Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 12/2014

01-12-2014

Postoperative complications in bariatric surgery using age and BMI stratification: a study using ACS-NSQIP data

Authors: Aliu Sanni, Sebastian Perez, Rachel Medbery, Hernan D. Urrego, Craig McCready, Juan P. Toro, Ankit D. Patel, Edward Lin, John F. Sweeney, S. Scott Davis Jr.

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 12/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Bariatric surgery results in long-term weight loss and significant morbidity reduction. Morbidity and mortality following bariatric surgery remain low and acceptable. This study looks to define the trend of morbidity and mortality as it relates to increasing age and body mass index (BMI) in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.

Methods

We queried the ACS/NSQIP 2010–2011 Public Use File for patients who underwent elective laparoscopic adjustable banding (LAGB), sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and gastric bypass (LGBP). Total morbidity and 30-day mortality were evaluated. Logistic regression models were created to estimate the effect of increasing age and BMI on morbidity for these bariatric procedures.

Results

A total of 20,308 laparoscopic bariatric procedures were reviewed (11617 LGBP, 3069 LSG and 5622 LAGB). Overall mortality and morbidity rates were 0.11 and 3.84 %, respectively. The odds of postoperative complications increased by 2 % with each additional year of age (OR 1.02, 95 % CI 1.02–1.03) and every point increase in BMI (OR 1.02, 95 % CI 1.01–1.03). Multiple logistic regression identified COPD, Diabetes, Hypertension, and Dyspnea as major risk factors for postoperative morbidity. Postoperative complications were three times more likely after LGBP (OR 2.87, 95 % CI 2.31–3.57) and two times more likely after LSG (OR 2.06, 95 % CI 1.57–2.72) when compared to patients undergoing LAGB.

Conclusion

Morbidity and mortality increase on a predictable trend with increasing age and BMI. There is increased risk of morbidity for stapling procedures when compared to gastric banding, but this must be considered in context of surgical efficacy when choosing a bariatric procedure. These data can be used in preoperative counseling and evaluation of surgical candidacy of bariatric surgical patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kopelman PG (2000) Obesity as a medical problem. Nature 404(6778):635–643PubMed Kopelman PG (2000) Obesity as a medical problem. Nature 404(6778):635–643PubMed
2.
go back to reference Flegal KM et al (2012) Prevalence of obesity and trends in the distribution of body mass index among US adults, 1999–2010. JAMA 307(5):491–497PubMedCrossRef Flegal KM et al (2012) Prevalence of obesity and trends in the distribution of body mass index among US adults, 1999–2010. JAMA 307(5):491–497PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Khan MA et al (2013) Perioperative risk factors for 30-day mortality after bariatric surgery: is functional status important? Surg Endosc 27(5):1772–1777PubMedCrossRef Khan MA et al (2013) Perioperative risk factors for 30-day mortality after bariatric surgery: is functional status important? Surg Endosc 27(5):1772–1777PubMedCrossRef
5.
6.
go back to reference Goldstein DJ (1992) Beneficial health effects of modest weight loss. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 16(6):397–415PubMed Goldstein DJ (1992) Beneficial health effects of modest weight loss. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 16(6):397–415PubMed
7.
8.
go back to reference Parikh MS et al (2006) Objective comparison of complications resulting from laparoscopic bariatric procedures. J Am Coll Surg 202(2):252–261PubMedCrossRef Parikh MS et al (2006) Objective comparison of complications resulting from laparoscopic bariatric procedures. J Am Coll Surg 202(2):252–261PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Meijer RI et al (2011) Bariatric surgery as a novel treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. Arch Surg 146(6):744–750PubMedCrossRef Meijer RI et al (2011) Bariatric surgery as a novel treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. Arch Surg 146(6):744–750PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Farrell TM et al (2009) Clinical application of laparoscopic bariatric surgery: an evidence-based review. Surg Endosc 23(5):930–949PubMedCrossRef Farrell TM et al (2009) Clinical application of laparoscopic bariatric surgery: an evidence-based review. Surg Endosc 23(5):930–949PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Yazbek T et al (2013) Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG)-a good bariatric option for failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB): a review of 90 patients. Obes Surg 23(3):300–305PubMedCrossRef Yazbek T et al (2013) Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG)-a good bariatric option for failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB): a review of 90 patients. Obes Surg 23(3):300–305PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Sjostrom L et al (2007) Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in Swedish obese subjects. N Engl J Med 357(8):741–752PubMedCrossRef Sjostrom L et al (2007) Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in Swedish obese subjects. N Engl J Med 357(8):741–752PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Nandipati K et al (2013) Factors predicting the increased risk for return to the operating room in bariatric patients: a NSQIP database study. Surg Endosc 27(4):1172–1177PubMedCrossRef Nandipati K et al (2013) Factors predicting the increased risk for return to the operating room in bariatric patients: a NSQIP database study. Surg Endosc 27(4):1172–1177PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Turgeon NA et al (2012) The impact of renal function on outcomes of bariatric surgery. J Am Soc Nephrol 23(5):885–894PubMedCrossRef Turgeon NA et al (2012) The impact of renal function on outcomes of bariatric surgery. J Am Soc Nephrol 23(5):885–894PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Buchwald H et al (2007) Trends in mortality in bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgery 142(4):621–632 discussion 632–5PubMedCrossRef Buchwald H et al (2007) Trends in mortality in bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgery 142(4):621–632 discussion 632–5PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Shiloach M et al (2010) Toward robust information: data quality and inter-rater reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 210(1):6–16PubMedCrossRef Shiloach M et al (2010) Toward robust information: data quality and inter-rater reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 210(1):6–16PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Santry HP, Gillen DL, Lauderdale DS (2005) Trends in bariatric surgical procedures. JAMA 294(15):1909–1917PubMedCrossRef Santry HP, Gillen DL, Lauderdale DS (2005) Trends in bariatric surgical procedures. JAMA 294(15):1909–1917PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kakarla VR et al (2011) Are laparoscopic bariatric procedures safe in superobese (BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2) patients? An NSQIP data analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis 7(4):452–458PubMedCrossRef Kakarla VR et al (2011) Are laparoscopic bariatric procedures safe in superobese (BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2) patients? An NSQIP data analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis 7(4):452–458PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lancaster RT, Hutter MM (2008) Bands and bypasses: 30-day morbidity and mortality of bariatric surgical procedures as assessed by prospective, multi-center, risk-adjusted ACS-NSQIP data. Surg Endosc 22(12):2554–2563PubMedCrossRef Lancaster RT, Hutter MM (2008) Bands and bypasses: 30-day morbidity and mortality of bariatric surgical procedures as assessed by prospective, multi-center, risk-adjusted ACS-NSQIP data. Surg Endosc 22(12):2554–2563PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Flum DR et al (2009) Perioperative safety in the longitudinal assessment of bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med 361(5):445–454PubMedCrossRef Flum DR et al (2009) Perioperative safety in the longitudinal assessment of bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med 361(5):445–454PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Gupta PK et al (2011) Development and validation of a bariatric surgery morbidity risk calculator using the prospective, multicenter NSQIP dataset. J Am Coll Surg 212(3):301–309PubMedCrossRef Gupta PK et al (2011) Development and validation of a bariatric surgery morbidity risk calculator using the prospective, multicenter NSQIP dataset. J Am Coll Surg 212(3):301–309PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Gupta PK (2011) Use of NSQIP to study the influence of resident involvement on surgical outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 213(1):196 author reply 196–7PubMedCrossRef Gupta PK (2011) Use of NSQIP to study the influence of resident involvement on surgical outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 213(1):196 author reply 196–7PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Dorman RB et al (2012) Bariatric surgery outcomes in the elderly: an ACS NSQIP study. J Gastrointest Surg 16(1):35–44 discussion 44PubMedCrossRef Dorman RB et al (2012) Bariatric surgery outcomes in the elderly: an ACS NSQIP study. J Gastrointest Surg 16(1):35–44 discussion 44PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Adams TD et al (2007) Long-term mortality after gastric bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 357(8):753–761PubMedCrossRef Adams TD et al (2007) Long-term mortality after gastric bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 357(8):753–761PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Davis MM et al (2006) National trends in bariatric surgery, 1996-2002. Arch Surg 141(1):71–74 discussion 75PubMedCrossRef Davis MM et al (2006) National trends in bariatric surgery, 1996-2002. Arch Surg 141(1):71–74 discussion 75PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Hutter MM et al (2006) Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass for morbid obesity: a multicenter, prospective, risk-adjusted analysis from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg 243(5):657–662 discussion 662–6PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Hutter MM et al (2006) Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass for morbid obesity: a multicenter, prospective, risk-adjusted analysis from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg 243(5):657–662 discussion 662–6PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Fischer L et al (2012) Excessive weight loss after sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review. Obes Surg 22(5):721–731PubMedCrossRef Fischer L et al (2012) Excessive weight loss after sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review. Obes Surg 22(5):721–731PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Garb J et al (2009) Bariatric surgery for the treatment of morbid obesity: a meta-analysis of weight loss outcomes for laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding and laparoscopic gastric bypass. Obes Surg 19(10):1447–1455PubMedCrossRef Garb J et al (2009) Bariatric surgery for the treatment of morbid obesity: a meta-analysis of weight loss outcomes for laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding and laparoscopic gastric bypass. Obes Surg 19(10):1447–1455PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Postoperative complications in bariatric surgery using age and BMI stratification: a study using ACS-NSQIP data
Authors
Aliu Sanni
Sebastian Perez
Rachel Medbery
Hernan D. Urrego
Craig McCready
Juan P. Toro
Ankit D. Patel
Edward Lin
John F. Sweeney
S. Scott Davis Jr.
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 12/2014
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3606-7

Other articles of this Issue 12/2014

Surgical Endoscopy 12/2014 Go to the issue