Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 7/2007

01-07-2007

Performance and ergonomic characteristics of expert surgeons using a face-mounted display during virtual reality–simulated laparoscopic surgery: an electromyographically based study

Authors: D. W. Lin, R. W. Bush, D. B. Earle, N. E. Seymour

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 7/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Display positions for laparoscopy in current operating rooms may not be optimal for surgeon comfort or task performance, and face-mounted displays (FMDs) have been forwarded as a potential ergonomic solution. Little is known concerning expert use characteristics of these devices that might help define their role in future surgical care. The authors report the performance and ergonomic characterization of an FMD using virtual reality simulation technology to recreate the surgical environment.

Methods

An FMD was studied in short- and long-duration trials of validated virtual reality–simulated surgical tasks. For the short-duration phase 7, expert surgeons were familiarized with a task on a conventional monitor, then returned on two separate occasions to repeat the task with the FMD while digital photos were taken during task performance and at the end in a standardized fashion. For the long-duration phase 5, expert surgeons performed two separate trials with repetitive groups of validated tasks for a minimum of 30 min while electromyelogram and performance data were measured. Photos of their gaze angle during and at the end of the trial were taken.

Results

All the participants consistently assumed a gaze angle slightly below horizontal during task performance. Performance scores on the FMD did not differ from those obtained with a conventional display, and remained stable with repetitive task performance. No participant had electromyelogram signals that exceeded the established thresholds for fatigue, but some had values within the threshold range.

Conclusion

The natural gaze angle during simulated surgery was consistently a bit below horizontal during rigorous virtual reality–simulated tasks. Performance was not compromised during expert surgeons’ use of an FMD, nor did muscle fatigue characteristics arise under these conditions. The findings suggest that these devices may represent a viable alternative to conventional displays for minimally invasive surgery, but definition of specific roles requires further investigation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Berguer R, Forkey DL, Smith WD (1999) Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 13: 466–468PubMedCrossRef Berguer R, Forkey DL, Smith WD (1999) Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 13: 466–468PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Christensen H (1986) Muscle activity and fatigue in the shoulder muscles during repetitive work: an electromyographic study. Eur J Appl Physiol 54: 596–601CrossRef Christensen H (1986) Muscle activity and fatigue in the shoulder muscles during repetitive work: an electromyographic study. Eur J Appl Physiol 54: 596–601CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hanna GB, Shimi SM, Cuschieri A (1998) Task performance in endoscopic surgery is influenced by location of the image display. Ann Surg 227: 481–484PubMedCrossRef Hanna GB, Shimi SM, Cuschieri A (1998) Task performance in endoscopic surgery is influenced by location of the image display. Ann Surg 227: 481–484PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Jonsson B (1978) Quantitative electromyographic evaluation of muscular load during work. Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl 6: 69–74PubMed Jonsson B (1978) Quantitative electromyographic evaluation of muscular load during work. Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl 6: 69–74PubMed
5.
go back to reference Maithel SK, Villegas L, Stylopoulos N, Dawson S, Jones DB (2005) Simulated laparoscopy using a head-mounted display vs traditional video monitor: an assessment of performance and muscle fatigue. Surg Endosc 19: 406–411PubMedCrossRef Maithel SK, Villegas L, Stylopoulos N, Dawson S, Jones DB (2005) Simulated laparoscopy using a head-mounted display vs traditional video monitor: an assessment of performance and muscle fatigue. Surg Endosc 19: 406–411PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Minnich DJ, Schell SR (2003) Evaluation of face-mounted binocular video display for laparoscopy: outcomes of psychometric skills testing and surgeon satisfaction. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 13: 333–338PubMedCrossRef Minnich DJ, Schell SR (2003) Evaluation of face-mounted binocular video display for laparoscopy: outcomes of psychometric skills testing and surgeon satisfaction. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 13: 333–338PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, O’Brien MK, Andersen DK, Satava RM (2002) Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 236: 458–463PubMedCrossRef Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, O’Brien MK, Andersen DK, Satava RM (2002) Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 236: 458–463PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Performance and ergonomic characteristics of expert surgeons using a face-mounted display during virtual reality–simulated laparoscopic surgery: an electromyographically based study
Authors
D. W. Lin
R. W. Bush
D. B. Earle
N. E. Seymour
Publication date
01-07-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 7/2007
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-9063-1

Other articles of this Issue 7/2007

Surgical Endoscopy 7/2007 Go to the issue