Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 11/2022

Open Access 07-12-2021 | Colorectal Cancer | Original Article – Clinical Oncology

Quality of life, distress, and posttraumatic growth 5 years after colorectal cancer diagnosis according to history of inpatient rehabilitation

Authors: Sophie Scherer-Trame, Lina Jansen, Lena Koch-Gallenkamp, Volker Arndt, Jenny Chang-Claude, Michael Hoffmeister, Hermann Brenner

Published in: Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology | Issue 11/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

In Germany, almost every other colorectal cancer (CRC) patient undergoes inpatient cancer rehabilitation (ICR), but research on long-term outcomes is sparse. We aimed to assess health-related quality of life (HRQOL), distress, and posttraumatic growth among former rehabilitants and non-rehabilitants as well as respective differences and to estimate disease-related quality of life deficits in both groups.

Methods

HRQOL (EORTC-QLQ-C30/CR29), distress (QSC-R10), and posttraumatic growth (PTGI) were assessed according to past ICR in patients 5-year post-CRC-diagnosis in the German DACHS study. Least square mean differences in HRQOL scores and elevated distress levels (QSC-R10 > 14 points) by ICR were estimated by confounder-adjusted linear and logistic regression, respectively. Differences in PTGI scales were tested for statistical significance. EORTC-QLQ-C30 reference scores from population controls were accessed from the LinDE study to estimate disease-related deficits in both treatment groups.

Results

49% of the included 1906 CRC survivors had undergone ICR. Rehabilitants reported lower HRQOL scores than non-rehabilitants in several dimensions of the EORTC-QLQ-C30/CR29. Differences were pronounced among younger survivors (< 70 years). In younger survivors, past ICR also predicted elevated distress. However, rehabilitants showed higher posttraumatic growth. When compared to 934 population controls, non-rehabilitants and older rehabilitants reported HRQOL scores (EORTC-QLQ-C30) similar to controls except higher levels of bowel dysfunctions, whereas younger rehabilitants experienced deficits regarding most scales (13/15).

Conclusion

Our findings suggest a high disease burden 5 years after diagnosis in particular among younger CRC survivors who had undergone ICR. Observed HRQOL deficits are possibly linked to the initial indication for ICR and rehabilitants may benefit from effective follow-up concepts after ICR.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference Allgayer H, Dietrich CF, Rohde W et al (2005) Prospective comparison of short-and long-term effects of pelvic floor exercise/biofeedback training in patients with fecal incontinence after surgery plus irradiation versus surgery alone for colorectal cancer: clinical, functional and endoscopic/endosonographic findings. Scand J Gastroenterol 40:1168–1175. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365520510023477CrossRefPubMed Allgayer H, Dietrich CF, Rohde W et al (2005) Prospective comparison of short-and long-term effects of pelvic floor exercise/biofeedback training in patients with fecal incontinence after surgery plus irradiation versus surgery alone for colorectal cancer: clinical, functional and endoscopic/endosonographic findings. Scand J Gastroenterol 40:1168–1175. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1080/​0036552051002347​7CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Allgayer H, Owen RW, Nair J et al (2008) Short-term moderate exercise programs reduce oxidative DNA damage as determined by high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry in patients with colorectal carcinoma following primary treatment. Scand J Gastroenterol 43:971–978. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365520701766111CrossRefPubMed Allgayer H, Owen RW, Nair J et al (2008) Short-term moderate exercise programs reduce oxidative DNA damage as determined by high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry in patients with colorectal carcinoma following primary treatment. Scand J Gastroenterol 43:971–978. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1080/​0036552070176611​1CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Allgayer H, Ignee A, Zipse S et al (2012) Endorectal ultrasound and real-time elastography in patients with fecal incontinence following anorectal surgery: a prospective comparison evaluating short- and long-term outcomes in irradiated and non-irradiated patients. Z Gastroenterol 50:1281–1286. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1313000CrossRefPubMed Allgayer H, Ignee A, Zipse S et al (2012) Endorectal ultrasound and real-time elastography in patients with fecal incontinence following anorectal surgery: a prospective comparison evaluating short- and long-term outcomes in irradiated and non-irradiated patients. Z Gastroenterol 50:1281–1286. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1055/​s-0032-1313000CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Biskup M, Uhlemann T, Gärtner, (1994) Veränderungen körperlicher Beschwerden und Belastungen von Tumorpatienten nach stationärer onkologischer Rehabilitation [Changes in physical complaints and stress in tumour patients after inpatient oncological rehabilitation]. Prax Klin Verhaltensmed Rehabiltation 28:219–229 (German) Biskup M, Uhlemann T, Gärtner, (1994) Veränderungen körperlicher Beschwerden und Belastungen von Tumorpatienten nach stationärer onkologischer Rehabilitation [Changes in physical complaints and stress in tumour patients after inpatient oncological rehabilitation]. Prax Klin Verhaltensmed Rehabiltation 28:219–229 (German)
go back to reference Deck R, Babaev V, Katalinic A (2019) Gründe für die Nichtinanspruchnahme einer onkologischen Rehabilitation. Ergebnisse einer schriftlichen Befragung von Patienten aus onkologischen Versorgungszentren [Reasons for the Non-Utilisation of an Oncological Rehabilitation. Results of a Written Survey with Patients of Oncological Healthcare Centers]. Rehabilitation 58:243–252. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0642-1411 (German)CrossRefPubMed Deck R, Babaev V, Katalinic A (2019) Gründe für die Nichtinanspruchnahme einer onkologischen Rehabilitation. Ergebnisse einer schriftlichen Befragung von Patienten aus onkologischen Versorgungszentren [Reasons for the Non-Utilisation of an Oncological Rehabilitation. Results of a Written Survey with Patients of Oncological Healthcare Centers]. Rehabilitation 58:243–252. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1055/​a-0642-1411 (German)CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Fayers P, Aaronson NK, Bjordal K et al (2001) EORTC QLQ–C30 scoring manual, 3rd edn. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels Fayers P, Aaronson NK, Bjordal K et al (2001) EORTC QLQ–C30 scoring manual, 3rd edn. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels
go back to reference Klocker J, Klocker-Kaiser U, Pipam W et al (2018) Langzeitverbesserung der biopsychosozialen Situation onkologischer Patienten durch 3-wöchige stationäre onkologische Rehabilitation [Long-term improvement of the bio-psycho-social state of cancer patients after 3 weeks of inpatient oncological rehabilitation: a long-term study at the Humanomed Zentrum Althofen]. Wien Med Wochenschr 168:350–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10354-018-0619-1.GermanCrossRefPubMed Klocker J, Klocker-Kaiser U, Pipam W et al (2018) Langzeitverbesserung der biopsychosozialen Situation onkologischer Patienten durch 3-wöchige stationäre onkologische Rehabilitation [Long-term improvement of the bio-psycho-social state of cancer patients after 3 weeks of inpatient oncological rehabilitation: a long-term study at the Humanomed Zentrum Althofen]. Wien Med Wochenschr 168:350–360. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10354-018-0619-1.​GermanCrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Quality of life, distress, and posttraumatic growth 5 years after colorectal cancer diagnosis according to history of inpatient rehabilitation
Authors
Sophie Scherer-Trame
Lina Jansen
Lena Koch-Gallenkamp
Volker Arndt
Jenny Chang-Claude
Michael Hoffmeister
Hermann Brenner
Publication date
07-12-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology / Issue 11/2022
Print ISSN: 0171-5216
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1335
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-021-03865-3

Other articles of this Issue 11/2022

Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 11/2022 Go to the issue