Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 6/2008

01-06-2008

Risk of pancreatitis following endoscopically placed large-bore plastic biliary stents with and without biliary sphincterotomy for management of postoperative bile leaks

Authors: D. T. Simmons, B. T. Petersen, C. J. Gostout, M. J. Levy, M. D. Topazian, T. H. Baron

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 6/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Endoscopic transpapillary biliary stent placement is effective for closure of postoperative bile leaks. Large-bore stents (10 French) may transiently obstruct the adjacent pancreatic duct orifice causing acute pancreatitis. Endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy may reduce this risk, but it introduces separate risks of bleeding and perforation. The objective of this study was to compare complications after large-bore biliary stent placement (10 Fr) with and without sphincterotomy in patients with bile leaks.

Methods

The institutional endoscopy database was queried to identify patients who had undergone endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogrpahy (ERCP) for bile leak between March 1996 and August 2006. Procedural reports were reviewed for evidence of biliary sphincterotomy, cholangiographic and pancreatographic findings, transpapillary stent placement, and procedural complications. Patients with prior biliary sphincterotomy, choledochoenteric anastomosis, placement of multiple biliary stents and expandable metal biliary stents, biliary stents smaller than 10 Fr, and patients in whom a stent was not placed were excluded. The chi-square test was used for categorical variables. Probability ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

The rate of pancreatitis (all mild) after large-bore biliary stent placement was greater when sphincterotomy was not performed than when sphincterotomy and stent placement were both performed (13% versus 2.4%). This difference was not statistically significant. (χ2 = 3.41; p = 0.1). Bleeding was observed in one patient who underwent sphincterotomy and large-bore stent placement (2.4%). No perforations occurred in either group.

Conclusions

Although not statistically significant, there is a higher rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis after placement of large-bore biliary stents when sphincterotomy is not performed. The additional complications of biliary sphincterotomy did not offset the reduction in post-ERCP pancreatitis. When large-bore biliary stents are used in the treatment of bile leak, a biliary sphincterotomy may avoid pancreatitis. Randomized trials are needed to determine whether there is a significant difference in overall complication rate when large-bore stents are placed with and without biliary sphincterotomy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Adamsen S, Hansen OH, Funch-Jensen P, Schulze S, Stage JG, Wara P (1997) Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective nationwide series. J Am Coll Surg 184:571–578PubMed Adamsen S, Hansen OH, Funch-Jensen P, Schulze S, Stage JG, Wara P (1997) Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective nationwide series. J Am Coll Surg 184:571–578PubMed
2.
go back to reference Barthel JS (1996) Letters to the editor. Internal stents and postsurgical bile leaks Am J Gastroenterol 91:1469–1470PubMed Barthel JS (1996) Letters to the editor. Internal stents and postsurgical bile leaks Am J Gastroenterol 91:1469–1470PubMed
3.
go back to reference Bjorkman DJ, Carr-Locke DL, Lichtenstein DR, Ferrari AP, Slivka A, Van Dam J, Brooks DC (1995) Postsurgical bile leaks: endoscopic obliteration of the transpapillary pressure gradient is enough. Am J Gastroenterol 90:2128–2133PubMed Bjorkman DJ, Carr-Locke DL, Lichtenstein DR, Ferrari AP, Slivka A, Van Dam J, Brooks DC (1995) Postsurgical bile leaks: endoscopic obliteration of the transpapillary pressure gradient is enough. Am J Gastroenterol 90:2128–2133PubMed
4.
go back to reference Braghetto I, Bastias J, Csendes A, Debandi A (2000) Intraperitoneal bile collections after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: causes, clinical presentation, diagnosis and treatment. Surg Endosc 14:1037–1041PubMedCrossRef Braghetto I, Bastias J, Csendes A, Debandi A (2000) Intraperitoneal bile collections after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: causes, clinical presentation, diagnosis and treatment. Surg Endosc 14:1037–1041PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Brooks DC, Becker JM, Connors PJ, Carr-Locke DL (1993) Management of bile leaks following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 7:292–295PubMedCrossRef Brooks DC, Becker JM, Connors PJ, Carr-Locke DL (1993) Management of bile leaks following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 7:292–295PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Cheng CL, Sherman S, Watkins JL, Barnett J, Freeman M, Geenen J, Ryan M, Parker H, Frakes JT, Fogel EL, Silverman WB, Dua KS, Aliperti G, Yakshe P, Uzer M, Jones W, Goff J, Lazzell-Pannell L, Rashdan A, Temkit M, Lehman GA (2006) Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 101:139–147PubMedCrossRef Cheng CL, Sherman S, Watkins JL, Barnett J, Freeman M, Geenen J, Ryan M, Parker H, Frakes JT, Fogel EL, Silverman WB, Dua KS, Aliperti G, Yakshe P, Uzer M, Jones W, Goff J, Lazzell-Pannell L, Rashdan A, Temkit M, Lehman GA (2006) Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 101:139–147PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, Geenen JE, Russell RC, Meyers WC, Liguory C, Nickl N (1991) Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 37:383–393PubMed Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, Geenen JE, Russell RC, Meyers WC, Liguory C, Nickl N (1991) Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 37:383–393PubMed
8.
go back to reference Cox MR, Wilson TG, Luck AJ, Jeans PL, Padbury RTA, Toouli J (2001) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute inflammation of the gallbladder. Ann Surg 218:630–634CrossRef Cox MR, Wilson TG, Luck AJ, Jeans PL, Padbury RTA, Toouli J (2001) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute inflammation of the gallbladder. Ann Surg 218:630–634CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Freeman ML, Douglas BN, Sherman S, Haber GB, Herman ME, Dorsher PJ, Moore JP, Fennerty MB, Ryan ME, Shaw MJ, Lande JD, Pheley AM (1996) Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 335:909–918PubMedCrossRef Freeman ML, Douglas BN, Sherman S, Haber GB, Herman ME, Dorsher PJ, Moore JP, Fennerty MB, Ryan ME, Shaw MJ, Lande JD, Pheley AM (1996) Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 335:909–918PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hanazaki K, Sodeyama H, Sode Y, Miyazawa M, Yokoyama S, Wakabayashi M, Kawamura N, Ohtsuka M, Miyzzaki T, Matsuda Y (1998) Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage for bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 11:1123–1125CrossRef Hanazaki K, Sodeyama H, Sode Y, Miyazawa M, Yokoyama S, Wakabayashi M, Kawamura N, Ohtsuka M, Miyzzaki T, Matsuda Y (1998) Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage for bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 11:1123–1125CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kadakia SC, Starnes E (1992) Comparison of 10 French gauge stent with 11.5 French gauge stent in patients with biliary tract diseases. Gastrointest Endosc 38:454–459PubMed Kadakia SC, Starnes E (1992) Comparison of 10 French gauge stent with 11.5 French gauge stent in patients with biliary tract diseases. Gastrointest Endosc 38:454–459PubMed
12.
go back to reference Kaffes AJ, Hourigan L, De Luca N, Byth K, Williams SJ, Bourke MJ (2005) Impact of endoscopic intervention in 100 patients with suspected postcholecystectomy bile leak. Gastrointest Endosc 61:269–275PubMedCrossRef Kaffes AJ, Hourigan L, De Luca N, Byth K, Williams SJ, Bourke MJ (2005) Impact of endoscopic intervention in 100 patients with suspected postcholecystectomy bile leak. Gastrointest Endosc 61:269–275PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kozarek R, Gannan R, Baerg R, Wagonfeld J, Ball T (1992) Bile leak after laparoscopic cholecsytectomy. Diagnostic and therapeutic application of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Arch Intern Med 152:1040–1043PubMedCrossRef Kozarek R, Gannan R, Baerg R, Wagonfeld J, Ball T (1992) Bile leak after laparoscopic cholecsytectomy. Diagnostic and therapeutic application of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Arch Intern Med 152:1040–1043PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference MacFadyen BV Jr, Vecchio R, Ricardo AE, Mathis CR (1998) Bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy—the United States experience. Surg Endosc 12:315–321PubMedCrossRef MacFadyen BV Jr, Vecchio R, Ricardo AE, Mathis CR (1998) Bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy—the United States experience. Surg Endosc 12:315–321PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Marks JM, Ponsky JL, Shillingstad RB, Singh J (1998) Biliary stenting is more effective than sphincterotomy in the resolution of biliary leaks. Surg Endosc 12:327–330PubMedCrossRef Marks JM, Ponsky JL, Shillingstad RB, Singh J (1998) Biliary stenting is more effective than sphincterotomy in the resolution of biliary leaks. Surg Endosc 12:327–330PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Marvrogiannis C, Liatsos C, Papanikolaou IS, Karagiannis S, Galanis P, Romanos A (2006) Biliary stenting alone versus biliary stenting plus sphincterotomy for the treatment of post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy biliary leaks: a prospective randomized study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 18:405–409CrossRef Marvrogiannis C, Liatsos C, Papanikolaou IS, Karagiannis S, Galanis P, Romanos A (2006) Biliary stenting alone versus biliary stenting plus sphincterotomy for the treatment of post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy biliary leaks: a prospective randomized study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 18:405–409CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Navez B. Mutter D. Russier Y, Vix M, Jameli F, Lipski D, Cambier E, Guiot P, Lery J, Marescaux J (2001) Safety of laparoscopic approach for acute cholecystitis: retrospective study of 600 cases. World J Surg 25:1352–1356CrossRef Navez B. Mutter D. Russier Y, Vix M, Jameli F, Lipski D, Cambier E, Guiot P, Lery J, Marescaux J (2001) Safety of laparoscopic approach for acute cholecystitis: retrospective study of 600 cases. World J Surg 25:1352–1356CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Shamiyeh A, Wayand W (2004) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: early and late complications and their treatment. Langenbecks Arch Surg 389:164–171PubMedCrossRef Shamiyeh A, Wayand W (2004) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: early and late complications and their treatment. Langenbecks Arch Surg 389:164–171PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Speer AG, Cotton PB, MacRae KD (1988) Endoscopic management of malignant biliary obstruction: stents of 10 French are preferable to stents of 8 French gauge. Gastrointest Endosc 34:412–417PubMed Speer AG, Cotton PB, MacRae KD (1988) Endoscopic management of malignant biliary obstruction: stents of 10 French are preferable to stents of 8 French gauge. Gastrointest Endosc 34:412–417PubMed
20.
go back to reference Suter M, Meyer A (2001) A 10-year experience with the use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Surg Endosc 15:1187–1192PubMedCrossRef Suter M, Meyer A (2001) A 10-year experience with the use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Surg Endosc 15:1187–1192PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Tarnasky PR, Cunningham JT, Hawes RH, Hoffman BJ, Uflacker R, Vujic I, Cotton PB (1996) Transpapillary stenting of proximal biliary strictures: does biliary sphincterotomy reduce the risk of postprocedure pancreatitis? Gastrointest Endosc 43:399 Tarnasky PR, Cunningham JT, Hawes RH, Hoffman BJ, Uflacker R, Vujic I, Cotton PB (1996) Transpapillary stenting of proximal biliary strictures: does biliary sphincterotomy reduce the risk of postprocedure pancreatitis? Gastrointest Endosc 43:399
Metadata
Title
Risk of pancreatitis following endoscopically placed large-bore plastic biliary stents with and without biliary sphincterotomy for management of postoperative bile leaks
Authors
D. T. Simmons
B. T. Petersen
C. J. Gostout
M. J. Levy
M. D. Topazian
T. H. Baron
Publication date
01-06-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 6/2008
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9643-8

Other articles of this Issue 6/2008

Surgical Endoscopy 6/2008 Go to the issue