Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 10/2006

01-10-2006 | Otology

Behavior of metal implants used in ENT surgery in 7 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging

Authors: Ariane Thelen, Hans-Christian Bauknecht, Patrick Asbach, Thomas Schrom

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 10/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become increasingly important as an imaging technique in cross-sectional imaging of head and neck diseases. To investigate whether MRI examinations can be performed without risk in patients with metal implants even at higher field strengths, we examined different materials in 7 Tesla MRI. Implants near sensory organs like the middle ear or eye are of particular interest here. Using the 7 Tesla research MRI for small animals, we tested implants made of various metals like titanium, gold, gold/platinum, platinum/iridium, gold-plated silver, PTFE and stainless steel for heating, translocation and rotation according to a standardized protocol. A fiber optic temperature probe measured the heating of the implant before, during and after MRI scanning. None of the implants showed significant heating. The gold-plated stainless steel ventilation tube was the only implant to markedly change its position already in the Petri dish. Of the remaining implants, a trachea support ring, a nose dilatator and the wire from the ventilation tubes moved during vibration of the Petri dish. With exception of two implants, all implants changed positions in the water bath. In the swim test, the gold implants showed the least movement of all the implants. In this study, the properties of the non-ferromagnetic implant materials differed in the 7 Tesla MRI. Stainless steel ventilation tubes, the trachea support ring and the nose dilatator were not suited for the 7 Tesla MRI system, because they changed their position during MRI. In the case of ventilation tubes with a steel wire, the wire should be removed before MRI to prevent injury to the external auditory canal. There was a tendency for the pure gold implants to move less in the 7 Tesla MRI than all other tested materials. General statements cannot be made about the MRI suitability of different implants. Every implant should be individually examined to confirm its definitive MRI compatibility. Particularly, middle ear implants warrant special attention here due to their closeness to the oval window.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Applebaum EL, Galdino E, Valvassori MD (1985) Effects of magnetic resonance imaging fields on stapedectomy prostheses. Arch Otolaryngol 111:820–821PubMed Applebaum EL, Galdino E, Valvassori MD (1985) Effects of magnetic resonance imaging fields on stapedectomy prostheses. Arch Otolaryngol 111:820–821PubMed
2.
go back to reference Applebaum EL, Galdino E, Valvassori MD (1990) Further studies on the effects of magnetic resonance imaging fields on middle ear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 99:801–804PubMed Applebaum EL, Galdino E, Valvassori MD (1990) Further studies on the effects of magnetic resonance imaging fields on middle ear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 99:801–804PubMed
3.
go back to reference Graf H, Klemm T, Lauer UA, Duda S, Claussen CD, Schick F (2003) Systematik der Artefakte metallischer Gefäßprothesen (Stents) in der MRT. Fortschr Geb Röntgenstr 175:1711–1719CrossRef Graf H, Klemm T, Lauer UA, Duda S, Claussen CD, Schick F (2003) Systematik der Artefakte metallischer Gefäßprothesen (Stents) in der MRT. Fortschr Geb Röntgenstr 175:1711–1719CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hüttenbrink KB, Große-Nobis W (1987) Experimentelle Untersuchungen und theoretische Betrachtungen über das Verhalten von Stapes-Metall-Prothesen im Magnetfeld eines Kernspintomographen. Laryngo Rhino Otol 66:127–130CrossRef Hüttenbrink KB, Große-Nobis W (1987) Experimentelle Untersuchungen und theoretische Betrachtungen über das Verhalten von Stapes-Metall-Prothesen im Magnetfeld eines Kernspintomographen. Laryngo Rhino Otol 66:127–130CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kwok P, Waldeck A, Strutz J (2003) Wie verhalten sich metallhaltige Mittelohrimplantate in der Kernspintomographie? Laryngo Rhino Otol 82:13–18CrossRef Kwok P, Waldeck A, Strutz J (2003) Wie verhalten sich metallhaltige Mittelohrimplantate in der Kernspintomographie? Laryngo Rhino Otol 82:13–18CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Leon YES, Gabriele OF (1987) Middle ear prosthesis: significance in magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 5:405–406PubMedCrossRef Leon YES, Gabriele OF (1987) Middle ear prosthesis: significance in magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 5:405–406PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Mattucci KF, Setzen M, Hyman R, Chaturvedi G (1986) The effect of nuclear magnetic resonance imaging on metallic middle ear prostheses. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 94:441–443PubMed Mattucci KF, Setzen M, Hyman R, Chaturvedi G (1986) The effect of nuclear magnetic resonance imaging on metallic middle ear prostheses. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 94:441–443PubMed
8.
go back to reference New P, Rosen B, Brady T, Buonanno F, Kistler J, Burt C, Hinshaw W, Newhouse J, Pohost G, Taveras J (1983) Potential hazards and artifacts of ferromagnetic and nonferromagnetic surgical and dental materials and devices in nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. Radiology 147(1):139–148PubMed New P, Rosen B, Brady T, Buonanno F, Kistler J, Burt C, Hinshaw W, Newhouse J, Pohost G, Taveras J (1983) Potential hazards and artifacts of ferromagnetic and nonferromagnetic surgical and dental materials and devices in nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. Radiology 147(1):139–148PubMed
9.
go back to reference Ruggera PS, Witters DM, von Maltzahn G, Bassen HI (2003) In vitro assessment of tissue heating near metallic medical implants by exposure to pulsed radio frequency diathermy. Phys Med Biol 48:2919–2928PubMedCrossRef Ruggera PS, Witters DM, von Maltzahn G, Bassen HI (2003) In vitro assessment of tissue heating near metallic medical implants by exposure to pulsed radio frequency diathermy. Phys Med Biol 48:2919–2928PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Schenk JF (1998) MR safety at high magnetic fields. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 6(4): 715–730 Schenk JF (1998) MR safety at high magnetic fields. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 6(4): 715–730
11.
go back to reference Schrom T, Bauknecht H, Berghaus A, Scherer H (2005) Einfluss der Magnetresonanztomographie auf Oberlidimplantate. HNO, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg New York (in press) Schrom T, Bauknecht H, Berghaus A, Scherer H (2005) Einfluss der Magnetresonanztomographie auf Oberlidimplantate. HNO, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg New York (in press)
12.
go back to reference Shellock FG, Swengros Curtis J (1991) MR Imaging and biomedical implants, materials, and devices: an updated review. Radiology 180:541–550PubMed Shellock FG, Swengros Curtis J (1991) MR Imaging and biomedical implants, materials, and devices: an updated review. Radiology 180:541–550PubMed
13.
go back to reference Shellock FG (2001) Guide to MR procedures and metallic objects: update 2001. 7th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia Shellock FG (2001) Guide to MR procedures and metallic objects: update 2001. 7th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia
14.
go back to reference Syms MJ, Petermann GW (2000) Magnetic resonance imaging of stapes prostheses. Am J Otol 21:494–498PubMed Syms MJ, Petermann GW (2000) Magnetic resonance imaging of stapes prostheses. Am J Otol 21:494–498PubMed
15.
go back to reference Williams MD, Antonelli PJ, Williams LS, Moorhead JE (2001) Middle ear prosthesis displacement in high-strength magnetic fields. Otol Neurotol 22(2):158–161PubMedCrossRef Williams MD, Antonelli PJ, Williams LS, Moorhead JE (2001) Middle ear prosthesis displacement in high-strength magnetic fields. Otol Neurotol 22(2):158–161PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Yang QX, Smith MB, Briggs RW, Rycyna RE (1999) Microimaging at 14 Tesla using GESEPI for removal of magnetic susceptibility artifacts in T2 weighted image contrast. J Magn Reson 141:1–6PubMedCrossRef Yang QX, Smith MB, Briggs RW, Rycyna RE (1999) Microimaging at 14 Tesla using GESEPI for removal of magnetic susceptibility artifacts in T2 weighted image contrast. J Magn Reson 141:1–6PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Behavior of metal implants used in ENT surgery in 7 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging
Authors
Ariane Thelen
Hans-Christian Bauknecht
Patrick Asbach
Thomas Schrom
Publication date
01-10-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 10/2006
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-006-0082-2

Other articles of this Issue 10/2006

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 10/2006 Go to the issue