS, Mathisen DJ, Morse CR (2012) Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy at a single, high-volume centre. Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg 42:430–437CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Awais O, Levy RM, Keeley S, Shende M, Christie NA, Weksler B, Landreneau RJ, Abbas G, Schuchert MJ, Nason KS (2012) Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients. Ann Surg 256:95–103CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Awais O, Levy RM, Keeley S, Shende M, Christie NA, Weksler B, Landreneau RJ, Abbas G, Schuchert MJ, Nason KS (2012) Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients. Ann Surg 256:95–103CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Yuan Y, Zeng X, Hu Y, Xie T, Zhao Y (2014) Omentoplasty for oesophagogastrostomy after oesophagectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10:CD008446 Yuan Y, Zeng X, Hu Y, Xie T, Zhao Y (2014) Omentoplasty for oesophagogastrostomy after oesophagectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10:CD008446
27.
go back to reference Yatabe T, Kitagawa H, Yamashita K, Hanazaki K, Yokoyama M (2013) Comparison of the perioperative outcome of esophagectomy by thoracoscopy in the prone position with that of thoracotomy in the lateral decubitus position. Surg Today 43:386–391CrossRefPubMed Yatabe T, Kitagawa H, Yamashita K, Hanazaki K, Yokoyama M (2013) Comparison of the perioperative outcome of esophagectomy by thoracoscopy in the prone position with that of thoracotomy in the lateral decubitus position. Surg Today 43:386–391CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Ribet M, Debrueres R, Iecomte HM (1992) Resection for advanced cancer of the thoracic esophagus: cervical or thoracic anastomosis? Late results of a prospective randomized study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 103:784–789PubMed Ribet M, Debrueres R, Iecomte HM (1992) Resection for advanced cancer of the thoracic esophagus: cervical or thoracic anastomosis? Late results of a prospective randomized study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 103:784–789PubMed
29.
go back to reference Sutton CD, White SA, Marshall LJ, Berry DP, Veitch PS (2002) Endoscopic-assisted intrathoracic oesophagogastrostomy without thoracotomy for tumours of the lower oesophagus and cardia. Eur J Surg Oncol 28:46–48CrossRefPubMed Sutton CD, White SA, Marshall LJ, Berry DP, Veitch PS (2002) Endoscopic-assisted intrathoracic oesophagogastrostomy without thoracotomy for tumours of the lower oesophagus and cardia. Eur J Surg Oncol 28:46–48CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Vande Walle C, Ceelen WP, Boterberg T, Vande Putte D, Van Nieuwenhove Y, Varin O, Pattyn P (2012) Anastomotic complications after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation are related to radiation dose to the gastric fundus. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 82:e513–e519CrossRefPubMed Vande Walle C, Ceelen WP, Boterberg T, Vande Putte D, Van Nieuwenhove Y, Varin O, Pattyn P (2012) Anastomotic complications after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation are related to radiation dose to the gastric fundus. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 82:e513–e519CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Thomay AA, Snyder JA, Edmondson DM, Scott WJ (2012) Initial results of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy after induction chemoradiation (50.4 gy) for esophageal cancer. Innovations 7:421–428PubMed Thomay AA, Snyder JA, Edmondson DM, Scott WJ (2012) Initial results of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy after induction chemoradiation (50.4 gy) for esophageal cancer. Innovations 7:421–428PubMed
32.
go back to reference McCulloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB, Flum DR, Glasziou P, Marshall JC, Nicholl J, Balliol C, Aronson JK, Barkun JS, Blazeby JM, Boutron IC, Campbell WB, Clavien PA, Cook JA, Ergina PL, Feldman LS, Flum DR, Maddern GJ, Nicholl J, Reeves BC, Seiler CM, Strasberg SM, Meakins JL, Ashby D, Black N, Bunker J, Burton M, Campbell M, Chalkidou K, Chalmers I, de Leval M, Deeks J, Ergina PL, Grant A, Gray M, Greenhalgh R, Jenicek M, Kehoe S, Lilford R, Littlejohns P, Loke Y, Madhock R, McPherson K, Meakins J, Rothwell P, Summerskill B, Taggart D, Tekkis P, Thompson M, Treasure T, Trohler U, Vandenbroucke J (2009) No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet 374:1105–1112CrossRefPubMed McCulloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB, Flum DR, Glasziou P, Marshall JC, Nicholl J, Balliol C, Aronson JK, Barkun JS, Blazeby JM, Boutron IC, Campbell WB, Clavien PA, Cook JA, Ergina PL, Feldman LS, Flum DR, Maddern GJ, Nicholl J, Reeves BC, Seiler CM, Strasberg SM, Meakins JL, Ashby D, Black N, Bunker J, Burton M, Campbell M, Chalkidou K, Chalmers I, de Leval M, Deeks J, Ergina PL, Grant A, Gray M, Greenhalgh R, Jenicek M, Kehoe S, Lilford R, Littlejohns P, Loke Y, Madhock R, McPherson K, Meakins J, Rothwell P, Summerskill B, Taggart D, Tekkis P, Thompson M, Treasure T, Trohler U, Vandenbroucke J (2009) No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet 374:1105–1112CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Techniques and short-term outcomes for total minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophageal resection in distal esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers: pooled data from six European centers
Authors
Jennifer Straatman
Nicole van der Wielen
Grard A. P. Nieuwenhuijzen
Camiel Rosman
Josep Roig
Joris J. G. Scheepers
Miguel A. Cuesta
Misha D. P. Luyer
Mark I. van Berge Henegouwen
Frans van Workum
Suzanne S. Gisbertz
Donald L. van der Peet
Publication date
01-01-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 1/2017
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4938-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Surgical Endoscopy 1/2017 Go to the issue