Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 4/2007

01-04-2007

Tissue ingrowth and bowel adhesion formation in an animal comparative study: polypropylene versus Proceed versus Parietex Composite

Authors: B. P. Jacob, N. J. Hogle, E. Durak, T. Kim, D. L. Fowler

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 4/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The optimal prosthesis for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair would combine excellent parietal surface tissue ingrowth with minimal visceral surface adhesiveness. Currently, few data are available from randomized trials comparing the commercially available prostheses.

Methods

In a pig model designed to incite adhesions, three 10 × 15-cm pieces of mesh (Proceed, Parietex Composite [PCO], and polypropylene [PPM]) were randomly positioned intraperitoneally in each of 10 animals using sutures and tack fixation. After a 28-day survival, the amount of shrinkage, the area and peel strength of visceral adhesions, the peak peel strength, the work required to separate mesh from the abdominal wall, and a coefficient representing the adhesiveness of tissue ingrowth were averaged for each type of mesh and then compared with the averages for the other prostheses. The histologic appearance of each prosthesis was documented.

Results

Proceed had more shrinkage (99.6 cm2) than PCO (105.8 cm2) or PPM (112 cm2), although the difference was not statistically significant. The mean area of adhesions to PCO (11%) was significantly less than for Proceed (48%; p < 0.008) or PPM (46%; p < 0.008). Adhesion peel strength was significantly less for PCO (5.9 N) than for Proceed (12.1 N; p < 0.02) or PPM (12.9 N; p < 0.02). According to a filmy-to-dense scale of 1 to 5, adhesions were more filmy with PCO (1.7) than with PPM (2.9) or Proceed (3.7) (p < 0.007). Peak peel strength from the abdominal wall was significantly higher for PCO (17.2 N) than for Proceed (10.7 N) or PPM (10 N; p < 0.002). The histology of each prosthesis showed a neoperitoneum only with PCO.

Conclusions

With less shrinkage, fewer and less dense adhesions to the viscera, and significantly stronger abdominal wall adherence and tissue ingrowth at 28 days in this animal study, PCO was superior to both Proceed and PPM in all categories. Furthermore, PCO demonstrated all the favorable qualities needed in an optimal prosthesis for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair, including the rapid development of a neoperitoneum.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ammaturo C, Bassi G (2004) Surgical treatment of large incisional hernias with an intraperitoneal Parietex Composite mesh: our preliminary experience on 26 cases. Hernia 8: 242–246PubMedCrossRef Ammaturo C, Bassi G (2004) Surgical treatment of large incisional hernias with an intraperitoneal Parietex Composite mesh: our preliminary experience on 26 cases. Hernia 8: 242–246PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Borrazzo EC, Belmont MF, Boffa D, Fowler DL (2004) Effect of prosthetic material on adhesion formation after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair in a porcine model. Hernia 8: 108–112PubMedCrossRef Borrazzo EC, Belmont MF, Boffa D, Fowler DL (2004) Effect of prosthetic material on adhesion formation after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair in a porcine model. Hernia 8: 108–112PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Chelala E, Gaede F, Douillez V, Dessily M, Alle JL (2003) The suturing concept for laparoscopic mesh fixation in ventral and incisional hernias: preliminary results. Hernia 7: 191–196PubMed Chelala E, Gaede F, Douillez V, Dessily M, Alle JL (2003) The suturing concept for laparoscopic mesh fixation in ventral and incisional hernias: preliminary results. Hernia 7: 191–196PubMed
4.
go back to reference Duffy AJ, Hogle NJ, LaPerle KM, Fowler DL (2004) Comparison of two composite meshes using two fixation devices in a porcine laparoscopic ventral hernia repair model. Hernia 8: 358–364PubMedCrossRef Duffy AJ, Hogle NJ, LaPerle KM, Fowler DL (2004) Comparison of two composite meshes using two fixation devices in a porcine laparoscopic ventral hernia repair model. Hernia 8: 358–364PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Gonzalez R, Rodeheaver GT, Moody DL, Foresman PA, Ramshaw BJ (2004) Resistance to adhesion formation: a comparative study of treated and untreated mesh products placed in the abdominal cavity. Hernia 8: 213–219PubMedCrossRef Gonzalez R, Rodeheaver GT, Moody DL, Foresman PA, Ramshaw BJ (2004) Resistance to adhesion formation: a comparative study of treated and untreated mesh products placed in the abdominal cavity. Hernia 8: 213–219PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Heniford BT, Park A, Ramshaw BJ, Voeller G (2000) Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair in 407 patients. J Am College Surg 190: 645–650CrossRef Heniford BT, Park A, Ramshaw BJ, Voeller G (2000) Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair in 407 patients. J Am College Surg 190: 645–650CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Heniford BT, Park A, Ramshaw BJ, Voeller G (2003) Laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias: nine years’ experience with 850 consecutive hernias. Ann Surg 238: 391–399, discussion 399–400PubMed Heniford BT, Park A, Ramshaw BJ, Voeller G (2003) Laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias: nine years’ experience with 850 consecutive hernias. Ann Surg 238: 391–399, discussion 399–400PubMed
8.
go back to reference LeBlanc KA, Booth WV, Whitaker JM, Bellanger DE (2001) Laparoscopic incisional and ventral herniorraphy: our initial 100 patients. Hernia 5: 41–45PubMedCrossRef LeBlanc KA, Booth WV, Whitaker JM, Bellanger DE (2001) Laparoscopic incisional and ventral herniorraphy: our initial 100 patients. Hernia 5: 41–45PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference McGinty JJ, Hogle NJ, McCarthy H, Fowler DL (2005) A comparative study of adhesion formation and abdominal wall ingrowth after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair in a porcine model using multiple types of mesh. Surg Endosc 19: 786–790PubMedCrossRef McGinty JJ, Hogle NJ, McCarthy H, Fowler DL (2005) A comparative study of adhesion formation and abdominal wall ingrowth after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair in a porcine model using multiple types of mesh. Surg Endosc 19: 786–790PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Tissue ingrowth and bowel adhesion formation in an animal comparative study: polypropylene versus Proceed versus Parietex Composite
Authors
B. P. Jacob
N. J. Hogle
E. Durak
T. Kim
D. L. Fowler
Publication date
01-04-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 4/2007
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-9157-9

Other articles of this Issue 4/2007

Surgical Endoscopy 4/2007 Go to the issue