Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 8/2012

01-08-2012 | Glaucoma

Surveillance of late-onset bleb leak, blebitis and bleb-related endophthalmitis — a UK incidence study

Authors: A. Alwitry, A. J. King

Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Issue 8/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Aims

To determine the incidence of late-onset bleb leak (BL), blebitis (B) and bleb-related endophthalmitis (BRE) after trabeculectomy surgery, and report the management approaches employed by UK ophthalmologists.

Methods

Prospective case ascertainment study reporting of incident cases fulfilling the study definitions of BL, B and BRE through the reporting mechanism provided by the British Ophthalmic Surveillance Unit (BOSU; United Kingdom) for the period July 2007 to August 2008 (13 months). Two questionnaires completed at initial reporting and 6 months later were used to collect clinical details related to presentation, early and late management and outcome.

Results

Ninety-eight cases were reported to the British Ophthalmic Surveillance Unit during the study period. Seventy-one first questionnaires were returned (response rate 72.4%). Of these, 11 were erroneous/duplicated. Sixty second questionnaires were sent out, and of these 37 fully completed questionnaires were returned. Analysis was, therefore, based upon 60 initial and 37 follow-up questionnaires. Overall incidences were estimated for isolated bleb leak (0.22%), blebitis without bleb leak (0.1%), blebitis with bleb leak (0.11%), and BRE with or without bleb leak (0.17%). Visual outcome in the BL group was good; however, in the BRE group half the patients ended with visions of perception of light or worse. There was a great variance in the initial and late management of these conditions. Surgical intervention for bleb leak seemed to result in the best chance of leak closure.

Conclusions

These complications of trabeculectomy surgery are relatively low but potentially visually devastating. This study updates the knowledge of the incidence of these complications, and suggests that no consistent management approach to any of the reported conditions was practised. In view of the potentially catastrophic consequences of these complications, formal guidance as to best practice would be beneficial, and further research to establish this is required.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fraser SG, Wormald RP (2008) Hospital Episode Statistics and changing trends in glaucoma surgery. Eye 22:3–7PubMedCrossRef Fraser SG, Wormald RP (2008) Hospital Episode Statistics and changing trends in glaucoma surgery. Eye 22:3–7PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Keenan TD, Wotton CJ, Goldacre MJ (2011) Recent trends in the rate of trabeculectomy in England. Eye 25:1243–1245PubMedCrossRef Keenan TD, Wotton CJ, Goldacre MJ (2011) Recent trends in the rate of trabeculectomy in England. Eye 25:1243–1245PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Thacker SB, Redmond S, Rothenberg RB, Spitz SB, Choi K, White MC (1986) A controlled trial of disease surveillance strategies. Am J Prev Med 2:345–350PubMed Thacker SB, Redmond S, Rothenberg RB, Spitz SB, Choi K, White MC (1986) A controlled trial of disease surveillance strategies. Am J Prev Med 2:345–350PubMed
4.
go back to reference Vogt RL, LaRue D, Klaucke DN, Jillson DA (1983) Comparison of an active and passive surveillance system of primary care providers for hepetitis, measles, rubella, and salmonellosis in Vermont. Am J Pub Health 73:795–797CrossRef Vogt RL, LaRue D, Klaucke DN, Jillson DA (1983) Comparison of an active and passive surveillance system of primary care providers for hepetitis, measles, rubella, and salmonellosis in Vermont. Am J Pub Health 73:795–797CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Foot B, Stanford M, Rahi J, Thompson J (2003) The British Ophthalmological Surveillance Unit: an evaluation of the first 3 years. Eye 17:9–15PubMedCrossRef Foot B, Stanford M, Rahi J, Thompson J (2003) The British Ophthalmological Surveillance Unit: an evaluation of the first 3 years. Eye 17:9–15PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Soltau JB, Rothman RF, Budenz DL, Greenfield DS, Feuer W, Liebmann JM, Ritch R (2000) Risk factors for glaucoma filtering bleb infections. Arch Ophthalmol 118:338–342PubMed Soltau JB, Rothman RF, Budenz DL, Greenfield DS, Feuer W, Liebmann JM, Ritch R (2000) Risk factors for glaucoma filtering bleb infections. Arch Ophthalmol 118:338–342PubMed
7.
go back to reference DeBry PW, Perkins TW, Heatley G, Kaufman P, Brumback LC (2002) Incidence of late-onset bleb-related complications following trabeculectomy with mitomycin. Arch Ophthalmol 120:297–300PubMedCrossRef DeBry PW, Perkins TW, Heatley G, Kaufman P, Brumback LC (2002) Incidence of late-onset bleb-related complications following trabeculectomy with mitomycin. Arch Ophthalmol 120:297–300PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Greenfield DS, Liebmann JM, Jee J, Ritch R (1998) Late-onset bleb leaks after glaucoma filtering surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 116:443–447PubMed Greenfield DS, Liebmann JM, Jee J, Ritch R (1998) Late-onset bleb leaks after glaucoma filtering surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 116:443–447PubMed
9.
go back to reference Edmunds B, Thompson JR, Salmon JF, Wormald RP (2001) The National Survey of Trabeculectomy. II. Variations in operative technique and outcome. Eye 15:441–448PubMedCrossRef Edmunds B, Thompson JR, Salmon JF, Wormald RP (2001) The National Survey of Trabeculectomy. II. Variations in operative technique and outcome. Eye 15:441–448PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Yamamoto T, Kuwayama Y, Collaborative Bleb-related Infection Incidence and Treatment Study Group (2011) Interim clinical outcomes in the collaborative bleb-related infection incidence and treatment study. Ophthalmology 118:453–458PubMedCrossRef Yamamoto T, Kuwayama Y, Collaborative Bleb-related Infection Incidence and Treatment Study Group (2011) Interim clinical outcomes in the collaborative bleb-related infection incidence and treatment study. Ophthalmology 118:453–458PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Wadhwani RA, Bellows AR, Hutchinson BT (2000) Surgical repair of leaking filtering blebs. Ophthalmology 107:1681–1687PubMedCrossRef Wadhwani RA, Bellows AR, Hutchinson BT (2000) Surgical repair of leaking filtering blebs. Ophthalmology 107:1681–1687PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference van de Geijn EJ, Lemij HG, de Vries J, de Waard PW (2002) Surgical revision of filtration blebs: a follow-up study. J Glaucoma 11:300–305PubMedCrossRef van de Geijn EJ, Lemij HG, de Vries J, de Waard PW (2002) Surgical revision of filtration blebs: a follow-up study. J Glaucoma 11:300–305PubMedCrossRef
13.
14.
go back to reference Myers JS, Yang CB, Herndon LW, Allingham RR, Shields MB (2000) Excisional bleb revision to correct overfiltration or leakage. J Glaucoma 9:169–173PubMedCrossRef Myers JS, Yang CB, Herndon LW, Allingham RR, Shields MB (2000) Excisional bleb revision to correct overfiltration or leakage. J Glaucoma 9:169–173PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Burnstein AL, WuDunn D, Knotts SL, Catoira Y, Cantor LB (2002) Conjunctivaladvancement versus nonincisional treatment for late-onset glaucoma filtering blebleaks. Ophthalmology 109:71–75PubMedCrossRef Burnstein AL, WuDunn D, Knotts SL, Catoira Y, Cantor LB (2002) Conjunctivaladvancement versus nonincisional treatment for late-onset glaucoma filtering blebleaks. Ophthalmology 109:71–75PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Surveillance of late-onset bleb leak, blebitis and bleb-related endophthalmitis — a UK incidence study
Authors
A. Alwitry
A. J. King
Publication date
01-08-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Issue 8/2012
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-011-1920-5

Other articles of this Issue 8/2012

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 8/2012 Go to the issue