Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 12/2017

01-12-2017 | Otology

CO2 laser stapedotomy safety: influence of laser energy and time on bone-conduction hearing levels

Authors: Uwe Schönfeld, Hu Weiming, Veit M. Hofmann, Sergije Jovanovic, Andreas E. Albers

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 12/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Total laser energy in CO2 stapedotomy depends on the laser settings and the amount of applications. It is unclear if the amount of total laser energy affects bone-conduction hearing thresholds and if possible effects are temporary or permanent. Alterations of bone-conduction hearing thresholds after single or multiple-shot CO2 laser stapedotomy were analyzed between 1 and 3 weeks and 1.5–6 months after primary (n = 501) or revision surgeries (n = 153) and correlated to time, laser energy, frequency, surgical technique, and pathology encountered in revision stapedotomy. In both time periods, most patients showed a lower bone-conduction threshold in the four-tone puretone average (PTA) at frequencies of 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 kHz that further improved over time. Between 1 and 3 weeks, the improvement was significant in subgroups with cumulative energies lower 1 J and successful one-shot technique or in revisions without laser application. The remaining subgroups with higher total energies showed significant improvements between 1.5 and 6 months. At 4 and 8 kHz, significant improvements were found during 1.5–6 months after primary and revision surgery independent of the used energy. Repeated CO2 laser applications showed no impairment in bone-conduction thresholds and can thus be considered as safe. In most patients, significant, yet unexplained, improvements in bone-conduction hearing thresholds were noticed in a time- and energy-related pattern.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cook JA, Krishnan S et al (1995) Quantifying the Carhart effect in otosclerosis. Clin Otolaryngol 20:258–261CrossRefPubMed Cook JA, Krishnan S et al (1995) Quantifying the Carhart effect in otosclerosis. Clin Otolaryngol 20:258–261CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Perez R, de Almeida J, Nedzelski JM, Chen JM (2009) Variations in the “Carhart notch” and overclosure after laser-assisted stapedotomy in otosclerosis. Otol Neurotol 30:1033–1036CrossRefPubMed Perez R, de Almeida J, Nedzelski JM, Chen JM (2009) Variations in the “Carhart notch” and overclosure after laser-assisted stapedotomy in otosclerosis. Otol Neurotol 30:1033–1036CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Sabbe A, Verhaert N, Joossen I, Lammens A, Debruyne F (2015) Otosclerosis: shift in bone conduction after stapedotomy. B-ENT 11:183–189PubMed Sabbe A, Verhaert N, Joossen I, Lammens A, Debruyne F (2015) Otosclerosis: shift in bone conduction after stapedotomy. B-ENT 11:183–189PubMed
4.
go back to reference McGee TM (1983) The argon laser in surgery for chronic ear disease and otosclerosis. Laryngoscope 93:1177–1182CrossRefPubMed McGee TM (1983) The argon laser in surgery for chronic ear disease and otosclerosis. Laryngoscope 93:1177–1182CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Lesinski SG (1989) Lasers for otosclerosis. Laryngoscope 99(Suppl 46):1–24PubMed Lesinski SG (1989) Lasers for otosclerosis. Laryngoscope 99(Suppl 46):1–24PubMed
6.
go back to reference Lesinski SG (1990) Lasers for otosclerosis—which one if any and why. Lasers Surg Med 10:448–457CrossRefPubMed Lesinski SG (1990) Lasers for otosclerosis—which one if any and why. Lasers Surg Med 10:448–457CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Horn KL, Gherini S, Griffin GM Jr (1990) Argon laser stapedectomy using an endo-otoprobe system. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 102:193–198CrossRefPubMed Horn KL, Gherini S, Griffin GM Jr (1990) Argon laser stapedectomy using an endo-otoprobe system. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 102:193–198CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Jovanovic S, Schönfeld U (1995) Application of the CO2 laser in stapedotomy. Adv Oto-Rhino-Laryngol 49:95–100CrossRef Jovanovic S, Schönfeld U (1995) Application of the CO2 laser in stapedotomy. Adv Oto-Rhino-Laryngol 49:95–100CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Garin P, Van PK, Jamart J (2002) Hearing outcome following laser-assisted stapes surgery. J Otolaryngol 31:31–34CrossRefPubMed Garin P, Van PK, Jamart J (2002) Hearing outcome following laser-assisted stapes surgery. J Otolaryngol 31:31–34CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Jovanovic S, Schönfeld U, Scherer H (2004) CO2 laser stapedotomy with the “one-shot” technique—clinical results. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 131:750–757CrossRefPubMed Jovanovic S, Schönfeld U, Scherer H (2004) CO2 laser stapedotomy with the “one-shot” technique—clinical results. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 131:750–757CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Albers AE, Schönfeld U, Kandilakis K, Jovanovic S (2013) CO2 laser revision stapedotomy. Laryngoscope 123:1519–1526CrossRefPubMed Albers AE, Schönfeld U, Kandilakis K, Jovanovic S (2013) CO2 laser revision stapedotomy. Laryngoscope 123:1519–1526CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Wegner I, Kamalski D, Tange A et al (2014) Laser versus conventional fenestration in stapedotomy for otosclerosis: a systematic review. Laryngoscope 124:1687–1693CrossRefPubMed Wegner I, Kamalski D, Tange A et al (2014) Laser versus conventional fenestration in stapedotomy for otosclerosis: a systematic review. Laryngoscope 124:1687–1693CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Fang L, Lin H, Zhang TY, Tan J (2014) Laser versus non-laser stapedotomy in otosclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Auris Nasus Larynx 41:337–342CrossRefPubMed Fang L, Lin H, Zhang TY, Tan J (2014) Laser versus non-laser stapedotomy in otosclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Auris Nasus Larynx 41:337–342CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Vernick DM (1996) A comparison of the results of KTP and CO2 laser stapedotomy. Am J Otol 17:221–224PubMed Vernick DM (1996) A comparison of the results of KTP and CO2 laser stapedotomy. Am J Otol 17:221–224PubMed
16.
go back to reference Buchman CA, Fucci MJ, Roberson JB Jr, De La Cruz A (2000) Comparison of argon and CO2 laser stapedotomy in primary otosclerosis surgery. Am J Otolaryngol 21:227–230CrossRefPubMed Buchman CA, Fucci MJ, Roberson JB Jr, De La Cruz A (2000) Comparison of argon and CO2 laser stapedotomy in primary otosclerosis surgery. Am J Otolaryngol 21:227–230CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Motta G, Moscillo L (2002) Functional results in stapedotomy with and without CO2 laser. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 64:307–310CrossRefPubMed Motta G, Moscillo L (2002) Functional results in stapedotomy with and without CO2 laser. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 64:307–310CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Marchese M, RaVaella M, Scorpecci A, Cianfrone F, Scorpecci A (2011) “One-shot” CO2 versus Er:YAG laser stapedotomy: is the outcome the same? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 268:351–356CrossRefPubMed Marchese M, RaVaella M, Scorpecci A, Cianfrone F, Scorpecci A (2011) “One-shot” CO2 versus Er:YAG laser stapedotomy: is the outcome the same? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 268:351–356CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Sergi B, Scorpecci A, Parrilla C, Paludetti G (2010) Early hearing assessment after “one shot” CO2 laser stapedotomy: is it helpful to predict inner ear damage and the functional outcome? Otol Neurotol 31:1376–1380PubMed Sergi B, Scorpecci A, Parrilla C, Paludetti G (2010) Early hearing assessment after “one shot” CO2 laser stapedotomy: is it helpful to predict inner ear damage and the functional outcome? Otol Neurotol 31:1376–1380PubMed
20.
go back to reference Kamalski D, Wegner I, Tange A et al (2014) Outcomes of different laser types in laser-assisted stapedotomy: a systematic review. Otol Neurotol 35:1046–1051CrossRefPubMed Kamalski D, Wegner I, Tange A et al (2014) Outcomes of different laser types in laser-assisted stapedotomy: a systematic review. Otol Neurotol 35:1046–1051CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Jovanovic S, Anft D, Schönfeld U, Berghaus A, Scherer H (1999) Influence of CO2 laser application to the guinea-pig cochlea on compound action potentials. Am J Otol 20:166–173CrossRefPubMed Jovanovic S, Anft D, Schönfeld U, Berghaus A, Scherer H (1999) Influence of CO2 laser application to the guinea-pig cochlea on compound action potentials. Am J Otol 20:166–173CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Jovanovic S, Schönfeld U, Fischer R et al (1996) Thermal stress on the inner ear in laser stapedotomy. HNO 44:6–13PubMed Jovanovic S, Schönfeld U, Fischer R et al (1996) Thermal stress on the inner ear in laser stapedotomy. HNO 44:6–13PubMed
23.
go back to reference Jovanovic S, Schönfeld U, Prapavat V et al (1996) Effects of continuous wave laser systems on stapes footplate. Lasers Surg Med 19:424–432CrossRefPubMed Jovanovic S, Schönfeld U, Prapavat V et al (1996) Effects of continuous wave laser systems on stapes footplate. Lasers Surg Med 19:424–432CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Kamalski D, Verdaasdonk R, de Boorder T, Vincent R, Versnel H, Grolman W (2014) Comparing mechanical effects and sound production of KTP, thulium, and CO2 laser in stapedotomy. Otol Neurotol 35:1156–1162PubMed Kamalski D, Verdaasdonk R, de Boorder T, Vincent R, Versnel H, Grolman W (2014) Comparing mechanical effects and sound production of KTP, thulium, and CO2 laser in stapedotomy. Otol Neurotol 35:1156–1162PubMed
25.
go back to reference Kamalski D, Peters J, de Boorder T, Klis S, Grolman W (2014) Influence of laser-assisted cochleostomy on acoustically evoked compound action potentials in the guinea pig. Otol Neurotol 35:1306–1311CrossRefPubMed Kamalski D, Peters J, de Boorder T, Klis S, Grolman W (2014) Influence of laser-assisted cochleostomy on acoustically evoked compound action potentials in the guinea pig. Otol Neurotol 35:1306–1311CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Kamalski D, Verdaasdonk R, de Boorder T, Vincent R, Trabelzini F, Grolman W (2014) Comparison of KTP, thulium, and CO2 laser in stapedotomy using specialized visualization techniques: thermal effects. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 271:1477–1483PubMed Kamalski D, Verdaasdonk R, de Boorder T, Vincent R, Trabelzini F, Grolman W (2014) Comparison of KTP, thulium, and CO2 laser in stapedotomy using specialized visualization techniques: thermal effects. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 271:1477–1483PubMed
27.
go back to reference Moscillo L, Imperiali M, Carra P, Catapano F, Motta G (2006) Bone conduction variation poststapedotomy. Am J Otol 27:330–333CrossRef Moscillo L, Imperiali M, Carra P, Catapano F, Motta G (2006) Bone conduction variation poststapedotomy. Am J Otol 27:330–333CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Karimi Yazdi A, Sazgar A, Motiee M, Ashtiani M (2009) Improvement of bone conduction after stapes surgery in otosclerosis patients with mixed hearing loss depending from surgical technique. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 266:1225–1228CrossRefPubMed Karimi Yazdi A, Sazgar A, Motiee M, Ashtiani M (2009) Improvement of bone conduction after stapes surgery in otosclerosis patients with mixed hearing loss depending from surgical technique. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 266:1225–1228CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Robinson M, Kasden SD (1977) Bone conduction speech discrimination: an indication of cochlear function in the immediate postoperative period. Arch Otolaryngol 103:238–240CrossRefPubMed Robinson M, Kasden SD (1977) Bone conduction speech discrimination: an indication of cochlear function in the immediate postoperative period. Arch Otolaryngol 103:238–240CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Smyth GD (1978) Immediate and delayed alterations in cochlear function following stapedectomy. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 11:105–112PubMed Smyth GD (1978) Immediate and delayed alterations in cochlear function following stapedectomy. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 11:105–112PubMed
31.
go back to reference Lesinski SG (2002) Causes of conductive hearing loss after stapedectomy or stapedotomy: a prospective study of 279 consecutive surgical revisions. Otol Neurotol 23:281–288CrossRefPubMed Lesinski SG (2002) Causes of conductive hearing loss after stapedectomy or stapedotomy: a prospective study of 279 consecutive surgical revisions. Otol Neurotol 23:281–288CrossRefPubMed
32.
33.
go back to reference Vincent R, Rovers M, Zingade N et al (2010) Revision stapedotomy: operative findings and hearing results. A prospective study of 652 cases from the otology–neurotology database. Otol Neurotol 31:875–882CrossRefPubMed Vincent R, Rovers M, Zingade N et al (2010) Revision stapedotomy: operative findings and hearing results. A prospective study of 652 cases from the otology–neurotology database. Otol Neurotol 31:875–882CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Somers T, Vercruysse J-P, Zarowski A, Verstreken M, Offeciers E (2006) Stapedotomy with microdrill or carbon dioxide laser: influence on inner ear function. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 115:880–885CrossRefPubMed Somers T, Vercruysse J-P, Zarowski A, Verstreken M, Offeciers E (2006) Stapedotomy with microdrill or carbon dioxide laser: influence on inner ear function. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 115:880–885CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Boonchoo R, Puapermpoonsiri P (2007) Early and late hearing outcomes after CO2 laser stapedotomy. J Med Assoc Thai 90:1647–1653PubMed Boonchoo R, Puapermpoonsiri P (2007) Early and late hearing outcomes after CO2 laser stapedotomy. J Med Assoc Thai 90:1647–1653PubMed
36.
go back to reference St Bauchet. Martin M, Rubinstein EN, Hirsch BE (2008) High-frequency sensorineural hearing loss after stapedectomy. Otol Neurotol 29:447–452CrossRef St Bauchet. Martin M, Rubinstein EN, Hirsch BE (2008) High-frequency sensorineural hearing loss after stapedectomy. Otol Neurotol 29:447–452CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Just T (2012) Effect of the stapedotomy technique on early post-operative hearing results—preliminary results. Auris Nasus Larynx 39:383–386CrossRefPubMed Just T (2012) Effect of the stapedotomy technique on early post-operative hearing results—preliminary results. Auris Nasus Larynx 39:383–386CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Brase C, Keil I, Schwitulla J et al (2013) Bone conduction after stapes surgery: comparison of CO2 laser and manual perforation. Otol Neurotol 34:821–826CrossRefPubMed Brase C, Keil I, Schwitulla J et al (2013) Bone conduction after stapes surgery: comparison of CO2 laser and manual perforation. Otol Neurotol 34:821–826CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Sperling NM, Sury K, Gordon J, Cox S (2013) Early postoperative results in stapedectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 149:918–923CrossRefPubMed Sperling NM, Sury K, Gordon J, Cox S (2013) Early postoperative results in stapedectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 149:918–923CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Huber A, Linder T, Fisch U (2001) Is the Er: YAG laser damaging to inner ear function? Otol Neurotol 22:311–315CrossRefPubMed Huber A, Linder T, Fisch U (2001) Is the Er: YAG laser damaging to inner ear function? Otol Neurotol 22:311–315CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Galli J, Parrilla C, Fiorita A, Marchese MR, Paludetti G (2005) Erbium:yttrium–aluminum–garnet laser application in stapedotomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 133:923–928CrossRefPubMed Galli J, Parrilla C, Fiorita A, Marchese MR, Paludetti G (2005) Erbium:yttrium–aluminum–garnet laser application in stapedotomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 133:923–928CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Timoshenko AP, Oletski A, Prades JM et al (2009) A comparison of the hearing results of KTP and Erbium YAG laser stapedotomy. Acta Otolaryngol 129:217–219CrossRefPubMed Timoshenko AP, Oletski A, Prades JM et al (2009) A comparison of the hearing results of KTP and Erbium YAG laser stapedotomy. Acta Otolaryngol 129:217–219CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Schrauwen I, Van Camp G (2010) The etiology of otosclerosis: a combination of genes and environment. Laryngoscope 120:1195–1202PubMed Schrauwen I, Van Camp G (2010) The etiology of otosclerosis: a combination of genes and environment. Laryngoscope 120:1195–1202PubMed
44.
go back to reference Stenfelt S, Goode RL (2005) Bone-conducted sound: physiological and clinical aspects. Otol Neurotol 26:1245–1261CrossRefPubMed Stenfelt S, Goode RL (2005) Bone-conducted sound: physiological and clinical aspects. Otol Neurotol 26:1245–1261CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Vincent R, Sperling NM, Oates J, Jindal M (2006) Surgical findings and long-term hearing results in 3,050 stapedotomies for primary otosclerosis: a prospective study with the otology–neurotology database. Otol Neurotol 27(8 Suppl 2):25–47CrossRef Vincent R, Sperling NM, Oates J, Jindal M (2006) Surgical findings and long-term hearing results in 3,050 stapedotomies for primary otosclerosis: a prospective study with the otology–neurotology database. Otol Neurotol 27(8 Suppl 2):25–47CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Forton G, Wuyts F, Delsupehe K, Verfaillie J, Loncke R (2009) CO2 laser assisted stapedotomy combined with a Wengen titanium clip stapes prosthesis: superior short-term results. Otol Neurotol 30:1071–1078CrossRefPubMed Forton G, Wuyts F, Delsupehe K, Verfaillie J, Loncke R (2009) CO2 laser assisted stapedotomy combined with a Wengen titanium clip stapes prosthesis: superior short-term results. Otol Neurotol 30:1071–1078CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Watson GJ, Byth K, da Cruz M (2015) Outcomes in stapedotomy surgery: the learning curve redefined. Otol Neurotol 36:1601–1603CrossRefPubMed Watson GJ, Byth K, da Cruz M (2015) Outcomes in stapedotomy surgery: the learning curve redefined. Otol Neurotol 36:1601–1603CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference Kwok P, Gleich O, Dalles K, Mayr E, Jacob P, Strutz J (2017) How to avoid a learning curve in stapedotomy: a standardized surgical technique. Otol Neurotol 38:931–937CrossRefPubMed Kwok P, Gleich O, Dalles K, Mayr E, Jacob P, Strutz J (2017) How to avoid a learning curve in stapedotomy: a standardized surgical technique. Otol Neurotol 38:931–937CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
CO2 laser stapedotomy safety: influence of laser energy and time on bone-conduction hearing levels
Authors
Uwe Schönfeld
Hu Weiming
Veit M. Hofmann
Sergije Jovanovic
Andreas E. Albers
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 12/2017
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4769-3

Other articles of this Issue 12/2017

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 12/2017 Go to the issue