Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 3/2021

Open Access 01-03-2021 | Neuroophthalmology

Training of vertical versus horizontal reading in patients with hemianopia – a randomized and controlled study

Authors: S. Kuester-Gruber, P. Kabisch, A. Cordey, H.-O. Karnath, S. Trauzettel-Klosinski

Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Issue 3/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Hypothesis

Patients with hemianopic field defects (HFD) might benefit from reading text in vertical orientation if they place the text in the seeing hemifield along the vertical midline.

Methods

We assigned 21 patients with HFD randomly to either vertical or horizontal reading training. They trained reading single lines of texts from a computer screen at home for 2 × 30 min/day, 5 days/week, for 4 weeks. The main outcome variable was reading speed (RS) during reading standardized paragraphs of printed text (IReST) aloud. RS was assessed before training (T1), directly after training (T2) and 4 weeks later (T3). Quality of life (QoL) was assessed by Impact of Visual Impairment (IVI) questionnaire.

Results

Vertical training improved RS in the vertical direction significantly. Only patients with right HFD benefited. Horizontal training improved RS in horizontal diection significantly, but much more in patients with left than in those with right HFD. Both effects remained stable at T3. RS during training at the computer improved highly significantly and correlated strongly with RS of printed text (Pearson r= > 0.9). QoL: Vertical training showed a statistically significant improvement in the complete IVI-score, patients with right HFD in the emotional IVI-score.

Conclusions

The improvements of RS were specific for the training. The stable effect indicates that the patients can apply the newly learned strategies to everyday life. The side of the HFD plays an essential role: Left-HFD patients benefitted from horizontal training, right-HFD patients from vertical training. However, the vertical RS did not reach the level of horizontal RS.
The study was registered in the German Clinical Trials register (DRKS-ID: DRKS00018843).
Literature
9.
go back to reference Trauzettel-Klosinski S, Brendler K (1998) Eye movements in reading with hemianopic field defects: the significance of clinical parameters. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol 236:91–102CrossRef Trauzettel-Klosinski S, Brendler K (1998) Eye movements in reading with hemianopic field defects: the significance of clinical parameters. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol 236:91–102CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Trauzettel-Klosinski S, Reinhard J (1998) The vertical field border in hemianopia and its significance for fixation and reading. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 39:2177–2186PubMed Trauzettel-Klosinski S, Reinhard J (1998) The vertical field border in hemianopia and its significance for fixation and reading. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 39:2177–2186PubMed
11.
go back to reference Schmidt D, Ullrich D, Rossner R (1993) Horizontal and vertical reading: a comparative investigation of eye movements. Ger J Ophthalmol 2:251–255PubMed Schmidt D, Ullrich D, Rossner R (1993) Horizontal and vertical reading: a comparative investigation of eye movements. Ger J Ophthalmol 2:251–255PubMed
15.
go back to reference Wertheim TH, Dunsky IL (1980) Peripheral visual acuity. Optom Vis Sci 57 Wertheim TH, Dunsky IL (1980) Peripheral visual acuity. Optom Vis Sci 57
25.
go back to reference Hassell JB, Weih LM, Keeffe JE (2000) A measure of handicap for low vision rehabilitation: the impact of vision impairment profile. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 28:156–161CrossRef Hassell JB, Weih LM, Keeffe JE (2000) A measure of handicap for low vision rehabilitation: the impact of vision impairment profile. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 28:156–161CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Kaltenegger K, Kuester S, Altpeter-Ott E, Eschweiler GW, Cordey A, Ivanov IV, Martus P, Knipp C, Trauzettel-Klosinski S (2019). Effects of home reading training on reading and quality of life in AMD—a randomized and controlled study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 257(7), 1499–1512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-019-04328-9 Kaltenegger K, Kuester S, Altpeter-Ott E, Eschweiler GW, Cordey A, Ivanov IV, Martus P, Knipp C, Trauzettel-Klosinski S (2019). Effects of home reading training on reading and quality of life in AMD—a randomized and controlled study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 257(7), 1499–1512. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00417-019-04328-9
Metadata
Title
Training of vertical versus horizontal reading in patients with hemianopia – a randomized and controlled study
Authors
S. Kuester-Gruber
P. Kabisch
A. Cordey
H.-O. Karnath
S. Trauzettel-Klosinski
Publication date
01-03-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Issue 3/2021
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-020-04952-w

Other articles of this Issue 3/2021

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 3/2021 Go to the issue