Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
International Journal of Legal Medicine
Published in: International Journal of Legal Medicine 3/2009

01-05-2009 | Review Article

How reliable are the risk estimates for X-ray examinations in forensic age estimations? A safety update

Authors: F. Ramsthaler, P. Proschek, W. Betz, M. A. Verhoff

Published in: International Journal of Legal Medicine | Issue 3/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Possible biological side effects of exposure to X-rays are stochastic effects such as carcinogenesis and genetic alterations. In recent years, a number of new studies have been published about the special cancer risk that children may suffer from diagnostic X-rays. Children and adolescents who constitute many of the probands in forensic age-estimation proceedings are considerably more sensitive to the carcinogenic risks of ionizing radiation than adults. Established doses for X-ray examinations in forensic age estimations vary from less than 0.1 μSv (left hand X-ray) up to more than 800 μSv (computed tomography). Computed tomography in children, as a relatively high-dose procedure, is of particular interest because the doses involved are near to the lower limit of the doses observed and analyzed in A-bombing survivor studies. From these studies, direct epidemiological data exist concerning the lifetime cancer risk. Since there is no medical indication for forensic age examinations, it should be stressed that only safe methods are generally acceptable. This paper reviews current knowledge on cancer risks associated with diagnostic radiation and aims to help forensic experts, dentists, and pediatricians evaluate the risk from radiation when using X-rays in age-estimation procedures.
Literature
1.
2.
Aebi MF, Aromaa K, Tavares T et al (2006) European Sourcebook of crime and criminal justical statistics. Third edition. WODC, Den Haag
3.
4.
Bauchinger M, Dahm-Dalphi J, Dikomey E et al (2003) Strahlenphysik, Strahlenbiologie, Strahlenschutz. In: Freyschmidt J, Schmidt Th (eds) (Hrsg.) Handbuch diagnostische Radiologie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp S 204–261
5.
BEIR V. National Research Council. Committee on the biological effects of ionizing radiation (1990) Health effects of exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation. National Academy Press, Washington D.C.
6.
BEIR VII Phase 2 Committee on the biological effects of ionizing radiation (2006) Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation. National Academy Press, Washington D.C.
7.
Berdon WE, Slovis TL (2002) Where we are since ALARA and the series of articles on CT dose in children and risk of long-term cancers: what has changed? Pediatr Radiol 32:699PubMedCrossRef
8.
Berrington de Gonzalez A, Darby S (2004) Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries. Lancet 363:345–351PubMedCrossRef
9.
Boice JD Jr, Fraumeni JF (1980) Late effects following isoniazid therapy. Am J Public Health 70:987–989PubMedCrossRef
10.
Boice JD Jr, Miller RW (1992) Risk of breast cancer in ataxia-telangiectasia. N Engl J Med 326:1357–1358PubMed
11.
Boice JD Jr, Morin MM, Glass AG et al (1991) Diagnostic X-ray procedures and risk of leukemia, lymphoma, and multiple myeloma. JAMA 265:1290–1294PubMedCrossRef
12.
Boice JD Jr, Preston D, Davis FG, Monson RR (1991) Frequent chest X-ray fluoroscopy and breast cancer incidence among tuberculosis patients in Massachusetts. Radiat Res 125:214–222PubMedCrossRef
13.
Bottollier-Depois JF, Chau Q, Bouisset P, Kerlau G, Plawinski L, Lebaron-Jacobs L (2000) Assessing exposure to cosmic radiation during long-haul flights. Radiat Res 153:526–532PubMedCrossRef
14.
Bottollier-Depois JF, Chau Q, Bouisset P et al (2003) Assessing exposure to cosmic radiation on board aircraft. Adv Space Res 32:59–66PubMedCrossRef
15.
Bottollier-Depois JF, Trompier F, Clairand I et al (2004) Exposure of aircraft crew to cosmic radiation: on-board intercomparison of various dosemeters. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 110:411–415PubMedCrossRef
16.
Breckow J (2006) Linear-no-threshold is a radiation-protection standard rather than a mechanistic effect model. Radiat Environ Biophys 44:257–260PubMedCrossRef
17.
Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E, Berdon W (2001) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR 176:289–296PubMed
18.
Brenner DJ (2002) Estimating cancer risks from pediatric CT: going from the qualitative to the quantitative. Pediatr Radiol 32:228–233PubMedCrossRef
19.
Brenner DJ, Doll R, Goodhead DT et al (2003) Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: assessing what we really know. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:13761–13766PubMedCrossRef
20.
21.
Brenner DJ, Sachs RK (2006) Estimating radiation-induced cancer risks at very low doses: rationale for using a linear no-threshold approach. Radiat Environ Biophys 44:253–256PubMedCrossRef
22.
23.
Demirjian A, Goldstein H, Tanner JM (1973) A new system of dental age assessment. Hum Biol 45:211–227PubMed
24.
Fearon T, Vucich J (1987) Normalized pediatric organ-absorbed doses from CT examinations. AJR 148:171–174PubMed
25.
Finestone A, Schlesinger T, Amir H, Richter E, Milgrom C (2003) Do physicians correctly estimate radiation risks from medical imaging? Arch Environ Health 58:59–61PubMedCrossRef
26.
Frederiksen NL, Benson BW, Sokolowski TW (1994) Effective dose and risk assessment from film tomography used for dental implant diagnostics. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 23:123–127PubMed
27.
Frederiksen NL, Benson BW, Sokolowski TW (1995) Effective dose and risk assessment from computed tomography of the maxillofacial complex. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 24:55–58PubMed
28.
Gibbs SJ (1982) Biological effects of radiation from dental radiography. Council on Dental Materials, Instruments, and Equipment. J Am Dent Assoc 105:275–281PubMed
29.
Hall EJ (2000) Radiation, the two-edged sword: cancer risks at high and low doses. Cancer J 6:343–350PubMed
30.
Hall EJ (2002) Lessons we have learned from our children: cancer risks from diagnostic radiology. Pediatr Radiol 32:700–706PubMedCrossRef
31.
Hall EJ (2009) Radiation biology for pediatric radiologists. Pediatr Radiol 39(Suppl. 1):57–64CrossRef
32.
33.
Harrison JD, Streffer C (2007) The ICRP protection quantities, equivalent and effective dose: their basis and application. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 127:12–18PubMedCrossRef
34.
Huda W, Atherton JV, Ware DE, Cumming WA (1997) An approach for the estimation of effective radiation dose at CT in pediatric patients. Radiology 203:417–422PubMed
35.
ICRP (International Commission on Radiological Protection) (1991) Recommendations of the ICRP 1990. Ann ICRP Publication 60:1–3
36.
ICRP (International Commission on Radiological Protection) (2007) Recommendations of the ICRP 2007. Ann ICRP Publication 37:2–4
37.
Jung H (2000) Strahlenrisiken durch Röntgenuntersuchungen zur Altersschätzung im Strafverfahren. Rofo 172:553–556PubMed
38.
Jurik AG, Jensen LC, Hansen J (1996) Radiation dose by spiral CT and conventional tomography of the sternoclavicular joints and the manubrium sterni. Skeletal Radiol 25:467–470PubMedCrossRef
39.
Kalra MK, Maher MM, Rizzo S, Saini S (2004) Radiation exposure and projected risks with multidetector-row computed tomography scanning: clinical strategies and technologic developments for dose reduction. J Comput Assist Tomogr 28(Suppl 1):S46–S49PubMedCrossRef
40.
Kalra MK, Maher MM, Sahani DV et al (2003) Low-dose CT of the abdomen: evaluation of image improvement with use of noise reduction filters pilot study. Radiology 228:251–256PubMedCrossRef
41.
Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL et al (2004) Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology 230:619–628PubMedCrossRef
42.
Kalra MK, Prasad S, Saini S et al (2002) Clinical comparison of standard-dose and 50% reduced-dose abdominal CT: effect on image quality. AJR 179:1101–1106PubMed
43.
Kalra MK, Wittram C, Maher MM et al (2003) Can noise reduction filters improve low-radiation-dose chest CT images? Pilot study. Radiology 228:257–264PubMedCrossRef
44.
Kellerer AM (2000) Risk estimates for radiation-induced cancer—the epidemiological evidence. Radiat Environ Biophys 39:17–24PubMedCrossRef
45.
Keske U, Hierholzer J, Neumann K et al (1995) Zur Altersschätzung der Patientendosis bei radiologischen Untersuchungen. Radiologe 35:162–170PubMed
46.
Kleinerman RA (2006) Cancer risks following diagnostic and therapeutic radiation exposure in children. Pediatr Radiol 36(Suppl 14):121–125PubMedCrossRef
47.
Koller F, Roth J (2007) Die Bestimmung der effektiven Dosen bei CT-Untersuchungen und deren Beeinflussung durch Einstellparameter. Rofo 179:38–45PubMed
48.
Konietzko N, Jung H, Hering KG, Schmidt T (2001) Risk of radiation exposure in X-ray examination of the thorax. German Central Committee for the Control of Tuberculosis (DZK). Pneumologie 55:57–71PubMedCrossRef
49.
Lantos P, Fuller N, Bottollier-Depois JF (2003) Methods for estimating radiation doses received by commercial aircrew. Aviat Space Environ Med 74:746–752PubMed
50.
Liversidge HM, Chaillet N, Mornstad H et al (2006) Timing of Demirjian’s tooth formation stages. Ann Hum Biol 33:454–470PubMedCrossRef
51.
Ludlow JB, vies-Ludlow LE, White SC (2008) Patient risk related to common dental radiographic examinations: the impact of 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations regarding dose calculation. J Am Dent Assoc 139:1237–1243PubMed
52.
Maher MM, Kalra MK, Toth TL et al (2004) Application of rational practice and technical advances for optimizing radiation dose for chest CT. J Thorac Imaging 19:16–23PubMedCrossRef
53.
Martin CJ (2005) The LNT model provides the best approach for practical implementation of radiation protection. Br J Radiol 78:14–16PubMedCrossRef
54.
Meijerman L, Maat GJ, Schulz R, Schmeling A (2007) Variables affecting the probability of complete fusion of the medial clavicular epiphysis. Int J Legal Med 121:463–468PubMedCrossRef
55.
Milner GR, Levick RK, Kay R (1986) Assessment of bone age: a comparison of the Greulich and Pyle, and the Tanner and Whitehouse methods. Clin Radiol 37:119–121PubMedCrossRef
56.
Mossman KL (1997) Radiation protection of radiosensitive populations. Health Phys 72:519–523PubMed
57.
58.
Mossman KL, Hill LT (1982) Radiation risks in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 60:237–242PubMed
59.
Muhler M, Schulz R, Schmidt S et al (2006) The influence of slice thickness on assessment of clavicle ossification in forensic age diagnostic. Int J Legal Med 120:15–17PubMedCrossRef
60.
Nussbaum RH (1998) The linear no-threshold dose–effect relation: is it relevant to radiation protection regulation? Med Phys 25:291–299PubMedCrossRef
61.
Okkalides D, Fotakis M (1994) Patient effective dose resulting from radiographic examinations. Br J Radiol 67:564–572PubMedCrossRef
62.
Olze A, Reisinger W, Geserick G, Schmeling A (2006) Age estimation of unaccompanied minors. Part II. Dental aspects. Forensic Sci Int 159(Suppl 1):S65–S67PubMedCrossRef
63.
Olze A, Reisinger W, Geserick G, Schmeling A (2006) Age estimation of unaccompanied minors. Part II. Dental aspects. Forensic Sci Int 159(Suppl 1):S65–S67PubMedCrossRef
64.
Olze A, van Niekerk P, Schmeling A et al (2007) Comparative study on the effect of ethnicity on wisdom tooth eruption. Int J Legal Med 121:445–448PubMedCrossRef
65.
Paterson A, Frush DP (2007) Dose reduction in paediatric MDCT: general principles. Clin Radiol 62:507–517PubMedCrossRef
66.
Paterson A, Frush DP, Donnelly LF (2001) Helical CT of the body: are settings adjusted for pediatric patients? AJR 176:297–301PubMed
67.
68.
Pierce DA, Preston DL (2000) Radiation-related cancer risks at low doses among atomic bomb survivors. Radiat Res 154:178–186PubMedCrossRef
69.
70.
Preston RJ (2008) Update on linear non-threshold dose–response model and implications for diagnostic radiology procedures. Health Phys 95:541–546PubMedCrossRef
71.
Reinhardt G, Zink P, Lippert HD (1985) Röntgenuntersuchungen am lebenden Menschen im Strafverfahren. Zur Frage der Zulässigkeit nach RöV und StPO. Medizinrecht 3:155–157
72.
Richardson DB, Wing S, Hoffmann W (2001) Cancer risk from low-level ionizing radiation: the role of age at exposure. Occup Med 16:191–218PubMed
73.
Ritz-Timme S, Cattaneo C, Borrman HI et al (2000) Age estimation: the state of the art in relation to the specific demands of forensic practice. Int J Legal Med 113:129–136PubMedCrossRef
74.
Rochedo ER, Lauria D (2008) International versus national regulations: concerns and trends. Appl Radiat Isot 66:1550–1553PubMedCrossRef
75.
Ron E (2002) Let’s not relive the past: a review of cancer risk after diagnostic or therapeutic irradiation. Pediatr Radiol 32(10):739–744PubMedCrossRef
76.
Schmeling A, Baumann U, Reisinger W et al (2006) Reference data for the Thiemann–Nitz method of assessing skeletal age for the purpose of forensic age estimation. Int J Legal Med 120(1):1–4PubMedCrossRef
77.
Schmeling A, Grundmann C, Geserick G et al (2008) Criteria for age estimation in living individuals. Int J Legal Med 122:457–460PubMedCrossRef
78.
Schmeling A, Olze A, Reisinger W, Geserick G (2004) Forensic age diagnostics of living people undergoing criminal proceedings. Forensic Sci Int 144(2–3):243–245PubMedCrossRef
79.
Schmeling A, Reisinger W, Wormanns D, Geserick G (2000) Strahlenexposition bei Röntgenuntersuchungen zur forensischen Altersschätzung Lebender. Rechtsmedizin 10:135–137CrossRef
80.
Schmeling A, Schulz R, Danner B, Rosing FW (2006) The impact of economic progress and modernization in medicine on the ossification of hand and wrist. Int J Legal Med 120:121–126PubMedCrossRef
81.
Schmeling A, Schulz R, Reisinger W et al (2004) Studies on the time frame for ossification of the medial clavicular epiphyseal cartilage in conventional radiography. Int J Legal Med 118:5–8PubMedCrossRef
82.
Schmidt S, Koch B, Schmeling A et al (2007) Comparative analysis of the applicability of the skeletal age determination methods of Greulich–Pyle and Thiemann–Nitz for forensic age estimation in living subjects. Int J Legal Med 121:293–296PubMedCrossRef
83.
Schulze D, Rother U, Heiland M et al (2006) Correlation of age and ossification of the medial clavicular epiphysis using computed tomography. Forensic Sci Int 158(2–3):184–189PubMedCrossRef
84.
Scott BR (2008) It’s time for a new low-dose-radiation risk assessment paradigm—one that acknowledges hormesis. Dose Response 6:333–351PubMedCrossRef
85.
SSK (Strahlenschutzkommission) (2006) Bildgebende Diagnostik beim Kind. Strahlenschutz, Rechtfertigung und Effektivität. Empfehlungen der Strahlenschutzkommission. BAnz. Nr. 96, Bonn
86.
Statistisches Bundesamt (Hrsg.) (2004) Todesursachen in Deutschland 2003. Sterbefälle nach ausgewählten Todesursachen, Altersgruppen und Geschlecht. Fachserie 12, Reihe 4.Wiesbaden
87.
UNSCEAR (United Nations Scientific committee on the effects of ionizing radiation) (2000) UNSCEAR Report Vol. 1. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. Report to the general assembly with scientific annexes. UN Publication E.08.IX.06: 309–314
88.
Vallario EJ (1988) Regulatory perceptions of the future: a view from the United States. Health Phys 55:385–389PubMedCrossRef
89.
Vock P (2002) CT radiation exposure in children: consequences of the American discussion for Europe. Radiologe 42:697–702PubMedCrossRef
90.
Wall BF, Kendall GM, Edwards AA, Bouffler S, Muirhead CR, Meara JR (2006) What are the risks from medical X-rays and other low dose radiation? Br J Radiol 79:285–294PubMedCrossRef
91.
92.
Zietz H, Berrak S, Ried H, Weber K, Maor M, Jaffe N (2001) The clavicle: a vulnerable bone in pediatric oncology. Int J Oncol 18:689–695PubMed
Metadata
Title
How reliable are the risk estimates for X-ray examinations in forensic age estimations? A safety update
Authors
F. Ramsthaler
P. Proschek
W. Betz
M. A. Verhoff
Publication date
01-05-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Journal of Legal Medicine / Issue 3/2009
Print ISSN: 0937-9827
Electronic ISSN: 1437-1596
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-009-0322-2

Other articles of this Issue 3/2009

International Journal of Legal Medicine 3/2009 Go to the issue

Case Report

Identification of an ethnic-specific variant (V207M) of the KCNQ1 cardiac potassium channel gene in sudden unexplained death and implications from a knock-in mouse model

Short Communication

Meiosis study in a population sample from Nigeria: allele frequencies and mutation rates of 16 STR loci

Original Article

Chemical submission: results of 4-year French inquiry

Original Article

Time-dependent appearance of intrathrombus neutrophils and macrophages in a stasis-induced deep vein thrombosis model and its application to thrombus age determination

Review Article

Ocular pathology in shaken baby syndrome and other forms of infantile non-accidental head injury

Original Article

Variants of the melanocortin 1 receptor gene (MC1R) and P gene as indicators of the population origin of an individual