Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 4/2011

01-04-2011

Analysis of standard multiport versus single-site access for laparoscopic skills training

Authors: Daniel R. Cox, Wenjing Zeng, Margaret M. Frisella, L. Michael Brunt

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 4/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Single-site-access (SSA) laparoscopy is more challenging to perform than multiport (MP) laparoscopy. This study examined the effect of MP versus SSA skills training on laparoscopic performance using surgically naive medical students.

Methods

For the study, 40 medical students at the end of their first year were randomized into two groups. Both groups were trained in four basic laparoscopic drills (peg, rope, bean drop, pattern cutting) using a standard MP setup (group 1) and an SSA approach (group 2). The time and number of repetitions required to attain proficiency were recorded. Each group then crossed over to the alternate approach and repeated the sequence. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation, and statistical analysis was performed using the two-tailed, unpaired t test.

Results

The total times required to attain proficiency for the SSA and MP approaches were not significantly different between the MP-trained group (234.0 ± 114.9 min) and the SSA-trained group (216.4 ± 106.5 min) (p = 0.67). The MP-trained group required less time to reach proficiency on the standard MP setup than the group using the SSA approach (119.1 ± 69.7 vs. 178.0 ± 93.4 min; p = 0.058) and significantly fewer repetitions (77.6 ± 42.6 vs. 118.8 ± 54.3; p = 0.027). The SSA-trained group required significantly less time to reach proficiency on the MP setup than the standard MP-trained group (38.4 ± 29.4 vs. 119.1 ± 69.7 min; p = 0.0013) and needed only a mean of 26.9 repetitions. When the standard MP trainees crossed over to the SSA setup, they required significantly less time to reach proficiency with the SSA approach than the SSA-trained group (114.8 ± 50.5 vs. 178.0 ± 93.4 min; p = 0.026) but required more repetitions than with the MP approach (86.2 ± 35.2 vs. 77.6 ± 42.6; nonsignificant difference).

Conclusions

Laparoscopic SSA skills training results in longer times and more repetitions to achieve proficiency than MP training, but the skills acquired transfer well to the MP approach.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Navarra G, Pozza E, Occhionorelli S, Carcoforo P, Donini I (1997) One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 84:695PubMedCrossRef Navarra G, Pozza E, Occhionorelli S, Carcoforo P, Donini I (1997) One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 84:695PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Vidal O, Valentini M, Ginestà C, Martí J, Espert JJ, Benarroch G, García-Valdecasas JC (2009) Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery appendectomy. Surg Endosc [Epub ahead of print 19 August] Vidal O, Valentini M, Ginestà C, Martí J, Espert JJ, Benarroch G, García-Valdecasas JC (2009) Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery appendectomy. Surg Endosc [Epub ahead of print 19 August]
3.
go back to reference Jeong BC, Park YH, Han DH, Kim HH (2009) Laparoendoscopic single-site and conventional laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a matched case–control study. J Endourol 23:1957–1960PubMedCrossRef Jeong BC, Park YH, Han DH, Kim HH (2009) Laparoendoscopic single-site and conventional laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a matched case–control study. J Endourol 23:1957–1960PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Nguyen NT, Slone J, Reavis K (2009) Comparison study of conventional laparoscopic gastric banding versus laparoendoscopic single site gastric banding. Surg Obes Relat Dis [Epub ahead of print 10 November] Nguyen NT, Slone J, Reavis K (2009) Comparison study of conventional laparoscopic gastric banding versus laparoendoscopic single site gastric banding. Surg Obes Relat Dis [Epub ahead of print 10 November]
5.
go back to reference Canes D, Berger A, Aron M, Brandina R, Goldfarb DA, Shoskes D, Desai MM, Gill IS (2009) Laparo endoscopic single site (LESS) versus standard laparoscopic left donor nephrectomy: matched-pair comparison. Eur Urol [Epub ahead of print 28 July] Canes D, Berger A, Aron M, Brandina R, Goldfarb DA, Shoskes D, Desai MM, Gill IS (2009) Laparo endoscopic single site (LESS) versus standard laparoscopic left donor nephrectomy: matched-pair comparison. Eur Urol [Epub ahead of print 28 July]
6.
go back to reference Scott DJ (2006) Patient safety, competency, and the future of surgical stimulation. Simul Healthcare 1:164–170CrossRef Scott DJ (2006) Patient safety, competency, and the future of surgical stimulation. Simul Healthcare 1:164–170CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (2010) Fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) program. Retrieved 7 March 2010, http://flsprogram.org Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (2010) Fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) program. Retrieved 7 March 2010, http://​flsprogram.​org
8.
go back to reference Rosser JC, Rosser LE, Savalgi RS (1997) Skill acquisition and assessment for laparoscopic surgery. Arch Surg 132:200–204PubMed Rosser JC, Rosser LE, Savalgi RS (1997) Skill acquisition and assessment for laparoscopic surgery. Arch Surg 132:200–204PubMed
10.
go back to reference Mac Donald E, Pringle K, Ahmed I (2009) Single port laparoscopic repair of incarcerated ventral hernia. Hernia [Epub ahead of print] Mac Donald E, Pringle K, Ahmed I (2009) Single port laparoscopic repair of incarcerated ventral hernia. Hernia [Epub ahead of print]
11.
go back to reference Jacob BP, Tong W, Reiner M, Vine A, Katz LB (2009) Single-incision total extraperitoneal (one-site) laparoscopic inguinal hernia. Hernia 13:571–572 Jacob BP, Tong W, Reiner M, Vine A, Katz LB (2009) Single-incision total extraperitoneal (one-site) laparoscopic inguinal hernia. Hernia 13:571–572
12.
go back to reference Barbaros U, Dinccag A (2009) Single-incision laparoscopic splenectomy: the first two cases. J Gastrointest Surg 13:1520–1523PubMedCrossRef Barbaros U, Dinccag A (2009) Single-incision laparoscopic splenectomy: the first two cases. J Gastrointest Surg 13:1520–1523PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Rawlings A, Hodgett SE, Matthews BD, Strasberg SM, Quasebarth M, Brunt LM (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial experience with critical view of safety dissection and routine intraoperative cholangiography. JACS Rawlings A, Hodgett SE, Matthews BD, Strasberg SM, Quasebarth M, Brunt LM (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial experience with critical view of safety dissection and routine intraoperative cholangiography. JACS
14.
go back to reference Fried GM, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, Fraser SA, Stanbridge D, Ghitulescu G, Andrew CG (2004) Proving the value of simulation in laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg 240:518–528PubMedCrossRef Fried GM, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, Fraser SA, Stanbridge D, Ghitulescu G, Andrew CG (2004) Proving the value of simulation in laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg 240:518–528PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Scott DJ, Dunnington GL (2008) The new ACS/APDS skills curriculum: moving the learning curve out of the operating room. J Gastrointest Surg 12:213–221PubMedCrossRef Scott DJ, Dunnington GL (2008) The new ACS/APDS skills curriculum: moving the learning curve out of the operating room. J Gastrointest Surg 12:213–221PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Sroka G, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, Kavena PA, Fayez R, Fried G (2010) Fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery simulator training to proficiency improves laparoscopic performance in the operating room: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Surg 199:115–120PubMedCrossRef Sroka G, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, Kavena PA, Fayez R, Fried G (2010) Fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery simulator training to proficiency improves laparoscopic performance in the operating room: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Surg 199:115–120PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Analysis of standard multiport versus single-site access for laparoscopic skills training
Authors
Daniel R. Cox
Wenjing Zeng
Margaret M. Frisella
L. Michael Brunt
Publication date
01-04-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 4/2011
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1349-7

Other articles of this Issue 4/2011

Surgical Endoscopy 4/2011 Go to the issue