Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Pediatrics 3/2017

01-03-2017 | Original Article

Dwell times and risk of non-elective removal of 1-French peripherally inserted central catheters according to catheter tip position in very preterm infants

Authors: Daniela M Erhard, Sarah Nguyen, Katelyn J Guy, Dan M Casalaz, Kai König

Published in: European Journal of Pediatrics | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

We investigated dwell times and risk of non-elective removal of 975 single-lumen 1-French peripherally inserted central catheters (1FR-PICC) according to tip position in a cohort of very preterm infants with a mean (SD) gestational age of 27+6 (2+1) weeks and a mean (SD) birth weight of 988 (294) g over an eight-year period. Infants with a 1FR-PICC inserted for continuous infusion of intravenous fluids within the first 30 days of life were eligible. Dwell times of PICC with elective versus non-elective removal, risk of non-elective removal of PICC according to tip position, and differences between upper versus lower limb catheter insertion were analysed. 33.8% PICC were removed non-electively. Median (IQR) dwell time was 193 (142–287) versus 154 (102–260) h for elective versus non-elective removal (p < 0.001). Non-elective removal was more common for lower limb insertion sites: 41 versus 31% (p = 0.002). PICC were significantly more likely to be removed non-electively when located in the axillary (odds ratio (OR) 2.08), cephalic (OR 8.93), external iliac (OR 4.99), and femoral (OR 10.31) vein.
Conclusion: In this cohort, dwell times of 1FR-PICC lines removed non-electively were similar to 1.9- or 2.0FR-PICC. PICC tips positioned in the axillary, cephalic, external iliac, and femoral veins had a higher risk of non-elective removal.
What is Known:
•Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) are widely used in neonatal intensive care.
•Previous studies focused on 2-French PICC and newborns of all gestational ages.
What is New:
•Dwell times of 1-French PICC removed non-electively were similar to 2-French PICC.
•1-French PICC tips positioned more peripherally had a higher risk of non-elective removal.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Colacchio K, Deng Y, Northrup V, Bizzarro MJ (2013) Complications associated with central and non-central venous catheters in a neonatal intensive care unit. J Perinatol 32:941–946CrossRef Colacchio K, Deng Y, Northrup V, Bizzarro MJ (2013) Complications associated with central and non-central venous catheters in a neonatal intensive care unit. J Perinatol 32:941–946CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Costa P, Bueno M, Aparecida Alves AM, Kimura AF (2013) Incidence of nonelective removal of percutaneously inserted central catheters according to tip position in neonates. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 42:348–356CrossRefPubMed Costa P, Bueno M, Aparecida Alves AM, Kimura AF (2013) Incidence of nonelective removal of percutaneously inserted central catheters according to tip position in neonates. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 42:348–356CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Greenberg RG, Cochran KM, Smith PB et al (2015) Effect of catheter dwell time on risk of central line-associated bloodstream infection in infants. Pediatrics 136:1080–1086CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Greenberg RG, Cochran KM, Smith PB et al (2015) Effect of catheter dwell time on risk of central line-associated bloodstream infection in infants. Pediatrics 136:1080–1086CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Hoang V, Sills J, Chandler M, Busalani E, Clifton-Koeppel R, Modanlou HD (2008) Percutaneously inserted central catheter for total parenteral nutrition in neonates: complications rates related to upper versus lower extremity insertion. Pediatrics 121:e1152–e1159CrossRefPubMed Hoang V, Sills J, Chandler M, Busalani E, Clifton-Koeppel R, Modanlou HD (2008) Percutaneously inserted central catheter for total parenteral nutrition in neonates: complications rates related to upper versus lower extremity insertion. Pediatrics 121:e1152–e1159CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Isemann B, Sorrels R, Akinbi H (2015) Effect of heparin and other factors associated with complications of peripherally inserted central venous catheters in neonates. J Perinatol 32:856–860CrossRef Isemann B, Sorrels R, Akinbi H (2015) Effect of heparin and other factors associated with complications of peripherally inserted central venous catheters in neonates. J Perinatol 32:856–860CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Jain A, Deshpande P, Shah P (2013) Peripherally inserted central catheter tip position and risk of associated complications in neonates. J Perinatol 33:307–312CrossRefPubMed Jain A, Deshpande P, Shah P (2013) Peripherally inserted central catheter tip position and risk of associated complications in neonates. J Perinatol 33:307–312CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Wrightson DD (2013) Peripherally inserted central catheter complications in neonates with upper versus lower extremity insertion sites. Adv Neonatal Care 13:198–204CrossRefPubMed Wrightson DD (2013) Peripherally inserted central catheter complications in neonates with upper versus lower extremity insertion sites. Adv Neonatal Care 13:198–204CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Dwell times and risk of non-elective removal of 1-French peripherally inserted central catheters according to catheter tip position in very preterm infants
Authors
Daniela M Erhard
Sarah Nguyen
Katelyn J Guy
Dan M Casalaz
Kai König
Publication date
01-03-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Pediatrics / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0340-6199
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1076
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-017-2854-7

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

European Journal of Pediatrics 3/2017 Go to the issue