Top

Surgical Endoscopy

Published in:

01-02-2016

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open lateral lymph node dissection for advanced lower rectal cancer

Authors: Tomohiro Yamaguchi, Yusuke Kinugasa, Akio Shiomi, Hiroyuki Tomioka, Hiroyasu Kagawa

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 2/2016

Abstract

Background

The aim of the present study was to clarify the advantages of robotic-assisted laparoscopic lateral lymph node dissection (RALLD) for rectal cancer by comparing its short-term outcomes with those of open lateral lymph node dissection (OLLD) in a large series from a single center. In terms of RALLD for advanced lower rectal cancer, there are only a few reports with a small number of cases in retrospective, non-comparative studies.

Methods

From April 2010 to July 2014, a total of 177 patients underwent rectal cancer surgery with lateral lymph node dissection. Four patients who underwent conventional laparoscopic lateral lymph node dissection were excluded. Thus, 173 patients were enrolled, with 85 RALLD and 88 OLLD cases. Perioperative outcomes, postoperative complications, and pathological results were compared between the groups.

Results

No conversion to open surgery was necessary in the RALLD group. The rate of sphincter-preserving procedure was significantly higher in the RALLD group than in the OLLD group (p = 0.007). Operative time was significantly longer in the RALLD group than in the OLLD group (p = 0.007). Blood loss was significantly less in the RALLD group than in the OLLD group (p < 0.001). The rates of wound infection, small bowel obstruction, anastomotic leakage, and urinary retention were significantly lower in the RALLD group than in the OLLD group. Numbers of harvested lymph nodes and positive resection margin rates showed no significant differences.

Conclusions

The short-term outcomes of RALLD may be superior to those of OLLD for advanced lower rectal cancer.

Sugihara K, Kobayashi H, Kato T, Mori T, Mochizuki H, Kameoka S, Shirouzu K, Muto T (2006) Indication and benefit of pelvic sidewall dissection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1663–1672CrossRefPubMed

Watanabe T, Itabashi M, Shimada Y, Tanaka S, Ito Y, Ajioka Y, Hamaguchi T, Hyodo I, Igarashi M, Ishida H, Ishiguro M, Kanemitsu Y, Kokudo N, Muro K, Ochiai A, Oguchi M, Ohkura Y, Saito Y, Sakai Y, Ueno H, Yoshino T, Fujimori T, Koinuma N, Morita T, Nishimura G, Sakata Y, Takahashi K, Takiuchi H, Tsuruta O, Yamaguchi T, Yoshida M, Yamaguchi N, Kotake K, Sugihara K (2012) Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 201 for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 17:1–29CrossRefPubMed

Fujita S, Akasu T, Mizusawa J, Saito N, Kinugasa Y, Kanemitsu Y, Ohue M, Fujii S, Shiozawa M, Yamaguchi T, Moriya Y (2012) Postoperative morbidity and mortality after mesorectal excision with and without lateral lymph node dissection for clinical stage II or stage III lower rectal cancer (JCOG0212): results from a multicentre, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol 13:616–621CrossRefPubMed

Pigazzi A, Ellenhorn JD, Ballantyne GH, Paz IB (2006) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 20:1521–1525CrossRefPubMed

Park EJ, Cho MS, Baek SJ, Hur H, Min BS, Baik SH, Lee KY, Kim NK (2014) Long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a comparative study with laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg 261:129–137CrossRef

Kwak JM, Kim SH, Kim J, Son DN, Baek SJ, Cho JS (2011) Robotic vs laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcomes of a case–control study. Dis Colon Rectum 54:151–156CrossRefPubMed

Ielpo B, Caruso R, Quijano Y, Duran H, Diaz E, Fabra I, Oliva C, Olivares S, Ferri V, Ceron R, Plaza C, Vicente E (2014) Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection: is there any real difference? A comparative single center study. Int J Med Robot 10:300–305CrossRefPubMed

Park JS, Choi GS, Lim KH, Jang YS, Jun SH (2011) S052: a comparison of robot-assisted, laparoscopic, and open surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 25:240–248CrossRefPubMed

D’Annibale A, Pernazza G, Monsellato I, Pende V, Lucandri G, Mazzocchi P, Alfano G (2013) Total mesorectal excision: a comparison of oncological and functional outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 27:1887–1895CrossRefPubMed

10.

Park JA, Choi GS, Park JS, Park SY (2012) Initial clinical experience with robotic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for advanced rectal cancer. J Korean Soc Coloproctol 28:265–270PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

11.

Kagawa H, Kinugasa Y, Shiomi A, Yamaguchi T, Tsukamoto S, Tomioka H, Yamakawa Y, Sato S (2015) Robotic-assisted lateral lymph node dissection for lower rectal cancer: short-term outcomes in 50 consecutive patients. Surg Endosc 29:995–1000CrossRefPubMed

12.

Bae SU, Saklani AP, Hur H, Min BS, Baik SH, Lee KY, Kim NK (2014) Robotic and laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection for rectal cancer: short-term outcomes of 21 consecutive series. Ann Surg Treat Res 86:76–82PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

13.

Sobin LH, Wittekind C (2009) TNM classification of malignant tumours, 7th edn. Wiley-Liss, New York

14.

Akiyoshi T, Watanabe T, Miyata S, Kotake K, Muto T, Sugihara K (2012) Results of a Japanese nationwide multi-institutional study on lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis in low rectal cancer: is it regional or distant disease? Ann Surg 255:1129–1134CrossRefPubMed

15.

Shiomi A, Kinugasa Y, Yamaguchi T, Tomioka H, Kagawa H (2014) Robot-assisted rectal cancer surgery: short-term outcomes for 113 consecutive patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 29:1105–1111CrossRefPubMed

16.

Kinugasa Y, Murakami G, Suzuki D, Sugihara K (2007) Histological identification of fascial structures posterolateral to the rectum. Br J Surg 94:620–626CrossRefPubMed

17.

Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

18.

Uyama I, Sugioka A, Matsui H, Fujita J, Komori Y, Hanai T, Hasumi A (2001) Laparoscopic lateral node dissection with autonomic nerve preservation for advanced lower rectal cancer. J Am Coll Surg 193:579–584CrossRefPubMed

19.

Liang JT (2011) Technical feasibility of laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for patients with low rectal cancer after concurrent chemoradiation therapy. Ann Surg Oncol 18:153–159CrossRefPubMed

20.

Park JS, Choi GS, Lim KH, Jang YS, Kim HJ, Park SY, Jun SH (2011) Laparoscopic extended lateral pelvic node dissection following total mesorectal excision for advanced rectal cancer: initial clinical experience. Surg Endosc 25:3322–3329CrossRefPubMed

21.

Furuhata T, Okita K, Nishidate T, Ito T, Yamaguchi H, Ueki T, Akizuki E, Meguro M, Ogawa T, Kukita K, Kimura Y, Mizuguchi T, Hirata K (2015) Clinical feasibility of laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection following total mesorectal excision for advanced rectal cancer. Surg Today 45:310–314CrossRefPubMed

22.

Kim JC, Lim SB, Yoon YS, Park IJ, Kim CW, Kim CN (2014) Completely abdominal intersphincteric resection for lower rectal cancer: feasibility and comparison of robot-assisted and open surgery. Surg Endosc 28:2734–2744CrossRefPubMed

23.

Yamaguchi T, Kinugasa Y, Shiomi A, Sato S, Yamakawa Y, Kagawa H, Tomioka H, Mori K (2014) Learning curve for robotic-assisted surgery for rectal cancer: use of the cumulative sum method. Surg Endosc. doi:10.1007/s00464-014-3855-5

24.

Kim JY, Kim NK, Lee KY, Hur H, Min BS, Kim JH (2012) A comparative study of voiding and sexual function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus robotic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 19:2485–2493CrossRefPubMed

25.

Barry MJ, Fowler FJ Jr, O’Leary MP, Bruskewitz RC, Holtgrewe HL, Mebust WK, Cockett AT (1992) The American Urological Association symptom index for benign prostatic hyperplasia. The Measurement Committee of the American Urological Association. J Urol 148:1549–1557 (discussion 1564)PubMed

Title: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open lateral lymph node dissection for advanced lower rectal cancer
Authors: Tomohiro Yamaguchi
Yusuke Kinugasa
Akio Shiomi
Hiroyuki Tomioka
Hiroyasu Kagawa
Publication date: 01-02-2016
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 2/2016
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4266-y

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

Springer Medicine

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open lateral lymph node dissection for advanced lower rectal cancer

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 2/2016

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) two midnight rule: policy at odds with reality

Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal carcinoma: short-term outcomes and experience after 80 cases

Laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia repair in obese patients: a long-term follow-up

Risk factors and correlations of immediate, early delayed, and late delayed bleeding associated with endoscopic resection for gastric neoplasms

General surgery training and robotics: Are residents improving their skills?

Electromagnetic organ tracking allows for real-time compensation of tissue shift in image-guided laparoscopic rectal surgery: results of a phantom study