Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 6/2016

Open Access 01-06-2016 | Basic Science

Fiat Lux: the effect of illuminance on acuity testing

Authors: Laurence P. Tidbury, Gabriela Czanner, David Newsham

Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Issue 6/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the effect of changing illuminance on visual and stereo acuity.

Methods

Twenty-eight subjects aged 21 to 60 years were assessed. Monocular visual acuity (ETDRS) of emmetropic subjects was assessed under 15 different illuminance levels (50–8000 lux), provided by a computer controlled halogen lighting rig. Three levels of myopia (−0.50DS, −1.00DS & 1.50DS) were induced in each subject using lenses and visual acuity (VA) was retested under the same illuminance conditions. Stereoacuity (TNO) was assessed under the same levels of illuminance.

Results

A one log unit change in illuminance level (lx) results in a significant change of 0.060 LogMAR (p < 0.001), an effect that is exacerbated in the presence of induced myopic refractive error (p < 0.001). Stereoacuity scores demonstrate statistically significant overall differences between illuminance levels (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The findings of this study demonstrate that changes in illuminance have a statistically significant effect on VA that may contribute to test/retest variability. Increases in illuminance from 50 to 500 lx resulted in an improved VA score of 0.12 LogMAR. Differences like these have significant clinical implications, such as false negatives during vision screening and non-detection of VA deterioration, as the full magnitude of any change may be hidden. In research where VA is a primary outcome measure, differences of 0.12 LogMAR or even less could affect the statistical significance and conclusions of a study. It is recommended that VA assessment always be performed between 400 lx and 600 lx, as this limits any effect of illuminance change to 0.012 LogMAR.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bailey IL, Lovie JE (1976) New design principles for visual acuity letter charts. Am J Optom Physiol Optic 53(11):740–745CrossRef Bailey IL, Lovie JE (1976) New design principles for visual acuity letter charts. Am J Optom Physiol Optic 53(11):740–745CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ferris FL III, Kassoff A, Bresnick GH, Bailey L (1982) New visual acuity charts for clinical research. Am J Ophthalmol 94(1):91–96CrossRefPubMed Ferris FL III, Kassoff A, Bresnick GH, Bailey L (1982) New visual acuity charts for clinical research. Am J Ophthalmol 94(1):91–96CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Ferris FL III, Sperduto RD (1982) Standardized illumination for visual acuity testing in clinical research. Am J Ophthalmol 94(1):97–98CrossRefPubMed Ferris FL III, Sperduto RD (1982) Standardized illumination for visual acuity testing in clinical research. Am J Ophthalmol 94(1):97–98CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Wozniak H, Kelly M, Glover S, Moss N (1999) The effect of room illumination on visual acuity measurement. Aust Orthoptic J 34:3 Wozniak H, Kelly M, Glover S, Moss N (1999) The effect of room illumination on visual acuity measurement. Aust Orthoptic J 34:3
6.
go back to reference Sheedy JE, Bailey IL, Raasch TW (1984) Visual acuity and chart luminance. Am J Optom Physiol Optic 61(9):595–600CrossRef Sheedy JE, Bailey IL, Raasch TW (1984) Visual acuity and chart luminance. Am J Optom Physiol Optic 61(9):595–600CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Rabin J (1994) Luminance effects on visual acuity and small letter contrast sensitivity. Optom Vis Sci 71(11):685–688CrossRefPubMed Rabin J (1994) Luminance effects on visual acuity and small letter contrast sensitivity. Optom Vis Sci 71(11):685–688CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Lee EM, Feis AE, Clark A (2009) Effect of room illumination in computerized visual acuity (Using Smart System II). Optom J Am Optom Assoc 80(6):316CrossRef Lee EM, Feis AE, Clark A (2009) Effect of room illumination in computerized visual acuity (Using Smart System II). Optom J Am Optom Assoc 80(6):316CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Johnson CA, Casson EJ (1995) Effects of luminance, contrast, and blur on visual acuity. Optom Vis Sci 72(12):864–869CrossRefPubMed Johnson CA, Casson EJ (1995) Effects of luminance, contrast, and blur on visual acuity. Optom Vis Sci 72(12):864–869CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Simpson TL, Barbeito R, Bedell HE (1986) The effect of optical blur on visual acuity for targets of different luminances. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 6(3):279–281CrossRefPubMed Simpson TL, Barbeito R, Bedell HE (1986) The effect of optical blur on visual acuity for targets of different luminances. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 6(3):279–281CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Allen C (1995) Astrophysical quantities, 3rd edn. Athlone Press, London, p 141 Allen C (1995) Astrophysical quantities, 3rd edn. Athlone Press, London, p 141
12.
go back to reference British Standards Institute (2011) BS EN 12464–1:2011 < br />Light and Lighting—lighting of work places < br />Part 1: indoor work places. BS EN 12464–1:2011 British Standards Institute (2011) BS EN 12464–1:2011 < br />Light and Lighting—lighting of work places < br />Part 1: indoor work places. BS EN 12464–1:2011
13.
14.
go back to reference Taylor AEF (2000) Illumination fundamentals. Optical Research Associates, California, pp 11–14 Taylor AEF (2000) Illumination fundamentals. Optical Research Associates, California, pp 11–14
15.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1(8476):307–310CrossRefPubMed Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1(8476):307–310CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Arditi A, Cagenello R (1993) On the statistical reliability of letter-chart visual acuity measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 34(1):120–129PubMed Arditi A, Cagenello R (1993) On the statistical reliability of letter-chart visual acuity measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 34(1):120–129PubMed
17.
go back to reference Rosser DA, Laidlaw DAH, Murdoch IE (2001) The development of a “reduced logMAR” visual acuity chart for use in routine clinical practice. Br J Ophthalmol 85(4):432–436CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rosser DA, Laidlaw DAH, Murdoch IE (2001) The development of a “reduced logMAR” visual acuity chart for use in routine clinical practice. Br J Ophthalmol 85(4):432–436CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Lim L, Frost NA, Powell RJ, Hewson P (2010) Comparison of the ETDRS logMAR, compact reduced logMar and Snellen charts in routine clinical practice. Eye 24(4):673–677CrossRefPubMed Lim L, Frost NA, Powell RJ, Hewson P (2010) Comparison of the ETDRS logMAR, compact reduced logMar and Snellen charts in routine clinical practice. Eye 24(4):673–677CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Gouthaman M, Raman RP, Kadambi A, Padmajakumari R, Paul PG, Sharma T (2005) A customised portable LogMAR chart with adjustable chart illumination for use as a mass screening device in the rural population. J Postgrad Med 51(2):112–114PubMed Gouthaman M, Raman RP, Kadambi A, Padmajakumari R, Paul PG, Sharma T (2005) A customised portable LogMAR chart with adjustable chart illumination for use as a mass screening device in the rural population. J Postgrad Med 51(2):112–114PubMed
20.
go back to reference Laidlaw DAH, Abbott A, Rosser DA (2003) Development of a clinically feasible logMAR alternative to the Snellen chart: performance of the “compact reduced logMAR” visual acuity chart in amblyopic children. Br J Ophthalmol 87(10):1232–1234CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Laidlaw DAH, Abbott A, Rosser DA (2003) Development of a clinically feasible logMAR alternative to the Snellen chart: performance of the “compact reduced logMAR” visual acuity chart in amblyopic children. Br J Ophthalmol 87(10):1232–1234CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Rosser DA, Cousens SN, Murdoch IE, Fitzke FW, Laidlaw DAH (2003) How sensitive to clinical change are ETDRS logMAR visual acuity measurements? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44(8):3278–3281CrossRefPubMed Rosser DA, Cousens SN, Murdoch IE, Fitzke FW, Laidlaw DAH (2003) How sensitive to clinical change are ETDRS logMAR visual acuity measurements? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44(8):3278–3281CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Snijders TAB, Bosker RJ (2012) Multilevel analysis. An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modelling, 2nd edn. SAGE Publications Ltd Snijders TAB, Bosker RJ (2012) Multilevel analysis. An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modelling, 2nd edn. SAGE Publications Ltd
23.
go back to reference Haymes SA, Lee J (2006) Effects of task lighting on visual function in age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 26(2):169–179CrossRefPubMed Haymes SA, Lee J (2006) Effects of task lighting on visual function in age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 26(2):169–179CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Baker PA, Raos AS, Thompson JMD, Jacobs RJ (2013) Visual acuity during direct laryngoscopy at different illuminance levels. Anesth Analg 116(2):343–350CrossRefPubMed Baker PA, Raos AS, Thompson JMD, Jacobs RJ (2013) Visual acuity during direct laryngoscopy at different illuminance levels. Anesth Analg 116(2):343–350CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Lovasik JV, Szymkiw M (1985) Effects of aniseikonia, anisometropia, accommodation, retinal illuminance, and pupil size on stereopsis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 26(5):741–750PubMed Lovasik JV, Szymkiw M (1985) Effects of aniseikonia, anisometropia, accommodation, retinal illuminance, and pupil size on stereopsis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 26(5):741–750PubMed
26.
go back to reference Yap M, Brown B, Clarke J (1994) Reduction in stereoacuity with age and reduced retinal illuminance. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 14(3):298–301CrossRefPubMed Yap M, Brown B, Clarke J (1994) Reduction in stereoacuity with age and reduced retinal illuminance. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 14(3):298–301CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Chang Y, Lee JB, Kim NS, Lee DW, Chang JH, Han S (2006) The effects of interocular differences in retinal illuminance on vision and binocularity. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 244(9):1083–1088CrossRefPubMed Chang Y, Lee JB, Kim NS, Lee DW, Chang JH, Han S (2006) The effects of interocular differences in retinal illuminance on vision and binocularity. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 244(9):1083–1088CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Fosse P, Valberg A, Arnljot HM (2001) Retinal illuminance and the dissociation of letter and grating acuity in age-related macular degeneration. Optom Vis Sci 78(3):162–168CrossRefPubMed Fosse P, Valberg A, Arnljot HM (2001) Retinal illuminance and the dissociation of letter and grating acuity in age-related macular degeneration. Optom Vis Sci 78(3):162–168CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Neubauer AS, Langer J, Liegl R, Haritoglou C, Wolf A, Kozak I (2013) Navigated macular laser decreases retreatment rate for diabetic macular edema: a comparison with conventional macular laser. Clin Ophthalmol 7(1):121–128PubMedPubMedCentral Neubauer AS, Langer J, Liegl R, Haritoglou C, Wolf A, Kozak I (2013) Navigated macular laser decreases retreatment rate for diabetic macular edema: a comparison with conventional macular laser. Clin Ophthalmol 7(1):121–128PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Fiat Lux: the effect of illuminance on acuity testing
Authors
Laurence P. Tidbury
Gabriela Czanner
David Newsham
Publication date
01-06-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Issue 6/2016
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-016-3329-7

Other articles of this Issue 6/2016

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 6/2016 Go to the issue