Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 9/2020

01-09-2020 | Canthotomy | Oculoplastics and Orbit

Efficacy of porcine acellular dermal matrix in the management of lower eyelid retraction: case series and review of the literature

Authors: Lindsay A. McGrath, Thomas G. Hardy, Alan A. McNab

Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Issue 9/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the efficacy of Permacol™, a decellularized porcine dermal–derived membrane, as a spacer in the management of lower eyelid retraction. The efficacy of sizing and insertion was investigated, as well as complications. The literature was also reviewed to compare this material with other porcine-derived grafts in use for the management of lower eyelid retraction.

Methods

This was a retrospective case series observing all patients who received lower eyelid Permacol implants by the two senior authors (AAM, TGH) for the management of lower eyelid retraction. Patient demographics, indications for surgery, graft size, degree of postoperative lid advancement, and complications were reviewed.

Results

A total of 12 patients (16 eyelids) received Permacol implants for correction of lower eyelid retraction during the study period of 18 months (January 2015 to July 2017). Ten procedures were related to thyroid eye disease, 3 for reconstruction, 2 postcosmetic lower lid blepharoplasty, and one acquired anophthalmic socket. The average preoperative inferior scleral show (ISS) was 1.74 mm, and the average postoperative ISS was 0.82 mm. There was a mean lower eyelid elevation of 0.91 mm (p < 0.005, Wilcoxon signed rank test) and mean ratio of graft height:preoperative ISS was 3.8:1 over a median of 8 months follow-up.

Conclusions

Permacol is a safe and effective alternative to autologous tissues for use as a spacer in patients with lower eyelid retraction of varying etiologies. It does undergo some resorption with time, however this can be predicted and incorporated into surgical planning; we recommend an implant height:ISS ratio of 4:1.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Dunn RM (2012) Cross-linking in biomaterials: a primer for clinicians. Plast Reconstr Surg 130(5 Suppl 2):18S–26SPubMedCrossRef Dunn RM (2012) Cross-linking in biomaterials: a primer for clinicians. Plast Reconstr Surg 130(5 Suppl 2):18S–26SPubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Novitsky YW, Rosen MJ (2012) The biology of biologics: basic science and clinical concepts. Plast Reconstr Surg 130(5 Suppl 2):9S–17SPubMedCrossRef Novitsky YW, Rosen MJ (2012) The biology of biologics: basic science and clinical concepts. Plast Reconstr Surg 130(5 Suppl 2):9S–17SPubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Borrelli M, Unterlauft J, Kleinsasser N et al (2012) Decellularized porcine derived membrane (Tarsys(R)) for correction of lower eyelid retraction. Orbit 31(3):187–189PubMedCrossRef Borrelli M, Unterlauft J, Kleinsasser N et al (2012) Decellularized porcine derived membrane (Tarsys(R)) for correction of lower eyelid retraction. Orbit 31(3):187–189PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference McCord C, Nahai FR, Codner MA et al (2008) Use of porcine acellular dermal matrix (Enduragen) grafts in eyelids: a review of 69 patients and 129 eyelids. Plast Reconstr Surg 122(4):1206–1213PubMedCrossRef McCord C, Nahai FR, Codner MA et al (2008) Use of porcine acellular dermal matrix (Enduragen) grafts in eyelids: a review of 69 patients and 129 eyelids. Plast Reconstr Surg 122(4):1206–1213PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Liao SL, Wei YH (2013) Correction of lower lid retraction using tarSys bioengineered grafts for graves ophthalmopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 156(2):387–92 e1PubMedCrossRef Liao SL, Wei YH (2013) Correction of lower lid retraction using tarSys bioengineered grafts for graves ophthalmopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 156(2):387–92 e1PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Barmettler A, Heo M (2018) A prospective, randomized comparison of lower eyelid retraction repair with autologous auricular cartilage, bovine acellular dermal matrix (Surgimend), and porcine acellular dermal matrix (Enduragen) spacer grafts. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 34(3):266–273PubMedCrossRef Barmettler A, Heo M (2018) A prospective, randomized comparison of lower eyelid retraction repair with autologous auricular cartilage, bovine acellular dermal matrix (Surgimend), and porcine acellular dermal matrix (Enduragen) spacer grafts. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 34(3):266–273PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Teo L, Woo YJ, Kim DK et al (2017) Surgical outcomes of porcine acellular dermis graft in anophthalmic socket: comparison with oral mucosa graft. Korean J Ophthalmol 31(1):9–15PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Teo L, Woo YJ, Kim DK et al (2017) Surgical outcomes of porcine acellular dermis graft in anophthalmic socket: comparison with oral mucosa graft. Korean J Ophthalmol 31(1):9–15PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Dailey RA, Marx DP, Ahn ES (2015) Porcine dermal collagen in lower eyelid retraction repair. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 31(3):233–241PubMedCrossRef Dailey RA, Marx DP, Ahn ES (2015) Porcine dermal collagen in lower eyelid retraction repair. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 31(3):233–241PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kersten RC, Kulwin DR, Levartovsky S et al (1990) Management of lower-lid retraction with hard-palate mucosa grafting. Arch Ophthalmol 108(9):1339–1343PubMedCrossRef Kersten RC, Kulwin DR, Levartovsky S et al (1990) Management of lower-lid retraction with hard-palate mucosa grafting. Arch Ophthalmol 108(9):1339–1343PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Sullivan SA, Dailey RA (2003) Graft contraction: a comparison of acellular dermis versus hard palate mucosa in lower eyelid surgery. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 19(1):14–24PubMedCrossRef Sullivan SA, Dailey RA (2003) Graft contraction: a comparison of acellular dermis versus hard palate mucosa in lower eyelid surgery. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 19(1):14–24PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Park E, Lewis K, Alghoul MS (2017) Comparison of efficacy and complications among various spacer grafts in the treatment of lower eyelid retraction: a systematic review. Aesthet Surg J 37(7):743–754PubMedCrossRef Park E, Lewis K, Alghoul MS (2017) Comparison of efficacy and complications among various spacer grafts in the treatment of lower eyelid retraction: a systematic review. Aesthet Surg J 37(7):743–754PubMedCrossRef
12.
13.
go back to reference Grumbine FL, Idowu O, Kersten RC, Deparis SW, Vagefi MR (2019) Correction of lower eyelid retraction with en glove placement of porcine dermal collagen matrix implant. Plast Reconstr Surg 143(3):743–746PubMedCrossRef Grumbine FL, Idowu O, Kersten RC, Deparis SW, Vagefi MR (2019) Correction of lower eyelid retraction with en glove placement of porcine dermal collagen matrix implant. Plast Reconstr Surg 143(3):743–746PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Symbas J, McCord C, Nahai F (2011) Acellular dermal matrix in eyelid surgery. Aesthet Surg J 31(7 Suppl):101S–107SPubMedCrossRef Symbas J, McCord C, Nahai F (2011) Acellular dermal matrix in eyelid surgery. Aesthet Surg J 31(7 Suppl):101S–107SPubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kim HJ, Grossniklaus HE, Wojno TH (2014) A cyst-like foreign body reaction to porcine decellularized membrane (TarSys). Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 30(4):e100–e102PubMedCrossRef Kim HJ, Grossniklaus HE, Wojno TH (2014) A cyst-like foreign body reaction to porcine decellularized membrane (TarSys). Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 30(4):e100–e102PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Cheung D, Brown L, Sampath R (2004) Localized inferior orbital fibrosis associated with porcine dermal collagen xenograft orbital floor implant. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 20(3):2579CrossRef Cheung D, Brown L, Sampath R (2004) Localized inferior orbital fibrosis associated with porcine dermal collagen xenograft orbital floor implant. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 20(3):2579CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Mancera N, Schneider A, Margo CE, Bajric J (2019) Inflammatory reaction to decellularized porcine-derived xenograft for lower eyelid retraction. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 35(4):e95–e97PubMedCrossRef Mancera N, Schneider A, Margo CE, Bajric J (2019) Inflammatory reaction to decellularized porcine-derived xenograft for lower eyelid retraction. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 35(4):e95–e97PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Alwitry A, Burns SJ, Abercrombie LC (2006) Orbital implant exposure treatment with porcine dermal collagen patching. Orbit 25:253–256PubMedCrossRef Alwitry A, Burns SJ, Abercrombie LC (2006) Orbital implant exposure treatment with porcine dermal collagen patching. Orbit 25:253–256PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Tan P, Wong J, Siah WF, Malhotra R (2018) Outcomes of lower eyelid retractor recession and lateral horn lysis in lower eyelid elevation for facial nerve palsy. Eye 32:338–344PubMedCrossRef Tan P, Wong J, Siah WF, Malhotra R (2018) Outcomes of lower eyelid retractor recession and lateral horn lysis in lower eyelid elevation for facial nerve palsy. Eye 32:338–344PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Norris JH, Ross JJ, O’Reilly P, Malhotra R (2011) A review of combined orbital decompression and lower eyelid recession surgery for lower eyelid retraction in thyroid orbitopathy. Br J Ophthalmol 95:1664–1669PubMedCrossRef Norris JH, Ross JJ, O’Reilly P, Malhotra R (2011) A review of combined orbital decompression and lower eyelid recession surgery for lower eyelid retraction in thyroid orbitopathy. Br J Ophthalmol 95:1664–1669PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Efficacy of porcine acellular dermal matrix in the management of lower eyelid retraction: case series and review of the literature
Authors
Lindsay A. McGrath
Thomas G. Hardy
Alan A. McNab
Publication date
01-09-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Keyword
Canthotomy
Published in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Issue 9/2020
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-020-04660-5

Other articles of this Issue 9/2020

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 9/2020 Go to the issue