Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 10/2010

01-10-2010

Transvaginal natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): a survey of women’s views on a new technique

Authors: Andrew D. Strickland, Michael G. A. Norwood, Fariba Behnia-Willison, Santosh A. Olakkengil, Peter J. Hewett

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 10/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic and minimally invasive surgery has changed the surgical landscape irrevocably. Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) offers the possibility of surgery without visible scars. Transvaginal entry offers potential benefits because it gains access to the peritoneal cavity without the need to open an abdominal viscus. Much of the discussion pertaining to NOTES focuses on technical and training issues, with little attention to date paid to the opinions of women. The perceptions of female health care workers and patients were sought in relation to their views on transvaginal NOTES.

Methods

This study surveyed 300 women using a 12-point questionnaire devised by a multidisciplinary group of surgeons interested in minimally invasive surgery. The questionnaire was designed to establish the opinions of women with respect to NOTES surgery versus standard laparoscopic procedures. Responses were de-identified.

Results

Three-fourths of the women surveyed were neutral or unhappy about the prospect of a NOTES procedure, and this remained constant even when it was stipulated that laparoscopic cholecystectomy and NOTES had equivalent safety and efficacy. Younger nulliparous women were most concerned about the potential negative effect of NOTES on sexual function. A minority were concerned about the cosmetic effect of surgery, although surgical scars were perceived as more important to younger respondents.

Conclusions

Potentially, NOTES surgery offers women a scarless operation with the possibility of less pain than experienced in standard laparoscopic surgery. Few women, however, were troubled about the cosmetic effect of surgery. The effect of NOTES on sexual function was expressed as a particular concern by younger women. In all groups and across all ages, peritoneal access using the transvaginal route was met by significant scepticism. In Australia, women remain to be convinced about the potential advantages of the emerging NOTES technology.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Vigano l, Tayar C, Laurent A, Cherqui D (2009) Laparoscopic liver surgery: a systematic review. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 16:410–421CrossRefPubMed Vigano l, Tayar C, Laurent A, Cherqui D (2009) Laparoscopic liver surgery: a systematic review. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 16:410–421CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Uranues S, Alimoglu O (2005) Laparoscopic surgery of the spleen. Surg Clin North Am 85:785–790CrossRef Uranues S, Alimoglu O (2005) Laparoscopic surgery of the spleen. Surg Clin North Am 85:785–790CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Gurusamy K, Junnarkar S, Farouk M, Davidson BR (2008) Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and effectiveness of day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 95:161–168CrossRefPubMed Gurusamy K, Junnarkar S, Farouk M, Davidson BR (2008) Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and effectiveness of day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 95:161–168CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Wattiez A, Cohen SB, Selvaggi L (2002) Laparoscopic hysterectomy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 14:417–422CrossRefPubMed Wattiez A, Cohen SB, Selvaggi L (2002) Laparoscopic hysterectomy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 14:417–422CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Giger UF, Michel JM, Opitz I, Th Inderbitzin D, Kocher T, Krahenbuhl L (2006) Risk factors for perioperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: analysis of 22,953 consecutive cases from the Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and thoracoscopic Surgery database. J Am Coll Surg 203:723–728CrossRefPubMed Giger UF, Michel JM, Opitz I, Th Inderbitzin D, Kocher T, Krahenbuhl L (2006) Risk factors for perioperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: analysis of 22,953 consecutive cases from the Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and thoracoscopic Surgery database. J Am Coll Surg 203:723–728CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Kalloo AN, Singh VK, Jagannath SB, Niiyama H, Hill SL, Vaughn CA, Magee CA, Kantsevoy SV (2004) Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity. Gastrointest Endosc 60:114–117CrossRefPubMed Kalloo AN, Singh VK, Jagannath SB, Niiyama H, Hill SL, Vaughn CA, Magee CA, Kantsevoy SV (2004) Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity. Gastrointest Endosc 60:114–117CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Bessler M, Stevens PD, Milone L, Parikh M, Fowler D (2007) Transvaginal laparoscopically assisted endoscopic cholecystectomy: a hybrid approach to natural orifice surgery. Gastrointest Endosc 66:1243–1245CrossRefPubMed Bessler M, Stevens PD, Milone L, Parikh M, Fowler D (2007) Transvaginal laparoscopically assisted endoscopic cholecystectomy: a hybrid approach to natural orifice surgery. Gastrointest Endosc 66:1243–1245CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Palanivelu C, Rajan PS, Rangaranjan M, Parthasarathi R, Senthilnathan P, Prasad M (2008) Transvaginal endoscopic appendectomy in humans: a unique approach to NOTES: world’s first report. Surg Endosc 22:1343–1347CrossRefPubMed Palanivelu C, Rajan PS, Rangaranjan M, Parthasarathi R, Senthilnathan P, Prasad M (2008) Transvaginal endoscopic appendectomy in humans: a unique approach to NOTES: world’s first report. Surg Endosc 22:1343–1347CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Willingham FF, Brugge WR (2007) Taking NOTES: translumenal flexible endoscopy and endoscopic surgery. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 23:550–555CrossRefPubMed Willingham FF, Brugge WR (2007) Taking NOTES: translumenal flexible endoscopy and endoscopic surgery. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 23:550–555CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Gumbs AA, Fowler D, Milone L, Evanko JC, Ude AO, Stevens P, Bessler M (2009) Transvaginal natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery cholecystectomy: early evolution of the technique. Ann Surg 249:908–912CrossRefPubMed Gumbs AA, Fowler D, Milone L, Evanko JC, Ude AO, Stevens P, Bessler M (2009) Transvaginal natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery cholecystectomy: early evolution of the technique. Ann Surg 249:908–912CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Yan SL, Thompson-Fawcett M (2009) NOTES: a new dimension of minimally invasive surgery. ANZ J Surg 79:583–602CrossRef Yan SL, Thompson-Fawcett M (2009) NOTES: a new dimension of minimally invasive surgery. ANZ J Surg 79:583–602CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Boni L, Dionigi G, Rovera F (2009) Natural orifices transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and other allied “ultra” minimally invasive procedures: are we loosing the plot? Surg Endosc 23:927–929CrossRefPubMed Boni L, Dionigi G, Rovera F (2009) Natural orifices transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and other allied “ultra” minimally invasive procedures: are we loosing the plot? Surg Endosc 23:927–929CrossRefPubMed
13.
14.
go back to reference Peterson CY, Ramamoorthy S, Andrews B, Horgan S, Talamini M, Chock A (2009) Women’s positive perception of transvaginal NOTES surgery. Surg Endosc 23:1770–1774CrossRefPubMed Peterson CY, Ramamoorthy S, Andrews B, Horgan S, Talamini M, Chock A (2009) Women’s positive perception of transvaginal NOTES surgery. Surg Endosc 23:1770–1774CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Swanstrom LL, Volckmann E, Hungness E, Soper NJ (2009) Patient attitudes and expectations regarding natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 23:1519–1525CrossRefPubMed Swanstrom LL, Volckmann E, Hungness E, Soper NJ (2009) Patient attitudes and expectations regarding natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 23:1519–1525CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Varadarajulu S, Tamhane A, Drelichman ER (2008) Patient perception of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery as a technique for cholecystectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 67:854–860CrossRefPubMed Varadarajulu S, Tamhane A, Drelichman ER (2008) Patient perception of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery as a technique for cholecystectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 67:854–860CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference El-Toukhy TA, Hefni MA, Davies AE, Mahadevan S (2004) The effect of different types of hysterectomy on urinary and sexual functions: a prospective study. J Obstet Gynaecol 24:420–425CrossRefPubMed El-Toukhy TA, Hefni MA, Davies AE, Mahadevan S (2004) The effect of different types of hysterectomy on urinary and sexual functions: a prospective study. J Obstet Gynaecol 24:420–425CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Dallenbach P, Kaelin-Gambirasio I, Jacob S, Dubuisson JB, Boulvain M (2008) Incidence rate and risk factors for vaginal vault prolapse after hysterectomy. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19:1623–1629CrossRefPubMed Dallenbach P, Kaelin-Gambirasio I, Jacob S, Dubuisson JB, Boulvain M (2008) Incidence rate and risk factors for vaginal vault prolapse after hysterectomy. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19:1623–1629CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Transvaginal natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): a survey of women’s views on a new technique
Authors
Andrew D. Strickland
Michael G. A. Norwood
Fariba Behnia-Willison
Santosh A. Olakkengil
Peter J. Hewett
Publication date
01-10-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 10/2010
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-0968-3

Other articles of this Issue 10/2010

Surgical Endoscopy 10/2010 Go to the issue