Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 8/2016

01-08-2016 | Cornea

Therapeutic dilemma in fungal keratitis: administration of steroids for immune rejection early after keratoplasty

Authors: Ting Wang, Suxia Li, Hua Gao, Weiyun Shi

Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Issue 8/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the timing and dosage of topical corticosteroid use after keratoplasty for fungal keratitis, and to evaluate the results with regard to anterior segment inflammation, immune rejection, and fungal recurrence.

Methods

This prospective observational study included a total of 244 patients (244 eyes) who underwent penetrating keratoplasty (PK, 118 patients) or lamellar keratoplasty (LK, 126 patients) for fungal keratitis at the Shandong Eye Hospital between January 2009 and April 2014. Topical administration of steroid eye drops was initiated at 1 week after surgery. Changes in ocular inflammation before and after steroid use, percentages of eyes with fungal recurrence and immune rejection, and the relationship between the timing of local administration of steroids and therapeutic anti-inflammatory effects after keratoplasty were evaluated. The follow-up period was 6 months.

Results

Anterior segment inflammation was aggravated within 1 week after surgery, with ocular pain, photophobia, redness, and tearing, but was controlled at 7.51 ± 1.76 days after steroid use. Fungal keratitis recurred in three eyes (1.23 %) at 3 to 5 days after administration of corticosteroids, including two eyes receiving PK and one eye receiving LK. Recurrence was controlled with antifungal medications. Allograft rejection occurred in eight (6.78 %) of 118 patients treated by PK, but did not occur in patients treated by LK.

Conclusions

Initiating the use of topical corticosteroids in patients with fungal keratitis 1 week after keratoplasty can aid in rapid control of anterior segment inflammation and reduction of immune rejection, with no increase in the rate of fungal recurrence.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Kalavathy CM, Parmar P, Kaliamurthy J, Philip VR, Ramalingam MD, Jesudasan CA, Thomas PA (2005) Comparison of topical itraconazole 1% with topical natamycin 5% for the treatment of filamentous fungal keratitis. Cornea 24:449–452CrossRefPubMed Kalavathy CM, Parmar P, Kaliamurthy J, Philip VR, Ramalingam MD, Jesudasan CA, Thomas PA (2005) Comparison of topical itraconazole 1% with topical natamycin 5% for the treatment of filamentous fungal keratitis. Cornea 24:449–452CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Xie L, Zhong W, Shi W, Sun S (2006) Spectrum of fungal keratitis in north China. Ophthalmology 113:1943–1948CrossRefPubMed Xie L, Zhong W, Shi W, Sun S (2006) Spectrum of fungal keratitis in north China. Ophthalmology 113:1943–1948CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Xie L, Zhai H, Shi W (2007) Penetrating keratoplasty for corneal perforations in fungal keratitis. Cornea 26:158–162CrossRefPubMed Xie L, Zhai H, Shi W (2007) Penetrating keratoplasty for corneal perforations in fungal keratitis. Cornea 26:158–162CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Xie L, Shi W, Liu Z, Li S (2002) Lamellar keratoplasty for the treatment of fungal keratitis. Cornea 21:33–37CrossRefPubMed Xie L, Shi W, Liu Z, Li S (2002) Lamellar keratoplasty for the treatment of fungal keratitis. Cornea 21:33–37CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Shi W, Wang T, Xie L, Li S, Gao H, Liu J, Li H (2010) Risk factors, clinical features, and outcomes of recurrent fungal keratitis after corneal transplantation. Ophthalmology 17:890–896CrossRef Shi W, Wang T, Xie L, Li S, Gao H, Liu J, Li H (2010) Risk factors, clinical features, and outcomes of recurrent fungal keratitis after corneal transplantation. Ophthalmology 17:890–896CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Shi W, Wang T, Zhang J, Zhao J, Xie L (2008) Clinical features of immune rejection after corneoscleral transplantation. Am J Ophthalmol 146:707–713CrossRefPubMed Shi W, Wang T, Zhang J, Zhao J, Xie L (2008) Clinical features of immune rejection after corneoscleral transplantation. Am J Ophthalmol 146:707–713CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Li C, Zhao G, Che C, Lin J, Li N, Jia WY, Zhang QQ, Jiang N, Hu LT (2012) Effect of corneal graft diameter on therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty for fungal keratitis. Int J Ophthalmol 5:698–703PubMedPubMedCentral Li C, Zhao G, Che C, Lin J, Li N, Jia WY, Zhang QQ, Jiang N, Hu LT (2012) Effect of corneal graft diameter on therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty for fungal keratitis. Int J Ophthalmol 5:698–703PubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Seedor JA, Stulting RD, Epstein RJ, Nay RE, Dreizen NG, Waring GO 3rd, Wilson LA, Cavanagh HD (1987) Survival of corneal grafts from donors supported by mechanical ventilation. Ophthalmology 94:101–108CrossRefPubMed Seedor JA, Stulting RD, Epstein RJ, Nay RE, Dreizen NG, Waring GO 3rd, Wilson LA, Cavanagh HD (1987) Survival of corneal grafts from donors supported by mechanical ventilation. Ophthalmology 94:101–108CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Belliappa S, Hade J, Kim S, Ayres BD, Chu DS (2010) Surgical outcomes in cases of contact lens-related Fusarium keratitis. Eye Contact Lens 36:190–194CrossRefPubMed Belliappa S, Hade J, Kim S, Ayres BD, Chu DS (2010) Surgical outcomes in cases of contact lens-related Fusarium keratitis. Eye Contact Lens 36:190–194CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Alfonso EC, Rosa RH Jr, Miller D (2005) Fungal keratitis. In: Krachmer JH, Mannis MJ, Holland EJ (eds) Cornea, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Mosby, pp 1101–1113 Alfonso EC, Rosa RH Jr, Miller D (2005) Fungal keratitis. In: Krachmer JH, Mannis MJ, Holland EJ (eds) Cornea, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Mosby, pp 1101–1113
12.
go back to reference Gregory ME, Macdonald EC, Lockington D, Ramaesh K (2010) Recurrent fungal keratitis following penetrating keratoplasty: an unusual source of infection. Arch Ophthalmol 128:1490–1491CrossRefPubMed Gregory ME, Macdonald EC, Lockington D, Ramaesh K (2010) Recurrent fungal keratitis following penetrating keratoplasty: an unusual source of infection. Arch Ophthalmol 128:1490–1491CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Jain V, Maiti A, Shome D, Borse N, Natarajan S (2007) Aspergillus-induced malignant glaucoma. Cornea 26:762–763CrossRefPubMed Jain V, Maiti A, Shome D, Borse N, Natarajan S (2007) Aspergillus-induced malignant glaucoma. Cornea 26:762–763CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Avunduk AM, Beuerman RW, Warnel ED, Kaufman HE, Greer D (2003) Comparison of efficacy of topical and oral fluconazole treatment in experimental Aspergillus keratitis. Curr Eye Res 26:113–117CrossRefPubMed Avunduk AM, Beuerman RW, Warnel ED, Kaufman HE, Greer D (2003) Comparison of efficacy of topical and oral fluconazole treatment in experimental Aspergillus keratitis. Curr Eye Res 26:113–117CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Kiryu H, Yoshida S, Suenaga Y, Asahi M (1991) Invasion and survival of Fusarium solani in the dexamethasone-treated cornea of rabbits. J Med Vet Mycol 29:395–406CrossRefPubMed Kiryu H, Yoshida S, Suenaga Y, Asahi M (1991) Invasion and survival of Fusarium solani in the dexamethasone-treated cornea of rabbits. J Med Vet Mycol 29:395–406CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Watson SL, Tuft SJ, Dart JK (2006) Patterns of rejection after deep lamellar keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 113:556–560CrossRefPubMed Watson SL, Tuft SJ, Dart JK (2006) Patterns of rejection after deep lamellar keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 113:556–560CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Forseto Ados S, dos Santos MS, Sampaio A, Mascaro V, Nosé W (2006) Diagnosis of epithelial ingrowth after penetrating keratoplasty with confocal microscopy. Cornea 25:1124–1127CrossRefPubMed Forseto Ados S, dos Santos MS, Sampaio A, Mascaro V, Nosé W (2006) Diagnosis of epithelial ingrowth after penetrating keratoplasty with confocal microscopy. Cornea 25:1124–1127CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Nicholls SM, Banerjee S, Figueiredo FC, Crome S, Mistry S, Easty DL, Dick AD (2006) Differences in leukocyte phenotype and interferon-gamma expression in stroma and endothelium during corneal graft rejection. Exp Eye Res 83:339–347CrossRefPubMed Nicholls SM, Banerjee S, Figueiredo FC, Crome S, Mistry S, Easty DL, Dick AD (2006) Differences in leukocyte phenotype and interferon-gamma expression in stroma and endothelium during corneal graft rejection. Exp Eye Res 83:339–347CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Price FW Jr, Price DA, Ngakeng V, Price MO (2009) Survey of steroid usage patterns during and after low-risk penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea 28:865–870CrossRefPubMed Price FW Jr, Price DA, Ngakeng V, Price MO (2009) Survey of steroid usage patterns during and after low-risk penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea 28:865–870CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Shimazaki J, Iseda A, Satake Y, Shimazaki-Den S (2012) Efficacy and safety of long-term corticosteroid eye drops after penetrating keratoplasty: a prospective, randomized, clinical trial. Ophthalmology 119:668–673CrossRefPubMed Shimazaki J, Iseda A, Satake Y, Shimazaki-Den S (2012) Efficacy and safety of long-term corticosteroid eye drops after penetrating keratoplasty: a prospective, randomized, clinical trial. Ophthalmology 119:668–673CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Nguyen NX, Seitz B, Martus P, Langenbucher A, Cursiefen C (2007) Long-term topical steroid treatment improves graft survival following normal-risk penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 144:318–319CrossRefPubMed Nguyen NX, Seitz B, Martus P, Langenbucher A, Cursiefen C (2007) Long-term topical steroid treatment improves graft survival following normal-risk penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 144:318–319CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Therapeutic dilemma in fungal keratitis: administration of steroids for immune rejection early after keratoplasty
Authors
Ting Wang
Suxia Li
Hua Gao
Weiyun Shi
Publication date
01-08-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Issue 8/2016
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-016-3412-0

Other articles of this Issue 8/2016

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 8/2016 Go to the issue