Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Neurology 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Bilateral Vestibulopathy | Original Communication

Comparison of three video head impulse test systems for the diagnosis of bilateral vestibulopathy

Authors: T. S. van Dooren, D. Starkov, F. M. P. Lucieer, B. Vermorken, A. M. L. Janssen, N. Guinand, A. Pérez-Fornos, V. Van Rompaey, H. Kingma, R. van de Berg

Published in: Journal of Neurology | Special Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

A horizontal vestibulo-ocular reflex gain (VOR gain) of < 0.6, measured by the video head impulse test (VHIT), is one of the diagnostic criteria for bilateral vestibulopathy (BV) according to the Báràny Society. Several VHIT systems are commercially available, each with different techniques of tracking head and eye movements and different methods of gain calculation. This study compared three different VHIT systems in patients diagnosed with BV.

Methods

This study comprised 46 BV patients (diagnosed according to the Báràny criteria), tested with three commercial VHIT systems (Interacoustics, Otometrics and Synapsys) in random order. Main outcome parameter was VOR gain as calculated by the system, and the agreement on BV diagnosis (VOR gain < 0.6) between the VHIT systems. Peak head velocities, the order effect and covert saccades were analysed separately, to determine whether these parameters could have influenced differences in outcome between VHIT systems.

Results

VOR gain in the Synapsys system differed significantly from VOR gain in the other two systems [F(1.256, 33.916) = 35.681, p < 0.000]. The VHIT systems agreed in 83% of the patients on the BV diagnosis. Peak head velocities, the order effect and covert saccades were not likely to have influenced the above mentioned results.

Conclusion

To conclude, using different VHIT systems in the same BV patient can lead to clinically significant differences in VOR gain, when using a cut-off value of 0.6. This might hinder proper diagnosis of BV patients. It would, therefore, be preferred that VHIT systems are standardised regarding eye and head tracking methods, and VOR gain calculation algorithms. Until then, it is advised to not only take the VOR gain in consideration when assessing a VHIT trial, but also look at the raw traces and the compensatory saccades.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lucieer F et al (2018) Full spectrum of reported symptoms of bilateral vestibulopathy needs further investigation—a systematic review. Front Neurol 9:352CrossRef Lucieer F et al (2018) Full spectrum of reported symptoms of bilateral vestibulopathy needs further investigation—a systematic review. Front Neurol 9:352CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Lucieer F et al (2016) Bilateral vestibular hypofunction: insights in etiologies, clinical subtypes, and diagnostics. Front Neurol 7:26CrossRef Lucieer F et al (2016) Bilateral vestibular hypofunction: insights in etiologies, clinical subtypes, and diagnostics. Front Neurol 7:26CrossRef
3.
4.
go back to reference Cleworth TW et al (2017) Differences in head impulse test results due to analysis techniques. J Vestib Res 27(2–3):163–172CrossRef Cleworth TW et al (2017) Differences in head impulse test results due to analysis techniques. J Vestib Res 27(2–3):163–172CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Janky KL et al (2017) Effects of device on video head impulse test (vHIT) gain. J Am Acad Audiol 28(9):778–785CrossRef Janky KL et al (2017) Effects of device on video head impulse test (vHIT) gain. J Am Acad Audiol 28(9):778–785CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Lee SH et al (2018) Comparison of video head impulse test (vHIT) gains between two commercially available devices and by different gain analytical methods. Otol Neurotol 39(5):e297–e300CrossRef Lee SH et al (2018) Comparison of video head impulse test (vHIT) gains between two commercially available devices and by different gain analytical methods. Otol Neurotol 39(5):e297–e300CrossRef
7.
go back to reference van Dooren TS et al (2018) The video head impulse test and the influence of daily use of spectacles to correct a refractive error. Front Neurol 9:125CrossRef van Dooren TS et al (2018) The video head impulse test and the influence of daily use of spectacles to correct a refractive error. Front Neurol 9:125CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Strupp M et al (2017) Bilateral vestibulopathy: diagnostic criteria consensus document of the classification committee of the Barany society. J Vestib Res 27(4):177–189CrossRef Strupp M et al (2017) Bilateral vestibulopathy: diagnostic criteria consensus document of the classification committee of the Barany society. J Vestib Res 27(4):177–189CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Mantokoudis G et al (2016) Adaptation and compensation of vestibular responses following superior canal dehiscence surgery. Otol Neurotol 37(9):1399–1405CrossRef Mantokoudis G et al (2016) Adaptation and compensation of vestibular responses following superior canal dehiscence surgery. Otol Neurotol 37(9):1399–1405CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Castro P et al (2018) Viewing target distance influences the vestibulo-ocular reflex gain when assessed using the video head impulse test. Audiol Neurootol 23(5):285–289CrossRef Castro P et al (2018) Viewing target distance influences the vestibulo-ocular reflex gain when assessed using the video head impulse test. Audiol Neurootol 23(5):285–289CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Interacoustics, EyeSeeCam vHIT system Manual (2014) Interacoustics, EyeSeeCam vHIT system Manual (2014)
13.
go back to reference Macdougall HG et al (2013) The video Head Impulse Test (vHIT) detects vertical semicircular canal dysfunction. PLoS One 8(4):e61488CrossRef Macdougall HG et al (2013) The video Head Impulse Test (vHIT) detects vertical semicircular canal dysfunction. PLoS One 8(4):e61488CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Wiener-Vacher SR, Wiener SI (2017) Video head impulse tests with a remote camera system: normative values of semicircular canal vestibulo-ocular reflex gain in infants and children. Front Neurol 8:434CrossRef Wiener-Vacher SR, Wiener SI (2017) Video head impulse tests with a remote camera system: normative values of semicircular canal vestibulo-ocular reflex gain in infants and children. Front Neurol 8:434CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Xie Y et al (2017) Compensatory saccades are associated with physical performance in older adults: data from the baltimore longitudinal study of aging. Otol Neurotol 38(3):373–378CrossRef Xie Y et al (2017) Compensatory saccades are associated with physical performance in older adults: data from the baltimore longitudinal study of aging. Otol Neurotol 38(3):373–378CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Mantokoudis G et al (2015) Quantifying the vestibulo-ocular reflex with video-oculography: nature and frequency of artifacts. Audiol Neurootol 20(1):39–50CrossRef Mantokoudis G et al (2015) Quantifying the vestibulo-ocular reflex with video-oculography: nature and frequency of artifacts. Audiol Neurootol 20(1):39–50CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Wenzel A et al (2019) Reducing the number of impulses in video head impulse testing—it’s the quality not the numbers. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 125:206–211CrossRef Wenzel A et al (2019) Reducing the number of impulses in video head impulse testing—it’s the quality not the numbers. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 125:206–211CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Rey-Martinez J et al (2017) The role of predictability in saccadic eye responses in the suppression head impulse test of horizontal semicircular canal function. Front Neurol 8:536CrossRef Rey-Martinez J et al (2017) The role of predictability in saccadic eye responses in the suppression head impulse test of horizontal semicircular canal function. Front Neurol 8:536CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kim TS et al (2018) Changes of video head impulse test results in lateral semicircular canal plane by different peak head velocities in patients with vestibular neuritis. Acta Otolaryngol 138(9):785–789CrossRef Kim TS et al (2018) Changes of video head impulse test results in lateral semicircular canal plane by different peak head velocities in patients with vestibular neuritis. Acta Otolaryngol 138(9):785–789CrossRef
20.
go back to reference MacDougall HG et al (2016) A new saccadic indicator of peripheral vestibular function based on the video head impulse test. Neurology 87(4):410–418CrossRef MacDougall HG et al (2016) A new saccadic indicator of peripheral vestibular function based on the video head impulse test. Neurology 87(4):410–418CrossRef
21.
go back to reference van de Berg R, van Tilburg M, Kingma H (2015) Bilateral vestibular hypofunction: challenges in establishing the diagnosis in adults. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 77(4):197–218CrossRef van de Berg R, van Tilburg M, Kingma H (2015) Bilateral vestibular hypofunction: challenges in establishing the diagnosis in adults. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 77(4):197–218CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Comparison of three video head impulse test systems for the diagnosis of bilateral vestibulopathy
Authors
T. S. van Dooren
D. Starkov
F. M. P. Lucieer
B. Vermorken
A. M. L. Janssen
N. Guinand
A. Pérez-Fornos
V. Van Rompaey
H. Kingma
R. van de Berg
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Journal of Neurology / Issue Special Issue 1/2020
Print ISSN: 0340-5354
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1459
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-10060-w

Other articles of this Special Issue 1/2020

Journal of Neurology 1/2020 Go to the issue