Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 3/2012

01-03-2012

Comparison of laparoscopic skills performance between single-site access (SSA) devices and an independent-port SSA approach

Authors: Matthew R. Schill, J. Esteban Varela, Margaret M. Frisella, L. Michael Brunt

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 3/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

This study compared the performance of validated laparoscopic tasks on four commercially available single-site-access (SSA) devices with the performance of those tasks on an independent-port (IP) SSA setup.

Methods

A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic skills performance on four access devices (ADs) (GelPOINT, SILS Port, SSL Access System, TriPort) and one IP-SSA setup was conducted. A laparoscopic trainer box was used to train 18 (2nd- to 4th-year) medical students, four surgical residents, and five attending surgeons to proficiency in multiport laparoscopy using four laparoscopic drills (i.e., peg transfer, bean drop, pattern cutting, extracorporeal suturing). Drills then were performed in random order on each IP-SSA and AD-SSA setup using straight laparoscopic instruments. Repetitions were timed and errors recorded. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey HSD post hoc tests.

Results

The attending surgeons had significantly faster total task times than the residents or students (P < 0.001), but the difference between the residents and students was not significant. Pair-wise comparisons showed significantly faster total task times for the IP-SSA setup than for all four AD-SSAs within the student group only (P < 0.05). The total task times for the residents and attending surgeons showed a similar profile, but the differences were not significant. When the data for the three groups were combined, the total task time was less for the IP-SSA setup than for each of the four AD-SSA setups (P < 0.001). Similarly, the IP-SSA setup was significantly faster than three of the four AD-SSA setups for peg transfer, three of the four setups for pattern cutting, and two of the four setups for suturing. No significant differences in error rates between the IP-SSA and AD-SSA setups were detected.

Conclusions

Compared with an IP-SSA laparoscopic setup, AD-SSAs are associated with longer task performance times in a trainer box model, independently of the level of training. Task performance was similar across the different SSA devices.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chamberlain R, Sakpal S (2009) A comprehensive review of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) techniques for cholecystectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 13:1733–1740PubMedCrossRef Chamberlain R, Sakpal S (2009) A comprehensive review of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) techniques for cholecystectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 13:1733–1740PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Romanelli J, Roshek T III, Lynn D, Earle D (2010) Single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial experience. Surg Endosc 24:1374–1379PubMedCrossRef Romanelli J, Roshek T III, Lynn D, Earle D (2010) Single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial experience. Surg Endosc 24:1374–1379PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Podolsky E, Curcillo P (2010) Single-port access (SPA) surgery: a 24-month experience. J Gastrointest Surg 14:759–767PubMedCrossRef Podolsky E, Curcillo P (2010) Single-port access (SPA) surgery: a 24-month experience. J Gastrointest Surg 14:759–767PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Vidal O, Valentini M, Ginesta C, Marti J, Espert JJ, Benarroch G, Garcia-Valdecasas JC (2010) Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery appendectomy. Surg Endosc 24:686–691PubMedCrossRef Vidal O, Valentini M, Ginesta C, Marti J, Espert JJ, Benarroch G, Garcia-Valdecasas JC (2010) Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery appendectomy. Surg Endosc 24:686–691PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Jeong B, Park Y, Han D, KIm H (2009) Laparoendoscopic single-site and conventional laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a matched case-control study. J Endourol 23:1957–1960PubMedCrossRef Jeong B, Park Y, Han D, KIm H (2009) Laparoendoscopic single-site and conventional laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a matched case-control study. J Endourol 23:1957–1960PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Nguyen N, Slone J, Reavis K (2010) Comparison study of conventional laparoscopic gastric banding versus laparoendoscopic single-site gastric banding. Surg Obes Relat Dis 6:503–507PubMedCrossRef Nguyen N, Slone J, Reavis K (2010) Comparison study of conventional laparoscopic gastric banding versus laparoendoscopic single-site gastric banding. Surg Obes Relat Dis 6:503–507PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Gandhi D, Ragupathi M, Patel C, Ramos-Valadez D, Bartley Pickron T, Haas E (2010) Single-incision versus hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: a case-matched series. J Gastrointest Surg 14:1875–1880PubMedCrossRef Gandhi D, Ragupathi M, Patel C, Ramos-Valadez D, Bartley Pickron T, Haas E (2010) Single-incision versus hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: a case-matched series. J Gastrointest Surg 14:1875–1880PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Filipovic-Cugura J, Kirac I, Kulis T, Jankovic J, Bekavac-Beslin M (2009) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair: first case. Surg Endosc 23:920–921PubMedCrossRef Filipovic-Cugura J, Kirac I, Kulis T, Jankovic J, Bekavac-Beslin M (2009) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair: first case. Surg Endosc 23:920–921PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Targarona EM, Pallares J, Balague C, Rodriguez Luppi C, Marinello F, Hernandez P, Martinez C, Trias M (2010) Single-incision approach for splenic diseases: a preliminary report on a series of 8 cases. Surg Endosc 24:2236–2240PubMedCrossRef Targarona EM, Pallares J, Balague C, Rodriguez Luppi C, Marinello F, Hernandez P, Martinez C, Trias M (2010) Single-incision approach for splenic diseases: a preliminary report on a series of 8 cases. Surg Endosc 24:2236–2240PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Pfluke J, Parker M, Stauffer J, Paetau A, Bowers SP, Asbun H, Smith C (2011) Laparoscopic surgery performed through a single incision: a systematic review of the current literature. J Am Coll Surg 212:113–118PubMedCrossRef Pfluke J, Parker M, Stauffer J, Paetau A, Bowers SP, Asbun H, Smith C (2011) Laparoscopic surgery performed through a single incision: a systematic review of the current literature. J Am Coll Surg 212:113–118PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ahmed K, Wang T, Patel V, Nagpal K, Clark J, Ali M, Deeba S, Ashrafian H, Darzi A, Athanasiou T, Paraskeva P (2011) The role of single-incision laparoscopic surgery in abdominal and pelvic surgery: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 25:378–396PubMedCrossRef Ahmed K, Wang T, Patel V, Nagpal K, Clark J, Ali M, Deeba S, Ashrafian H, Darzi A, Athanasiou T, Paraskeva P (2011) The role of single-incision laparoscopic surgery in abdominal and pelvic surgery: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 25:378–396PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Canes D, Berger A, Aron M, Brandina R, Goldfarb DA, Shoskes D, Desai M, Gill I (2010) Laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) versus standard laparoscopic left donor nephrectomy: matched-pair comparison. Eur Urol 57:95–101PubMedCrossRef Canes D, Berger A, Aron M, Brandina R, Goldfarb DA, Shoskes D, Desai M, Gill I (2010) Laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) versus standard laparoscopic left donor nephrectomy: matched-pair comparison. Eur Urol 57:95–101PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Marks J, Tacchino R, Roberts K, Onders R, Denoto G, Paraskeva P, Rivas H, Soper NJ, Rosemurgy AS, Shah S (2011) Prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: report of preliminary data. Am J Surg 201:369–373PubMedCrossRef Marks J, Tacchino R, Roberts K, Onders R, Denoto G, Paraskeva P, Rivas H, Soper NJ, Rosemurgy AS, Shah S (2011) Prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: report of preliminary data. Am J Surg 201:369–373PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Garey C, Laituri C, Ostlie D, St. Peter S (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery and the necessity for prospective evidence. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 20:503–506CrossRef Garey C, Laituri C, Ostlie D, St. Peter S (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery and the necessity for prospective evidence. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 20:503–506CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Santos B, Enter D, Sopher N, Hungness E (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) versus standard laparoscopic surgery: a comparison of performance using a surgical simulator. Surg Endosc 25:483–490PubMedCrossRef Santos B, Enter D, Sopher N, Hungness E (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) versus standard laparoscopic surgery: a comparison of performance using a surgical simulator. Surg Endosc 25:483–490PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Cox D, Zeng W, Frisella MM, Brunt LM (2011) Analysis of standard multiport versus single-site access for laparoscopic skills training. Surg Endosc 25:1238–1244PubMedCrossRef Cox D, Zeng W, Frisella MM, Brunt LM (2011) Analysis of standard multiport versus single-site access for laparoscopic skills training. Surg Endosc 25:1238–1244PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference SAGES (2010) Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) program. Retrieved 7 March 2010 http://flsprogram.org SAGES (2010) Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) program. Retrieved 7 March 2010 http://​flsprogram.​org
18.
go back to reference Rosser JC, Rosser LE, Savalgi RS (1997) Skill acquisition and assessment for laparoscopic surgery. Arch Surg 132:200–204PubMedCrossRef Rosser JC, Rosser LE, Savalgi RS (1997) Skill acquisition and assessment for laparoscopic surgery. Arch Surg 132:200–204PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Rawlings A, Hodgett S, Matthews BD, Strasberg SM, Quasebarth M, Brunt LM (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial experience with critical view of safety dissection and routine intraoperative cholangiography. J Am Coll Surg 211:1–7PubMedCrossRef Rawlings A, Hodgett S, Matthews BD, Strasberg SM, Quasebarth M, Brunt LM (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial experience with critical view of safety dissection and routine intraoperative cholangiography. J Am Coll Surg 211:1–7PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Curcillo P, Wu A, Podolsky E, Graybeal C, Katkhouda N, Saenz A, Dunham R, Fendley S, Neff M, Copper C, Bessler M, Gumbs A, Norton M, Iannelli A, Mason R, Moazzez A, Cohen L, Mouhlas A, Poor A (2010) Single-port-access (SPA) cholecystectomy: a multi-institutional report of the first 297 cases. Surg Endosc 24:1854–1860PubMedCrossRef Curcillo P, Wu A, Podolsky E, Graybeal C, Katkhouda N, Saenz A, Dunham R, Fendley S, Neff M, Copper C, Bessler M, Gumbs A, Norton M, Iannelli A, Mason R, Moazzez A, Cohen L, Mouhlas A, Poor A (2010) Single-port-access (SPA) cholecystectomy: a multi-institutional report of the first 297 cases. Surg Endosc 24:1854–1860PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Varela JE (2009) Single-site laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: preclinical use of a novel multi-access port device. Surg Innov 16:207–210PubMedCrossRef Varela JE (2009) Single-site laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: preclinical use of a novel multi-access port device. Surg Innov 16:207–210PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Khanna R, White MA, Autorino R, Laydner HK, Isac W et al (2011) Selection of a port for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery. Curr Urol Rep 12:94–99PubMedCrossRef Khanna R, White MA, Autorino R, Laydner HK, Isac W et al (2011) Selection of a port for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery. Curr Urol Rep 12:94–99PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Rieder E, Martinec D, Cassera M, Goers T, Dunst C, Swanstrom L (2011) A triangulating operating platform enhances bimanual performance and reduces surgical workload in single-incision laparoscopy. J Am Coll Surg 212:378–384PubMedCrossRef Rieder E, Martinec D, Cassera M, Goers T, Dunst C, Swanstrom L (2011) A triangulating operating platform enhances bimanual performance and reduces surgical workload in single-incision laparoscopy. J Am Coll Surg 212:378–384PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Rimonda R, Tang B, Brown S, Cuschieri A (2012) 0) Ergonomic performance with crossed and uncrossed instruments in single-port laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 24:S493–S494 Rimonda R, Tang B, Brown S, Cuschieri A (2012) 0) Ergonomic performance with crossed and uncrossed instruments in single-port laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 24:S493–S494
Metadata
Title
Comparison of laparoscopic skills performance between single-site access (SSA) devices and an independent-port SSA approach
Authors
Matthew R. Schill
J. Esteban Varela
Margaret M. Frisella
L. Michael Brunt
Publication date
01-03-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1941-5

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

Surgical Endoscopy 3/2012 Go to the issue