Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Dysphagia 3/2009

01-09-2009 | Original Article

Answering Orientation Questions and Following Single-Step Verbal Commands: Effect on Aspiration Status

Authors: Steven B. Leder, Debra M. Suiter, Heather Lisitano Warner

Published in: Dysphagia | Issue 3/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

In the acute-care setting patients with altered mental status as a result of such diverse etiologies as stroke, traumatic brain injury, degenerative neurologic impairments, dementia, or alcohol/drug abuse are routinely referred for dysphagia testing. A protocol for dysphagia testing was developed that began with verbal stimuli to determine patient orientation status and ability to follow single-step verbal commands. Although unknown, it would be beneficial to ascertain if this information on mental status was predictive of aspiration risk. The purpose of this investigation was to determine if there was a difference in odds for aspiration based upon correctly answering specific orientation questions, i.e., 1. What is your name? 2. Where are you right now? and 3. What year is it?, and following specific single-step verbal commands, i.e., 1. Open your mouth. 2. Stick out your tongue. and 3. Smile. In a consecutive retrospective manner data from 4070 referred patients accrued between 1 December 1999 and 1 January 2007 were analyzed. The odds of liquid aspiration were 31% greater for patients not oriented to person, place, and time (odds ratio [OR] = 1.305, 95% CI = 1.134–1.501). The odds of liquid aspiration (OR = 1.566, 95% CI = 1.307–1.876), puree aspiration (OR = 1.484, 95% CI = 1.202–1.831), and being deemed unsafe for any oral intake (OR = 1.688, 95% CI = 1.387–2.054) were, respectively, 57, 48, and 69% greater for patients unable to follow single-step verbal commands. Being able to answer orientation questions and follow single-step verbal commands provides information on odds of aspiration for liquid and puree food consistencies as well as overall eating status prior to dysphagia testing. Knowledge of potential increased odds of aspiration allows for individualization of dysphagia testing thereby optimizing swallowing success.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sackett DL. Evidence based research: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ. 1996;312:71–2.PubMed Sackett DL. Evidence based research: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ. 1996;312:71–2.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Barer DH. The natural history and functional consequences of dysphagia after hemispheric stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1989;52:236–41.PubMedCrossRef Barer DH. The natural history and functional consequences of dysphagia after hemispheric stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1989;52:236–41.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Martin BJ, Curlew MM. The incidence of communication disorders in dysphagic patients. J Speech Hear Disord. 1990;55:28–32.PubMed Martin BJ, Curlew MM. The incidence of communication disorders in dysphagic patients. J Speech Hear Disord. 1990;55:28–32.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Stanczak DE, White JG, Gouview WD, Moehle KA, Daniel M, Novack T, et al. Assessment of level of consciousness following severe neurological insult. J Neurosurg. 1984;60:955–60.PubMedCrossRef Stanczak DE, White JG, Gouview WD, Moehle KA, Daniel M, Novack T, et al. Assessment of level of consciousness following severe neurological insult. J Neurosurg. 1984;60:955–60.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kelly AM, Drinnan MJ, Leslie P. Assessing penetration and aspiration: how do videofluorosocpy and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing compare? Laryngoscope. 2007;117:1723–7.PubMedCrossRef Kelly AM, Drinnan MJ, Leslie P. Assessing penetration and aspiration: how do videofluorosocpy and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing compare? Laryngoscope. 2007;117:1723–7.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Langmore SE, Schatz K, Olsen N. Endoscopic and videofluoroscopic evaluations of swallowing and aspiration. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1991;100:678–81.PubMed Langmore SE, Schatz K, Olsen N. Endoscopic and videofluoroscopic evaluations of swallowing and aspiration. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1991;100:678–81.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Leder SB, Ross DA, Briskin KB, Sasaki CT. A prospective, double-blind, randomized study on the use of topical anesthetic, vasoconstrictor, and placebo during transnasal flexible fiberoptic endoscopy. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997;40:1352–7.PubMed Leder SB, Ross DA, Briskin KB, Sasaki CT. A prospective, double-blind, randomized study on the use of topical anesthetic, vasoconstrictor, and placebo during transnasal flexible fiberoptic endoscopy. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997;40:1352–7.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Logemann JA. Evaluation and treatment of swallowing disorders. 2nd ed. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; 1998. Logemann JA. Evaluation and treatment of swallowing disorders. 2nd ed. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; 1998.
15.
go back to reference Fleiss JL, Statistical methods for rates and proportions, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1981, Section 5.6. Fleiss JL, Statistical methods for rates and proportions, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1981, Section 5.6.
17.
Metadata
Title
Answering Orientation Questions and Following Single-Step Verbal Commands: Effect on Aspiration Status
Authors
Steven B. Leder
Debra M. Suiter
Heather Lisitano Warner
Publication date
01-09-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Dysphagia / Issue 3/2009
Print ISSN: 0179-051X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0460
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-008-9204-x

Other articles of this Issue 3/2009

Dysphagia 3/2009 Go to the issue