Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Applied Physiology 2/2010

01-01-2010 | Original Article

Panoramic ultrasonography is a valid method to measure changes in skeletal muscle cross-sectional area

Authors: Juha P. Ahtiainen, Merja Hoffren, Juha J. Hulmi, Mikko Pietikäinen, Antti A. Mero, Janne Avela, Keijo Häkkinen

Published in: European Journal of Applied Physiology | Issue 2/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of the “panoramic” brightness mode ultrasonography (US) method to detect training-induced changes in muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) by comparison with results obtained using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Out of 27 young male volunteers, 20 subjects were assigned to training group and seven to non-training control group. Muscle CSAs of vastus lateralis were analyzed by MRI and US before and after 21 weeks of either heavy resistance training or control period. Measured by both the US and MRI, the resistance training induced significant increases (~13–14%, P < 0.001) in muscle CSA, whereas no changes were observed in control group. A high repeatability was found between the two consequent US measurements (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC of 0.997) with standard error of measurement (SEM) of 0.38 cm2 and smallest detectable difference of 1.1 cm2. Validity of the US method against MRI in assessing CSA of VL produced ICC of 0.905 and SEM of 0.87 cm2 with high limits of agreement analyzed by Bland and Altman method. However, the MRI produced systematically (10 ± 4%, P < 0.01) larger CSA values than the US method. The US showed high agreement against MRI in detecting changes in muscle CSA (ICC of 0.929, SEM of 0.94 cm2). The results of this study showed that the panoramic US method provides repeatable measures of a muscle CSA although MRI produced larger absolute CSA values. Moreover, this US method detects training-induced changes in muscle CSA with a comparable degree of precision to MRI.
Literature
go back to reference Bemben MG (2002) Use of diagnostic ultrasound for assessing muscle size. J Strength Cond Res 16:103–108CrossRefPubMed Bemben MG (2002) Use of diagnostic ultrasound for assessing muscle size. J Strength Cond Res 16:103–108CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Beneke R, Neuerburg J, Bohndorf K (1991) Muscle cross-section measurement by magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 63:424–429CrossRefPubMed Beneke R, Neuerburg J, Bohndorf K (1991) Muscle cross-section measurement by magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 63:424–429CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Berg HE, Tedner B, Tesch PA (1993) Changes in lower limb muscle cross-sectional area and tissue fluid volume after transition from standing to supine. Acta Physiol Scand 148:379–385CrossRefPubMed Berg HE, Tedner B, Tesch PA (1993) Changes in lower limb muscle cross-sectional area and tissue fluid volume after transition from standing to supine. Acta Physiol Scand 148:379–385CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310PubMed Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310PubMed
go back to reference Dons B, Bollerup K, Bonde-Petersen F, Hancke S (1979) The effect of weight-lifting exercise related to muscle fiber composition and muscle cross-sectional area in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 40:95–106CrossRefPubMed Dons B, Bollerup K, Bonde-Petersen F, Hancke S (1979) The effect of weight-lifting exercise related to muscle fiber composition and muscle cross-sectional area in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 40:95–106CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Engstrom CM, Loeb GE, Reid JG, Forrest WJ, Avruch L (1991) Morphometry of the human thigh muscles. A comparison between anatomical sections and computer tomographic and magnetic resonance images. J Anat 176:139–156PubMed Engstrom CM, Loeb GE, Reid JG, Forrest WJ, Avruch L (1991) Morphometry of the human thigh muscles. A comparison between anatomical sections and computer tomographic and magnetic resonance images. J Anat 176:139–156PubMed
go back to reference Esformes JI, Narici MV, Maganaris CN (2002) Measurement of human muscle volume using ultrasonography. Eur J Appl Physiol 87:90–92CrossRefPubMed Esformes JI, Narici MV, Maganaris CN (2002) Measurement of human muscle volume using ultrasonography. Eur J Appl Physiol 87:90–92CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Häkkinen K, Pakarinen A, Kraemer WJ, Häkkinen A, Valkeinen H, Alen M (2001) Selective muscle hypertrophy, changes in EMG and force, and serum hormones during strength training in older women. J Appl Physiol 91:569–580PubMed Häkkinen K, Pakarinen A, Kraemer WJ, Häkkinen A, Valkeinen H, Alen M (2001) Selective muscle hypertrophy, changes in EMG and force, and serum hormones during strength training in older women. J Appl Physiol 91:569–580PubMed
go back to reference Howe TE, Oldham JA (1996) The reliability of measuring quadriceps cross-sectional area with compound B ultrasound scanning. Physiother Res Int 1:112–126PubMed Howe TE, Oldham JA (1996) The reliability of measuring quadriceps cross-sectional area with compound B ultrasound scanning. Physiother Res Int 1:112–126PubMed
go back to reference Hulmi JJ, Kovanen V, Selänne H, Kraemer WJ, Häkkinen K, Mero AA (2009) Acute and long-term effects of resistance exercise with or without protein ingestion on muscle hypertrophy and gene expression. Amino Acids 37:297–308CrossRefPubMed Hulmi JJ, Kovanen V, Selänne H, Kraemer WJ, Häkkinen K, Mero AA (2009) Acute and long-term effects of resistance exercise with or without protein ingestion on muscle hypertrophy and gene expression. Amino Acids 37:297–308CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Ikai M, Fukunaga T (1968) Calculation of muscle strength per unit cross-sectional area of human muscle by means of ultrasonic measurement. Int Z Angew Physiol Einschl Arbeitsphysiol 26:26–32 Ikai M, Fukunaga T (1968) Calculation of muscle strength per unit cross-sectional area of human muscle by means of ultrasonic measurement. Int Z Angew Physiol Einschl Arbeitsphysiol 26:26–32
go back to reference Kanehisa H, Ikegawa S, Fukunaga T (1998) Body composition and cross-sectional areas of limb lean tissues in Olympic weight lifters. Scand J Med Sci Sports 8:271–278PubMed Kanehisa H, Ikegawa S, Fukunaga T (1998) Body composition and cross-sectional areas of limb lean tissues in Olympic weight lifters. Scand J Med Sci Sports 8:271–278PubMed
go back to reference Mitsiopoulos N, Baumgartner RN, Heymsfield SB, Lyons W, Gallagher D, Ross R (1998) Cadaver validation of skeletal muscle measurement by magnetic resonance imaging and computerized tomography. J Appl Physiol 85:115–122PubMed Mitsiopoulos N, Baumgartner RN, Heymsfield SB, Lyons W, Gallagher D, Ross R (1998) Cadaver validation of skeletal muscle measurement by magnetic resonance imaging and computerized tomography. J Appl Physiol 85:115–122PubMed
go back to reference Rankin G, Stokes M (1998) Reliability of assessment tools in rehabilitation: an illustration of appropriate statistical analyses. Clin Rehabil 12:187–199CrossRefPubMed Rankin G, Stokes M (1998) Reliability of assessment tools in rehabilitation: an illustration of appropriate statistical analyses. Clin Rehabil 12:187–199CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Reeves ND, Maganaris CN, Narici MV (2004a) Ultrasonographic assessment of human skeletal muscle size. Eur J Appl Physiol 91:116–118CrossRefPubMed Reeves ND, Maganaris CN, Narici MV (2004a) Ultrasonographic assessment of human skeletal muscle size. Eur J Appl Physiol 91:116–118CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Reeves ND, Narici MV, Maganaris CN (2004b) Effect of resistance training on skeletal muscle-specific force in elderly humans. J Appl Physiol 96:885–892CrossRefPubMed Reeves ND, Narici MV, Maganaris CN (2004b) Effect of resistance training on skeletal muscle-specific force in elderly humans. J Appl Physiol 96:885–892CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Sipilä S, Suominen H (1993) Muscle ultrasonography and computed tomography in elderly trained and untrained women. Muscle Nerve 16:294–300CrossRefPubMed Sipilä S, Suominen H (1993) Muscle ultrasonography and computed tomography in elderly trained and untrained women. Muscle Nerve 16:294–300CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Sipilä S, Suominen H (1996) Quantitative ultrasonography of muscle: detection of adaptations to training in elderly women. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 77:1173–1178CrossRefPubMed Sipilä S, Suominen H (1996) Quantitative ultrasonography of muscle: detection of adaptations to training in elderly women. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 77:1173–1178CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Walton JM, Roberts N, Whitehouse GH (1997) Measurement of the quadriceps femoris muscle using magnetic resonance and ultrasound imaging. Br J Sports Med 31:59–64CrossRefPubMed Walton JM, Roberts N, Whitehouse GH (1997) Measurement of the quadriceps femoris muscle using magnetic resonance and ultrasound imaging. Br J Sports Med 31:59–64CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Weir JP (2005) Quantifying test–retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res 19:231–240CrossRefPubMed Weir JP (2005) Quantifying test–retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res 19:231–240CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Panoramic ultrasonography is a valid method to measure changes in skeletal muscle cross-sectional area
Authors
Juha P. Ahtiainen
Merja Hoffren
Juha J. Hulmi
Mikko Pietikäinen
Antti A. Mero
Janne Avela
Keijo Häkkinen
Publication date
01-01-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology / Issue 2/2010
Print ISSN: 1439-6319
Electronic ISSN: 1439-6327
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-009-1211-6

Other articles of this Issue 2/2010

European Journal of Applied Physiology 2/2010 Go to the issue