Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 8/2012

01-08-2012 | Glaucoma

Evaluation of the Icare-ONE rebound tonometer as a self-measuring intraocular pressure device in normal subjects

Authors: Ioannis Halkiadakis, Aimilianos Stratos, George Stergiopoulos, Eleni Patsea, Sotiris Skouriotis, Panagiotis Mitropoulos, Dimitrios Papaconstantinou, Gerasimos Georgopoulos

Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Issue 8/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To compare Icare ONE rebound self-tonometer (ICRBT) measurements with Goldman applanation tonometry (GAT).

Methods

A trained examiner instructed each of 60 normal subjects on use of the ICRBT. Each subject then took two measurements of his/her own pressure using the ICRBT. Finally, a different examiner, who was masked to the earlier readings, measured IOP by GAT. Bland–Altman limits of agreement (LOA), intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), Kappa values, and paired t-test were used to assess the agreement between the two methods. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used for correlation analysis.

Results

All of the subjects were able to obtain correct measurements with ICRBT after three attempts. The mean intraocular pressure with ICRBT and GAT measurements were 16.0 ± 3.3 mmHg and 13.7 ± 2.5 mmHg respectively. The mean difference between patient’s ICRBT and technician’s GAT measurements was 2.3 mmHg (p < 0.001). In 63 % (38/60) of the cases the IOP difference (ICRBT − GAT) was within ± 3 mmHg. The weighted Kappa for the IOP measurements of the two methods was 0.49 (95% CI: 0.30–0.68, p < 0.001), indicating acceptable agreement. A significantly positive correlation was found between ICRBT IOP measurements and central corneal thickness (CCT) (r = 0.48, p < 0.001). In addition, the difference in IOP measurements (ICRBT − GAT) between the two methods was positively correlated with CCT (r = 0.31, p = 0.015), indicating that greater thickness is associated with greater differences between the two methods.

Conclusion

The ICRBT was reliable in the hands of normal subjects, and may be used for self-monitoring of IOP. ICRBT measurements generally overestimated GAT measurements.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Whitacre MM, Stein R (1993) Sources of error with use of Goldmann type tonometers. Surv Ophthalmol 38:1–30PubMedCrossRef Whitacre MM, Stein R (1993) Sources of error with use of Goldmann type tonometers. Surv Ophthalmol 38:1–30PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Whitacre MM, Stein RA, Hassanein K (1993) The effect of corneal thickness on applanation tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol 115:592–596PubMed Whitacre MM, Stein RA, Hassanein K (1993) The effect of corneal thickness on applanation tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol 115:592–596PubMed
3.
go back to reference ElMallah MK, Asrani SG (2008) New ways to measure intraocular pressure. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 19:122–126PubMedCrossRef ElMallah MK, Asrani SG (2008) New ways to measure intraocular pressure. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 19:122–126PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kontiola AI (2000) A new induction-based impact method for measuring intraocular pressure. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 78:142–145PubMedCrossRef Kontiola AI (2000) A new induction-based impact method for measuring intraocular pressure. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 78:142–145PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Danias J, Kontiola AI, Filippopoulos T, Mittag T (2003) Method for the noninvasive measurement of intraocular pressure in mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44:1138–1141PubMedCrossRef Danias J, Kontiola AI, Filippopoulos T, Mittag T (2003) Method for the noninvasive measurement of intraocular pressure in mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44:1138–1141PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Cervino A (2006) Rebound tonometry: new opportunities and limitations of non-invasive determination of intraocular pressure. Br J Ophthalmol 90:1444–1446PubMedCrossRef Cervino A (2006) Rebound tonometry: new opportunities and limitations of non-invasive determination of intraocular pressure. Br J Ophthalmol 90:1444–1446PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Castillo A, Garcia Sanchez J (2005) Reproducibility and clinical evaluation of rebound tonometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46:4578–4580PubMedCrossRef Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Castillo A, Garcia Sanchez J (2005) Reproducibility and clinical evaluation of rebound tonometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46:4578–4580PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Davies LN, Bartlett H, Mallen EA, Wolffsohn JS (2006) Clinical evaluation of rebound tonometer. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 84:206–209PubMedCrossRef Davies LN, Bartlett H, Mallen EA, Wolffsohn JS (2006) Clinical evaluation of rebound tonometer. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 84:206–209PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Nakamura M, Darhad U, Tatsumi Y, Fujioka M, Kusuhara A, Maeda H, Negi A (2006) Agreement of rebound tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure with three types of applanation tonometers. Am J Ophthalmol 142:332–334PubMedCrossRef Nakamura M, Darhad U, Tatsumi Y, Fujioka M, Kusuhara A, Maeda H, Negi A (2006) Agreement of rebound tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure with three types of applanation tonometers. Am J Ophthalmol 142:332–334PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Brusini P, Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Tosoni C, Parisi L (2006) Comparison of ICare tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients. J Glaucoma 15:213–217PubMedCrossRef Brusini P, Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Tosoni C, Parisi L (2006) Comparison of ICare tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients. J Glaucoma 15:213–217PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Vico E, Fernandez-Vidal A, Benitez del Castillo JM, Wasfi M, Garcia-Sanchez J (2006) Effect of corneal thickness on dynamic contour, rebound, and Goldmann tonometry. Ophthalmology 113:2156–2162PubMedCrossRef Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Vico E, Fernandez-Vidal A, Benitez del Castillo JM, Wasfi M, Garcia-Sanchez J (2006) Effect of corneal thickness on dynamic contour, rebound, and Goldmann tonometry. Ophthalmology 113:2156–2162PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Sahin A, Niyaz L, Yildirim N (2007) Comparison of the rebound tonometer with the Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 35:335–339PubMedCrossRef Sahin A, Niyaz L, Yildirim N (2007) Comparison of the rebound tonometer with the Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 35:335–339PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ruokonen PC, Schwenteck T, Draeger J (2007) Evaluation of the impedance tonometer TGDc-01 and iCare according to the international ocular tonometer standards ISO 8612. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 245:1259–1265PubMedCrossRef Ruokonen PC, Schwenteck T, Draeger J (2007) Evaluation of the impedance tonometer TGDc-01 and iCare according to the international ocular tonometer standards ISO 8612. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 245:1259–1265PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Munkwitz S, Elkarmouty A, Hoffmann EM, Pfeiffer N, Thieme H (2008) Comparison of the iCare rebound tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer over a wide IOP range. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 246:875–879PubMedCrossRef Munkwitz S, Elkarmouty A, Hoffmann EM, Pfeiffer N, Thieme H (2008) Comparison of the iCare rebound tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer over a wide IOP range. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 246:875–879PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Chui WS, Lam A, Chen D, Chiu R (2008) The influence of corneal properties on rebound tonometry. Ophthalmology 115:80–84PubMedCrossRef Chui WS, Lam A, Chen D, Chiu R (2008) The influence of corneal properties on rebound tonometry. Ophthalmology 115:80–84PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Jóhannesson G, Hallberg P, Eklund A, Lindén C (2008) Pascal, ICare and Goldmann applanation tonometry–a comparative study. Acta Ophthalmol 86:614–621PubMedCrossRef Jóhannesson G, Hallberg P, Eklund A, Lindén C (2008) Pascal, ICare and Goldmann applanation tonometry–a comparative study. Acta Ophthalmol 86:614–621PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Abraham LM, Epasinghe NC, Selva D, Casson R (2008) Comparison of the ICare reboundtonometer with the Goldmann applanation tonometer by experienced and inexperienced tonometrists. Eye 22:503–506PubMedCrossRef Abraham LM, Epasinghe NC, Selva D, Casson R (2008) Comparison of the ICare reboundtonometer with the Goldmann applanation tonometer by experienced and inexperienced tonometrists. Eye 22:503–506PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Poostchi A, Mitchell R, Nicholas S, Purdie G, Wells A (2009) The iCare rebound tonometer: comparisons with Goldmann tonometry, and influence of central corneal thickness. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 37:687–691PubMedCrossRef Poostchi A, Mitchell R, Nicholas S, Purdie G, Wells A (2009) The iCare rebound tonometer: comparisons with Goldmann tonometry, and influence of central corneal thickness. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 37:687–691PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Vandewalle E, Vandenbroeck S, Stalmans I, Zeyen T (2009) Comparison of ICare, dynamic contour tonometer, and ocular response analyzer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma. Eur J Ophthalmol 19:783–789PubMed Vandewalle E, Vandenbroeck S, Stalmans I, Zeyen T (2009) Comparison of ICare, dynamic contour tonometer, and ocular response analyzer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma. Eur J Ophthalmol 19:783–789PubMed
20.
go back to reference Scuderi GL, Cascone NC, Regine F, Perdicchi A, Cerulli A, Recupero SM (2010) Validity and limits of the rebound tonometer (ICare®): clinical study. Eur J Ophthalmol 21:251–257CrossRef Scuderi GL, Cascone NC, Regine F, Perdicchi A, Cerulli A, Recupero SM (2010) Validity and limits of the rebound tonometer (ICare®): clinical study. Eur J Ophthalmol 21:251–257CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Asrani S, Chatterjee A, Wallace DK, Santiago-Turla C, Stinnett S (2011) Evaluation of the ICare rebound tonometer as a home intraocular pressure monitoring device. J Glaucoma 20:74–79PubMedCrossRef Asrani S, Chatterjee A, Wallace DK, Santiago-Turla C, Stinnett S (2011) Evaluation of the ICare rebound tonometer as a home intraocular pressure monitoring device. J Glaucoma 20:74–79PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference McGraw K, Wong S (1996) Forming Inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods 1:30–46CrossRef McGraw K, Wong S (1996) Forming Inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods 1:30–46CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174PubMedCrossRef Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Altman DG, Bland JM (1983) Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. Statistician 32:307–317CrossRef Altman DG, Bland JM (1983) Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. Statistician 32:307–317CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Bagga H, Liu JH, Weinreb RN (2009) Intraocular pressure measurements throughout the 24 h. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 20:79–83PubMedCrossRef Bagga H, Liu JH, Weinreb RN (2009) Intraocular pressure measurements throughout the 24 h. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 20:79–83PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Konstas AG, Topouzis F, Leliopoulou O, Pappas T, Georgiadis N, Jenkins JN, Stewart WC (2006) 24-hour intraocular pressure control with maximum medical therapy compared with surgery in patients with advanced open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 113:761–765PubMedCrossRef Konstas AG, Topouzis F, Leliopoulou O, Pappas T, Georgiadis N, Jenkins JN, Stewart WC (2006) 24-hour intraocular pressure control with maximum medical therapy compared with surgery in patients with advanced open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 113:761–765PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Liang SY, Lee GA, Shields D (2009) Self-tonometry in glaucoma management—past, present and future. Surv Ophthalmol 54:450–462PubMedCrossRef Liang SY, Lee GA, Shields D (2009) Self-tonometry in glaucoma management—past, present and future. Surv Ophthalmol 54:450–462PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Hughes E, Spry P, Diamond J (2003) 24-hour monitoring of intraocular pressure in glaucoma management: a retrospective review. J Glaucoma 12:232–236PubMedCrossRef Hughes E, Spry P, Diamond J (2003) 24-hour monitoring of intraocular pressure in glaucoma management: a retrospective review. J Glaucoma 12:232–236PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Tarkkanen A, Ulfves K, Ulfves T (2010) Self-tonometry in glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 248:1679–1681PubMedCrossRef Tarkkanen A, Ulfves K, Ulfves T (2010) Self-tonometry in glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 248:1679–1681PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Vasanthan Muttuvelu VD, Baggesen K, Ehlers N (2010) Precision and accuracy of the ICare tonometer - Peripheral and central IOP measurements by rebound tonometry. Acta Ophthalmol Sep 15 [Epub ahead of print] Vasanthan Muttuvelu VD, Baggesen K, Ehlers N (2010) Precision and accuracy of the ICare tonometer - Peripheral and central IOP measurements by rebound tonometry. Acta Ophthalmol Sep 15 [Epub ahead of print]
31.
go back to reference Balkrishnan R, Bond JB, Byerly WG, Camacho FT, Anderson RT (2003) Medication-related predictors of health-related quality of life in glaucoma patients enrolled in amedicare health maintenance organization. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother 1:75–81PubMedCrossRef Balkrishnan R, Bond JB, Byerly WG, Camacho FT, Anderson RT (2003) Medication-related predictors of health-related quality of life in glaucoma patients enrolled in amedicare health maintenance organization. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother 1:75–81PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of the Icare-ONE rebound tonometer as a self-measuring intraocular pressure device in normal subjects
Authors
Ioannis Halkiadakis
Aimilianos Stratos
George Stergiopoulos
Eleni Patsea
Sotiris Skouriotis
Panagiotis Mitropoulos
Dimitrios Papaconstantinou
Gerasimos Georgopoulos
Publication date
01-08-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Issue 8/2012
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-011-1875-6

Other articles of this Issue 8/2012

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 8/2012 Go to the issue