Published in:
01-02-2017 | Glaucoma
Contralateral eye comparison study in MICS & MIGS: Trabectome® vs. iStent inject®
Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Issue 2/2017
Login to get accessAbstract
Purpose
To compare the safety and efficacy profile after combined micro-incision cataract surgery (MICS) and micro-invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) with the ab interno trabeculectomy (Trabectome®) in one eye versus two iStent® inject devices in the contralateral eye in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and cataract.
Methods
This retrospective, intraindividual eye comparison study included 27 patients (54 eyes) who were treated with combined MICS and ab interno trabeculectomy (group I, Trabectome®) in one eye and two iStent® inject devices (group II, GTS 400) in the fellow eye. Primary outcome measures included intraocular pressure (IOP) and glaucoma medication after 6 weeks, 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up. Secondary outcome measures were number of postoperative interventions, complications, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA).
Results
Mean preoperative IOP decreased from 22.3 ± 3.7 mmHg in group I and 21.3 ± 4.1 mmHg in group II to 15.6 ± 3.6 mmHg for Trabectome (p < 0.001) and 14.0 ± 2.3 mmHg for iStent inject (p < 0.001) at 12 months after surgery without a significant difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). No vision-threatening complications such as choroidal effusion, choroidal hemorrhage, or infection occurred. In each group trabeculectomy had to be performed in two eyes due to insufficient IOP lowering effect.
Conclusions
Ab interno trabeculectomy and iStent® inject were both effective in lowering IOP with a favourable and comparable safety profile in an intraindividual comparative study over a 12-months follow-up in OAG. However, longer follow-up of these patients will be necessary to determine long-term outcomes and to evaluate significant differences.