Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 12/2003

01-12-2003 | Original article

Preincisional local infiltration of levobupivacaine vs ropivacaine for pain control after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Authors: P. Papagiannopoulou, H. Argiriadou, M. Georgiou, B. Papaziogas, E. Sfyra, F. Kanakoudis

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 12/2003

Login to get access

Abstract

Background: Postoperative pain is less intense after laparoscopic surgery than after open surgery. However, patients may gain additional benefit from a preincisional local infiltration of anesthetic. The aim of this study was to compare the analgesic efficacy of two local anesthetics, ropivacaine and levobupivacaine, for tissue infiltration as a means of improving postoperative pain control after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Methods: Using a randomized, double-blind study design, 57 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I and II patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly assigned to receive local infiltration with 0.9% saline solution (Placebo group, n = 18), ropivacaine 1% (Rop group, n = 20), or levobupivacaine 0.5% (Lev group, n = 19). The local anesthetic was administered, prior to trocar placement, using the same technique and delivering the same volume (20 ml) for all three groups. The anesthetic technique was standardized for all groups. Postoperative pain was rated at 2 h, 4 h, and 24 h postoperatively by visual analogue scale (VAS) score. Cumulative analgesic consumption and adverse effects were also recorded. Data were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by a post hoc test.Results: The Lev and Rop groups did not differ significantly in their VAS scores at 2 h postoperatively, but the Lev group experienced significantly (p < 0.001) less pain than the Placebo and Rop groups at 4 h and 24 h postoperatively. The Rop group registered significantly lower VAS scores (p < 0.001) than the Placebo group at 4 h postoperatively. Additionally, the consumption of analgesics was significantly lower in the Lev group than in the Rop (p < 0.01) and Placebo (p < 0.001) groups, and patients in the Rop group consumed significantly less analgesics (p < 0.001) than the to patients in the Placebo group.Conclusion: Local tissue infiltration with levobupivacaine is more effective than ropivacaine in reducing the postoperative pain associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Aps, C, Reynolds, F 1978An intradermal study of the local anaesthetic and vascular effects of the isomers of bupivacaine.Br J Clin Pharmacol66368PubMed Aps, C, Reynolds, F 1978An intradermal study of the local anaesthetic and vascular effects of the isomers of bupivacaine.Br J Clin Pharmacol66368PubMed
2.
go back to reference Bay-Nielsen, M, Klarsov, B, Bech, K, Andersen, J, Kehlet, H 1999Levobupivacaine vs bupivacaine as infiltration anesthesia in inguinal herniorrhaphy.Br J Anaesth82280282PubMed Bay-Nielsen, M, Klarsov, B, Bech, K, Andersen, J, Kehlet, H 1999Levobupivacaine vs bupivacaine as infiltration anesthesia in inguinal herniorrhaphy.Br J Anaesth82280282PubMed
3.
go back to reference Bisgaard, T, Klarskov, B, Bjerregaard, K, et al. 1999Multi-regional local anesthetic infiltration during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients receiving prophylactic multi-modal analgesia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.Anesth Analg8910171024PubMed Bisgaard, T, Klarskov, B, Bjerregaard, K,  et al. 1999Multi-regional local anesthetic infiltration during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients receiving prophylactic multi-modal analgesia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.Anesth Analg8910171024PubMed
4.
go back to reference Goldstein, A, Grimault, P, Henique, A, Keller, M, Fortin, A, Darai, E 2000Preventing postoperative pain by local anesthetic instillation after laparoscopic gynecologic surgery: a placebo-controlled comparison of bupivacaine and ropivacaine.Anesth Analg91403407PubMed Goldstein, A, Grimault, P, Henique, A, Keller, M, Fortin, A, Darai, E 2000Preventing postoperative pain by local anesthetic instillation after laparoscopic gynecologic surgery: a placebo-controlled comparison of bupivacaine and ropivacaine.Anesth Analg91403407PubMed
5.
go back to reference Gristwood, RW 2002Cardiac and CNS toxicity of levobupivacaine: strengths of evidence for advantage over bupivacaine.Drug Saf25153163PubMed Gristwood, RW 2002Cardiac and CNS toxicity of levobupivacaine: strengths of evidence for advantage over bupivacaine.Drug Saf25153163PubMed
6.
go back to reference Johansson, B, Hallerback, B, Stubberod, A, Janbu, T, Edwin, B, Glise, H, Solhaug, JH 1997Preoperative local infiltration with ropivacaine for postoperative pain relief after inguinal hernia repair: a randomised controlled trial.Eur J Surg163371378PubMed Johansson, B, Hallerback, B, Stubberod, A, Janbu, T, Edwin, B, Glise, H, Solhaug, JH 1997Preoperative local infiltration with ropivacaine for postoperative pain relief after inguinal hernia repair: a randomised controlled trial.Eur J Surg163371378PubMed
7.
go back to reference Katz, JA, Bridenbaugh, PO, Knarr, DC, Helton, SH, Denson, DD 1990Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of epidural ropivacaine in humans.Anesth Analg701621PubMed Katz, JA, Bridenbaugh, PO, Knarr, DC, Helton, SH, Denson, DD 1990Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of epidural ropivacaine in humans.Anesth Analg701621PubMed
8.
go back to reference Labaille, T, Mazoit, JX, Paqueron, X, Franco, D, Benhamou, D 2002The clinical efficacy and pharmacokinetics of intraperitoneal ropivacaine for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Anesth Analg94100105PubMed Labaille, T, Mazoit, JX, Paqueron, X, Franco, D, Benhamou, D 2002The clinical efficacy and pharmacokinetics of intraperitoneal ropivacaine for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Anesth Analg94100105PubMed
9.
go back to reference Lewis, DL, Thompson, WAL 1953Reduction of postoperative pain.BMJ1973974PubMed Lewis, DL, Thompson, WAL 1953Reduction of postoperative pain.BMJ1973974PubMed
10.
go back to reference Maestroni, U, Sortini, D, Devito, C, et al. 2002A new method of preemptive analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Surg Endosc1613361340PubMed Maestroni, U, Sortini, D, Devito, C,  et al. 2002A new method of preemptive analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Surg Endosc1613361340PubMed
11.
go back to reference Mjåland, O, Ræder, J, Aasboe, V, et al. 1997Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Br J Surg84958961PubMed Mjåland, O, Ræder, J, Aasboe, V,  et al. 1997Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Br J Surg84958961PubMed
12.
go back to reference Papaziogas, B, Argiriadou, H, Papagiannopoulou, P, Pavlidis, T, Georgiou, M, Sfyra, E, Papaziogas, T 2001Preincisional intravenous low-dose ketamine and local infiltration with ropivacaine reduces postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Surg Endosc1510301033PubMed Papaziogas, B, Argiriadou, H, Papagiannopoulou, P, Pavlidis, T, Georgiou, M, Sfyra, E, Papaziogas, T 2001Preincisional intravenous low-dose ketamine and local infiltration with ropivacaine reduces postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Surg Endosc1510301033PubMed
13.
go back to reference Pettersson, N, Emanuelsson, BM, Pharm, M, Reventlid, H, Hahn, R 1998High-dose ropivacaine wound infiltration for pain relief after inguinal hernia repair.Reg Anesth Pain Med23189196PubMed Pettersson, N, Emanuelsson, BM, Pharm, M, Reventlid, H, Hahn, R 1998High-dose ropivacaine wound infiltration for pain relief after inguinal hernia repair.Reg Anesth Pain Med23189196PubMed
14.
go back to reference Sarac, AM, Aktan, AO, Baykan, N, Yegen, C, Yalin, R 1996The effect and timing of local anesthesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Surg Laparosc Endosc6362366CrossRefPubMed Sarac, AM, Aktan, AO, Baykan, N, Yegen, C, Yalin, R 1996The effect and timing of local anesthesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Surg Laparosc Endosc6362366CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Scott, DB, Lee, A, Fagan, D, Bowler, GMR, Bloomfield, P, Lundh, R 1989Acute toxicity of ropivacaine compared with that of bupivacaine.Anaesth Analg69563569 Scott, DB, Lee, A, Fagan, D, Bowler, GMR, Bloomfield, P, Lundh, R 1989Acute toxicity of ropivacaine compared with that of bupivacaine.Anaesth Analg69563569
16.
go back to reference Slim, K 2000Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Br J Surg871249 Slim, K 2000Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Br J Surg871249
17.
go back to reference Ure, BM, Troidl, H, Spangenberger, W, Neugebauer, E, Lefering, R, Ullmann, K, Bende, J 1993Preincisional local anesthesia with bupivacaine and pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a double-blind randomized clinical trial.Surg Endosc7482488PubMed Ure, BM, Troidl, H, Spangenberger, W, Neugebauer, E, Lefering, R, Ullmann, K, Bende, J 1993Preincisional local anesthesia with bupivacaine and pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a double-blind randomized clinical trial.Surg Endosc7482488PubMed
18.
go back to reference Ure, BM, Troidl, H, Spangenberger, W, Dietrich, A, Lefering, R, Neugebauer, E 1994Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: intensity and localization of pain and analysis of predictors in preoperative symptoms and intraoperative events.Surg Endosc89096PubMed Ure, BM, Troidl, H, Spangenberger, W, Dietrich, A, Lefering, R, Neugebauer, E 1994Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: intensity and localization of pain and analysis of predictors in preoperative symptoms and intraoperative events.Surg Endosc89096PubMed
19.
go back to reference Woolf, C, Chong, WS 1993Preemptive analgesia—treating postoperative pain by preventing the establishment of central sensitization.Anesth Analg77362379PubMed Woolf, C, Chong, WS 1993Preemptive analgesia—treating postoperative pain by preventing the establishment of central sensitization.Anesth Analg77362379PubMed
Metadata
Title
Preincisional local infiltration of levobupivacaine vs ropivacaine for pain control after laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Authors
P. Papagiannopoulou
H. Argiriadou
M. Georgiou
B. Papaziogas
E. Sfyra
F. Kanakoudis
Publication date
01-12-2003
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 12/2003
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002-9256-1

Other articles of this Issue 12/2003

Surgical Endoscopy 12/2003 Go to the issue