Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 3/2014

01-03-2014

Laparoscopic versus open elective repair of primary umbilical hernias: short-term outcomes from the American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program

Authors: Scott Cassie, Allan Okrainec, Fady Saleh, Fayez S. Quereshy, Timothy D. Jackson

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 3/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Approximately 175,000 umbilical hernia repairs are performed annually in the US. Controversy exists regarding the optimal approach for the elective repair of primary umbilical hernias.

Objective

The objective of this study was to compare 30-day outcomes of elective primary open (OHR) and laparoscopic (LHR) umbilical hernia repairs, using a prospectively collected dataset.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study using the American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program Participant Use Files during 2009 and 2010. Current Procedural Terminology and post-operative International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision diagnostic codes were used to identify primary umbilical hernia repairs. Primary outcomes included composite endpoints of 30-day mortality, and major and overall complications. Univariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression were performed controlling for relevant patient characteristics. Secondary outcomes included operative time and hospital length of stay (LOS).

Results

Overall, 14,652 patients were identified—13,109 (89.5 %) OHR and 1543 (10.5 %) LHR. Univariate analyses of primary outcomes demonstrated similar 30-day morbidity and mortality between groups. In our multivariate model, however, after controlling for body mass index, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, the odds ratio (OR) for overall complications favored LHR (OR 0.60; p = 0.01). This difference was driven primarily by the reduced wound complication rate in the LHR group [OR 0.41 (0.20, 0.78); p = 0.005]. LHR was associated with significantly longer operative time [57.7 min (SD 32.6) vs. 38.3 min (SD 22.9); p < 0.001], longer LOS [0.29 days (SD 0.68) vs. 0.17 days (SD 1.47); p = 0.001], and an increased rate of respiratory (0.52 vs. 0.10 %; p < 0.001) and cardiac (0.26 vs. 0.05 %; p = 0.005) complications.

Conclusions

This study identified potential decreased total and wound morbidity associated with LHR for elective primary umbilical hernia repairs at the expense of increased operative time, LOS, and respiratory and cardiac complications. These results should be considered within the context of a retrospective study with its inherent risks of bias and limitations.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Rutkow I (2003) Demographic and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States in 2003. Surg Clin N Am 83:1045–1051PubMedCrossRef Rutkow I (2003) Demographic and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States in 2003. Surg Clin N Am 83:1045–1051PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Solomon TA, Wignesvaran P, Chaudry MA, Tutton MG (2010) A retrospective audit comparing outcomes of open versus laparoscopic repair of umbilical/paraumbilical herniae. Surg Endosc 24:3109–3112PubMedCrossRef Solomon TA, Wignesvaran P, Chaudry MA, Tutton MG (2010) A retrospective audit comparing outcomes of open versus laparoscopic repair of umbilical/paraumbilical herniae. Surg Endosc 24:3109–3112PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Wright B, Beckerman J, Cohen M, Cumming J, Rodriguez J (2002) Is laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair with mesh a reasonable alternative to conventional repair? Am J Surg 184:505–509PubMedCrossRef Wright B, Beckerman J, Cohen M, Cumming J, Rodriguez J (2002) Is laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair with mesh a reasonable alternative to conventional repair? Am J Surg 184:505–509PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Forbes SS, Eskicioglu C, McLeod RS, Okrainec A (2009) Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing open and laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair with mesh. Br J Surg 96:851–858PubMedCrossRef Forbes SS, Eskicioglu C, McLeod RS, Okrainec A (2009) Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing open and laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair with mesh. Br J Surg 96:851–858PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Nguyen N, Lee S, Mayer K (2000) Laparoscopic umbilical herniorrhaphy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 10:151–153CrossRef Nguyen N, Lee S, Mayer K (2000) Laparoscopic umbilical herniorrhaphy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 10:151–153CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Colon MJ, Kitamura R, Telem DA, Nguyen S, Divino CM (2013) Laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair is the preferred approach in obese patients. Am J Surg 205:231–236PubMedCrossRef Colon MJ, Kitamura R, Telem DA, Nguyen S, Divino CM (2013) Laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair is the preferred approach in obese patients. Am J Surg 205:231–236PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Gonzalez R, Mason E, Duncan T, Wilson R, Ramshaw B (2003) Laparoscopic versus open umbilical hernia repair. JSLS 7:323–328PubMedCentralPubMed Gonzalez R, Mason E, Duncan T, Wilson R, Ramshaw B (2003) Laparoscopic versus open umbilical hernia repair. JSLS 7:323–328PubMedCentralPubMed
9.
go back to reference ACS NSQIP user guide for the 2011 participant use. Data on file. (2012) ACS NSQIP user guide for the 2011 participant use. Data on file. (2012)
10.
go back to reference Mason R, Moazzez A, Sohn H, Berne T, Kathouda N (2011) Laparoscopic versus open anterior abdominal wall hernia repair. Ann Surg 254:641–652PubMedCrossRef Mason R, Moazzez A, Sohn H, Berne T, Kathouda N (2011) Laparoscopic versus open anterior abdominal wall hernia repair. Ann Surg 254:641–652PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Eriksen JR, Bisgaard T, Assaadzedah S, Jorgensen LN, Rosenberg J (2011) Randomized clinical trial of fibrin sealant versus titanium tacks for mesh fixation in laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair. Br J Surg 98:1537–1545PubMedCrossRef Eriksen JR, Bisgaard T, Assaadzedah S, Jorgensen LN, Rosenberg J (2011) Randomized clinical trial of fibrin sealant versus titanium tacks for mesh fixation in laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair. Br J Surg 98:1537–1545PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Wassenaar E, Schoenmaeckers E, Raymakers J, van der Palen J, Rakic S (2010) Mesh fixation method and pain and quality of life after laparoscopic ventral or incisional hernia repair: a randomized trial of three fixation techniques. Surg Endosc 24:1296–1302PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Wassenaar E, Schoenmaeckers E, Raymakers J, van der Palen J, Rakic S (2010) Mesh fixation method and pain and quality of life after laparoscopic ventral or incisional hernia repair: a randomized trial of three fixation techniques. Surg Endosc 24:1296–1302PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Eriksen JR, Poornoroozy P, Jorgensen LN, Jacobsen B, Friis Anderson HU, Rosenberg J (2009) Pain, quality of life and recovery of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Hernia 13:13–21PubMedCrossRef Eriksen JR, Poornoroozy P, Jorgensen LN, Jacobsen B, Friis Anderson HU, Rosenberg J (2009) Pain, quality of life and recovery of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Hernia 13:13–21PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Reynolds D, Davenport D, Roth JS (2013) Predictors of poor outcomes in functionally dependent patients undergoing ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc 27:1099–1104PubMedCrossRef Reynolds D, Davenport D, Roth JS (2013) Predictors of poor outcomes in functionally dependent patients undergoing ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc 27:1099–1104PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kakarla VR, Nurkin SJ, Sharma S, Ruiz DE, Tiszenkel H (2012) Elective laparoscopic versus open colectomy for diverticulosis: an analysis of ACS-NSQIP Database. Surg Endosc 26:1837–1842PubMedCrossRef Kakarla VR, Nurkin SJ, Sharma S, Ruiz DE, Tiszenkel H (2012) Elective laparoscopic versus open colectomy for diverticulosis: an analysis of ACS-NSQIP Database. Surg Endosc 26:1837–1842PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference O’Malley KJ, Cook KF, Price MD, Wildes KR, Hurdle JF, Ashton CM (2005) Measuring diagnoses: ICD code accuracy. Health Serv Res 40:1620–1639PubMedCrossRef O’Malley KJ, Cook KF, Price MD, Wildes KR, Hurdle JF, Ashton CM (2005) Measuring diagnoses: ICD code accuracy. Health Serv Res 40:1620–1639PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Faciszewski T, Jensen R, Berg RL (2003) Procedural coding of spinal surgeries (CPT-4 vs. ICD-9-CM) and decisions regarding standards. Spine 28:502–507PubMed Faciszewski T, Jensen R, Berg RL (2003) Procedural coding of spinal surgeries (CPT-4 vs. ICD-9-CM) and decisions regarding standards. Spine 28:502–507PubMed
Metadata
Title
Laparoscopic versus open elective repair of primary umbilical hernias: short-term outcomes from the American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program
Authors
Scott Cassie
Allan Okrainec
Fady Saleh
Fayez S. Quereshy
Timothy D. Jackson
Publication date
01-03-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 3/2014
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3252-5

Other articles of this Issue 3/2014

Surgical Endoscopy 3/2014 Go to the issue