Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 6/2017

Open Access 01-06-2017 | Rhinology

Adaptation and validation of the Dutch version of the nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) scale

Authors: Floris V. W. J. van Zijl, Reinier Timman, Frank R. Datema

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 6/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

The nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) scale is a validated disease-specific, self-completed questionnaire for the assessment of quality of life related to nasal obstruction. The aim of this study was to validate the Dutch (NL-NOSE) questionnaire. A prospective instrument validation study was performed in a tertiary academic referral center. Guidelines for the cross-cultural adaptation process from the original English language scale into a Dutch language version were followed. Patients undergoing functional septoplasty or septorhinoplasty and asymptomatic controls completed the questionnaire both before and 3 months after surgery to test reliability and validity. Additionally, we explored the possibility to reduce the NOSE scale even further using graded response models. 129 patients and 50 controls were included. Internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha 0.82) and test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.89) were good. The instrument showed excellent between-group discrimination (Mann–Whitney U = 85, p < 0.001) and high response sensitivity to change (Wilcoxon rank p < 0.001). The NL-NOSE correlated well with the score on a visual analog scale measuring the subjective sensation of nasal obstruction, with exception of item 4 (trouble sleeping). Item 4 provided the least information to the total scale and item 3 (trouble breathing through nose) the most, particularly in the postoperative group. The Dutch version of the NOSE (NL-NOSE) demonstrated satisfactory reliability and validity. We recommend the use of the NL-NOSE as a validated instrument to measure subjective severity of nasal obstruction in Dutch adult patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Stewart MG, Witsell DL, Smith TL, Weaver EM, Yueh B, Hannley MT (2004) Development and validation of the nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) scale. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 130(2):157–163CrossRefPubMed Stewart MG, Witsell DL, Smith TL, Weaver EM, Yueh B, Hannley MT (2004) Development and validation of the nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) scale. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 130(2):157–163CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Lachanas VA, Tsiouvaka S, Tsea M, Hajiioannou JK, Skoulakis CE (2014) Validation of the nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) scale for Greek patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 151(5):819–823CrossRefPubMed Lachanas VA, Tsiouvaka S, Tsea M, Hajiioannou JK, Skoulakis CE (2014) Validation of the nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) scale for Greek patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 151(5):819–823CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Bezerra TF, Padua FG, Pilan RR, Stewart MG, Voegels RL (2011) Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of a quality of life questionnaire: the nasal obstruction symptom evaluation questionnaire. Rhinology 49(2):227–231PubMed Bezerra TF, Padua FG, Pilan RR, Stewart MG, Voegels RL (2011) Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of a quality of life questionnaire: the nasal obstruction symptom evaluation questionnaire. Rhinology 49(2):227–231PubMed
4.
go back to reference Marro M, Mondina M, Stoll D, de Gabory L (2011) French validation of the NOSE and RhinoQOL questionnaires in the management of nasal obstruction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 144(6):988–993CrossRefPubMed Marro M, Mondina M, Stoll D, de Gabory L (2011) French validation of the NOSE and RhinoQOL questionnaires in the management of nasal obstruction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 144(6):988–993CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Mozzanica F, Urbani E, Atac M et al (2013) Reliability and validity of the Italian nose obstruction symptom evaluation (I-NOSE) scale. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270(12):3087–3094CrossRefPubMed Mozzanica F, Urbani E, Atac M et al (2013) Reliability and validity of the Italian nose obstruction symptom evaluation (I-NOSE) scale. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270(12):3087–3094CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Larrosa F, Roura J, Dura MJ, Guirao M, Alberti A, Alobid I (2015) Adaptation and validation of the Spanish version of the nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) Scale. Rhinology 53(2):176–180PubMed Larrosa F, Roura J, Dura MJ, Guirao M, Alberti A, Alobid I (2015) Adaptation and validation of the Spanish version of the nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) Scale. Rhinology 53(2):176–180PubMed
7.
go back to reference Dong D, Zhao Y, Stewart MG et al (2014) Development of the Chinese nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) questionnaire. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi 49(1):20–26PubMed Dong D, Zhao Y, Stewart MG et al (2014) Development of the Chinese nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) questionnaire. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi 49(1):20–26PubMed
8.
go back to reference Rhee JS, Sullivan CD, Frank DO, Kimbell JS, Garcia GJ (2014) A systematic review of patient-reported nasal obstruction scores: defining normative and symptomatic ranges in surgical patients. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 16(3): 219–25 (quiz 232) CrossRef Rhee JS, Sullivan CD, Frank DO, Kimbell JS, Garcia GJ (2014) A systematic review of patient-reported nasal obstruction scores: defining normative and symptomatic ranges in surgical patients. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 16(3): 219–25 (quiz 232) CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Beaton, DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25(24): 3186–91CrossRef Beaton, DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25(24): 3186–91CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR et al (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60(1):34–42CrossRefPubMed Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR et al (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60(1):34–42CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Aaronson N, Alonso J, Burnam A et al (2002) Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res 11(3):193–205CrossRefPubMed Aaronson N, Alonso J, Burnam A et al (2002) Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res 11(3):193–205CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference van Belle G (2002) Statistical rules of thumb. Wiley, Chichester, p. 60 van Belle G (2002) Statistical rules of thumb. Wiley, Chichester, p. 60
13.
go back to reference Cicchetti D (1994) Guidelines, criteria and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess 6(4):284–290CrossRef Cicchetti D (1994) Guidelines, criteria and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess 6(4):284–290CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Brown T (2006) Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. p 87 Brown T (2006) Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. p 87
15.
go back to reference Reise SP, Yu J (1990) Parameter recovery in the graded response model using MULTILOG. J Educ Meas 27:133–144CrossRef Reise SP, Yu J (1990) Parameter recovery in the graded response model using MULTILOG. J Educ Meas 27:133–144CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Adaptation and validation of the Dutch version of the nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) scale
Authors
Floris V. W. J. van Zijl
Reinier Timman
Frank R. Datema
Publication date
01-06-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 6/2017
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4486-y

Other articles of this Issue 6/2017

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 6/2017 Go to the issue