Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 10/2006

01-10-2006 | Laryngology

Hoarseness and laryngopharyngeal reflux: a cause and effect relationship or coincidence?

Authors: Ozcan Ozturk, Ferhan Oz, Baris Karakullukcu, Fatih Oghan, Ender Guclu, Mehmet Ada

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 10/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

The role of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) on hoarseness is widely assumed and accepted. Few articles present objective information on the subject. One of the main problems in establishing a relationship is our lack of knowledge of what is normal. We compared patients with chronic hoarseness and healthy controls to establish three goals: (1) to demonstrate the presence of additional symptoms and signs of LPR in patients with hoarseness; (2) to find the prevalence of LPR by utilizing 24 h double-probe in patients with hoarseness and compare it with that of the control group; (3) to contribute data to establish prevalence of LPR in healthy population. Forty-three patients with hoarseness and 20 healthy volunteers were enrolled in the study. All the patients in the study group had hoarseness of more than 3 months duration. The subjects recieved videolaryngoscopic evaluation and 24 h double-probe pH monitoring, and the results were compared. In the study group, 27 patients (62.8%) out of 43 had LPR episodes, compared to 6 (30%) of 20 healthy volunteers. Mean number of LPR episodes recorded by the pharyngeal probe was 7.0 [standard deviation (SD): 8.8] in 24 h, and this was significantly higher than that of the healthy controls [0.9/24 h (SD: 1.9)] (P = 0.003). Mean number of LPR episodes of the study group in upright position was 5.8 (SD: 7,0) and in supine position was 1.2 (SD: 3.3). These numbers were also significantly higher from the controls (P = 0.005 and P = 0.014 respectively). The results of this study show that: (1) most common additional symptoms were heartburn and chronic throat clearing and most common finding is pachydermia; (2) LPR incidence in patients with chronic hoarseness is significantly higher than the LPR incidence in healthy controls; (3) LPR is present in healthy people. However, the severity of LPR seems to be the causative factor rather than its presence.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Koufman JA, Aviv JE, Casiano RR, Shaw GY (2002) Laryngopharyngeal reflux: position statement of the committee on speech, voice, and swallowing disorders of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 127:32–35PubMedCrossRef Koufman JA, Aviv JE, Casiano RR, Shaw GY (2002) Laryngopharyngeal reflux: position statement of the committee on speech, voice, and swallowing disorders of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 127:32–35PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Koufman JA, Amin MR, Panetti M (2000) Prevalence of reflux in 113 consecutive patients with laryngeal and voice disorders. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123:385–388PubMedCrossRef Koufman JA, Amin MR, Panetti M (2000) Prevalence of reflux in 113 consecutive patients with laryngeal and voice disorders. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123:385–388PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Wiener GJ, Koufman JA, Wu WC, Cooper JB, Richter JE, Castell DO (1989) Chronic hoarseness secondary to gastroesophageal reflux disease: documentation with 24-h ambulatory pH monitoring. Am J Gastroenterol 84:1503–1508PubMed Wiener GJ, Koufman JA, Wu WC, Cooper JB, Richter JE, Castell DO (1989) Chronic hoarseness secondary to gastroesophageal reflux disease: documentation with 24-h ambulatory pH monitoring. Am J Gastroenterol 84:1503–1508PubMed
4.
go back to reference Smit CF, Van Leeuwen JAM, Mathus-Vliegen LMF et al (2000) Gastropharyngeal and gastroesophageal reflux in globus and hoarseness. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 126:827–830PubMed Smit CF, Van Leeuwen JAM, Mathus-Vliegen LMF et al (2000) Gastropharyngeal and gastroesophageal reflux in globus and hoarseness. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 126:827–830PubMed
5.
go back to reference Wiener GJ, Koufman JA, Wu WC et al (1987) The pharyngoesophageal dual ambulatory pH probe for evaluation of atypical manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux (GER). Gastroenterology 92:1694 Wiener GJ, Koufman JA, Wu WC et al (1987) The pharyngoesophageal dual ambulatory pH probe for evaluation of atypical manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux (GER). Gastroenterology 92:1694
6.
go back to reference Vincent DA Jr, Garrett JD, Radionoff SL, Reussner LA, Stasney CR (2000) The proximal probe in esophageal pH monitoring: development of a normative database. J Voice 14:247–254PubMedCrossRef Vincent DA Jr, Garrett JD, Radionoff SL, Reussner LA, Stasney CR (2000) The proximal probe in esophageal pH monitoring: development of a normative database. J Voice 14:247–254PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ulualp SO, Toohill RJ, Hoffmann R, Shaker R (1999) Pharyngeal pH monitoring in patients with posterior laryngitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 120:672–677PubMedCrossRef Ulualp SO, Toohill RJ, Hoffmann R, Shaker R (1999) Pharyngeal pH monitoring in patients with posterior laryngitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 120:672–677PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Smit CF, Tan J, Devriese PP, Mathus-Vliegen LMH, Brandsen M, Schouwenburg PF (1998) Ambulatory pH measurements at the upper esophageal sphincter. Laryngoscope 108:299–302PubMedCrossRef Smit CF, Tan J, Devriese PP, Mathus-Vliegen LMH, Brandsen M, Schouwenburg PF (1998) Ambulatory pH measurements at the upper esophageal sphincter. Laryngoscope 108:299–302PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Yates PD, Pryde A, Maher L, Heading RC, Wilson JA (2001) Pattern of ambulatory pharyngo-oesophageal motility and pH-metry in healthy volunteers. Clin Otolaryngol 26:113–116PubMedCrossRef Yates PD, Pryde A, Maher L, Heading RC, Wilson JA (2001) Pattern of ambulatory pharyngo-oesophageal motility and pH-metry in healthy volunteers. Clin Otolaryngol 26:113–116PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Yorulmaz I, Ozlugedık S, Kucuk B (2003) Gastroesophageal reflux disease: symptoms versus pH monitoring results. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 129:582–586PubMedCrossRef Yorulmaz I, Ozlugedık S, Kucuk B (2003) Gastroesophageal reflux disease: symptoms versus pH monitoring results. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 129:582–586PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Koufman JA (1991) The otolaryngologic manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD): a clinical investigation of 225 patients using ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring and an experimental investigation of the role of acid and pepsin in the development of laryngeal injury. Laryngoscope 101(Suppl 53):1–78PubMed Koufman JA (1991) The otolaryngologic manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD): a clinical investigation of 225 patients using ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring and an experimental investigation of the role of acid and pepsin in the development of laryngeal injury. Laryngoscope 101(Suppl 53):1–78PubMed
12.
go back to reference Postma GN (2000) Ambulatory pH monitoring methodology. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 109(Suppl 184):10–14 Postma GN (2000) Ambulatory pH monitoring methodology. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 109(Suppl 184):10–14
13.
go back to reference Johnson PE, Koufman JA, Nowak LJ et al (2001) Ambulatory 24-hour double-probe pH monitoring: the importance of manometry. Laryngoscope 111:1970–1975PubMedCrossRef Johnson PE, Koufman JA, Nowak LJ et al (2001) Ambulatory 24-hour double-probe pH monitoring: the importance of manometry. Laryngoscope 111:1970–1975PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Hoarseness and laryngopharyngeal reflux: a cause and effect relationship or coincidence?
Authors
Ozcan Ozturk
Ferhan Oz
Baris Karakullukcu
Fatih Oghan
Ender Guclu
Mehmet Ada
Publication date
01-10-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 10/2006
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-006-0097-8

Other articles of this Issue 10/2006

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 10/2006 Go to the issue