Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 2/2016

Open Access 01-02-2016

In vitro assessment of the performance of a new multiband mucosectomy device for endoscopic resection of early upper gastrointestinal neoplasia

Authors: D. W. Schölvinck, K. Belghazi, R. E. Pouw, W. L. Curvers, B. L. A. M. Weusten, J. J. G. H. M. Bergman

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 2/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background and study aims

Multiband mucosectomy (MBM) is widely used for the endoscopic resection of early neoplasia in the upper gastrointestinal tract. A new MBM-device may have advantages over the current MBM-device with improved visualization, easier passage of accessories, and higher suction power due to different trip wire and cap.

Methods

Rubber bands were released one by one for both MBM-devices while endoscopic images were collected. First, free endoscopic view was assessed by computer-assisted measurements (quantitative) and by ranking the images by a panel of 11 endoscopists (qualitative). Second, using a visual analog scale, three ‘blinded’ endoscopists assessed introduction and advancement of three types of endoscopic devices through the working channel of a diagnostic endoscope with the MBM-devices assembled. Third, suction power was evaluated by a manometer attached to the cap of the assembled MBM-devices in four endoscopes. Negative pressures were measured after 5 and 10 s of suction and repeated five times. The passage and suction experiments were performed with dry trip wires and repeated after soaking with bloody, mucous fluids.

Results

With all bands present, endoscopic views were 90 and 40 % in the new and current MBM-device, respectively. With the release of more bands, differences slowly disappeared. The panel scored a better endoscopic view in the new MBM-device (p = 0.03). Passage of all accessories was considered significantly easier in the new MBM-device. With the associated snare in the working channel, suction power was significantly better with the new MBM-device.

Conclusion

Compared to the currently available MBM-device, the new MBM-device provides improved endoscopic visibility, smoother passage of accessories, and higher suction power.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Inoue H, Takeshita K, Hori H, Muraoka Y, Yoneshima H, Endo M (1993) Endoscopic mucosal resection with a cap-fitted panendoscope for esophagus, stomach, and colon mucosal lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 39:58–62CrossRefPubMed Inoue H, Takeshita K, Hori H, Muraoka Y, Yoneshima H, Endo M (1993) Endoscopic mucosal resection with a cap-fitted panendoscope for esophagus, stomach, and colon mucosal lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 39:58–62CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Ell C, May A, Gossner L, Pech O, Gunter E, Mayer G, Henrich R, Vieth M, Muller H, Seitz G, Stolte M (2000) Endoscopic mucosal resection of early cancer and high-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology 118:670–677CrossRefPubMed Ell C, May A, Gossner L, Pech O, Gunter E, Mayer G, Henrich R, Vieth M, Muller H, Seitz G, Stolte M (2000) Endoscopic mucosal resection of early cancer and high-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology 118:670–677CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Peters FP, Brakenhoff KP, Curvers WL, Rosmolen WD, ten Kate FJ, Krishnadath KK, Fockens P, Bergman JJ (2007) Endoscopic cap resection for treatment of early Barrett’s neoplasia is safe: a prospective analysis of acute and early complications in 216 procedures. Dis Esophagus 20:510–515CrossRefPubMed Peters FP, Brakenhoff KP, Curvers WL, Rosmolen WD, ten Kate FJ, Krishnadath KK, Fockens P, Bergman JJ (2007) Endoscopic cap resection for treatment of early Barrett’s neoplasia is safe: a prospective analysis of acute and early complications in 216 procedures. Dis Esophagus 20:510–515CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Soehendra N, Seewald S, Groth S, Omar S, Seitz U, Zhong Y, de Weerth A, Thonke F, Schroeder S (2006) Use of modified multiband ligator facilitates circumferential EMR in Barrett’s esophagus (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 63:847–852CrossRefPubMed Soehendra N, Seewald S, Groth S, Omar S, Seitz U, Zhong Y, de Weerth A, Thonke F, Schroeder S (2006) Use of modified multiband ligator facilitates circumferential EMR in Barrett’s esophagus (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 63:847–852CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Seewald S, Ang TL, Omar S, Groth S, Dy F, Zhong Y, Seitz U, Thonke F, Yekebas E, Izbicki J, Soehendra N (2006) Endoscopic mucosal resection of early esophageal squamous cell cancer using the Duette mucosectomy kit. Endoscopy 38:1029–1031CrossRefPubMed Seewald S, Ang TL, Omar S, Groth S, Dy F, Zhong Y, Seitz U, Thonke F, Yekebas E, Izbicki J, Soehendra N (2006) Endoscopic mucosal resection of early esophageal squamous cell cancer using the Duette mucosectomy kit. Endoscopy 38:1029–1031CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Peters FP, Kara MA, Curvers WL, Rosmolen WD, Fockens P, Krishnadath KK, Ten Kate FJ, Bergman JJ (2007) Multiband mucosectomy for endoscopic resection of Barrett’s esophagus: feasibility study with matched historical controls. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 19:311–315CrossRefPubMed Peters FP, Kara MA, Curvers WL, Rosmolen WD, Fockens P, Krishnadath KK, Ten Kate FJ, Bergman JJ (2007) Multiband mucosectomy for endoscopic resection of Barrett’s esophagus: feasibility study with matched historical controls. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 19:311–315CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Pouw RE, Bergman JJ (2008) Endoscopic resection of early oesophageal and gastric neoplasia. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 22:929–943CrossRefPubMed Pouw RE, Bergman JJ (2008) Endoscopic resection of early oesophageal and gastric neoplasia. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 22:929–943CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Pouw RE, van Vilsteren FG, Peters FP, Alvarez Herrero L, Ten Kate FJ, Visser M, Schenk BE, Schoon EJ, Peters FT, Houben M, Bisschops R, Weusten BL, Bergman JJ (2011) Randomized trial on endoscopic resection-cap versus multiband mucosectomy for piecemeal endoscopic resection of early Barrett’s neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 74:35–43CrossRefPubMed Pouw RE, van Vilsteren FG, Peters FP, Alvarez Herrero L, Ten Kate FJ, Visser M, Schenk BE, Schoon EJ, Peters FT, Houben M, Bisschops R, Weusten BL, Bergman JJ (2011) Randomized trial on endoscopic resection-cap versus multiband mucosectomy for piecemeal endoscopic resection of early Barrett’s neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 74:35–43CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Alvarez Herrero L, Pouw RE, van Vilsteren FG, ten Kate FJ, Visser M, Seldenrijk CA, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Weusten BL, Bergman JJ (2011) Safety and efficacy of multiband mucosectomy in 1060 resections in Barrett’s esophagus. Endoscopy 43:177–183CrossRefPubMed Alvarez Herrero L, Pouw RE, van Vilsteren FG, ten Kate FJ, Visser M, Seldenrijk CA, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Weusten BL, Bergman JJ (2011) Safety and efficacy of multiband mucosectomy in 1060 resections in Barrett’s esophagus. Endoscopy 43:177–183CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference May A, Gossner L, Behrens A, Kohnen R, Vieth M, Stolte M, Ell C (2003) A prospective randomized trial of two different endoscopic resection techniques for early stage cancer of the esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc 58:167–175CrossRefPubMed May A, Gossner L, Behrens A, Kohnen R, Vieth M, Stolte M, Ell C (2003) A prospective randomized trial of two different endoscopic resection techniques for early stage cancer of the esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc 58:167–175CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Alvarez Herrero L, Mijnals C, Grimbergen CA, Weusten BL, Bergman JJ (2012) Influence of multi-band mucosectomy assembly and snare on endoscopic suction pressure of gastroscopes. St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein (unpublished manuscript) Alvarez Herrero L, Mijnals C, Grimbergen CA, Weusten BL, Bergman JJ (2012) Influence of multi-band mucosectomy assembly and snare on endoscopic suction pressure of gastroscopes. St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein (unpublished manuscript)
Metadata
Title
In vitro assessment of the performance of a new multiband mucosectomy device for endoscopic resection of early upper gastrointestinal neoplasia
Authors
D. W. Schölvinck
K. Belghazi
R. E. Pouw
W. L. Curvers
B. L. A. M. Weusten
J. J. G. H. M. Bergman
Publication date
01-02-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 2/2016
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4222-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2016

Surgical Endoscopy 2/2016 Go to the issue