Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 3/2008

01-03-2008

Transgastric instrumentation and bacterial contamination of the peritoneal cavity

Authors: Vimal K. Narula, Jeffrey W. Hazey, David B. Renton, Kevin M. Reavis, Christopher M. Paul, Kristen E. Hinshaw, Bradley J. Needleman, Dean J. Mikami, E. Christopher Ellison, W. Scott Melvin

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 3/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is a rapidly evolving technique providing access to the peritoneum utilizing an endoscope via a natural orifice. One of the most significant requirements of this technique is the need to minimize the risk of clinically significant peritoneal contamination. We report the bacterial load and contamination of the peritoneal cavity in patients requiring a gastrotomy Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LSRYGB).

Methods

We prospectively studied 50 patients undergoing a gastrotomy with creation of a gastrojejunostomy during LSRYGB. We recorded the patient’s proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) utilization preoperatively and sampled gastric contents without lavage. We also sampled peritoneal fluid prior to and after gastrotomy, noting the length of time the gastrotomy was open to the peritoneum. Each of the three samples was sent for bacterial colony counts, and culture with identification of species.

Results

Fifty patients underwent LSRYGB with a mean operative time of 93 min. The gastrotomy was open to the peritoneal cavity for an average of 18 min. Seventeen of 50 patients were on PPIs preoperatively, resulting in a significant difference in postgastrostomy peritoneal bacterial counts. The average number of colony-forming units (CFU) of the gastric aspirate was 22,303 CFU/ml. Peritoneal aspirates obtained for examination prior to creation of a gastrotomy showed no CFUs in 44 of 50 patients. Peritoneal sampling after gastrotomy showed contamination of the abdomen with an average of 1102 CFU/ml. There was no correlation between the bacterial load in the stomach and peritoneal load after gastrotomy. No infectious complications or leaks developed. One complication of rhabdomyolysis in a patient with no peritoneal bacterial contamination developed.

Conclusions

Transgastric instrumentation does contaminate the abdominal cavity but pathogens are clinically insignificant due to species or bacterial load. Patients on PPIs do have an increased bacterial load in the gastric aspirate, with no clinical significant infection.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kantsevoy SV, Hu B, Jagannath SB, et al. (2006) Transgastric endoscopic splenectomy: is it possible? Surg Endosc 20:522–525PubMedCrossRef Kantsevoy SV, Hu B, Jagannath SB, et al. (2006) Transgastric endoscopic splenectomy: is it possible? Surg Endosc 20:522–525PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kantsevoy SV, Jagannath SB, Niiyama H, et al. (2005) Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy with survival in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 62:287–292PubMedCrossRef Kantsevoy SV, Jagannath SB, Niiyama H, et al. (2005) Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy with survival in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 62:287–292PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Wagh MS, Merrifield BF, Thompson CC (2005) Endoscopic transgastric abdominal exploration and organ resection: initial experience in a porcine model. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 3:892–896PubMedCrossRef Wagh MS, Merrifield BF, Thompson CC (2005) Endoscopic transgastric abdominal exploration and organ resection: initial experience in a porcine model. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 3:892–896PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Park PO, Bergstrom M, Ikeda K, Fritscher-Ravens A, Swain P (2005) Experimental studies of transgastric gallbladder surgery: cholecystectomy and cholecystogastric anastomosis (videos). Gastrointest Endosc 61:601–606PubMedCrossRef Park PO, Bergstrom M, Ikeda K, Fritscher-Ravens A, Swain P (2005) Experimental studies of transgastric gallbladder surgery: cholecystectomy and cholecystogastric anastomosis (videos). Gastrointest Endosc 61:601–606PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Jagannath SB, Kantsevoy SV, Vaughn CA, et al. (2005) Peroral transgastric endoscopic ligation of fallopian tubes with long-term survival in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 61:449–453PubMedCrossRef Jagannath SB, Kantsevoy SV, Vaughn CA, et al. (2005) Peroral transgastric endoscopic ligation of fallopian tubes with long-term survival in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 61:449–453PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Wagh MS, Merrifield BF, Thompson CC (2006) Survival studies after endoscopic transgastric oophorectomy and tubectomy in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 63:473–8PubMedCrossRef Wagh MS, Merrifield BF, Thompson CC (2006) Survival studies after endoscopic transgastric oophorectomy and tubectomy in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 63:473–8PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Williams MD, Champion JK (2004) Experience with routine intraabdominal cultures during laparoscopic gastric bypass with implications for antibiotic prophylaxis. Surg Endosc 18:755–756PubMedCrossRef Williams MD, Champion JK (2004) Experience with routine intraabdominal cultures during laparoscopic gastric bypass with implications for antibiotic prophylaxis. Surg Endosc 18:755–756PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Grant SW, Hopkins J, Wilson SE (1995) Operative site bacteriology as an indicator of postoperative infectious complications in elective colorectal surgery. Am Surg 61(10):856–61PubMed Grant SW, Hopkins J, Wilson SE (1995) Operative site bacteriology as an indicator of postoperative infectious complications in elective colorectal surgery. Am Surg 61(10):856–61PubMed
9.
go back to reference Bartlett JG, Condon RD, Gorbach SL, et al. (1978) cooperative study on bowel preparation from elective colorectal operations: Impact of oral antibiotic regimen on colonic flora, wound irrigation cultures, and bacteriology of septic complications. Ann Surg 188:249–254PubMedCrossRef Bartlett JG, Condon RD, Gorbach SL, et al. (1978) cooperative study on bowel preparation from elective colorectal operations: Impact of oral antibiotic regimen on colonic flora, wound irrigation cultures, and bacteriology of septic complications. Ann Surg 188:249–254PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Stone HH, Hooper CA, Kolb LD, et al. (1976) Antibiotic prophylaxis in gastric, biliary, and colonic surgery. Ann Surg 184(4):443–52PubMedCrossRef Stone HH, Hooper CA, Kolb LD, et al. (1976) Antibiotic prophylaxis in gastric, biliary, and colonic surgery. Ann Surg 184(4):443–52PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Tornqvist A, Forsgren A, Leandoer L, et al. (1987) Identification and antibiotic prophylaxis of high-risk patients in elective colorectal surgery. World J Surg 11:115–19PubMedCrossRef Tornqvist A, Forsgren A, Leandoer L, et al. (1987) Identification and antibiotic prophylaxis of high-risk patients in elective colorectal surgery. World J Surg 11:115–19PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Egipan P, Francolin P, Bille J, et al. (1999) Fluconazole prophylaxis prevents intraabdominal candidiasis in high-risk surgical patients. Critical Care Med 27:1066–72CrossRef Egipan P, Francolin P, Bille J, et al. (1999) Fluconazole prophylaxis prevents intraabdominal candidiasis in high-risk surgical patients. Critical Care Med 27:1066–72CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Transgastric instrumentation and bacterial contamination of the peritoneal cavity
Authors
Vimal K. Narula
Jeffrey W. Hazey
David B. Renton
Kevin M. Reavis
Christopher M. Paul
Kristen E. Hinshaw
Bradley J. Needleman
Dean J. Mikami
E. Christopher Ellison
W. Scott Melvin
Publication date
01-03-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 3/2008
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9661-6

Other articles of this Issue 3/2008

Surgical Endoscopy 3/2008 Go to the issue