Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 4/2018

01-10-2018 | Gynecologic Oncology

Participation of elderly gynecological cancer patients in clinical trials

Authors: Katharina Prieske, Fabian Trillsch, Gülten Oskay-Özcelik, Radoslav Chekerov, Christiane Bleich, Leticia Oliveira-Ferrer, Donata Grimm, Sascha Kuerti, Volkmar Mueller, Anna Suling, Barbara Schmalfeldt, Jalid Sehouli, Sven Mahner, Linn Woelber

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 4/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Elderly patients are underrepresented in clinical trials in gynecological cancer, even though they are disproportionally often affected. This study aimed to evaluate the disposition and apprehension of elderly patients toward study participation.

Methods

112 elderly gynecological cancer patients (median age 70) were surveyed in a multicenter cross-sectional study. Besides fitness, state of disease, education and domestic situation, questions aimed at the general willingness to participate in a clinical trial. Personal reasons for refusal and anticipated advantages/disadvantages that might evolve from participation were inquired.

Results

Willingness to participate in a clinical study was generally high (72%, 74/102). Reasons for potential study participation were: ‘better monitoring of the disease’ (67.1%), ‘better medical care’ (46.1%), ‘to help medical research’ (44.7%), ‘better medication’ (35.5%) and ‘because of my doctor’s recommendation’ (22.4%). Reasons for potential refusal were: ‘too time consuming’ (24.4%), ‘fear of side effects’ (21.8%), ‘misuse as experimental animal’ (18%), ‘long distance to clinic’ (14.1%) and ‘too little or unclear information’ (10.3%). 37.2% (29/78) of the patients stated that they had ‘no objection’ at all against study participation. The question if patients anticipated having a longer life due to study participation was answered with ‘yes’ or ‘rather yes’ in 42% (38/90); 28.9% answered ‘no’ or ‘rather no’ (29% undecided). No statistical significant relation between willingness to participate in a study and general fitness (p = 0.133), education (p = 0.122), age (p = 0.474) or domestic situation (p = 0.123) could be observed in a multivariate logistic regression model.

Conclusions

Elderly patients are generally willing to participate in clinical studies, in our cohort regardless of their fitness. Benefits of participation seem to be unclear among a majority of potential study participants. Therefore, it might be decisive to provide more general information regarding benefits and safety for elderly patients in a clinical trial.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Talarico L, Chen G, Pazdur R (2004) Enrollment of elderly patients in clinical trials for cancer drug registration: a 7-year experience by the US Food and Drug Administration. J Clin Oncol 22(22):4626–4631CrossRefPubMed Talarico L, Chen G, Pazdur R (2004) Enrollment of elderly patients in clinical trials for cancer drug registration: a 7-year experience by the US Food and Drug Administration. J Clin Oncol 22(22):4626–4631CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Villella J, Chalas E (2005) Optimising treatment of elderly patients with ovarian cancer: improving their enrollment in clinical trials. Drugs Aging 22(2):95–100CrossRefPubMed Villella J, Chalas E (2005) Optimising treatment of elderly patients with ovarian cancer: improving their enrollment in clinical trials. Drugs Aging 22(2):95–100CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Lara PN Jr et al (2005) Evaluation of factors affecting awareness of and willingness to participate in cancer clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 23(36):9282–9289CrossRefPubMed Lara PN Jr et al (2005) Evaluation of factors affecting awareness of and willingness to participate in cancer clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 23(36):9282–9289CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Mathews C et al (2009) Willingness of gynecologic cancer patients to participate in clinical trials. Gynecol Oncol 112(1):161–165CrossRefPubMed Mathews C et al (2009) Willingness of gynecologic cancer patients to participate in clinical trials. Gynecol Oncol 112(1):161–165CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Comis RL et al (2003) Public attitudes toward participation in cancer clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 21(5):830–835CrossRefPubMed Comis RL et al (2003) Public attitudes toward participation in cancer clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 21(5):830–835CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Colon-Otero G et al (2008) Disparities in participation in cancer clinical trials in the United States: a symptom of a healthcare system in crisis. Cancer 112(3):447–454CrossRefPubMed Colon-Otero G et al (2008) Disparities in participation in cancer clinical trials in the United States: a symptom of a healthcare system in crisis. Cancer 112(3):447–454CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Donnelly CB et al (2017) A population-level investigation of cancer clinical trials participation in a UK region. Eur J Cancer Prev 26:S229–S235CrossRefPubMed Donnelly CB et al (2017) A population-level investigation of cancer clinical trials participation in a UK region. Eur J Cancer Prev 26:S229–S235CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Jimenez R et al (2013) Clinical trial participation among ethnic/racial minority and majority patients with advanced cancer: what factors most influence enrollment? J Palliat Med 16(3):256–262CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jimenez R et al (2013) Clinical trial participation among ethnic/racial minority and majority patients with advanced cancer: what factors most influence enrollment? J Palliat Med 16(3):256–262CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Gross CP et al (2004) Cancer trial enrollment after state-mandated reimbursement. J Natl Cancer Inst 96(14):1063–1069CrossRefPubMed Gross CP et al (2004) Cancer trial enrollment after state-mandated reimbursement. J Natl Cancer Inst 96(14):1063–1069CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Bell JA, Balneaves LG (2015) Cancer patient decision making related to clinical trial participation: an integrative review with implications for patients’ relational autonomy. Support Care Cancer 23(4):1169–1196CrossRefPubMed Bell JA, Balneaves LG (2015) Cancer patient decision making related to clinical trial participation: an integrative review with implications for patients’ relational autonomy. Support Care Cancer 23(4):1169–1196CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Roick J et al (2017) Factors associated with non-participation and dropout among cancer patients in a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cancer Care 27:e12645CrossRef Roick J et al (2017) Factors associated with non-participation and dropout among cancer patients in a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cancer Care 27:e12645CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ellis PM et al (2001) Randomized clinical trials in oncology: understanding and attitudes predict willingness to participate. J Clin Oncol 19(15):3554–3561CrossRefPubMed Ellis PM et al (2001) Randomized clinical trials in oncology: understanding and attitudes predict willingness to participate. J Clin Oncol 19(15):3554–3561CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Go RS et al (2006) Clinical trial accrual among new cancer patients at a community-based cancer center. Cancer 106(2):426–433CrossRefPubMed Go RS et al (2006) Clinical trial accrual among new cancer patients at a community-based cancer center. Cancer 106(2):426–433CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2016) Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin 66(1):7–30CrossRef Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2016) Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin 66(1):7–30CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Woopen H et al (2016) Elderly ovarian cancer patients: an individual participant data meta-analysis of the North-Eastern German Society of Gynecological Oncology (NOGGO). Eur J Cancer 60:101–106CrossRefPubMed Woopen H et al (2016) Elderly ovarian cancer patients: an individual participant data meta-analysis of the North-Eastern German Society of Gynecological Oncology (NOGGO). Eur J Cancer 60:101–106CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Tinquaut F et al (2016) Prognostic factors for overall survival in elderly patients with advanced ovarian cancer treated with chemotherapy: results of a pooled analysis of three GINECO phase II trials. Gynecol Oncol 143(1):22–26CrossRefPubMed Tinquaut F et al (2016) Prognostic factors for overall survival in elderly patients with advanced ovarian cancer treated with chemotherapy: results of a pooled analysis of three GINECO phase II trials. Gynecol Oncol 143(1):22–26CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Vercelli M et al (2000) Relative survival in elderly European cancer patients: evidence for health care inequalities. The EUROCARE Working Group. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 35(3):161–179CrossRefPubMed Vercelli M et al (2000) Relative survival in elderly European cancer patients: evidence for health care inequalities. The EUROCARE Working Group. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 35(3):161–179CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Stewart JH et al (2007) Participation in surgical oncology clinical trials: gender-, race/ethnicity-, and age-based disparities. Ann Surg Oncol 14(12):3328–3334CrossRefPubMed Stewart JH et al (2007) Participation in surgical oncology clinical trials: gender-, race/ethnicity-, and age-based disparities. Ann Surg Oncol 14(12):3328–3334CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Velikova G et al (2004) Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 22(4):714–724CrossRefPubMed Velikova G et al (2004) Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 22(4):714–724CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Lewis JH et al (2003) Participation of patients 65 years of age or older in cancer clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 21(7):1383–1389CrossRefPubMed Lewis JH et al (2003) Participation of patients 65 years of age or older in cancer clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 21(7):1383–1389CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Marcus MW et al (2014) Factors associated with dropout in a lung cancer high risk cohort—the Liverpool Lung Project. Int J Oncol 44(6):2146–2152CrossRefPubMed Marcus MW et al (2014) Factors associated with dropout in a lung cancer high risk cohort—the Liverpool Lung Project. Int J Oncol 44(6):2146–2152CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Baquet CR et al (2006) Recruitment and participation in clinical trials: socio-demographic, rural/urban, and health care access predictors. Cancer Detect Prev 30(1):24–33CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Baquet CR et al (2006) Recruitment and participation in clinical trials: socio-demographic, rural/urban, and health care access predictors. Cancer Detect Prev 30(1):24–33CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
25.
go back to reference Harter P et al (2005) Non-enrolment of ovarian cancer patients in clinical trials: reasons and background. Ann Oncol 16(11):1801–1805CrossRefPubMed Harter P et al (2005) Non-enrolment of ovarian cancer patients in clinical trials: reasons and background. Ann Oncol 16(11):1801–1805CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Hilpert F et al (2012) Treatment of elderly ovarian cancer patients in the context of controlled clinical trials: a joint analysis of the AGO Germany experience. Onkologie 35(3):76–81CrossRefPubMed Hilpert F et al (2012) Treatment of elderly ovarian cancer patients in the context of controlled clinical trials: a joint analysis of the AGO Germany experience. Onkologie 35(3):76–81CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Freyer G, Geay JF, Touzet S, Provencal J, Weber B, Jacquin JP, Ganem G, Tubiana-Mathieu N, Gisserot O, Pujade-Lauraine E (2005) Comprehensive geriatric assessment predicts tolerance to chemotherapy and survival in elderly patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma: a GINECO study. Ann Oncol 16(11):1795–1800CrossRefPubMed Freyer G, Geay JF, Touzet S, Provencal J, Weber B, Jacquin JP, Ganem G, Tubiana-Mathieu N, Gisserot O, Pujade-Lauraine E (2005) Comprehensive geriatric assessment predicts tolerance to chemotherapy and survival in elderly patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma: a GINECO study. Ann Oncol 16(11):1795–1800CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Participation of elderly gynecological cancer patients in clinical trials
Authors
Katharina Prieske
Fabian Trillsch
Gülten Oskay-Özcelik
Radoslav Chekerov
Christiane Bleich
Leticia Oliveira-Ferrer
Donata Grimm
Sascha Kuerti
Volkmar Mueller
Anna Suling
Barbara Schmalfeldt
Jalid Sehouli
Sven Mahner
Linn Woelber
Publication date
01-10-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 4/2018
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4886-2

Other articles of this Issue 4/2018

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 4/2018 Go to the issue