Top

Published in:

Open Access 01-07-2021 | Original Article

Age-related differences in negative cognitive empathy but similarities in positive affective empathy

Authors: Maryam Ziaei, Lena Oestreich, David C. Reutens, Natalie C. Ebner

Published in: Brain Structure and Function | Issue 6/2021

Abstract

Empathy, among other social-cognitive processes, changes across adulthood. More specifically, cognitive components of empathy (understanding another’s perspective) appear to decline with age, while findings for affective empathy (sharing another’s emotional state) are rather mixed. Structural and functional correlates underlying cognitive and affective empathy in aging and the extent to which valence affects empathic response in brain and behavior are not well understood yet. To fill these research gaps, younger and older adults completed a modified version of the Multifaceted Empathy Test, which measures both cognitive and affective empathy as well as empathic responding to both positive and negative stimuli (i.e., positive vs. negative empathy). Adopting a multimodal imaging approach and applying multivariate analysis, the study found that for cognitive empathy to negative emotions, regions of the salience network including the anterior insula and anterior cingulate were more involved in older than younger adults. For affective empathy to positive emotions, in contrast, younger and older adults recruited a similar brain network including main nodes of the default mode network. Additionally, increased structural microstructure (fractional anisotropy values) of the posterior cingulum bundle (right henisphere) was related to activation of default mode regions during affective empathy for positive emotions in both age groups. These findings provide novel insights into the functional networks subserving cognitive and affective empathy in younger and older adults and highlight the importance of considering valence in empathic response in aging research. Further this study, for the first time, underscores the role of the posterior cingulum bundle in higher-order social-cognitive processes such as empathy, specifically for positive emotions, in aging.

Available only for authorised users

Behavioral performance was analyzed using the three DASS-21 subscales and personal distress subscale from the IRI as covariates. Inclusion of these covariates did not change the results.

For completeness, however, results pertaining to accuracy are reported in the Supplemental Material.

Andreychik MR (2019) I like that you feel my pain, but I love that you feel my joy: Empathy for a partner’s negative versus positive emotions independently affect relationship quality. J Soc Personal Relatsh 36(3):834–854. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517746518CrossRef

Aron AR, Robbins TW, Poldrack RA (2014) Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex: one decade on. Trends Cognit Sci 18(4):177–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.12.003CrossRef

Bailey PE, Brady B, Ebner NC, Ruffman T (2018) Effects of age on emotion regulation, emotional empathy, and prosocial behavior. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby084CrossRefPubMedCentral

Bailey PE, Ebner NC, Stine-Morrow EAL (2021) Introduction to the special issue on prosociality in adult development and aging: advancing theory within a multilevel framework. Psychol Aging 36(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000598CrossRefPubMed

Baron-Cohen S, Wheelwright S (2004) The empathy quotient: an investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. J of Autism and Dev Dis 34(2):163–175. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JADD.0000022607.19833.00CrossRef

Baron-Cohen S, Wheelwright S, Hill J, Raste Y, Plumb I (2001) The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” test revised version: a study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 42(2):241–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00715CrossRefPubMed

Beadle JN, de la Vega CE (2019) Impact of aging on empathy: review of psychological and neural mechanisms. Front Psychiatry 10:331. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00331CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Beadle JN, Sheehan AH, Dahlben B, Gutchess AH (2015) Aging, empathy, and prosociality. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 70(2):215–224. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbt091CrossRefPubMed

Beaulieu C (2002) The basis of anisotropic water diffusion in the nervous system-a technical review. NMR Biomed 15(7–8):435–455. https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.782CrossRefPubMed

Bellucci G, Camilleri JA, Eickhoff SB, Krueger F (2020) Neural signatures of prosocial behaviors. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 118:186–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.07.006CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Bernhardt BC, Singer T (2012) The neural basis of empathy. Annu Rev Neurosci 35:1–23CrossRefPubMed

Bilker WB, Hansen JA, Brensinger CM, Richard J, Gur RE, Gur RC (2012) Development of abbreviated nine-item forms of the Raven’s standard progressive matrices test. Assessment 19(3):354–369. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191112446655CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Brewer JA, Garrison KA, Whitfield-Gabrieli S (2013) What about the “Self” is processed in the posterior cingulate cortex? Front Hum Neurosci 7:647. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00647CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Buckner RL, Andrews-Hanna JR, Schacter DL (2008) The brain’s default network: anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. Ann n y Acad Sci 1124:1–38. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1440.011CrossRefPubMed

Bzdok D, Schilbach L, Vogeley K, Schneider K, Laird A, Langner R, Eickhoff S (2012) Parsing the neural correlates of moral cognition: ALE meta-analysis on morality, theory of mind, and empathy. Brain Struct Funct 217(4):783–796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-012-0380-yCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Carstensen LL, Isaacowitz DM, Charles ST (1999) Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. Am Psychol 54(3):165CrossRefPubMed

Carstensen LL, Fung HH, Charles ST (2003) Socioemotional Selectivity Theory and the regulation of emotion in the second half of the life. Motiv Emot 27:103–123CrossRef

Chen YC, Chen CC, Decety J, Cheng Y (2014) Aging is associated with changes in the neural circuits underlying empathy. Neurobiol Aging 35(4):827–836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.10.080CrossRefPubMed

Dale AM, Fischl B, Sereno MI (1999) Cortical surface-based analysis I. segmentation and surface reconstruction. Neuroimage 9(2):179–194. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.1998.0395CrossRefPubMed

Davis MH (1983) Measuring individual differences in empathy: evidence for a multidimensional approach. J Pers Soc Psychol 44(1):113. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113CrossRef

Davis SW, Dennis NA, Daselaar SM, Fleck MS, Cabeza R (2008) Que PASA? The posterior-anterior shift in aging. Cereb Cortex 18(5):1201–1209. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhm155CrossRefPubMed

Decety J, Jackson PL (2006) A social-neuroscience perspective on empathy. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 15(2):54–58CrossRef

Dziobek I, Preissler S, Grozdanovic Z, Heuser I, Heekeren HR, Roepke S (2011) Neuronal correlates of altered empathy and social cognition in borderline personality disorder. Neuroimage 57(2):539–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.005CrossRefPubMed

Ebner NC, Johnson MK, Fischer H (2012) Neural mechanisms of reading facial emotions in young and older adults. Front Psychol 3:223–242. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00223CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Ebner, N. C., Bailey, P. E., Horta, M., Joiner, J. A., & Chang, S. W. C. (2017). Multidisciplinary perspective on prosociality in aging. In Social cognition: Development across the life span. (pp. 303–325). New York, NY, US: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Efron B, Tibshirani R (1985) The bootstrap method for assessing statistical accuracy. Behaviormetrika 12(17):1–35CrossRef

Fan Y, Duncan NW, de Greck M, Northoff G (2011) Is there a core neural network in empathy? An fMRI based quantitative meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 35(3):903–911CrossRefPubMed

Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) “Mini-Mental State”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12(3):189–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6CrossRefPubMed

Frith CD, Frith U (2006) The neural basis of mentalizing. Neuron 50(4):531–534CrossRefPubMed

Gable SL, Gonzaga GC, Strachman A (2006) Will you be there for me when things go right? Supportive responses to positive event disclosures. J Pers Soc Psychol 91(5):904–917. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.904CrossRefPubMed

Gallagher HL, Frith CD (2003) Functional imaging of ‘theory of mind.’ Trends Cognit Sci 7(2):77–83CrossRef

Greve DN, Fischl B (2009) Accurate and robust brain image alignment using boundary-based registration. Neuroimage 48(1):63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.06.060CrossRefPubMed

Grühn D, Rebucal K, Diehl M, Lumley M, Labouvie-Vief G (2008) Empathy across the adult lifespan: longitudinal and experience-sampling findings. Emotion 8(6):753–765. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014123CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Harbaugh WT, Mayr U, Burghart DR (2007) Neural responses to taxation and voluntary giving reveal motives for charitable donations. Science 316(5831):1622–1625. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1140738CrossRefPubMed

Hare TA, Camerer CF, Knoepfle DT, Rangel A (2010) Value computations in ventral medial prefrontal cortex during charitable decision making incorporate input from regions involved in social cognition. J Neurosci 30(2):583–590. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.4089-09.2010CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Hayes GS, McLennan SN, Henry JD, Phillips LH, Terrett G, Rendell PG, Labuschagne I (2020) Task characteristics influence facial emotion recognition age-effects: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Aging 35(2):295–315. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000441CrossRefPubMed

Henry JD, Phillips LH, Ruffman T, Bailey PE (2013) A meta-analytic review of age differences in theory of mind. Psychol Aging 28(3):826. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030677CrossRefPubMed

Henry JD, von Hippel W, Molenberghs P, Lee T, Sachdev PS (2016) Clinical assessment of social cognitive function in neurological disorders. Nat Rev Neurol 12(1):28–39. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2015.229CrossRefPubMed

Huettel, S. A., Song, A. W., & McCarthy, G. (2014). Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (Vol. 3rd volume).

Jensen AR, Rohwer WD (1966) The Stroop color-word test: A review. Acta Physiol (oxf) 25:36–93

Jeurissen B, Tournier J-D, Dhollander T, Connelly A, Sijbers J (2014) Multi-tissue constrained spherical deconvolution for improved analysis of multi-shell diffusion MRI data. Neuroimage 103:411–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.07.061CrossRefPubMed

Keedwell PA, Doidge AN, Meyer M, Lawrence N, Lawrence AD, Jones DK (2016) Subgenual cingulum microstructure supports control of emotional conflict. Cereb Cortex 26(6):2850–2862. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhw030CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Krishnan A, Williams LJ, McIntosh AR, Abdi H (2011) Partial Least Squares (PLS) methods for neuroimaging: a tutorial and review. Neuroimage 56(2):455–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.034CrossRefPubMed

Lamm C, Decety J, Singer T (2011) Meta-analytic evidence for common and distinct neural networks associated with directly experienced pain and empathy for pain. Neuroimage 54(3):2492–2502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.014CrossRefPubMed

Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2008). International affective picture system (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. Technical report A-8.

Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH (1995) The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behav Res Ther 33:335–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-UCrossRefPubMed

Mather M (2016) The affective neuroscience of aging. Annu Rev Psychol 67:213–238. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033540CrossRefPubMed

Mather M, Carstensen LL (2003) Aging and attentional biases for emotional faces. Psychol Sci 14(5):409–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.01455CrossRefPubMed

McIntosh AR, Bookstein FL, Haxby JV, Grady CL (1996) Spatial pattern analysis of functional brain images using partial least squares. Neuroimage 3(3):143–157. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.1996.0016CrossRefPubMed

McIntosh AR, Chau WK, Protzner AB (2004) Spatiotemporal analysis of event-related fMRI data using partial least squares. Neuroimage 23(2):764–775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.05.018CrossRefPubMed

Mendes WB (2010) Weakened links between mind and body in older age: the case for maturational dualism in the experience of emotion. Emot Rev 2(3):240–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073910364149CrossRef

Menon V (2015) Salience Network. In: Toga AW (ed) Brain mapping: an encyclopedic reference, vol 2. Elsevier, Academic Press, pp 597–611CrossRef

Menon V, Uddin LQ (2010) Saliency, switching, attention and control: a network model of insula function. Brain Struct Funct 214(5–6):655–667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-010-0262-0CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Metzler-Baddeley C, Jones DK, Steventon J, Westacott L, Aggleton JP, O’Sullivan MJ (2012) Cingulum microstructure predicts cognitive control in older age and mild cognitive impairment. J Neurosci 32(49):17612–17619. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.3299-12.2012CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Mitchell JP (2009) Inferences about mental states. Phil Trans R Soc B: Biol Sci 364(1521):1309–1316CrossRef

Molenberghs P, Johnson H, Henry JD, Mattingley JB (2016) Understanding the minds of others: a neuroimaging meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 65:276–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.03.020CrossRefPubMed

Morelli SA, Lieberman MD, Zaki J (2015) The emerging study of positive empathy. Soc Pers Psychol Compass 9(2):57–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12157CrossRef

Newcombe, F. (1969). Missile wounds of the brain: A study of psychological deficits.

Nyberg L, Lövdén M, Riklund K, Lindenberger U, Bäckman L (2012) Memory aging and brain maintenance. Trends Cognit Sci 16(5):292–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.04.005CrossRef

O’Brien E, Konrath SH, Grühn D, Hagen AL (2012) Empathic concern and perspective taking: linear and quadratic effects of age across the adult life span. J Gerontol: Ser B 68(2):168–175. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbs055CrossRef

Pasquini L, Nana AL, Toller G, Brown JA, Deng J, Staffaroni A, Seeley WW (2020) Salience network atrophy links neuron type-specific pathobiology to loss of empathy in frontotemporal dementia. Cereb Cortex 30(10):5387–5399. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhaa119CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Rankin KP, Gorno-Tempini ML, Allison SC, Stanley CM, Glenn S, Weiner MW, Miller BL (2006) Structural anatomy of empathy in neurodegenerative disease. Brain 129(Pt 11):2945–2956. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awl254CrossRefPubMed

Reed AE, Carstensen LL (2012) The theory behind the age-related positivity effect. Front Psychol 3:339. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00339CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Reitan RM, Wolfson D (1986) The halstead-reitan neuropsychological test battery and aging. Clin Gerontol: J Aging M Health 5:39–61. https://doi.org/10.1300/J018v05n01_03CrossRef

Riva F, Tschernegg M, Chiesa PA, Wagner IC, Kronbichler M, Lamm C, Silani G (2018) Age-related differences in the neural correlates of empathy for pleasant and unpleasant touch in a female sample. Neurobiol Aging 65:7–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.12.028CrossRefPubMed

Ruffman T, Henry JD, Livingstone V, Phillips LH (2008) A meta-analytic review of emotion recognition and aging: implications for neuropsychological models of aging. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 32(4):863–881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.01.001CrossRefPubMed

Sampson PD, Streissguth AP, Barr HM, Bookstein FL (1989) Neurobehavioral effects of prenatal alcohol: Part II partial least squares analysis. Neurotox Teratol 11(5):477–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/0892-0362(89)90025-1CrossRef

Singer T, Lamm C (2009) The social neuroscience of empathy. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1156:81–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04418.xCrossRefPubMed

Sperduti M, Martinelli P, Piolino P (2012) A neurocognitive model of meditation based on activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis. Conscious Cogn 21(1):269–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2011.09.019CrossRefPubMed

Sze JA, Gyurak A, Goodkind MS, Levenson RW (2012) Greater emotional empathy and prosocial behavior in late life. Emotion 12(5):1129–1140. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025011CrossRefPubMed

Timmers I, Park AL, Fischer MD, Kronman CA, Heathcote LC, Hernandez JM, Simons LE (2018) Is empathy for pain unique in its neural correlates? frontiers in behavioral neuroscience. Meta-Anal Neuroimaging Stud Empathy. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00289CrossRef

Tournier JD, Calamante F, Connelly A (2012) MRtrix: diffusion tractography in crossing fiber regions. Int J Imaging Syst Technol 22(1):53–66. https://doi.org/10.1002/ima.22005CrossRef

van den Heuvel M, Mandl R, Luigjes J, Hulshoff Pol H (2008) Microstructural organization of the cingulum tract and the level of default mode functional connectivity. J Neurosci 28(43):10844–10851. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2964-08.2008CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Van Kleef GA (2009) How emotions regulate social life: the emotions as social information (EASI) model. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 18(3):184–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01633.xCrossRef

Wakana S, Jiang H, Nagae-Poetscher LM, van Zijl PC, Mori S (2004) Fiber tract-based atlas of human white matter anatomy. Radiology 230(1):77–87. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2301021640CrossRefPubMed

Weisz E, Zaki J (2018) Motivated empathy: a social neuroscience perspective. Curr Opin Psychol 24:67–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.05.005CrossRefPubMed

Wu Y, Sun D, Wang Y, Wang Y, Ou S (2016) Segmentation of the cingulum bundle in the human brain: a new perspective based on dsi tractography and fiber dissection study. Front Neuroanat 10:84. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2016.00084CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Yu C-L, Chou T-L (2018) A dual route model of empathy: a neurobiological prospective. Front Psychol 9:2212CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Ziaei M, Fischer H (2016) Emotion and Aging: The Impact of Emotion on Attention, Memory, and Face Recognition in Late Adulthood. In: Absher JR, Cloutier J (eds) Neuroimaging Personality, Social Cognition, and Character. Academic Press, Elsevier, San Diego, pp 259–278CrossRef

Ziaei M, von Hippel W, Henry JD, Becker SI (2015) Are Age Effects in Positivity Influenced by the Valence of Distractors? PLoS ONE 10(9):e0137604. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137604CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Ziaei M, Burianova H, Von Hippel W, Ebner NC, Phillips LH, Henry JD (2016) The impact of aging on the neural networks involved in gaze and emotional processing. Neurobiol Aging 48:182–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.08.026CrossRefPubMed

Ziaei M, Ebner NC, Burianova H (2017a) Functional brain networks involved in gaze and emotional processing. European J Neurosci 45:312–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13464CrossRef

Ziaei M, Salami A, Persson J (2017b) Age-related alterations in functional connectivity patterns during working memory encoding of emotional items. Neuropsychologia 94:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.11.012CrossRefPubMed

Ziaei M, Persson J, Bonyadi MR, Reutens DC, Ebner NC (2019) Amygdala functional network during recognition of own-age vs. other-age faces in younger and older adults. Neuropsychologia 129:10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.03.003CrossRefPubMed

Ziaei M, Bonyadi MR, Reutens D (2020) Role of hippocampus during logical reasoning and belief bias in aging. Front Aging Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2020.00111CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Ziaei M, Arnold C, Thompson K, Reutens DC (2021) Social cognition in frontal and temporal lobe epilepsy: systematic review, meta-analysis, and clinical recommendations. MedRxiv

Title: Age-related differences in negative cognitive empathy but similarities in positive affective empathy
Authors: Maryam Ziaei
Lena Oestreich
David C. Reutens
Natalie C. Ebner
Publication date: 01-07-2021
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: Brain Structure and Function / Issue 6/2021
Print ISSN: 1863-2653
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2661
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-021-02291-y

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Age-related differences in negative cognitive empathy but similarities in positive affective empathy

Abstract

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 6/2021

The density of calretinin striatal interneurons is decreased in 6-OHDA-lesioned mice

A fully segmented 3D anatomical atlas of a lizard brain

Motor network connectivity predicts neuroplastic response following theta burst stimulation in healthy adults

A comprehensive approach to study the resting-state brain network related to creative potential

Leftovers of viruses in human physiology

Phase fMRI defines brain resting-state functional hubs within central and posterior regions