Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Pediatrics 4/2009

Open Access 01-04-2009 | Original Paper

Fetal leg posture in uncomplicated breech and cephalic pregnancies

Authors: Bianca F. Fong, Geert J. P. Savelsbergh, Johanna I. P. de Vries

Published in: European Journal of Pediatrics | Issue 4/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background The objective of our study was to determine differences in prenatal leg posture development between breech and cephalic-born babies. Materials and methods Ten healthy fetuses in breech and ten healthy fetuses in cephalic presentation were observed by means of weekly ultrasounds from 33 weeks gestational age until birth to assess leg posture. Results The breech fetuses showed a clear preference for an extended leg position; they spent significantly more time with their knees in extension than the cephalic fetuses (p<0.001). The cephalic fetuses showed significantly more leg-crossing than the breech fetuses (p<0.01). For both findings, no significant change over time could be observed in either group. Conclusion These findings show that the intra-uterine position does influence the fetal postural and motor development. However, it seems unlikely that intra-uterine movement restriction can solely be held accountable for the observed differences in leg position between breech and cephalic fetuses.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Amiel-Tison C (1968) Neurological evaluation of the maturity of newborn infants. Arch Dis Child 43:89–93PubMedCrossRef Amiel-Tison C (1968) Neurological evaluation of the maturity of newborn infants. Arch Dis Child 43:89–93PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bartlett D, Okun N (1994) Breech presentation: a random event or an explainable phenomenon? Dev Med Child Neurol 36:833–838PubMedCrossRef Bartlett D, Okun N (1994) Breech presentation: a random event or an explainable phenomenon? Dev Med Child Neurol 36:833–838PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bradley J, Wetherill M, Benson MK (1987) Splintage for congenital dislocation of the hip. Is it safe and reliable? J Bone Joint Surg Br 69:257–263PubMed Bradley J, Wetherill M, Benson MK (1987) Splintage for congenital dislocation of the hip. Is it safe and reliable? J Bone Joint Surg Br 69:257–263PubMed
4.
go back to reference Chan A, McCaul KA, Cundy PJ, Haan EA, Byron-Scott R (1997) Perinatal risk factors for developmental dysplasia of the hip. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 76:F94–F100PubMedCrossRef Chan A, McCaul KA, Cundy PJ, Haan EA, Byron-Scott R (1997) Perinatal risk factors for developmental dysplasia of the hip. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 76:F94–F100PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Danielian PJ, Wang J, Hall MH (1996) Long-term outcome by method of delivery of fetuses in breech presentation at term: population based follow up. BMJ 312:1451–1453PubMed Danielian PJ, Wang J, Hall MH (1996) Long-term outcome by method of delivery of fetuses in breech presentation at term: population based follow up. BMJ 312:1451–1453PubMed
9.
go back to reference Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR (2000) Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet 356:1375–1383 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02840-3 PubMedCrossRef Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR (2000) Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet 356:1375–1383 doi:10.​1016/​S0140-6736(00)02840-3 PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kloosterman GJ (1970) On intrauterine growth: the significance of prenatal care. Int J Gynecol Obstet 8:895–912 Kloosterman GJ (1970) On intrauterine growth: the significance of prenatal care. Int J Gynecol Obstet 8:895–912
12.
go back to reference Lehmann HP, Hinton R, Morello P, Santoli J (2000) Developmental dysplasia of the hip practice guideline: technical report. Committee on Quality Improvement, and Subcommittee on Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip. Pediatrics 105:E57 doi:10.1542/peds.105.4.e57 PubMedCrossRef Lehmann HP, Hinton R, Morello P, Santoli J (2000) Developmental dysplasia of the hip practice guideline: technical report. Committee on Quality Improvement, and Subcommittee on Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip. Pediatrics 105:E57 doi:10.​1542/​peds.​105.​4.​e57 PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Rühmann O, Lazović D, Bouklas P, Rössig S (1998) Ultrasound hip joint screening in newborn infants. Is twin pregnancy a risk factor for dysplasia? Ultraschall Med 19:64–69PubMedCrossRef Rühmann O, Lazović D, Bouklas P, Rössig S (1998) Ultrasound hip joint screening in newborn infants. Is twin pregnancy a risk factor for dysplasia? Ultraschall Med 19:64–69PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Whyte H, Hannah ME, Saigal S, Hannah WJ, Hewson S, Amankwah K, Cheng M, Gafni A, Guselle P, Helewa M, Hodnett ED, Hutton E, Kung R, McKay D, Ross S, Willan A; Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group (2004) Outcomes of children at 2 years after planned cesarean birth versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the International Randomized Term Breech Trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191:864–871 doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2004.06.056 PubMedCrossRef Whyte H, Hannah ME, Saigal S, Hannah WJ, Hewson S, Amankwah K, Cheng M, Gafni A, Guselle P, Helewa M, Hodnett ED, Hutton E, Kung R, McKay D, Ross S, Willan A; Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group (2004) Outcomes of children at 2 years after planned cesarean birth versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the International Randomized Term Breech Trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191:864–871 doi:10.​1016/​j.​ajog.​2004.​06.​056 PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Fetal leg posture in uncomplicated breech and cephalic pregnancies
Authors
Bianca F. Fong
Geert J. P. Savelsbergh
Johanna I. P. de Vries
Publication date
01-04-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Journal of Pediatrics / Issue 4/2009
Print ISSN: 0340-6199
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1076
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-008-0769-z

Other articles of this Issue 4/2009

European Journal of Pediatrics 4/2009 Go to the issue