Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 6/2014

01-06-2014

Postoperative pain after transvaginal cholecystectomy: single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial

Authors: Dietmar H. Borchert, Matthias Federlein, Frauke Fritze-Büttner, Jens Burghardt, Britta Liersch-Löhn, Yüksel Atas, Verena Müller, Oskar Rückbeil, Stefan Wagenpfeil, Stefan Gräber, Klaus Gellert

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 6/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) has the potential to reduce postoperative pain. We compared postoperative pain in the hybrid NOTES procedure transvaginal video-assisted cholecystectomy (TVC) with standard conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC).

Design

Single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial in a level II hospital between June 2008 and June 2012.

Methods

Female patients, older than 18 years of age with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis were randomized to receive either TVC or CLC. The follow-up period was 7 days and the primary outcome of the study was postoperative pain. We hypothesized that there is no reduction of pain (Visual Rating Scale ≥1) while resting or coughing over a 48-h period after the operation. Secondary outcome included wound infections, complications, and patient reported outcomes. Sealed envelopes with computer-generated randomization information were kept for allocation in theater. All patients received opaque wound dressing, as in standard four-trocar cholecystectomy and a vaginal tamponade. Theater protocol and surgical notes were kept separate after the procedure.

Results

Overall, 97 of 426 patients assessed for participation were randomized for either TVC or CLC. A total of 41 patients had a TVC and 51 had a CLC. Five patients were excluded from the analysis. There was no difference in age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, or hospital stay, but anesthetic and surgical times were significantly longer in TVC (p < 0.001). There was no statistical difference in postoperative pain between the two groups while resting or coughing. Complications included conversion to laparotomy, bleeding, wound infections, and re-admission. No difference in the rate of complications between the two groups was seen. Overall, 86 and 93 % of CLC and TVC patients, respectively, would recommend the procedure to other patients.

Conclusion

In this study, no significant difference in pain on days 1 and 2 postoperatively between the two methods was found. The safety profile of TVC is comparable to CLC, and TVC patients would generally recommend this procedure to other patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hucl T, Saglova A, Benes M, Kocik M, Oliverius M, Valenta Z et al (2012) Patient and physician perception of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic appendectomy. World J Gastroenterol 18(15):1800–1805PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Hucl T, Saglova A, Benes M, Kocik M, Oliverius M, Valenta Z et al (2012) Patient and physician perception of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic appendectomy. World J Gastroenterol 18(15):1800–1805PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Varadarajulu S, Tamhane A, Drelichman ER (2008) Patient perception of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery as a technique for cholecystectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 67(6):854–860PubMedCrossRef Varadarajulu S, Tamhane A, Drelichman ER (2008) Patient perception of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery as a technique for cholecystectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 67(6):854–860PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Noguera JF, Cuadrado A, Dolz C, Olea JM, Garcia JC (2012) Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) (NCT00835250). Surg Endosc 26(12):3435–3441PubMedCrossRef Noguera JF, Cuadrado A, Dolz C, Olea JM, Garcia JC (2012) Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) (NCT00835250). Surg Endosc 26(12):3435–3441PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bulian DR, Knuth J, Cerasani N, Sauerwald A, Lefering R, Heiss MM (2013) Transvaginal/transumbilical hybrid-NOTES-versus 3-trocar needlescopic cholecystectomy: short-term results of a randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000000218 Bulian DR, Knuth J, Cerasani N, Sauerwald A, Lefering R, Heiss MM (2013) Transvaginal/transumbilical hybrid-NOTES-versus 3-trocar needlescopic cholecystectomy: short-term results of a randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg. doi:10.​1097/​SLA.​0000000000000218​
5.
go back to reference Hensel M, Schernikau U, Schmidt A, Arlt G (2012) Comparison between transvaginal and laparoscopic cholecystectomy—a retrospective case–control study. Zentralbl Chir 137(1):48–54PubMedCrossRef Hensel M, Schernikau U, Schmidt A, Arlt G (2012) Comparison between transvaginal and laparoscopic cholecystectomy—a retrospective case–control study. Zentralbl Chir 137(1):48–54PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kilian M, Raue W, Menenakos C, Wassersleben B, Hartmann J (2011) Transvaginal-hybrid vs. single-port-access vs. ‘conventional’ laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective observational study. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396(5):709–715PubMedCrossRef Kilian M, Raue W, Menenakos C, Wassersleben B, Hartmann J (2011) Transvaginal-hybrid vs. single-port-access vs. ‘conventional’ laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective observational study. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396(5):709–715PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Borchert D, Federlein M, Ruckbeil O, Burghardt J, Fritze F, Gellert K (2012) Prospective evaluation of transvaginal assisted cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 26(12):3597–3604PubMedCrossRef Borchert D, Federlein M, Ruckbeil O, Burghardt J, Fritze F, Gellert K (2012) Prospective evaluation of transvaginal assisted cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 26(12):3597–3604PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Federlein M, Borchert D, Muller V, Atas Y, Fritze F, Burghardt J et al (2010) Transvaginal video-assisted cholecystectomy in clinical practice. Surg Endosc 24(10):2444–2452PubMedCrossRef Federlein M, Borchert D, Muller V, Atas Y, Fritze F, Burghardt J et al (2010) Transvaginal video-assisted cholecystectomy in clinical practice. Surg Endosc 24(10):2444–2452PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Majeed AW, Troy G, Nicholl JP, Smythe A, Reed MW, Stoddard CJ et al (1996) Randomised, prospective, single-blind comparison of laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy. Lancet 347(9007):989–994PubMedCrossRef Majeed AW, Troy G, Nicholl JP, Smythe A, Reed MW, Stoddard CJ et al (1996) Randomised, prospective, single-blind comparison of laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy. Lancet 347(9007):989–994PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ros A, Gustafsson L, Krook H, Nordgren CE, Thorell A, Wallin G et al (2001) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study. Ann Surg 234(6):741–749PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Ros A, Gustafsson L, Krook H, Nordgren CE, Thorell A, Wallin G et al (2001) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study. Ann Surg 234(6):741–749PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Bullinger M (1995) German translation and psychometric testing of the SF-36 Health Survey: preliminary results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. Soc Sci Med 41(10):1359–1366PubMedCrossRef Bullinger M (1995) German translation and psychometric testing of the SF-36 Health Survey: preliminary results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. Soc Sci Med 41(10):1359–1366PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Eypasch E, Williams JI, Wood-Dauphinee S, Ure BM, Schmulling C, Neugebauer E et al (1995) Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index: development, validation and application of a new instrument. Br J Surg 82(2):216–222PubMedCrossRef Eypasch E, Williams JI, Wood-Dauphinee S, Ure BM, Schmulling C, Neugebauer E et al (1995) Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index: development, validation and application of a new instrument. Br J Surg 82(2):216–222PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD et al (2009) The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2):187–196PubMedCrossRef Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD et al (2009) The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2):187–196PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Zornig C, Mofid H, Siemssen L, Emmermann A, Alm M, von Waldenfels HA et al (2009) Transvaginal NOTES hybrid cholecystectomy: feasibility results in 68 cases with mid-term follow-up. Endoscopy 41(5):391–394PubMedCrossRef Zornig C, Mofid H, Siemssen L, Emmermann A, Alm M, von Waldenfels HA et al (2009) Transvaginal NOTES hybrid cholecystectomy: feasibility results in 68 cases with mid-term follow-up. Endoscopy 41(5):391–394PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Solomon D, Shariff AH, Silasi DA, Duffy AJ, Bell RL, Roberts KE (2012) Transvaginal cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective cohort study. Surg Endosc 26(10):2823–2827PubMedCrossRef Solomon D, Shariff AH, Silasi DA, Duffy AJ, Bell RL, Roberts KE (2012) Transvaginal cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective cohort study. Surg Endosc 26(10):2823–2827PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Barkun JS, Barkun AN, Sampalis JS, Fried G, Taylor B, Wexler MJ et al (1992) Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus mini cholecystectomy. The McGill Gallstone Treatment Group. Lancet 340(8828):1116–1119PubMedCrossRef Barkun JS, Barkun AN, Sampalis JS, Fried G, Taylor B, Wexler MJ et al (1992) Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus mini cholecystectomy. The McGill Gallstone Treatment Group. Lancet 340(8828):1116–1119PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference McCloy R, Randall D, Schug SA, Kehlet H, Simanski C, Bonnet F et al (2008) Is smaller necessarily better? A systematic review comparing the effects of minilaparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy on patient outcomes. Surg Endosc 22(12):2541–2553PubMedCrossRef McCloy R, Randall D, Schug SA, Kehlet H, Simanski C, Bonnet F et al (2008) Is smaller necessarily better? A systematic review comparing the effects of minilaparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy on patient outcomes. Surg Endosc 22(12):2541–2553PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Bisgaard T, Kehlet H, Rosenberg J (2001) Pain and convalescence after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Eur J Surg 167(2):84–96PubMedCrossRef Bisgaard T, Kehlet H, Rosenberg J (2001) Pain and convalescence after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Eur J Surg 167(2):84–96PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Sajid MS, Khan MA, Ray K, Cheek E, Baig MK (2009) Needlescopic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis. ANZ J Surg 79(6):437–442PubMedCrossRef Sajid MS, Khan MA, Ray K, Cheek E, Baig MK (2009) Needlescopic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis. ANZ J Surg 79(6):437–442PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Todd KH (1996) Clinical versus statistical significance in the assessment of pain relief. Ann Emerg Med 27(4):439–441PubMedCrossRef Todd KH (1996) Clinical versus statistical significance in the assessment of pain relief. Ann Emerg Med 27(4):439–441PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference van den Boezem PB, Velthuis S, Lourens HJ, Samlal RA, Cuesta MA, Sietses C (2013) Hybrid transvaginal cholecystectomy, clinical results and patient-reported outcomes of 50 consecutive cases. J Gastrointest Surg 17(5):907–912PubMedCrossRef van den Boezem PB, Velthuis S, Lourens HJ, Samlal RA, Cuesta MA, Sietses C (2013) Hybrid transvaginal cholecystectomy, clinical results and patient-reported outcomes of 50 consecutive cases. J Gastrointest Surg 17(5):907–912PubMedCrossRef
23.
24.
go back to reference Marks JM, Phillips MS, Tacchino R, Roberts K, Onders R, DeNoto G et al (2013) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with improved cosmesis scoring at the cost of significantly higher hernia rates: 1-year results of a prospective randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial of traditional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 216(6):1037–1047PubMedCrossRef Marks JM, Phillips MS, Tacchino R, Roberts K, Onders R, DeNoto G et al (2013) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with improved cosmesis scoring at the cost of significantly higher hernia rates: 1-year results of a prospective randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial of traditional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 216(6):1037–1047PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Enochsson L, Thulin A, Osterberg J, Sandblom G, Persson G (2013) The Swedish Registry of Gallstone Surgery and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (GallRiks): a nationwide registry for quality assurance of gallstone surgery. JAMA Surg 148(5):471–478PubMedCrossRef Enochsson L, Thulin A, Osterberg J, Sandblom G, Persson G (2013) The Swedish Registry of Gallstone Surgery and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (GallRiks): a nationwide registry for quality assurance of gallstone surgery. JAMA Surg 148(5):471–478PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Mantha S, Thisted R, Foss J, Ellis JE, Roizen MF (1993) A proposal to use confidence intervals for visual analog scale data for pain measurement to determine clinical significance. Anesth Analg 77(5):1041–1047PubMedCrossRef Mantha S, Thisted R, Foss J, Ellis JE, Roizen MF (1993) A proposal to use confidence intervals for visual analog scale data for pain measurement to determine clinical significance. Anesth Analg 77(5):1041–1047PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Postoperative pain after transvaginal cholecystectomy: single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial
Authors
Dietmar H. Borchert
Matthias Federlein
Frauke Fritze-Büttner
Jens Burghardt
Britta Liersch-Löhn
Yüksel Atas
Verena Müller
Oskar Rückbeil
Stefan Wagenpfeil
Stefan Gräber
Klaus Gellert
Publication date
01-06-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 6/2014
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3409-2

Other articles of this Issue 6/2014

Surgical Endoscopy 6/2014 Go to the issue