Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Pediatrics 12/2010

01-12-2010 | Original Paper

Interdisciplinary approach to design, performance, and quality management in a multicenter newborn hearing screening project

Discussion of the results of newborn hearing screening in Hamburg (Part II)

Authors: Anna-Katharina Rohlfs, Thomas Wiesner, Holger Drews, Frank Müller, Achim Breitfuß, Regina Schiller, Markus Hess

Published in: European Journal of Pediatrics | Issue 12/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Previously presented results of the newborn hearing screening in Hamburg and the perspectives are subsequently discussed. Minimum standards referring a participation of 95% of the neonates and a fail rate of less than 4% hearing-impaired children at the primary screening are fulfilled in Hamburg. Systematic screening of newborn hearing by an interdisciplinary approach provides early identification and intervention for children with permanent unilateral and bilateral hearing loss. But a newborn hearing screening on a voluntary basis alone cannot be maintained in the long run. Further, an anonymous data collection is not sufficient in regard to an uninterrupted tracking of conspicuous and unscreened neonates. A lost-to-follow-up rate of 31.3% at primary screening in Hamburg is much too high and emphasizes the need for a public health approach to a population-based newborn hearing screening with an elaborate and name-based tracking system. The legislation and implementation of a nationwide newborn hearing screening program in Germany and the association of German newborn hearing screening centers are highlighting long efforts of hearing professionals. But the implementation of a newborn hearing screening only makes sense if there exists an efficient tracking system. Sad to say, we are still a long way from the implementation of such a tracking system.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Rohlfs AK, Wiesner T, Drews H et al Interdisciplinary approach to design, performance and quality management in a multicentre newborn hearing screening project. Introduction, methods and results of the newborn hearing screening in Hamburg Rohlfs AK, Wiesner T, Drews H et al Interdisciplinary approach to design, performance and quality management in a multicentre newborn hearing screening project. Introduction, methods and results of the newborn hearing screening in Hamburg
3.
go back to reference Anonymous (1995) Joint Committee on Infant Hearing 1994 Position Statement. American Academy of Pediatrics Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. Pediatr 95:152–156 Anonymous (1995) Joint Committee on Infant Hearing 1994 Position Statement. American Academy of Pediatrics Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. Pediatr 95:152–156
4.
go back to reference Bamford J, Uus K, Davis A (2005) Screening for hearing loss in childhood: issues, evidence and current approaches in the UK. J Med Screen 12:119–124CrossRefPubMed Bamford J, Uus K, Davis A (2005) Screening for hearing loss in childhood: issues, evidence and current approaches in the UK. J Med Screen 12:119–124CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Bess FH, Dodd-Murphy J, Parker RA (1998) Children with minimal sensorineural hearing loss: prevalence, educational performance, and functional status. Ear Hear 19:339–354CrossRefPubMed Bess FH, Dodd-Murphy J, Parker RA (1998) Children with minimal sensorineural hearing loss: prevalence, educational performance, and functional status. Ear Hear 19:339–354CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Bess FH, Tharpe AM (1986) Case history data on unilaterally hearing-impaired children. Ear Hear 7:14–19CrossRefPubMed Bess FH, Tharpe AM (1986) Case history data on unilaterally hearing-impaired children. Ear Hear 7:14–19CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Bess FH, Tharpe AM (1986) An introduction to unilateral sensorineural hearing loss in children. Ear Hear 7:3–13CrossRefPubMed Bess FH, Tharpe AM (1986) An introduction to unilateral sensorineural hearing loss in children. Ear Hear 7:3–13CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Bess FH, Tharpe AM, Gibler AM (1986) Auditory performance of children with unilateral sensorineural hearing impairment. Ear Hear 7:20–26CrossRefPubMed Bess FH, Tharpe AM, Gibler AM (1986) Auditory performance of children with unilateral sensorineural hearing impairment. Ear Hear 7:20–26CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Böttcher P, Gramß M, Euler HA et al (2009) Cost analysis of a universal newborn hearing screening for clinics using the State of Hesse as an example. HNO 57:21–28CrossRefPubMed Böttcher P, Gramß M, Euler HA et al (2009) Cost analysis of a universal newborn hearing screening for clinics using the State of Hesse as an example. HNO 57:21–28CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Bretschneider J, Maier H, Hess M et al (2001) Use and results of universal newborn hearing screening with ALGO portable device. Laryngorhinootol 80(7):357–364CrossRef Bretschneider J, Maier H, Hess M et al (2001) Use and results of universal newborn hearing screening with ALGO portable device. Laryngorhinootol 80(7):357–364CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Cao-Nguyen MH, Kos MI, Guyot JP (2007) Benefits and costs of universal hearing screening programme. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 71(10):1591–1595CrossRefPubMed Cao-Nguyen MH, Kos MI, Guyot JP (2007) Benefits and costs of universal hearing screening programme. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 71(10):1591–1595CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Clarke P, Iqbal M, Mitchell S (2003) A comparison of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions and automated auditory brainstem responses for pre-discharge neonatal hearing screening. Int J Audiol 42:443–447CrossRefPubMed Clarke P, Iqbal M, Mitchell S (2003) A comparison of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions and automated auditory brainstem responses for pre-discharge neonatal hearing screening. Int J Audiol 42:443–447CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Dalzell L, Orlando M, MacDonald M et al (2000) The New York State universal newborn hearing screening demonstration project: ages of hearing loss identification, hearing aid fitting, and enrollment in early intervention. Ear Hear 21:118–130CrossRefPubMed Dalzell L, Orlando M, MacDonald M et al (2000) The New York State universal newborn hearing screening demonstration project: ages of hearing loss identification, hearing aid fitting, and enrollment in early intervention. Ear Hear 21:118–130CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Dalzell LE, Orlando MS, Seeger C (1996) 3-Stage newborn hearing screening reduces failures at discharge. Poster at American Academy of Audiology, Salt Lake City Dalzell LE, Orlando MS, Seeger C (1996) 3-Stage newborn hearing screening reduces failures at discharge. Poster at American Academy of Audiology, Salt Lake City
19.
go back to reference Davis A, Hind S (2003) The newborn hearing screening programme in England. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 67(Suppl 1):S193–S196CrossRefPubMed Davis A, Hind S (2003) The newborn hearing screening programme in England. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 67(Suppl 1):S193–S196CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Delb W, Merkel D, Pilorget K et al (2004) Effectiveness of a TEOAE-based screening program. Can a patient-tracking system effectively be organized using modern information technology and central data management? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 261:191–196CrossRefPubMed Delb W, Merkel D, Pilorget K et al (2004) Effectiveness of a TEOAE-based screening program. Can a patient-tracking system effectively be organized using modern information technology and central data management? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 261:191–196CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Dettman SJ, Pinder D, Briggs RJ et al (2007) Communication development in children who receive the cochlear implant younger than 12 months: risks versus benefits. Ear Hear 28(2 Suppl):11S–18SCrossRefPubMed Dettman SJ, Pinder D, Briggs RJ et al (2007) Communication development in children who receive the cochlear implant younger than 12 months: risks versus benefits. Ear Hear 28(2 Suppl):11S–18SCrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Erenberg A, Lemons J, Sia C et al (1999) Newborn and infant hearing loss: detection and intervention. American Academy of Pediatrics. Task Force on Newborn and Infant Hearing, 1998–1999. Pediatr 103:527–530CrossRef Erenberg A, Lemons J, Sia C et al (1999) Newborn and infant hearing loss: detection and intervention. American Academy of Pediatrics. Task Force on Newborn and Infant Hearing, 1998–1999. Pediatr 103:527–530CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Finckh-Krämer U, Spormann-Lagodzinski M, Gross M (2000) German registry for hearing loss in children: results after 4 years. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 56:113–127CrossRefPubMed Finckh-Krämer U, Spormann-Lagodzinski M, Gross M (2000) German registry for hearing loss in children: results after 4 years. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 56:113–127CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Finckh-Krämer U, Spormann-Lagodzinski M, Nubel K et al (1998) Is diagnosis of persistent pediatric hearing loss still made too late? HNO 46:598–602CrossRefPubMed Finckh-Krämer U, Spormann-Lagodzinski M, Nubel K et al (1998) Is diagnosis of persistent pediatric hearing loss still made too late? HNO 46:598–602CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Fortnum H, Davis A (1997) Epidemiology of permanent childhood hearing impairment in Trent Region, 1985–1993. Br J Audiol 31:409–446PubMed Fortnum H, Davis A (1997) Epidemiology of permanent childhood hearing impairment in Trent Region, 1985–1993. Br J Audiol 31:409–446PubMed
27.
go back to reference Foulon I, Naessens A, Foulon W et al (2008) A 10-year prospective study of sensorineural hearing loss in children with congenital cytomegalovirus infection. J Pediatr 153(1):84–88CrossRefPubMed Foulon I, Naessens A, Foulon W et al (2008) A 10-year prospective study of sensorineural hearing loss in children with congenital cytomegalovirus infection. J Pediatr 153(1):84–88CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Fowler KB, Boppana SB (2006) Congenital cytomegalovirus infection and hearing deficit. J Clin Virol 35:226–231CrossRefPubMed Fowler KB, Boppana SB (2006) Congenital cytomegalovirus infection and hearing deficit. J Clin Virol 35:226–231CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Fowler KB, McCollister FP, Dahle AJ et al (1997) Progressive and fluctuating sensorineural hearing loss in children with asymptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection. J Pediatr 130:624–630CrossRefPubMed Fowler KB, McCollister FP, Dahle AJ et al (1997) Progressive and fluctuating sensorineural hearing loss in children with asymptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection. J Pediatr 130:624–630CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Govaerts PJ, Yperman M, De Ceulaer G et al (2001) A two-stage bipodal screening model for universal neonatal hearing screening. Otol Neurotol 22:850–854CrossRefPubMed Govaerts PJ, Yperman M, De Ceulaer G et al (2001) A two-stage bipodal screening model for universal neonatal hearing screening. Otol Neurotol 22:850–854CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Gross M, Finckh-Krämer U, Spormann-Lagodzinski M (2000) Congenital hearing disorders in children. 1: Acquired hearing disorders. HNO 48:879–886CrossRefPubMed Gross M, Finckh-Krämer U, Spormann-Lagodzinski M (2000) Congenital hearing disorders in children. 1: Acquired hearing disorders. HNO 48:879–886CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Hall JW 3rd, Smith SD, Popelka GR (2004) Newborn hearing screening with combined otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem responses. J Am Acad Audiol 15:414–425CrossRefPubMed Hall JW 3rd, Smith SD, Popelka GR (2004) Newborn hearing screening with combined otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem responses. J Am Acad Audiol 15:414–425CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Harrison M, Roush J (1996) Age of suspicion, identification, and intervention for infants and young children with hearing loss: a national study. Ear Hear 17:55–62CrossRefPubMed Harrison M, Roush J (1996) Age of suspicion, identification, and intervention for infants and young children with hearing loss: a national study. Ear Hear 17:55–62CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Heinemann M, Bohnert A (2000) Hearing screening in newborn infants. Comparative studies and cost analysis with different instruments. Laryngorhinootol 79(8):453–458CrossRef Heinemann M, Bohnert A (2000) Hearing screening in newborn infants. Comparative studies and cost analysis with different instruments. Laryngorhinootol 79(8):453–458CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Hergils L (2007) Analysis of measurements from the first Swedish universal neonatal hearing screening program. Int J Audiol 46:680–685CrossRefPubMed Hergils L (2007) Analysis of measurements from the first Swedish universal neonatal hearing screening program. Int J Audiol 46:680–685CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Iwasaki S, Hayashi Y, Seki A et al (2003) A model of two-stage newborn hearing screening with automated auditory brainstem response. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 67:1099–1104CrossRefPubMed Iwasaki S, Hayashi Y, Seki A et al (2003) A model of two-stage newborn hearing screening with automated auditory brainstem response. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 67:1099–1104CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Johnson JL, Kuntz NL, Sia CC et al (1997) Newborn hearing screening in Hawaii. Hawaii Med J 56:352–355PubMed Johnson JL, Kuntz NL, Sia CC et al (1997) Newborn hearing screening in Hawaii. Hawaii Med J 56:352–355PubMed
41.
go back to reference Joint Committee on Infant Hearing, American Academy of Audiology, American Academy of Pediatrics et al (2000) Year 2000 position statement: principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Joint Committee on Infant Hearing, American Academy of Audiology, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, and Directors of Speech and Hearing Programs in State Health and Welfare Agencies. Pediatr 106:798–817CrossRef Joint Committee on Infant Hearing, American Academy of Audiology, American Academy of Pediatrics et al (2000) Year 2000 position statement: principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Joint Committee on Infant Hearing, American Academy of Audiology, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, and Directors of Speech and Hearing Programs in State Health and Welfare Agencies. Pediatr 106:798–817CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Kiese-Himmel C, Kruse E (2001) Unilateral hearing loss in childhood. An empirical analysis comparing bilateral hearing loss. Laryngorhinootol 80:18–22CrossRef Kiese-Himmel C, Kruse E (2001) Unilateral hearing loss in childhood. An empirical analysis comparing bilateral hearing loss. Laryngorhinootol 80:18–22CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Lesinski-Schiedat A, Illg A, Warnecke A et al (2006) Paediatric cochlear implantation in the first year of life: preliminary results. HNO 54:565–572CrossRefPubMed Lesinski-Schiedat A, Illg A, Warnecke A et al (2006) Paediatric cochlear implantation in the first year of life: preliminary results. HNO 54:565–572CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Lin HC, Shu MT, Lee KS et al (2005) Comparison of hearing screening programs between one step with transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and two steps with TEOAE and automated auditory brainstem response. Laryngoscope 115:1957–1962CrossRefPubMed Lin HC, Shu MT, Lee KS et al (2005) Comparison of hearing screening programs between one step with transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and two steps with TEOAE and automated auditory brainstem response. Laryngoscope 115:1957–1962CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Magnuson M, Hergils L (1999) The parents’ view on hearing screening in newborns. Feelings, thoughts and opinions on otoacoustic emissions screening. Scand Audiol 28:47–56CrossRefPubMed Magnuson M, Hergils L (1999) The parents’ view on hearing screening in newborns. Feelings, thoughts and opinions on otoacoustic emissions screening. Scand Audiol 28:47–56CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference Maxon AB, White KR, Behrens TR et al (1995) Referral rates and cost efficiency in a universal newborn hearing screening program using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. J Am Acad Audiol 6:271–277PubMed Maxon AB, White KR, Behrens TR et al (1995) Referral rates and cost efficiency in a universal newborn hearing screening program using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. J Am Acad Audiol 6:271–277PubMed
49.
go back to reference Mehl AL, Thomson V (2002) The Colorado newborn hearing screening project, 1992–1999: on the threshold of effective population-based universal newborn hearing screening. Pediatr 109:E7CrossRef Mehl AL, Thomson V (2002) The Colorado newborn hearing screening project, 1992–1999: on the threshold of effective population-based universal newborn hearing screening. Pediatr 109:E7CrossRef
50.
go back to reference Meier S, Narabayashi O, Probst R et al (2004) Comparison of currently available devices designed for newborn hearing screening using automated auditory brainstem and/or otoacoustic emission measurements. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 68:927–934CrossRefPubMed Meier S, Narabayashi O, Probst R et al (2004) Comparison of currently available devices designed for newborn hearing screening using automated auditory brainstem and/or otoacoustic emission measurements. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 68:927–934CrossRefPubMed
51.
go back to reference Mezzano P, Serra G, Calevo MG (2009) Cost analysis of an Italian neonatal hearing screening programme. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 22(9):806–811PubMed Mezzano P, Serra G, Calevo MG (2009) Cost analysis of an Italian neonatal hearing screening programme. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 22(9):806–811PubMed
52.
go back to reference Nennstiel-Ratzel U, Arenz S, von Kries R et al (2007) The model project “newborn auditory screening” in the Upper Palatinate: high process and result quality of an interdisciplinary concept. HNO 55:128–134CrossRefPubMed Nennstiel-Ratzel U, Arenz S, von Kries R et al (2007) The model project “newborn auditory screening” in the Upper Palatinate: high process and result quality of an interdisciplinary concept. HNO 55:128–134CrossRefPubMed
53.
go back to reference Nennstiel-Ratzel U, Arenz S, Wildner M et al (2004) New challenges to the Screening Center in the Bavarian State office for Health Care and Safe Quality of Foods. Gesundheitswes 66 (Suppl 1):S8–S12 Nennstiel-Ratzel U, Arenz S, Wildner M et al (2004) New challenges to the Screening Center in the Bavarian State office for Health Care and Safe Quality of Foods. Gesundheitswes 66 (Suppl 1):S8–S12
55.
go back to reference Neumann K, Gross M, Böttcher P et al (2006) Effectiveness and efficiency of a universal newborn hearing screening in Germany. Folia Phoniatr Logop 58:440–455CrossRefPubMed Neumann K, Gross M, Böttcher P et al (2006) Effectiveness and efficiency of a universal newborn hearing screening in Germany. Folia Phoniatr Logop 58:440–455CrossRefPubMed
57.
go back to reference Deutsche Gesellschaft für Phoniatrie und Pädaudiologie (2001) Phoniatrisch-pädaudiologischer Konsensus zu einem universellen Neugeborenen Hörscreening in Deutschland. Phoniatr Pädaudiol Mitt, 11 Deutsche Gesellschaft für Phoniatrie und Pädaudiologie (2001) Phoniatrisch-pädaudiologischer Konsensus zu einem universellen Neugeborenen Hörscreening in Deutschland. Phoniatr Pädaudiol Mitt, 11
64.
go back to reference Szyfter W, Wróbel M, Radziszewska-Konopka M et al (2008) Polish universal neonatal hearing screening program-4-year experience (2003–2006). Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 72:1783–1787CrossRefPubMed Szyfter W, Wróbel M, Radziszewska-Konopka M et al (2008) Polish universal neonatal hearing screening program-4-year experience (2003–2006). Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 72:1783–1787CrossRefPubMed
65.
go back to reference Tait M, De Raeve L, Nikolopoulos TP (2007) Deaf children with cochlear implants before the age of 1 year: comparison of preverbal communication with normally hearing children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 71:1605–1611CrossRefPubMed Tait M, De Raeve L, Nikolopoulos TP (2007) Deaf children with cochlear implants before the age of 1 year: comparison of preverbal communication with normally hearing children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 71:1605–1611CrossRefPubMed
66.
go back to reference Tharpe AM, Sladen DP, Dodd-Murphy J et al (2009) Minimal hearing loss in children: minimal but not inconsequential. Semin Hear 30:080–093CrossRef Tharpe AM, Sladen DP, Dodd-Murphy J et al (2009) Minimal hearing loss in children: minimal but not inconsequential. Semin Hear 30:080–093CrossRef
67.
go back to reference Thompson DC, McPhillips H, Davis RL et al (2001) Universal newborn hearing screening: summary of evidence. J Am Med Assoc 286:2000–2010CrossRef Thompson DC, McPhillips H, Davis RL et al (2001) Universal newborn hearing screening: summary of evidence. J Am Med Assoc 286:2000–2010CrossRef
68.
go back to reference Uilenburg N, Kauffman-de Boer M, van der Ploeg K et al (2009) An implementation study of neonatal hearing screening in the Netherlands. Int J Audiol 48:108–116CrossRefPubMed Uilenburg N, Kauffman-de Boer M, van der Ploeg K et al (2009) An implementation study of neonatal hearing screening in the Netherlands. Int J Audiol 48:108–116CrossRefPubMed
69.
go back to reference Uus K, Bamford J (2006) Effectiveness of population-based newborn hearing screening in England: ages of interventions and profile of cases. Pediatr 117:e887–e893CrossRef Uus K, Bamford J (2006) Effectiveness of population-based newborn hearing screening in England: ages of interventions and profile of cases. Pediatr 117:e887–e893CrossRef
70.
go back to reference Vohr BR, Carty LM, Moore PE et al (1998) The Rhode Island Hearing Assessment Program: experience with statewide hearing screening (1993–1996). J Pediatr 133:353–357CrossRefPubMed Vohr BR, Carty LM, Moore PE et al (1998) The Rhode Island Hearing Assessment Program: experience with statewide hearing screening (1993–1996). J Pediatr 133:353–357CrossRefPubMed
71.
go back to reference Vohr BR, Oh W, Stewart EJ et al (2001) Comparison of costs and referral rates of 3 universal newborn hearing screening protocols. J Pediatr 139:238–244CrossRefPubMed Vohr BR, Oh W, Stewart EJ et al (2001) Comparison of costs and referral rates of 3 universal newborn hearing screening protocols. J Pediatr 139:238–244CrossRefPubMed
72.
go back to reference Vohr B, Simon P, McDermott C et al (2002) Early hearing screening, detection and intervention (EHDI) in Rhode Island. Med Health R I 85:369–372PubMed Vohr B, Simon P, McDermott C et al (2002) Early hearing screening, detection and intervention (EHDI) in Rhode Island. Med Health R I 85:369–372PubMed
73.
74.
go back to reference Watkin PM, Baldwin M, Dixon R et al (1998) Maternal anxiety and attitudes to universal neonatal hearing screening. Br J Audiol 32:27–37PubMed Watkin PM, Baldwin M, Dixon R et al (1998) Maternal anxiety and attitudes to universal neonatal hearing screening. Br J Audiol 32:27–37PubMed
75.
go back to reference Weichbold V, Nekahm-Heis D, Welzl-Müller K (2005) Evaluation of the Austrian Newborn Hearing Screening Program. Wien Klin Wochenschr 117:641–646CrossRefPubMed Weichbold V, Nekahm-Heis D, Welzl-Müller K (2005) Evaluation of the Austrian Newborn Hearing Screening Program. Wien Klin Wochenschr 117:641–646CrossRefPubMed
76.
go back to reference Weichbold V, Welzl-Müller K (2000) Neonatal hearing screening—maternal attitudes and anxiety. HNO 48:606–612CrossRefPubMed Weichbold V, Welzl-Müller K (2000) Neonatal hearing screening—maternal attitudes and anxiety. HNO 48:606–612CrossRefPubMed
78.
go back to reference White KR (1996) Universal newborn hearing screening using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: past, present, and future. Sem Hear 17:171–183CrossRef White KR (1996) Universal newborn hearing screening using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: past, present, and future. Sem Hear 17:171–183CrossRef
79.
go back to reference Yoshinaga-Itano C (2004) Levels of evidence: universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) and early hearing detection and intervention systems (EHDI). J Commun Disord 37:451–465CrossRefPubMed Yoshinaga-Itano C (2004) Levels of evidence: universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) and early hearing detection and intervention systems (EHDI). J Commun Disord 37:451–465CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Interdisciplinary approach to design, performance, and quality management in a multicenter newborn hearing screening project
Discussion of the results of newborn hearing screening in Hamburg (Part II)
Authors
Anna-Katharina Rohlfs
Thomas Wiesner
Holger Drews
Frank Müller
Achim Breitfuß
Regina Schiller
Markus Hess
Publication date
01-12-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Journal of Pediatrics / Issue 12/2010
Print ISSN: 0340-6199
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1076
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-010-1229-0

Other articles of this Issue 12/2010

European Journal of Pediatrics 12/2010 Go to the issue