Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 3/2008

01-03-2008

Impact of a full-time preceptor on the institutional outcome of laparoscopic colectomy

Authors: Alessio Pigazzi, Casandra Anderson, Pablo Mojica-Manosa, David Smith, Kathrina Hernandez, I. Benjamin Paz, Joshua D. I. Ellenhorn

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 3/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic assisted colectomy (LAC) is a difficult operation with long learning curves and conversion rates inversely proportional to the surgeon’s experience. Methods to help train surgeons outside of residency or fellowship programs have been poorly analyzed. This study was undertaken to assess the impact of an experienced laparoscopic surgeon preceptor on the outcome of LAC in a single institution

Methods

In September 2004, a fellowship-trained laparoscopic surgeon joined our department of surgery. This surgeon served as a LAC preceptor for six inexperienced staff surgeons and four surgical oncology fellows. Clinical and pathologic data from all attempted LAC for the 22 months preceding the arrival of the trained laparoscopic surgeon were compared with those for the 18 months following the recruitment.

Results

Before the addition of the expert surgeon, 28 LAC were performed in our institution, compared with 63 during the preceptor program. These represented 59% and 95% of eligible operations for each time period, respectively (P = 0.005). Overall conversion rates before and after the preceptor’s arrival decreased from 44% to 14%, respectively (P < 0.05). The chances of conversion were strongly affected by the presence or absence of the preceptor in the operating room (7% vs. 30%, respectively, P = 0.003). Overall complication rates, hospital stay, blood loss, operative time and number of lymph nodes retrieved were not affected by the presence of the preceptor. Operations completed laparoscopically resulted in significantly lower blood loss and length of stay compared with converted ones.

Conclusions

A shared departmental preceptor can positively affect the institutional outcome of laparoscopic colectomy. This model may help improve training and patient care in inexperienced centers.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Pahlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy AM (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6(7):477–484PubMedCrossRef Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Pahlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy AM (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6(7):477–484PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taura P, Pique JM, Visa J (2002) Laparoscopically-assisted colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359(9325):2224–2229PubMedCrossRef Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taura P, Pique JM, Visa J (2002) Laparoscopically-assisted colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359(9325):2224–2229PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Weeks JC, Nelson H, Gelber S, Sargent D, Schroeder G (2002) Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs. open colectomy for colon cancer: A randomized trial. JAMA 287:321–328PubMedCrossRef Weeks JC, Nelson H, Gelber S, Sargent D, Schroeder G (2002) Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs. open colectomy for colon cancer: A randomized trial. JAMA 287:321–328PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Braga M, Frasson M, Vignali A, Zulani W, Civelli V, Di Carlo V (2005) Laparoscopic vs. open colectomy in cancer patients: Long-term complications, quality of life, and survival. Dis Colon Rectum 48:2217–2223PubMedCrossRef Braga M, Frasson M, Vignali A, Zulani W, Civelli V, Di Carlo V (2005) Laparoscopic vs. open colectomy in cancer patients: Long-term complications, quality of life, and survival. Dis Colon Rectum 48:2217–2223PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Clinical outcomes of surgical therapy study group of the laparoscopic colectomy trial (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Eng J Med 350(20):2050–2059CrossRef Clinical outcomes of surgical therapy study group of the laparoscopic colectomy trial (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Eng J Med 350(20):2050–2059CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Tekkis P, Senagore A, Delaney C, Fazio V (2005) Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: Comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections. Ann Surg 242(1):83–90PubMedCrossRef Tekkis P, Senagore A, Delaney C, Fazio V (2005) Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: Comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections. Ann Surg 242(1):83–90PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Larach SW, Pantakar SK, Ferrara A, Williamson PR, Perozo SE, Lord AS (1997) Complications of laparoscopic colorectal surgery: Analysis and comparison of early vs. latter experience. Dis Colon Rectum 40(5):592–596PubMedCrossRef Larach SW, Pantakar SK, Ferrara A, Williamson PR, Perozo SE, Lord AS (1997) Complications of laparoscopic colorectal surgery: Analysis and comparison of early vs. latter experience. Dis Colon Rectum 40(5):592–596PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Black M, Gould JC (2006) Measuring laparoscopic operative skill in a video trainer. Surg Endosc May 26 EPUB ahead of print Black M, Gould JC (2006) Measuring laparoscopic operative skill in a video trainer. Surg Endosc May 26 EPUB ahead of print
9.
go back to reference Seymour NE (2005) Integrating simulation into a busy residency program. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 14(4):280–286PubMedCrossRef Seymour NE (2005) Integrating simulation into a busy residency program. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 14(4):280–286PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Mehall JR, Fassler SA, Harper SG, Nejman JH, Zebley DM (2005) Comparing results of residents and attending surgeons to determine whether laparoscopic colectomy is safe. Am J Surg 189(6):738–741PubMedCrossRef Mehall JR, Fassler SA, Harper SG, Nejman JH, Zebley DM (2005) Comparing results of residents and attending surgeons to determine whether laparoscopic colectomy is safe. Am J Surg 189(6):738–741PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ballantyne GH, Kelly WE Jr (2002) Granting clinical privileges for telerobotic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12(1):17–25PubMedCrossRef Ballantyne GH, Kelly WE Jr (2002) Granting clinical privileges for telerobotic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12(1):17–25PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Park A, Witzke DB (2002) Training and educational approached to minimally invasive surgery: state of the art. Semin Laparosc Surg. 9(4):198–205PubMedCrossRef Park A, Witzke DB (2002) Training and educational approached to minimally invasive surgery: state of the art. Semin Laparosc Surg. 9(4):198–205PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Park A, Witzke D (2002) Ongoing deficits in resident training for minimally invasive surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 6(3):501–507PubMedCrossRef Park A, Witzke D (2002) Ongoing deficits in resident training for minimally invasive surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 6(3):501–507PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Nappas T, Jacobs D (2004) Laparoscopic resection for colon cancer-The end of the beginning? N Eng J Med 350(2):2091–2092CrossRef Nappas T, Jacobs D (2004) Laparoscopic resection for colon cancer-The end of the beginning? N Eng J Med 350(2):2091–2092CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Swanstrom L, Park A, Arregui M, Franklin M, Smith D, Blaney C (2006) Bringing order to the chaos: Developing a matching process for minimally invasive and gastrointestinal postgraduate fellowships. Ann Surg 243:431–435PubMedCrossRef Swanstrom L, Park A, Arregui M, Franklin M, Smith D, Blaney C (2006) Bringing order to the chaos: Developing a matching process for minimally invasive and gastrointestinal postgraduate fellowships. Ann Surg 243:431–435PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Dincler S, Koller M, Steurer J, Bachmann L, Christen D, Buchmann P (2003) Multidimensional analysis of learning curves in laparoscopic sigmoid resection: Eight-year results. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1371–1379PubMedCrossRef Dincler S, Koller M, Steurer J, Bachmann L, Christen D, Buchmann P (2003) Multidimensional analysis of learning curves in laparoscopic sigmoid resection: Eight-year results. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1371–1379PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ritchie W Jr, Rhodes R, Biester T (1999) Work loads and practice patterns of general surgeon in the United States 1995–1997: A report From the American Board of Surgery. Ann Surg 230(4):433–543CrossRef Ritchie W Jr, Rhodes R, Biester T (1999) Work loads and practice patterns of general surgeon in the United States 1995–1997: A report From the American Board of Surgery. Ann Surg 230(4):433–543CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Beck DE (1994) Colorectal operative experiences: Results of a survey. Dis Colon Rectum 37(9):905–908PubMedCrossRef Beck DE (1994) Colorectal operative experiences: Results of a survey. Dis Colon Rectum 37(9):905–908PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Prystowsky J (2005) Are young surgeons competent to perform alimentary tract surgery? Arch Surg 140:495–502PubMedCrossRef Prystowsky J (2005) Are young surgeons competent to perform alimentary tract surgery? Arch Surg 140:495–502PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference COLOR Study Group (2005) Impact of hospital case volume on short-term outcome after laparoscopic operation for colonic cancer. Surg Endosc 19:687–692CrossRef COLOR Study Group (2005) Impact of hospital case volume on short-term outcome after laparoscopic operation for colonic cancer. Surg Endosc 19:687–692CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP (2005) Conversion rates in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a predictive model with 1253 patients. Surg Endosc 19(1):47–54PubMedCrossRef Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP (2005) Conversion rates in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a predictive model with 1253 patients. Surg Endosc 19(1):47–54PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Moloo H, Mamazza J, Poulin EC, Burpee SE, Bendavid Ym Klein L, Gregoire R, Schlachta CM (2004) Laparoscopic resections for colorectal cancer: Does conversion survival? Surg Endosc 18(5):732–735PubMedCrossRef Moloo H, Mamazza J, Poulin EC, Burpee SE, Bendavid Ym Klein L, Gregoire R, Schlachta CM (2004) Laparoscopic resections for colorectal cancer: Does conversion survival? Surg Endosc 18(5):732–735PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Zmora O, Weiss EG (2001) Trocar site recurrence in laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Myth or real concern? Surg Oncol Clin N Am 10(3):625–638PubMed Zmora O, Weiss EG (2001) Trocar site recurrence in laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Myth or real concern? Surg Oncol Clin N Am 10(3):625–638PubMed
24.
go back to reference Marusch F, Gastinger I, Schneider C, Scheidbach H, Konradt J, Bruch HP, Köhler L, Bärlehner E, Köckerling F, LCSSG (2001) Importance of conversion for results obtained with laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 44:207–216PubMedCrossRef Marusch F, Gastinger I, Schneider C, Scheidbach H, Konradt J, Bruch HP, Köhler L, Bärlehner E, Köckerling F, LCSSG (2001) Importance of conversion for results obtained with laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 44:207–216PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Austin M, Feurer I, Holtzman M, Richards W, Pinson C, Herline A (2005) The impact of a laparoscopic colorectal surgeon on the laparoscopic colectomy experience of a single academic center. Surg Endosc 19:311–315PubMedCrossRef Austin M, Feurer I, Holtzman M, Richards W, Pinson C, Herline A (2005) The impact of a laparoscopic colorectal surgeon on the laparoscopic colectomy experience of a single academic center. Surg Endosc 19:311–315PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Impact of a full-time preceptor on the institutional outcome of laparoscopic colectomy
Authors
Alessio Pigazzi
Casandra Anderson
Pablo Mojica-Manosa
David Smith
Kathrina Hernandez
I. Benjamin Paz
Joshua D. I. Ellenhorn
Publication date
01-03-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 3/2008
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9425-3

Other articles of this Issue 3/2008

Surgical Endoscopy 3/2008 Go to the issue