Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 6/2009

01-06-2009

Transgastric endoscopic peritoneoscopy does not require decontamination of the stomach in humans

Authors: Vimal K. Narula, Lynn C. Happel, Kevin Volt, Simon Bergman, Jason C. Roland, Rebecca Dettorre, David B. Renton, Kevin M. Reavis, Bradley J. Needleman, Dean J. Mikami, E. Christopher Ellison, W. Scott Melvin, Jeffrey W. Hazey

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 6/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is a rapidly evolving field that provides endoscopic access to the peritoneum via a natural orifice. One important requirement of this technique is the need to minimize the risk of clinically significant peritoneal contamination. We report the bacterial load and contamination of the peritoneal cavity in ten patients who underwent diagnostic transgastric endoscopic peritoneoscopy.

Methods

Patients participating in this trial were scheduled to undergo diagnostic laparoscopy for evaluation of presumed pancreatic cancer. Findings at diagnostic laparoscopy were compared with those of diagnostic transgastric endoscopic peritoneoscopy, using an orally placed gastroscope, blinding the endoscopist to the laparoscopic findings. We performed no gastric decontamination. Diagnostic findings, operative times, and clinical course were recorded. Gastroscope and peritoneal fluid aspirates were obtained prior to and after the gastrotomy. Each sample was sent for bacterial colony counts, culture, and identification of species.

Results

Ten patients, with an average age of 63.7 years, have completed the protocol. All patients underwent diagnostic laparoscopy followed by successful transgastric access and diagnostic peritoneoscopy. The average time for laparoscopy was 7.2 min, compared with 18 min for transgastric instrumentation. Bacterial sampling was obtained in all ten patients. The average number of colony-forming units (CFU) in the gastroscope aspirate was 132.1 CFU/ml, peritoneal aspirates prior to creation of a gastrotomy showed 160.4 CFU/ml, and peritoneal sampling after gastrotomy had an average of 642.1 CFU/ml. There was no contamination of the peritoneal cavity with species isolated from the gastroscope aspirate. No infectious complications or leaks were noted at 30-day follow-up.

Conclusions

There was no clinically significant contamination of the peritoneal cavity from the gastroscope after transgastric endoscopic instrumentation in humans. Transgastric instrumentation does contaminate the abdominal cavity but, the pathogens do not mount a clinically significant response in terms of either the species or the bacterial load.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kantsevoy SV, Hu B, Jagannath SB et al (2006) Transgastric endoscopic splenectomy: is it possible? Surg Endosc 20(3):522–525PubMedCrossRef Kantsevoy SV, Hu B, Jagannath SB et al (2006) Transgastric endoscopic splenectomy: is it possible? Surg Endosc 20(3):522–525PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kantsevoy SV, Jagannath SB, Niiyama H et al (2005) Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy with survival in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 62(2):287–292PubMedCrossRef Kantsevoy SV, Jagannath SB, Niiyama H et al (2005) Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy with survival in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 62(2):287–292PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bergstrom M, Ikeda K, Swain P et al (2006) Transgastric anastamosis by using flexible endoscopy in a porcine model (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 63(2):307–312PubMedCrossRef Bergstrom M, Ikeda K, Swain P et al (2006) Transgastric anastamosis by using flexible endoscopy in a porcine model (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 63(2):307–312PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Park PO, Bergstrom M, Ikeda K et al (2005) Experimental studies of transgastric gallbladder surgery: cholecystectomy and cholecystogastric anastomosis (videos). Gastrointest Endosc 61(4):601–606PubMedCrossRef Park PO, Bergstrom M, Ikeda K et al (2005) Experimental studies of transgastric gallbladder surgery: cholecystectomy and cholecystogastric anastomosis (videos). Gastrointest Endosc 61(4):601–606PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Wagh MS, Merrifield BF, Thompson CC (2006) Survival studies after endoscopic transgastric oophorectomy and tubectomy in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 63(3):473–478PubMedCrossRef Wagh MS, Merrifield BF, Thompson CC (2006) Survival studies after endoscopic transgastric oophorectomy and tubectomy in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 63(3):473–478PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Jagannath SB, Kantsevoy SV, Vaughn CA et al (2005) Peroral transgastric endoscopic ligation of fallopian tubes with long-term survival in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 61(3):449–453PubMedCrossRef Jagannath SB, Kantsevoy SV, Vaughn CA et al (2005) Peroral transgastric endoscopic ligation of fallopian tubes with long-term survival in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 61(3):449–453PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Rattner D, Kalloo A, ASGE/SAGES Working Group (2006) ASGE/SAGES working group on natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery, October 2005. Surg Endosc 20(2):329–233PubMedCrossRef Rattner D, Kalloo A, ASGE/SAGES Working Group (2006) ASGE/SAGES working group on natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery, October 2005. Surg Endosc 20(2):329–233PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hazey JH, Narula VK, Renton DB et al (2008) Natural-orifice transgastric endoscopic peritoneoscopy in humans: initial clinical trial. Surg Endosc 22(1):16–20PubMedCrossRef Hazey JH, Narula VK, Renton DB et al (2008) Natural-orifice transgastric endoscopic peritoneoscopy in humans: initial clinical trial. Surg Endosc 22(1):16–20PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Narula VK, Hazey JH, Renton DB et al (2008) Transgastric instrumentation and bacterial contamination of the peritoneal cavity. Surg Endosc 22(3):605–611PubMedCrossRef Narula VK, Hazey JH, Renton DB et al (2008) Transgastric instrumentation and bacterial contamination of the peritoneal cavity. Surg Endosc 22(3):605–611PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Williams MD, Champion JK (2004) Experience with routine intraabdominal cultures during laparoscopic gastric bypass with implications for antibiotic prophylaxis. Surg Endosc 18:755–756PubMedCrossRef Williams MD, Champion JK (2004) Experience with routine intraabdominal cultures during laparoscopic gastric bypass with implications for antibiotic prophylaxis. Surg Endosc 18:755–756PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Grant SW, Hopkins J, Wilson SE (1995) Operative site bacteriology as an indicator of postoperative infectious complications in elective colorectal surgery. Am Surg 61(10):856–861PubMed Grant SW, Hopkins J, Wilson SE (1995) Operative site bacteriology as an indicator of postoperative infectious complications in elective colorectal surgery. Am Surg 61(10):856–861PubMed
12.
go back to reference Bartlett JG, Condon RD, Gorbach SL et al (1978) VA cooperative study on bowel preparation from elective colorectal operations: impact of oral antibiotic regimen on colonic flora, wound irrigation cultures, and bacteriology of septic complications. Ann Surg 188:249–254PubMedCrossRef Bartlett JG, Condon RD, Gorbach SL et al (1978) VA cooperative study on bowel preparation from elective colorectal operations: impact of oral antibiotic regimen on colonic flora, wound irrigation cultures, and bacteriology of septic complications. Ann Surg 188:249–254PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Stone HH, Hooper CA, Kolb LD et al (1976) Antibiotic prophylaxis in gastric, biliary, and colonic surgery. Ann Surg 184(4):443–452PubMedCrossRef Stone HH, Hooper CA, Kolb LD et al (1976) Antibiotic prophylaxis in gastric, biliary, and colonic surgery. Ann Surg 184(4):443–452PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Tornqvist A, Forsgren A, Leandoer L et al (1987) Identification and antibiotic prophylaxis of high-risk patients in elective colorectal surgery. World J Surg 11:115–119PubMedCrossRef Tornqvist A, Forsgren A, Leandoer L et al (1987) Identification and antibiotic prophylaxis of high-risk patients in elective colorectal surgery. World J Surg 11:115–119PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Egipan P, Francolin P, Bille J et al (1999) Fluconazole prophylaxis prevents intraabdominal candidiasis in high-risk surgical patients. Crit Care Med 27:1066–1072CrossRef Egipan P, Francolin P, Bille J et al (1999) Fluconazole prophylaxis prevents intraabdominal candidiasis in high-risk surgical patients. Crit Care Med 27:1066–1072CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Transgastric endoscopic peritoneoscopy does not require decontamination of the stomach in humans
Authors
Vimal K. Narula
Lynn C. Happel
Kevin Volt
Simon Bergman
Jason C. Roland
Rebecca Dettorre
David B. Renton
Kevin M. Reavis
Bradley J. Needleman
Dean J. Mikami
E. Christopher Ellison
W. Scott Melvin
Jeffrey W. Hazey
Publication date
01-06-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 6/2009
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0161-0

Other articles of this Issue 6/2009

Surgical Endoscopy 6/2009 Go to the issue