Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 5/2005

01-05-2005 | Letter to the Editors

Reply concerning “Clinical evaluation of in vitro chemosensitivity testing: the example of uveal melanoma” by Terheyden et al. (2004)

Authors: P. Terheyden, E.-B. Bröcker, J. C. Becker

Published in: Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology | Issue 5/2005

Login to get access

Excerpt

We are very grateful for the critical and valuable discussion of our paper by Ian Cree and colleagues, even if their letter partially lacks the appropriate style of scientific discussions. Cree et al. mainly judge our trial from the laboratory point of view, which is justified in some aspects, but does not necessarily reflect the clinical situation. It is actually surprising that Cree and colleagues became upset when we tested their suggestion that “treosulfan and gemcitabine might be more active than other drugs” and observed rather discouraging clinical efficacy. …
Literature
go back to reference Avril MF, Aamdal S, Grob JJ, et al (2004) Fotemustine compared with dacarbazine in patients with disseminated malignant melanoma: a phase III study. J Clin Oncol 22:1118–1125 Avril MF, Aamdal S, Grob JJ, et al (2004) Fotemustine compared with dacarbazine in patients with disseminated malignant melanoma: a phase III study. J Clin Oncol 22:1118–1125
go back to reference Eskelin S, Pyrhönen S, Hahka-Kemppinen M, Tuomaala S (2003) A prognostic model and staging for metastatic uveal melanoma. Cancer 97:465–475CrossRefPubMed Eskelin S, Pyrhönen S, Hahka-Kemppinen M, Tuomaala S (2003) A prognostic model and staging for metastatic uveal melanoma. Cancer 97:465–475CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Flaherty LE, Liu PY, Unger J, Sondak VK (1997) Comparison of patient characteristics and outcome between a single-institution phase II trial and a cooperative-group phase II trial with identical eligibility in metastatic melanoma. Am J Clin Oncol 20:600–604 Flaherty LE, Liu PY, Unger J, Sondak VK (1997) Comparison of patient characteristics and outcome between a single-institution phase II trial and a cooperative-group phase II trial with identical eligibility in metastatic melanoma. Am J Clin Oncol 20:600–604
go back to reference Pföhler C, Cree IA, Ugurel S, Kuwert C, et al (2003) Treosulfan and gemcitabine in metastatic uveal melanoma patients: results of a multicenter feasibility study. Anticancer Drugs 14:337–340CrossRefPubMed Pföhler C, Cree IA, Ugurel S, Kuwert C, et al (2003) Treosulfan and gemcitabine in metastatic uveal melanoma patients: results of a multicenter feasibility study. Anticancer Drugs 14:337–340CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Serrone L, Zeuli M, Sega FM, Cognetti F (2000) Dacarbacine-based chemotherapy for metastatic melanoma: thirty-year experience overview. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 19:21–34 Serrone L, Zeuli M, Sega FM, Cognetti F (2000) Dacarbacine-based chemotherapy for metastatic melanoma: thirty-year experience overview. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 19:21–34
Metadata
Title
Reply concerning “Clinical evaluation of in vitro chemosensitivity testing: the example of uveal melanoma” by Terheyden et al. (2004)
Authors
P. Terheyden
E.-B. Bröcker
J. C. Becker
Publication date
01-05-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology / Issue 5/2005
Print ISSN: 0171-5216
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1335
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-004-0631-2

Other articles of this Issue 5/2005

Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 5/2005 Go to the issue