Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 8/2010

01-08-2010

Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial

Authors: Evangelos C. Tsimoyiannis, Konstantinos E. Tsimogiannis, George Pappas-Gogos, Charalampos Farantos, Nikolaos Benetatos, Paraskevi Mavridou, Adamantia Manataki

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 8/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The attempt to further reduce operative trauma in laparoscopic cholecystectomy has led to new techniques such as natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS). These new techniques are considered to be painless procedures, but no published studies investigate the possibility of different pain scores in these new techniques versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In this randomized control study, we investigated pain scores in SILS cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Patients and methods

Forty patients (34 women and 6 men) were randomly assigned to two groups. In group A (n = 20) four-port classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed. Patients in group B (n = 20) underwent SILS cholecystectomy. In all patients, preincisional local infiltration of ropivacaine around the trocar wounds was performed. Infusion of ropivacaine solution in the right subdiaphragmatic area at the beginning of the procedure plus normal saline infusion in the same area at the end of the procedure was performed in all patients as well. Shoulder tip and abdominal pain were registered at 2, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h postoperatively using visual analog scale (VAS).

Results

Significantly lower pain scores were observed in the SILS group versus the classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy group after the first 12 h for abdominal pain, and after the first 6 h for shoulder pain. Total pain after the first 24 h was nonexistent in the SILS group. Also, requests for analgesics were significantly less in the SILS group, while no difference was observed in incidence of nausea and vomiting between the two groups.

Conclusion

SILS cholecystectomy, as well as the invisible scar, has significantly lower abdominal and shoulder pain scores, especially after the first 24 h postoperatively, when this pain is nonexistent. (Registration Clinical Trial number: NTC00872287, www.​clinicaltrials.​gov).
Literature
1.
go back to reference Zorron R, Maggioni LC, Pombo L, Oliveira AL, Carvalho GL, Filgueiras M (2008) NOTES transvaginal cholecystectomy: preliminary clinical application. Surg Endosc 22:542–547CrossRefPubMed Zorron R, Maggioni LC, Pombo L, Oliveira AL, Carvalho GL, Filgueiras M (2008) NOTES transvaginal cholecystectomy: preliminary clinical application. Surg Endosc 22:542–547CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference McGee MF, Rosen MJ, Marks J, Onders RP, Chak A, Faulx A, Chen VK, Ponsky J (2006) A primer on natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: building a new paradigm. Surg Inn 13:86–93CrossRef McGee MF, Rosen MJ, Marks J, Onders RP, Chak A, Faulx A, Chen VK, Ponsky J (2006) A primer on natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: building a new paradigm. Surg Inn 13:86–93CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Rattner D, Kalloo A (2006) ASGE/SAGES working group on natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 20:329–333CrossRefPubMed Rattner D, Kalloo A (2006) ASGE/SAGES working group on natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 20:329–333CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Cuesta MA, Berends F, Veenhof AAFA (2008) The “invisible cholecystectomy”: a transumbilical laparoscopic operation without a scar. Surg Endosc 22:1211–1213CrossRefPubMed Cuesta MA, Berends F, Veenhof AAFA (2008) The “invisible cholecystectomy”: a transumbilical laparoscopic operation without a scar. Surg Endosc 22:1211–1213CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Tacchino R, Greco F, Matera D (2008) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: surgery without a visible scar. Surg Endosc 23:896–899CrossRefPubMed Tacchino R, Greco F, Matera D (2008) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: surgery without a visible scar. Surg Endosc 23:896–899CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Pappas-Gogos G, Tsimogiannis KE, Zikos N, Nikas K, Manataki A, Tsimoyiannis EC (2008) Preincisional and intraperitoneal ropivacaine plus normal saline infusion for postoperative pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized double-blind controlled trial. Surg Endosc 22:2036–2045CrossRefPubMed Pappas-Gogos G, Tsimogiannis KE, Zikos N, Nikas K, Manataki A, Tsimoyiannis EC (2008) Preincisional and intraperitoneal ropivacaine plus normal saline infusion for postoperative pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized double-blind controlled trial. Surg Endosc 22:2036–2045CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Tsimoyiannis EC, Siakas P, Tassis A, Lekkas ET, Tzourou H, Kambili M (1998) Intraperitoneal normal saline infusion for postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg 22:824–828CrossRefPubMed Tsimoyiannis EC, Siakas P, Tassis A, Lekkas ET, Tzourou H, Kambili M (1998) Intraperitoneal normal saline infusion for postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg 22:824–828CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Tsimoyiannis EC, Glantzounis G, Lekkas ET, Siakas P, Jabarin M, Tzourou H (1998) Intraperitoneal normal saline and bupivacaine infusion for reduction of postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 8:416–420CrossRef Tsimoyiannis EC, Glantzounis G, Lekkas ET, Siakas P, Jabarin M, Tzourou H (1998) Intraperitoneal normal saline and bupivacaine infusion for reduction of postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 8:416–420CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Leggett PL, Churchman-Winn R, Miller G (2000) Minimizing ports to improve laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 14:32–36CrossRefPubMed Leggett PL, Churchman-Winn R, Miller G (2000) Minimizing ports to improve laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 14:32–36CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Sarli S, Iusco D, Gobbi S, Porrini C, Ferro M, Roncoroni L (2003) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed with mini-instruments. Br J Surg 90:1345–1348CrossRefPubMed Sarli S, Iusco D, Gobbi S, Porrini C, Ferro M, Roncoroni L (2003) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed with mini-instruments. Br J Surg 90:1345–1348CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Papagiannopoulou P, Argiriadou H, Georgiou M, Papaziogas B, Sfyra E, Kanakoudis F (2003) Preincisional local infiltration of levobupivacaine vs ropivacaine for pain control after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 17:1961–1964CrossRefPubMed Papagiannopoulou P, Argiriadou H, Georgiou M, Papaziogas B, Sfyra E, Kanakoudis F (2003) Preincisional local infiltration of levobupivacaine vs ropivacaine for pain control after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 17:1961–1964CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Elfberg BA, Sjovall-Mjoberg S (2000) Intraperitoneal bupivacaine does not effectively reduce pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized, placebo-controlled and double blind study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 10:375–379 Elfberg BA, Sjovall-Mjoberg S (2000) Intraperitoneal bupivacaine does not effectively reduce pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized, placebo-controlled and double blind study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 10:375–379
13.
go back to reference Kucuk C, Kadiogullari N, Canoler O, Savli S (2007) A placebo-controlled comparison of bupivacaine and ropivacaine instillation for preventing postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Today 37:396–400CrossRefPubMed Kucuk C, Kadiogullari N, Canoler O, Savli S (2007) A placebo-controlled comparison of bupivacaine and ropivacaine instillation for preventing postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Today 37:396–400CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Kristiansen VB, Callesen T, Svend D, Kehlet H, Rosenberg J (1999) Multiregional local anesthetic infiltration during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients receiving prophylactic multimodal analgesia: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Anesth Analg 89:1017–1024CrossRefPubMed Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Kristiansen VB, Callesen T, Svend D, Kehlet H, Rosenberg J (1999) Multiregional local anesthetic infiltration during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients receiving prophylactic multimodal analgesia: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Anesth Analg 89:1017–1024CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Korell M, Schmaus F, Strowitzki T, Schneeweiss SG, Hepp H (1996) Pain intensity following laparoscopy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 6:375–379CrossRef Korell M, Schmaus F, Strowitzki T, Schneeweiss SG, Hepp H (1996) Pain intensity following laparoscopy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 6:375–379CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial
Authors
Evangelos C. Tsimoyiannis
Konstantinos E. Tsimogiannis
George Pappas-Gogos
Charalampos Farantos
Nikolaos Benetatos
Paraskevi Mavridou
Adamantia Manataki
Publication date
01-08-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 8/2010
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-0887-3

Other articles of this Issue 8/2010

Surgical Endoscopy 8/2010 Go to the issue