Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 11/2015

Open Access 01-11-2015

OpenHELP (Heidelberg laparoscopy phantom): development of an open-source surgical evaluation and training tool

Authors: H. G. Kenngott, J. J. Wünscher, M. Wagner, A. Preukschas, A. L. Wekerle, P. Neher, S. Suwelack, S. Speidel, F. Nickel, D. Oladokun, L. Maier-Hein, R. Dillmann, H. P. Meinzer, B. P. Müller-Stich

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 11/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Apart from animal testing and clinical trials, surgical research and laparoscopic training mainly rely on phantoms. The aim of this project was to design a phantom with realistic anatomy and haptic characteristics, modular design and easy reproducibility. The phantom was named open-source Heidelberg laparoscopic phantom (OpenHELP) and serves as an open-source platform.

Methods

The phantom was based on an anonymized CT scan of a male patient. The anatomical structures were segmented to obtain digital three-dimensional models of the torso and the organs. The digital models were materialized via rapid prototyping. One flexible, using an elastic abdominal wall, and one rigid method, using a plastic shell, to simulate pneumoperitoneum were developed. Artificial organ production was carried out sequentially starting from raw gypsum models to silicone molds to final silicone casts. The reproduction accuracy was exemplarily evaluated for ten silicone rectum models by comparing the digital 3D surface of the original rectum with CT scan by calculating the root mean square error of surface variations. Haptic realism was also evaluated to find the most realistic silicone compositions on a visual analog scale (VAS, 0–10).

Results

The rigid and durable plastic torso and soft silicone organs of the abdominal cavity were successfully produced. A simulation of pneumoperitoneum could be created successfully by both methods. The reproduction accuracy of ten silicone rectum models showed an average root mean square error of 2.26 (0–11.48) mm. Haptic realism revealed an average value on a VAS of 7.25 (5.2–9.6) for the most realistic rectum.

Conclusion

The OpenHELP phantom proved to be feasible and accurate. The phantom was consecutively applied frequently in the field of computer-assisted surgery at our institutions and is accessible as an open-source project at www.​open-cas.​org for the academic community.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hirst A, Agha RA, Rosin D, McCulloch P (2013) How can we improve surgical research and innovation? The IDEAL framework for action. Int J Surg 11:1038–1042 Hirst A, Agha RA, Rosin D, McCulloch P (2013) How can we improve surgical research and innovation? The IDEAL framework for action. Int J Surg 11:1038–1042
2.
go back to reference Paul S, McCulloch P, Sedrakyan A (2013) Robotic surgery: revisiting “no innovation without evaluation”. BMJ 346:f1573 Paul S, McCulloch P, Sedrakyan A (2013) Robotic surgery: revisiting “no innovation without evaluation”. BMJ 346:f1573
3.
go back to reference Diener MK, Dörr-Harim C, Rossion I, Büchler MW (2012) Assessing the effectiveness of medical devices in patient-oriented surgical research. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes 106:336–340CrossRefPubMed Diener MK, Dörr-Harim C, Rossion I, Büchler MW (2012) Assessing the effectiveness of medical devices in patient-oriented surgical research. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes 106:336–340CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Cook RC, Alscher KT, Hsiang YN (2003) A debate on the value and necessity of clinical trials in surgery. Am J Surg 185:305–310CrossRefPubMed Cook RC, Alscher KT, Hsiang YN (2003) A debate on the value and necessity of clinical trials in surgery. Am J Surg 185:305–310CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Ergina PL, Cook JA, Blazeby JM, Boutron I, Clavien PA, Reeves BC, Seiler CM, Altman DG, Aronson JK, Barkun JS, Campbell WB, Feldman LS, Flum DR, Glasziou P, Maddern GJ, Marshall JC, McCulloch P, Nicholl J, Strasberg SM, Meakins JL, Ashby D, Black N, Bunker J, Burton M, Campbell M, Chalkidou K, Chalmers I, de Leval M, Deeks J, Grant A, Gray M, Greenhalgh R, Jenicek M, Kehoe S, Lilford R, Littlejohns P, Loke Y, Madhock R, McPherson K, Rothwell P, Summerskill B, Taggart D, Tekkis P, Thompson M, Treasure T, Trohler U, Vandenbroucke J (2009) Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation. Lancet 374:1097–1104PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Ergina PL, Cook JA, Blazeby JM, Boutron I, Clavien PA, Reeves BC, Seiler CM, Altman DG, Aronson JK, Barkun JS, Campbell WB, Feldman LS, Flum DR, Glasziou P, Maddern GJ, Marshall JC, McCulloch P, Nicholl J, Strasberg SM, Meakins JL, Ashby D, Black N, Bunker J, Burton M, Campbell M, Chalkidou K, Chalmers I, de Leval M, Deeks J, Grant A, Gray M, Greenhalgh R, Jenicek M, Kehoe S, Lilford R, Littlejohns P, Loke Y, Madhock R, McPherson K, Rothwell P, Summerskill B, Taggart D, Tekkis P, Thompson M, Treasure T, Trohler U, Vandenbroucke J (2009) Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation. Lancet 374:1097–1104PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Wente MN (2012) Barriers to clinical studies involving medical devices. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes 106:315–319 (discussion 320–311)CrossRefPubMed Wente MN (2012) Barriers to clinical studies involving medical devices. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes 106:315–319 (discussion 320–311)CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Pereira-Sampaio MA, Favorito LA, Sampaio FJ (2004) Pig kidney: anatomical relationships between the intrarenal arteries and the kidney collecting system. Applied study for urological research and surgical training. J Urol 172:2077–2081CrossRefPubMed Pereira-Sampaio MA, Favorito LA, Sampaio FJ (2004) Pig kidney: anatomical relationships between the intrarenal arteries and the kidney collecting system. Applied study for urological research and surgical training. J Urol 172:2077–2081CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Watson DI, Treacy PJ, Williams JA (1995) Developing a training model for laparoscopic common bile duct surgery. Surg Endosc 9:1116–1118PubMed Watson DI, Treacy PJ, Williams JA (1995) Developing a training model for laparoscopic common bile duct surgery. Surg Endosc 9:1116–1118PubMed
9.
go back to reference Shelley C (2010) Why test animals to treat humans? On the validity of animal models. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci 41:292–299CrossRefPubMed Shelley C (2010) Why test animals to treat humans? On the validity of animal models. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci 41:292–299CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
go back to reference Reznick RK, MacRae H (2006) Teaching surgical skills—changes in the wind. N Engl J Med 355:2664–2669CrossRefPubMed Reznick RK, MacRae H (2006) Teaching surgical skills—changes in the wind. N Engl J Med 355:2664–2669CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Fried GM, Derossis AM, Bothwell J, Sigman HH (1999) Comparison of laparoscopic performance in vivo with performance measured in a laparoscopic simulator. Surg Endosc 13:1077–1081 (discussion 1082)CrossRefPubMed Fried GM, Derossis AM, Bothwell J, Sigman HH (1999) Comparison of laparoscopic performance in vivo with performance measured in a laparoscopic simulator. Surg Endosc 13:1077–1081 (discussion 1082)CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Böhm B, Milsom JW (1993) Animal models as educational tools in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 8:707–713CrossRef Böhm B, Milsom JW (1993) Animal models as educational tools in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 8:707–713CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Nolden M, Zelzer S, Seitel A, Wald D, Muller M, Franz AM, Maleike D, Fangerau M, Baumhauer M, Maier-Hein L, Maier-Hein KH, Meinzer HP, Wolf I (2013) The medical imaging interaction toolkit: challenges and advances: 10 years of open-source development. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 8:607–620CrossRefPubMed Nolden M, Zelzer S, Seitel A, Wald D, Muller M, Franz AM, Maleike D, Fangerau M, Baumhauer M, Maier-Hein L, Maier-Hein KH, Meinzer HP, Wolf I (2013) The medical imaging interaction toolkit: challenges and advances: 10 years of open-source development. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 8:607–620CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Wolf I, Vetter M, Wegner I, Bottger T, Nolden M, Schobinger M, Hastenteufel M, Kunert T, Meinzer HP (2005) The medical imaging interaction toolkit. Med Image Anal 9:594–604CrossRefPubMed Wolf I, Vetter M, Wegner I, Bottger T, Nolden M, Schobinger M, Hastenteufel M, Kunert T, Meinzer HP (2005) The medical imaging interaction toolkit. Med Image Anal 9:594–604CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Rengier F, Mehndiratta A, von Tengg-Kobligk H, Zechmann CM, Unterhinninghofen R, Kauczor HU, Giesel FL (2010) 3D printing based on imaging data: review of medical applications. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 5:335–341CrossRefPubMed Rengier F, Mehndiratta A, von Tengg-Kobligk H, Zechmann CM, Unterhinninghofen R, Kauczor HU, Giesel FL (2010) 3D printing based on imaging data: review of medical applications. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 5:335–341CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Pham DT, Gault RS (1998) A comparison of rapid prototyping technologies. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 38:1257–1287CrossRef Pham DT, Gault RS (1998) A comparison of rapid prototyping technologies. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 38:1257–1287CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Lokesh K, Jain PK (2010) Selection of rapid prototyping technology. Adv Prod Eng Manag 5:75–84 Lokesh K, Jain PK (2010) Selection of rapid prototyping technology. Adv Prod Eng Manag 5:75–84
19.
go back to reference Horn TJ, Harrysson OL (2012) Overview of current additive manufacturing technologies and selected applications. Sci Prog 95:255–282CrossRefPubMed Horn TJ, Harrysson OL (2012) Overview of current additive manufacturing technologies and selected applications. Sci Prog 95:255–282CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Kim GD, Oh YT (2008) A benchmark study on rapid prototyping processes and machines: quantitative comparisons of mechanical properties, accuracy, roughness, speed, and material cost. J Eng Manuf 222:201–215CrossRef Kim GD, Oh YT (2008) A benchmark study on rapid prototyping processes and machines: quantitative comparisons of mechanical properties, accuracy, roughness, speed, and material cost. J Eng Manuf 222:201–215CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Besl PJ, McKay ND (1992) A method for registration of 3-d shapes. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 14:239–256CrossRef Besl PJ, McKay ND (1992) A method for registration of 3-d shapes. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 14:239–256CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Grundel K, Bohm B, Bauwens K, Junghans T, Scheiba R (1998) Influence of acute hemorrhage and pneumoperitoneum on hemodynamic and respiratory parameters. Surg Endosc 12:809–812CrossRefPubMed Grundel K, Bohm B, Bauwens K, Junghans T, Scheiba R (1998) Influence of acute hemorrhage and pneumoperitoneum on hemodynamic and respiratory parameters. Surg Endosc 12:809–812CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Ishizaki Y, Bandai Y, Shimomura K, Abe H, Ohtomo Y, Idezuki Y (1993) Safe intraabdominal pressure of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic surgery. Surgery 114:549–554PubMed Ishizaki Y, Bandai Y, Shimomura K, Abe H, Ohtomo Y, Idezuki Y (1993) Safe intraabdominal pressure of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic surgery. Surgery 114:549–554PubMed
24.
go back to reference Szinicz G, Beller S, Zerz A (1997) Role of the pulsatile organ perfusion surgical simulator in surgery education. Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd 114:687–693PubMed Szinicz G, Beller S, Zerz A (1997) Role of the pulsatile organ perfusion surgical simulator in surgery education. Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd 114:687–693PubMed
25.
go back to reference Gillen S, Wilhelm D, Meining A, Fiolka A, Doundoulakis E, Schneider A, Vov Delius S, Friess H, Feussner H (2009) The “ELITE” model: construct validation of a new training system for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). Endoscopy 41:395–399CrossRefPubMed Gillen S, Wilhelm D, Meining A, Fiolka A, Doundoulakis E, Schneider A, Vov Delius S, Friess H, Feussner H (2009) The “ELITE” model: construct validation of a new training system for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). Endoscopy 41:395–399CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Fiolka A, Gillen S, Meining A, Feussner H (2010) ELITE—the ex vivo training unit for NOTES: development and validation. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 19:281–286CrossRefPubMed Fiolka A, Gillen S, Meining A, Feussner H (2010) ELITE—the ex vivo training unit for NOTES: development and validation. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 19:281–286CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
OpenHELP (Heidelberg laparoscopy phantom): development of an open-source surgical evaluation and training tool
Authors
H. G. Kenngott
J. J. Wünscher
M. Wagner
A. Preukschas
A. L. Wekerle
P. Neher
S. Suwelack
S. Speidel
F. Nickel
D. Oladokun
L. Maier-Hein
R. Dillmann
H. P. Meinzer
B. P. Müller-Stich
Publication date
01-11-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 11/2015
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4094-0

Other articles of this Issue 11/2015

Surgical Endoscopy 11/2015 Go to the issue