Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Legal Medicine 5/2011

01-09-2011 | Original Article

Dental age assessment (DAA): reference data for British children at the 10-year-old threshold

Authors: Monica Yadava, Graham J. Roberts, Victoria S. Lucas

Published in: International Journal of Legal Medicine | Issue 5/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

The purpose of this work was to develop a reference dataset for dental age assessment at the 10-year-old threshold. Dental panoramic radiographs of children aged between 9 and 11 years were reused to determine the age of attainment of tooth development stages relevant to the 10-year threshold. These data were used to test the accuracy of the dental age assessment (DAA) on a separate study sample of known chronological age. The study sample comprised 100 radiographs (50 female, 50 male) of known chronological age that did not form part of the reference dataset. For each subject in the study sample, the mathematical procedure used in meta-analysis was applied to all teeth that were still developing. The weighted average of all the developing teeth in a given child was assigned as the dental age for that individual. This was compared to the gold standard of chronological age. Three thousand six hundred sixty-two radiographs comprised the reference sample. The mean difference between the chronological age and dental age estimated for the sample of female subjects was 0.12 years (1.44 months) and for the males was 0.33 years (3.96 months). A method comparison technique was used to evaluate the difference between the chronological age and estimated dental age for each study subject. This showed a good agreement for both females and males. DAA using meta-analysis provides a simple method of estimating the age of subjects of unknown birth date at the 10-year threshold. This is, presently, the most accurate method of age assessment for individuals of unknown date of birth.
Literature
5.
go back to reference Schmeling A, Olze A, Reisinger W, Geserick G (2001) Age estimation of living people undergoing criminal proceedings. Lancet 358:89–90PubMedCrossRef Schmeling A, Olze A, Reisinger W, Geserick G (2001) Age estimation of living people undergoing criminal proceedings. Lancet 358:89–90PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hagg U, Matsson L (1985) Dental maturity as an indicator of chronological age: the accuracy and precision of three methods. Eur J Orthod 7:25–34PubMed Hagg U, Matsson L (1985) Dental maturity as an indicator of chronological age: the accuracy and precision of three methods. Eur J Orthod 7:25–34PubMed
7.
go back to reference Maber M, Liversidge HM, Hector MP (2006) Accuracy of age estimation of radiographic methods using developing teeth. Forensic Sci Int 1:S68–S73CrossRef Maber M, Liversidge HM, Hector MP (2006) Accuracy of age estimation of radiographic methods using developing teeth. Forensic Sci Int 1:S68–S73CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Demirjian A (1978) Dentition, chapter 15. In: Falkner F, Tanner J (eds) Human growth, vol 2. Developmental growth. Bailliere, London Demirjian A (1978) Dentition, chapter 15. In: Falkner F, Tanner J (eds) Human growth, vol 2. Developmental growth. Bailliere, London
9.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174PubMedCrossRef Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Roberts GJ, Parekh S, Petrie A, Lucas VS (2008) Dental age assessment (DAA): a simple method for children and emerging adults. Br Dent J 204:192–193CrossRef Roberts GJ, Parekh S, Petrie A, Lucas VS (2008) Dental age assessment (DAA): a simple method for children and emerging adults. Br Dent J 204:192–193CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310PubMedCrossRef Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Willerhausen B, Loffler R, Schulze (2001) Analysis of 1202 orthopantomograms to evaluate the potential of forensic age determination based on third molar developmental stages. Eur J Med Res 6:377–384 Willerhausen B, Loffler R, Schulze (2001) Analysis of 1202 orthopantomograms to evaluate the potential of forensic age determination based on third molar developmental stages. Eur J Med Res 6:377–384
13.
go back to reference Mincer HH, Harris EF, Berryman HE (1993) The A.B.F.O. study of third molar development and its use as an estimator of chronological age. J Forensic Sci 38:379–390PubMed Mincer HH, Harris EF, Berryman HE (1993) The A.B.F.O. study of third molar development and its use as an estimator of chronological age. J Forensic Sci 38:379–390PubMed
Metadata
Title
Dental age assessment (DAA): reference data for British children at the 10-year-old threshold
Authors
Monica Yadava
Graham J. Roberts
Victoria S. Lucas
Publication date
01-09-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Journal of Legal Medicine / Issue 5/2011
Print ISSN: 0937-9827
Electronic ISSN: 1437-1596
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-010-0491-z

Other articles of this Issue 5/2011

International Journal of Legal Medicine 5/2011 Go to the issue