Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Legal Medicine 1/2009

01-01-2009 | Original Article

Sex determination from the foramen magnum: discriminant function analysis in an eighteenth and nineteenth century British sample

Authors: René Gapert, Sue Black, Jason Last

Published in: International Journal of Legal Medicine | Issue 1/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

The successful identification of the deceased is vital to the progress of any forensic investigation. One of the principal biological traits to be established from skeletal remains is the sex of the individual. This becomes more difficult if only parts of a skeleton are found or if the bones are compromised by physical insults such as fire, explosions or violence. The basal region of the occipital bone is covered by a large volume of soft tissue and is therefore in a relatively well-protected anatomical position, and as such, classification of sex using the occipital bone may prove useful in cases of significantly disrupted remains. The aim of this paper is to evaluate manually recorded morphometric variables of the region of the foramen magnum using both discriminant function analysis and linear regression. The skulls utilised in this study were selected from the eighteenth to nineteenth century documented skeletal collection of St. Bride’s Church, Fleet Street, London. Adult human skulls n = 158 (♂82/♀76) were measured to derive statistical functions. The results demonstrated that significant sexual dimorphism is present in the cranial base of the St. Bride’s material. The correctly classified crania within this population ranged from 65.8% for univariate functions to 70.3% for multivariate functions within the cranial sample. Males were correctly classified at 70.7% and females at 69.7% using multivariate functions. The linear regression equations predicted sex in the cranial sample correctly for 76% of the males and 70% for the females using different variables; however, overall highest correct prediction percentage was only 68%. Cross-validation brought the percentage down in some cases, but it was concluded that, overall, the expression of sexual dimorphism in the foramen magnum region within the St. Bride’s population is significantly demonstrable, and therefore, this area of the skull should be considered useful in the identification of sex.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Catalina-Herrera CJ (1987) Study of the anatomic metric values of the foramen magnum and its relation to sex. Acta Anat 130:344–347PubMedCrossRef Catalina-Herrera CJ (1987) Study of the anatomic metric values of the foramen magnum and its relation to sex. Acta Anat 130:344–347PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Fisher RA (1936) The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Ann Eugen 7:179–188 Fisher RA (1936) The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Ann Eugen 7:179–188
4.
go back to reference Franklin D, Freedman L, Milne N (2005) Sexual dimorphism and discriminant function sexing in indigenous South African crania. Homo 55:213–228PubMedCrossRef Franklin D, Freedman L, Milne N (2005) Sexual dimorphism and discriminant function sexing in indigenous South African crania. Homo 55:213–228PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Gapert R, Last J (2005) The adult human occipital bone: measurement variance and observer error. In: Zakrzewski SR, Clegg M (eds) Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Conference of the British Association for Biological Anthropology and Osteoarchaeology. BAR International Series. Archaeopress, Oxford, pp 119–122 Gapert R, Last J (2005) The adult human occipital bone: measurement variance and observer error. In: Zakrzewski SR, Clegg M (eds) Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Conference of the British Association for Biological Anthropology and Osteoarchaeology. BAR International Series. Archaeopress, Oxford, pp 119–122
6.
go back to reference Giles E (1964) Sex determination by discriminant function analysis of the mandible. Am J Phys Anthropol 22:129–136PubMedCrossRef Giles E (1964) Sex determination by discriminant function analysis of the mandible. Am J Phys Anthropol 22:129–136PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Giles E, Elliot O (1963) Sex determination by discriminant function analysis of crania. Am J Phys Anthropol 21:53–68PubMedCrossRef Giles E, Elliot O (1963) Sex determination by discriminant function analysis of crania. Am J Phys Anthropol 21:53–68PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Graw M (2001) Morphometrische und morphognostische Geschlechtsdiagnostik an der menschlichen Schädelbasis. In: Oehmichen M, Geserick G (eds) Osteologische Identifikation und Altersschätzung. Schmidt-Römhild, Lübeck, pp 103–121 Graw M (2001) Morphometrische und morphognostische Geschlechtsdiagnostik an der menschlichen Schädelbasis. In: Oehmichen M, Geserick G (eds) Osteologische Identifikation und Altersschätzung. Schmidt-Römhild, Lübeck, pp 103–121
9.
go back to reference Günay Y, Altinkök M (2000) The value of the size of foramen magnum in sex determination. J Clin Forensic Med 7:147–149PubMedCrossRef Günay Y, Altinkök M (2000) The value of the size of foramen magnum in sex determination. J Clin Forensic Med 7:147–149PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hamilton ME (1982) Sexual dimorphism in skeletal samples. In: Hall RL (ed) Sexual dimorphism in homo sapiens—a question of size. Praeger Publishers, New York, pp 107–163 Hamilton ME (1982) Sexual dimorphism in skeletal samples. In: Hall RL (ed) Sexual dimorphism in homo sapiens—a question of size. Praeger Publishers, New York, pp 107–163
11.
go back to reference Henke W (1972) Zur Methode der diskriminanzanalytischen Geschlechtsbestimmung am Schädel. Homo 24:99–117 Henke W (1972) Zur Methode der diskriminanzanalytischen Geschlechtsbestimmung am Schädel. Homo 24:99–117
12.
go back to reference Henke W (1977) On the method of discriminant function analysis for sex determination of the skull. J Hum Evol 6:95–100CrossRef Henke W (1977) On the method of discriminant function analysis for sex determination of the skull. J Hum Evol 6:95–100CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hermann B, Grupe G, Hummel S, Piepenbrink H, Schutkowski H (1990) Prähistorische Anthropologie—Leitfaden der Feld- und Labormethoden. Springer, Berlin Hermann B, Grupe G, Hummel S, Piepenbrink H, Schutkowski H (1990) Prähistorische Anthropologie—Leitfaden der Feld- und Labormethoden. Springer, Berlin
14.
go back to reference Holland TD (1986) Sex determination of fragmentary crania by analysis of the cranial base. Am J Phys Anthropol 70:203–208PubMedCrossRef Holland TD (1986) Sex determination of fragmentary crania by analysis of the cranial base. Am J Phys Anthropol 70:203–208PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kajanoja P (1969) Sex determination of Finnish crania by discriminant function analysis. Am J Phys Anthropol 24:29–34CrossRef Kajanoja P (1969) Sex determination of Finnish crania by discriminant function analysis. Am J Phys Anthropol 24:29–34CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Keen JA (1950) A Study of the differences between male and female skulls. Am J Phys Anthropol 8:65–78PubMedCrossRef Keen JA (1950) A Study of the differences between male and female skulls. Am J Phys Anthropol 8:65–78PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Knussmann R (1996) Vergleichende Biologie des Menschen—Lehrbuch der Anthropologie und Humangenetik, 2. Auflage. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart Knussmann R (1996) Vergleichende Biologie des Menschen—Lehrbuch der Anthropologie und Humangenetik, 2. Auflage. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart
18.
go back to reference Krogman WM (1978) The human skeleton in forensic medicine, 3rd Printing. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL Krogman WM (1978) The human skeleton in forensic medicine, 3rd Printing. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL
19.
go back to reference Marino EA (1995) Sex estimation using the first cervical vertebra. Am J Phys Anthropol 97:127–133PubMedCrossRef Marino EA (1995) Sex estimation using the first cervical vertebra. Am J Phys Anthropol 97:127–133PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Mays S, Cox M (2002) Sex determination in skeletal remains. In: Cox M, Mays S (eds) Human osteology in archaeology and forensic science. Greenwich Medical Media, London, pp 117–130 Mays S, Cox M (2002) Sex determination in skeletal remains. In: Cox M, Mays S (eds) Human osteology in archaeology and forensic science. Greenwich Medical Media, London, pp 117–130
21.
go back to reference Murshed KA, Cicekcibasi AE, Tuncer I (2003) Morphometric evaluation of the foramen magnum and variations in its shape: a study on computerized tomographic images of normal adults. Turk J Med Sci 33:301–306 Murshed KA, Cicekcibasi AE, Tuncer I (2003) Morphometric evaluation of the foramen magnum and variations in its shape: a study on computerized tomographic images of normal adults. Turk J Med Sci 33:301–306
22.
go back to reference Pötsch-Schneider L, Endris R, Schmidt H (1985) Diskriminanzanalyse zur Geschlechtsbestimmung an Unterkieferknochen. Z Rechtsmed 94:21–30PubMedCrossRef Pötsch-Schneider L, Endris R, Schmidt H (1985) Diskriminanzanalyse zur Geschlechtsbestimmung an Unterkieferknochen. Z Rechtsmed 94:21–30PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Ramsthaler F, Kreutz K, Verhoff MA (2007) Accuracy of metric sex analysis of skeletal remains using Fordisc® based on a recent skull collection. Int J Legal Med 121:477–482PubMedCrossRef Ramsthaler F, Kreutz K, Verhoff MA (2007) Accuracy of metric sex analysis of skeletal remains using Fordisc® based on a recent skull collection. Int J Legal Med 121:477–482PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Rösing FW, Graw M, Marré B, Ritz-Timme S, Rothschild MA, Rötzscher K, Schmeling A, Schröder I, Geserick G (2007) Recommendations for the forensic diagnosis of sex and age from skeletons. Homo 58:75–89PubMedCrossRef Rösing FW, Graw M, Marré B, Ritz-Timme S, Rothschild MA, Rötzscher K, Schmeling A, Schröder I, Geserick G (2007) Recommendations for the forensic diagnosis of sex and age from skeletons. Homo 58:75–89PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Rösing FW, Paul G, Schnutenhaus S (1995) Sexing skeletons by tooth size. In: Radlanski RJ, Renz RJ (eds) Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Dental Morphology, Berlin. M-Marketing Services, Berlin, pp 373–376 Rösing FW, Paul G, Schnutenhaus S (1995) Sexing skeletons by tooth size. In: Radlanski RJ, Renz RJ (eds) Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Dental Morphology, Berlin. M-Marketing Services, Berlin, pp 373–376
26.
go back to reference Routal RR, Pal GP, Bhagwat SS, Tamankar BP (1984) Metrical studies with sexual dimorphism in foramen magnum of human crania. J Anat Soc India 2(33):85–89 Routal RR, Pal GP, Bhagwat SS, Tamankar BP (1984) Metrical studies with sexual dimorphism in foramen magnum of human crania. J Anat Soc India 2(33):85–89
27.
go back to reference Saunders SR, Yang D (1999) Sex determination: XX or XY from the human skeleton. In: Fairgrieve SI (ed) Forensic osteological analysis. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL, pp 36–59 Saunders SR, Yang D (1999) Sex determination: XX or XY from the human skeleton. In: Fairgrieve SI (ed) Forensic osteological analysis. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL, pp 36–59
28.
go back to reference Scheuer L, Black S (2000) Developmental juvenile osteology. Academic, London Scheuer L, Black S (2000) Developmental juvenile osteology. Academic, London
29.
go back to reference Scheuer L, Black S (2004) The juvenile skeleton. Elsevier, London Scheuer L, Black S (2004) The juvenile skeleton. Elsevier, London
30.
go back to reference Stewart TD (1979) Essentials of forensic anthropology—especially as developed in the United States. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL Stewart TD (1979) Essentials of forensic anthropology—especially as developed in the United States. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL
31.
go back to reference Teixeira WRG (1982) Sex identification utilizing the size of the foramen magnum. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 3(3):203–206PubMedCrossRef Teixeira WRG (1982) Sex identification utilizing the size of the foramen magnum. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 3(3):203–206PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Uysal SRM, Gokharman D, Kacar M, Tuncbilek I, Kosar U (2005) Estimation of sex by 3D CT measurements of the foramen magnum. J Forensic Sci 50:1310–1314PubMed Uysal SRM, Gokharman D, Kacar M, Tuncbilek I, Kosar U (2005) Estimation of sex by 3D CT measurements of the foramen magnum. J Forensic Sci 50:1310–1314PubMed
34.
go back to reference Wahl J, Graw M (2001) Metric sex differentiation of the pars petrosa ossis temporalis. Int J Legal Med 114:215–223PubMedCrossRef Wahl J, Graw M (2001) Metric sex differentiation of the pars petrosa ossis temporalis. Int J Legal Med 114:215–223PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Westcott DJ (2000) Sex variation in the second cervical vertebra. J Forensic Sci 45:462–466 Westcott DJ (2000) Sex variation in the second cervical vertebra. J Forensic Sci 45:462–466
36.
go back to reference Westcott D, Moore-Jansen P (2001) Metric variation in the human occipital bone: forensic anthropological applications. J Forensic Sci 5(46):1159–1163 Westcott D, Moore-Jansen P (2001) Metric variation in the human occipital bone: forensic anthropological applications. J Forensic Sci 5(46):1159–1163
37.
go back to reference Williams MM (1987) Sex determination of fragmentary crania by analysis of the cranial base: applications for the study of an Arikara skeletal sample. Thesis, University of Tennessee Williams MM (1987) Sex determination of fragmentary crania by analysis of the cranial base: applications for the study of an Arikara skeletal sample. Thesis, University of Tennessee
Metadata
Title
Sex determination from the foramen magnum: discriminant function analysis in an eighteenth and nineteenth century British sample
Authors
René Gapert
Sue Black
Jason Last
Publication date
01-01-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Journal of Legal Medicine / Issue 1/2009
Print ISSN: 0937-9827
Electronic ISSN: 1437-1596
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-008-0256-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2009

International Journal of Legal Medicine 1/2009 Go to the issue