Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Surgical Endoscopy
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 11/2016

01-11-2016

Age is highly associated with stereo blindness among surgeons: a cross-sectional study

Authors: Charlotte Fergo, Jakob Burcharth, Hans-Christian Pommergaard, Jacob Rosenberg

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 11/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The prevalence of stereo blindness in the general population varies greatly within a range of 1–30 %. Stereo vision adds an extra dimension to aid depth perception and gives a binocular advantage in task completion. Lack of depth perception may lower surgical performance, potentially affecting surgical outcome. 3D laparoscopy offers stereoscopic vision of the operative field to improve depth perception and is being introduced to several surgical specialties; however, a normal stereo vision is a prerequisite. The aim of this study was to establish the prevalence of stereo blindness among surgeons in the field of general surgery, gynecology, and urology as these are potential users of 3D laparoscopy.

Methods

The study was conducted according to the STROBE guidelines for cross-sectional studies. Medical doctors from the department of general surgery, gynecology, and urology were recruited and stereo tested by the use of the Random Dot E stereo test. Upon stereo testing, a demographic questionnaire was completed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was employed to assess the association between stereo blindness and the variables resulting from the univariate analysis.

Results

Three hundred medical doctors completed the study. Of these 9.7 % were stereo blind. There were 47 % women and 53 % men, aged 25–71 years. General surgery was represented with 64 % of the participants, gynecology with 26 %, and urology with 10 %. Age (OR 5.6; CI 1.7–18.9; P = 0.005) and not being aware of having any vision anomaly in need for correction (OR 4; CI 1.4–11.4; P = 0.010) were significantly associated with stereo blindness.

Conclusion

Approximately one in ten medical doctors in general surgery, gynecology, and urology were stereo blind with an increasing prevalence with age. This is relevant since stereo blind surgeons will not benefit from the implementation of 3D laparoscopy.
Literature
1.
Taffinder N, Smith SGT, Huber J, Russell RCG, Darzi A (1999) The effect of a second-generation 3D endoscope on the laparoscopic precision of novices and experienced surgeons. Surg Endosc 13(11):1087–1092CrossRefPubMed
2.
Smith R, Day A, Rockall T, Ballard K, Bailey M, Jourdan I (2012) Advanced stereoscopic projection technology significantly improves novice performance of minimally invasive surgical skills. Surg Endosc 26(6):1522–1527CrossRefPubMed
3.
Sahu D, Mathew MJ, Reddy PK (2014) 3D Laparoscopy-help or hype; initial experience of a tertiary health centre. J Clin Diagn Res 8(7):NC01–NC03PubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Bilgen K, Üstün M, Karakahya M, Isik S, Sengül S, Çetinkünar S, Küçükpinar TH (2013) Comparison of 3D imaging and 2D imaging for performance time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 23(2):180–183CrossRefPubMed
5.
6.
Blavier A, Nyssen AS (2014) The effect of 2D and 3D visual modes on surgical task performance: role of expertise and adaptation processes. Cogn Technol Work 16(4):509–518CrossRef
7.
8.
Heron S, Lages M (2012) Screening and sampling in studies of binocular vision. Vis Res 62:228–234CrossRefPubMed
9.
Bosten JM, Goodbourn PT, Lawrance-Owen AJ, Bargary G, Hogg RE, Mollon JD (2015) A population study of binocular function. Vis Res 110:34–50CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
Schiller PH, Kendall GL, Kwak MC, Slocum WM (2012) Depth perception, binocular integration and hand-eye coordination in intact and stereo impaired human subjects. J Clin Exp Ophthalmol 3:210CrossRef
12.
Coutant BE, Westheimer G (1993) Population distribution of stereoscopic ability. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 13(1):3–7CrossRefPubMed
13.
Storz P, Buess GF, Kunert W, Kirschniak A (2012) 3D HD versus 2D HD: surgical task efficiency in standardised phantom tasks. Surg Endosc 26(5):1454–1460CrossRefPubMed
14.
Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, Initiative Strobe (2007) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Prev Med 45(4):247–251CrossRef
15.
Schmidt PP (1994) Vision screening with the RDE stereotest in pediatric populations. Optom Vis Sci 71(4):273–281CrossRefPubMed
16.
Hammond RS, Schmidt PP (1986) A random dot E stereogram for the vision screening of children. Arch Ophthalmol 104(1):54–60CrossRefPubMed
17.
Shallo-Hoffmann J, Coulter R, Oliver P, Hardigan P, Blavo C (2004) A study of pre-school vision screening tests’ testability, validity and duration: do group differences matter? Strabismus 12(2):65–73CrossRefPubMed
18.
Fricke T, Siderov J (1997) Non-stereoscopic cues in the random-dot E stereotest: results for adult observers. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 17(2):122–127PubMed
19.
Heron G, Dholakia S, Collins DE, McLaughlan H (1985) Stereoscopic threshold in children and adults. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 62(8):505–515CrossRefPubMed
20.
Vision in Preschoolers Study Group, Schmidt P, Maguire M, Kulp MT, Dobson V, Quinn G (2006) Random dot E stereotest: testability and reliability in 3-to 5-year-old children. JAAPOS 10(6):507–514
21.
Ruttum MS, Nelson DB (1990) Stereopsis testing to reduce overreferral in preschool vision screening. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 28(3):131–133
22.
23.
O’Connor AR, Birch EE, Anderson S, Draper H (2009) The functional significance of stereopsis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51(4):2019–2023CrossRefPubMed
24.
25.
Melmoth DR, Finlay AL, Morgan MJ, Grant S (2009) Grasping deficits and adaptations in adults with stereo vision losses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50(8):3711–3720CrossRefPubMed
26.
Read JC, Begum SF, McDonald A, Trowbridge J (2013) The binocular advantage in visuomotor tasks involving tools. Iperception 4(2):101–110PubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Bloch E, Uddin N, Gannon L, Rantell K, Jain S (2015) The effects of absence of stereopsis on performance of a simulated surgical task in two-dimensional and three-dimensional viewing conditions. Br J Ophthalmol 99(2):240–245CrossRefPubMed
28.
Biddle M, Hamid S, Ali N (2014) An evaluation of stereoacuity in practising surgeons across a range of surgical specialities. Surgeon 12(1):7–10CrossRefPubMed
29.
Nakagawara V, Wood KJ (1998) Clinical application of the new civil airman vision standards and certification procedures. J Am Optom Assoc 69(3):144–150PubMed
30.
Zaroff CM, Knutelska M, Frumkes TE (2003) Variation in stereoacuity: normative description, fixation disparity, and the roles of aging and gender. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44(2):891–900CrossRefPubMed
31.
Lee SY, Koo NK (2005) Change of stereoacuity with aging in normal eyes. Korean J Ophthalmol 19(2):136–139CrossRefPubMed
32.
Ding J, Levi DM (2011) Recovery of stereopsis through perceptual learning in human adults with abnormal binocular vision. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(37):E733–E741CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
Bhatt NR, Morris M, O’Neil A, Gillis A, Ridgway PF (2016) When should surgeons retire? Br J Surg 103(1):35–42CrossRefPubMed
34.
35.
Kurt Simons (1981) A comparison of the frisby, random-dot E, TNO, and randot circles stereotests in screening and office use. Arch Ophthalmol 99(3):446–452CrossRef
36.
Wong BPH, Woods RL, Peli E (2002) Stereoacuity at distance and near. Optom Vis Sci 79(12):771–778CrossRefPubMed
37.
Ruttum MS (1988) Visual screening with random dot stereograms. Semin Ophthalmol 3(3):175–180CrossRef
38.
Hoffmann H, Ruiz-Schirinzi R, Goldblum D, Dell-Kuster S, Oertli D, Hahnloser D, Rosenthal R (2014) Impact of examinees’ stereopsis and near visual acuity on laparoscopic virtual reality performance. Surg Today 45(10):1280–1290CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Age is highly associated with stereo blindness among surgeons: a cross-sectional study
Authors
Charlotte Fergo
Jakob Burcharth
Hans-Christian Pommergaard
Jacob Rosenberg
Publication date
01-11-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 11/2016
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4826-9

Other articles of this Issue 11/2016

Surgical Endoscopy 11/2016 Go to the issue

Editorial

A perverse quality incentive in surgery: implications of reimbursing surgeons less for doing laparoscopic surgery

OriginalPaper

A comparison of two endoscopic closures: over-the-scope clip (OTSC) versus KING closure (endoloop + clips) in a randomized long-term experimental study

OriginalPaper

Prospective, randomized and controlled trial on magnesium sulfate administration during laparoscopic gastrectomy: effects on surgical space conditions and recovery profiles

New Technology

Congenital anomaly rectified at birth: one-stage single-incision laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty for newborns with anorectal malformations and recto-urethral fistula

OriginalPaper

Robotic versus laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy of liver

OriginalPaper

Single-port laparoscopic surgery in acute appendicitis: retrospective comparative analysis for 618 patients