Published in:
01-04-2005 | Original Article
Effectiveness of a new carrier-bound fibrin sealant versus argon beamer as haemostatic agent during liver resection: a randomised prospective trial
Authors:
Andrea Frilling, Gregor A. Stavrou, Hans-Jörg Mischinger, Bernard de Hemptinne, Mogens Rokkjaer, Jürgen Klempnauer, Anders Thörne, Beat Gloor, Susanne Beckebaum, Mohamed F. A. Ghaffar, Christoph E. Broelsch
Published in:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
|
Issue 2/2005
Login to get access
Abstract
Background and aims
A new carrier-bound fibrin sealant, TachoSil, is expected to be efficacious and safe as a haemostatic treatment in hepatic resection.
Design
A prospective, randomised, open and controlled multicentre trial with intraoperative as well as postoperative assessment of efficacy and a 1 month follow-up period.
Setting
Tertiary care centres.
Patients/methods
One hundred and twenty-one patients requiring secondary haemostasis during planned liver resection. Patients with coagulation disorders and patients with persistent major bleeding after primary haemostatic measures were excluded.
Intervention
Application of either carrier-bound fibrin sealant (n=59) or argon beamer (argon beam coagulator) (n=62) as secondary haemostatic treatment.
Main outcome measure
Time to intraoperative haemostasis.
Results
There was a significant superiority of TachoSil over argon beamer with regard to time to haemostasis (3.9 min, median 3.0, range 3–20 min vs 6.3 min, median 4.0, range 3–39 min) (P=0.0007). Haemoglobin concentration of drainage fluid was significantly lower on day 2 after surgery in TachoSil patients (1.1 mmol/l) than in argon beamer patients (2.3 mmol/l) (P=0.012). Overall, the frequency and causality of adverse events did not differ between the two treatment groups.
Conclusion
TachoSil is superior to argon beamer in obtaining effective and fast intraoperative haemostasis. The safety data show TachoSil to be tolerable and safe for haemostatic treatment in liver resection.