Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 9/2020

Open Access 01-09-2020 | Otology

Can we predict the altered subjective quality assessment of sound after ear canal surgery?

Authors: M. R. Zwemstra, P. Brienesse, F. A. Ebbens, M. J. F. de Wolf, E. van Spronsen

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 9/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To correlate the subjective quality assessment of ear canal acoustics of the participants to the objective measurement of the ear canal acoustics. The objective ear canal acoustics is the frequency-dependent modulation of soundwaves through the ear canal. Our second objective is to design a model to predict the subjective quality of sound based on the altered objective ear canal acoustics.

Methods

To determine the frequency-dependent modulation of the soundwaves the real-ear unaided gain (REUG) of the ear canal is measured. 40 participants with normal hearing were presented six simulated sound fragments representing the acoustic properties of six different ear canals (REUG). These six sound fragments were built based on the difference between these six REUGs and the average REUG of a normal adult ear canal. Subjective sound quality was evaluated using a VAS score and a paired comparison score.

Results

We found a strong correlation between the objective ear canal acoustics and the subjective assessment of the quality of sound (Spearman’s rho—0.89). Our linear mixed VAS model for individual participants has an intercept of 95.6 and a slope of − 4.2 (p < 0.001). The paired comparison analysis endorsed our findings that an increased difference in REUG is predictive for a decreased quality assessment of ear canal acoustics.

Conclusion

There is a strong correlation between the subjective evaluation of ear canal acoustics and the objective quality assessment of ear canal acoustics. Our models show that an increased difference in REUG predicts a decreased quality of ear canal acoustics.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Djupesland G, Zwislocki JJ (1973) Sound pressure distribution in the outer ear. Acta Otolaryngology 75(4):350–352CrossRef Djupesland G, Zwislocki JJ (1973) Sound pressure distribution in the outer ear. Acta Otolaryngology 75(4):350–352CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Ballachanda BB (1997) Theoretical and applied external ear acoustics. J Am Acad Audiol 8:411–420PubMed Ballachanda BB (1997) Theoretical and applied external ear acoustics. J Am Acad Audiol 8:411–420PubMed
4.
go back to reference Jang CH (2002) Changes in external ear resonance after mastoidectomy: open cavity mastoid versus obliterated mastoid cavity. Clin Otolaryngol 27(6):509–511CrossRef Jang CH (2002) Changes in external ear resonance after mastoidectomy: open cavity mastoid versus obliterated mastoid cavity. Clin Otolaryngol 27(6):509–511CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hartwein J (1992) The acoustics of the open mastoid cavity (so-called “radical cavity”) and its modification by surgical measures. II. Clinical studies. Laryngorhinootologie 71(9):453–461CrossRef Hartwein J (1992) The acoustics of the open mastoid cavity (so-called “radical cavity”) and its modification by surgical measures. II. Clinical studies. Laryngorhinootologie 71(9):453–461CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Satar B, YetiLer S, Özkaptan Y (2000) Acoustic characteristics of reconstructed ear canal after atresia surgery. Br J Audiol 34(6):379–381CrossRef Satar B, YetiLer S, Özkaptan Y (2000) Acoustic characteristics of reconstructed ear canal after atresia surgery. Br J Audiol 34(6):379–381CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Evans RA, Day GA, Browning GG (1989) Open-cavity mastoid surgery: its effect on the acoustics of the external ear canal. Clin Otolaryngol 14(4):317–321CrossRef Evans RA, Day GA, Browning GG (1989) Open-cavity mastoid surgery: its effect on the acoustics of the external ear canal. Clin Otolaryngol 14(4):317–321CrossRef
8.
go back to reference van Spronsen E, Brienesse P, Ebbens FA et al (2015) The effects of alterations in the osseous external auditory canal on perceived sound quality. The Laryngoscope 125(10):2362–2365CrossRef van Spronsen E, Brienesse P, Ebbens FA et al (2015) The effects of alterations in the osseous external auditory canal on perceived sound quality. The Laryngoscope 125(10):2362–2365CrossRef
9.
go back to reference van Spronsen E, Brienesse P, Ebbens FA et al (2016) The effects of a canalplasty and a canal wall reconstruction on perceived sound quality: preliminary results. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273(10):3143–3148CrossRef van Spronsen E, Brienesse P, Ebbens FA et al (2016) The effects of a canalplasty and a canal wall reconstruction on perceived sound quality: preliminary results. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273(10):3143–3148CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Chisolm TH, Johnson CE, Danhauer JL et al (2007) A systematic review of health-related quality of life and hearing aids: final report of the American Academy of Audiology Task Force on the Health-Related Quality of Life Benefits of Amplification in Adults. J Am Acad Audiol 18(2):151–183CrossRef Chisolm TH, Johnson CE, Danhauer JL et al (2007) A systematic review of health-related quality of life and hearing aids: final report of the American Academy of Audiology Task Force on the Health-Related Quality of Life Benefits of Amplification in Adults. J Am Acad Audiol 18(2):151–183CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Vaisberg JM, Martindale AT, Folkeard P et al (2018) A qualitative study of the effects of hearing loss and hearing aid use on music perception in performing musicians. J Am Acad Audiol 10:3766–17019 Vaisberg JM, Martindale AT, Folkeard P et al (2018) A qualitative study of the effects of hearing loss and hearing aid use on music perception in performing musicians. J Am Acad Audiol 10:3766–17019
12.
go back to reference Carvalho AP, Morgado AE, Henrique L (1997) Relationships between subjective and objective acoustical measures in churches. Building Acoustics 4(1):1–20CrossRef Carvalho AP, Morgado AE, Henrique L (1997) Relationships between subjective and objective acoustical measures in churches. Building Acoustics 4(1):1–20CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Versfeld NJ, Daalder L, Festen JM et al (2000) Method for the selection of sentence materials for efficient measurement of the speech reception threshold. J Acoust Soc Am 107(3):1671–1684CrossRef Versfeld NJ, Daalder L, Festen JM et al (2000) Method for the selection of sentence materials for efficient measurement of the speech reception threshold. J Acoust Soc Am 107(3):1671–1684CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Dillon H (2001) Aided threshold testing and functional gain. In: Dillan H (ed) Hearing aids. Boomerang Press, Sydney, p 110 Dillon H (2001) Aided threshold testing and functional gain. In: Dillan H (ed) Hearing aids. Boomerang Press, Sydney, p 110
16.
go back to reference Christensen RHB (2018) Regression models for ordinal data. In: Sarkar D (ed) Multivariate data visualization with R. Springer, New York, pp 8–25 Christensen RHB (2018) Regression models for ordinal data. In: Sarkar D (ed) Multivariate data visualization with R. Springer, New York, pp 8–25
17.
go back to reference Torrance GW, Feeny D, Furlong W (2001) Visual analog scales: do they have a role in the measurement of preferences for health states? Med Decis Making 21:329–334CrossRef Torrance GW, Feeny D, Furlong W (2001) Visual analog scales: do they have a role in the measurement of preferences for health states? Med Decis Making 21:329–334CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hjermstad MJ, Fayers PM, Haugen DF et al (2001) Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review. J Pain Symptom Manage 41(6):1073–1093CrossRef Hjermstad MJ, Fayers PM, Haugen DF et al (2001) Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review. J Pain Symptom Manage 41(6):1073–1093CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2013) Methodological considerations in the measurement of subjective well-being. In Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Guidelines on measuring subjective well-being. OECD Publishing pp 61–125 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2013) Methodological considerations in the measurement of subjective well-being. In Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Guidelines on measuring subjective well-being. OECD Publishing pp 61–125
Metadata
Title
Can we predict the altered subjective quality assessment of sound after ear canal surgery?
Authors
M. R. Zwemstra
P. Brienesse
F. A. Ebbens
M. J. F. de Wolf
E. van Spronsen
Publication date
01-09-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 9/2020
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-05971-3

Other articles of this Issue 9/2020

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 9/2020 Go to the issue