Top

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

Published in:

Open Access 01-02-2018 | General Gynecology

The Society of European Robotic Gynaecological Surgery (SERGS) Pilot Curriculum for robot assisted gynecological surgery

Authors: Peter Rusch, Rainer Kimmig, Fabrice Lecuru, Jan Persson, Jordi Ponce, Michel Degueldre, René Verheijen

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 2/2018

Abstract

Purpose

To set forth experiences in the context of the SERGS Pilot Curriculum—the first standardized educational program for robotic use in gynecological surgery—in terms of feasibility, effectiveness and potential for certification.

Methods

The Society of European Robotic Gynecological Surgery (SERGS) outlined a Pilot Curriculum for standardized education in robot-assisted laparoscopic gynecological surgery. Its feasibility and acceptance were checked in the form of a fellowship pilot program conducted at four European Centers of Excellence for robot-assisted surgery. Results and conclusions derived from this pilot program are presented.

Results

The SERGS Pilot Curriculum defines criteria for a standardized training and assessment of performance, boosts the learning curve of the candidate and increases contentment at work. Regarding face validity, it proves valuable as finally all candidates could perform the outlined procedure safely and efficiently without supervision.

Conclusion

Due to the immense increase of robotic procedures in gynecology standardized training curricula are indispensable. This seems highly necessary to ensure patients’ safety and surgical outcome. The SERGS Pilot Curriculum sets standards for a stepwise theoretical and practical training in gynecological robotic procedures. It seems feasible as instrument for accreditation as gynecologic robotic surgeon. Though as a general applicable guideline for systematic training in robot-assisted surgery, a definite curriculum should have a more definite timeline and implementation of a structured assessment of performance.

Available only for authorised users

Conrad LB, Ramirez PT, Burke W et al (2015) Role of minimally invasive surgery in gynecologic oncology: an updated survey of members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology. Int J Gynecol Cancer 25(6):1121–1127. https://doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0000000000000450 (PMID: 25860841) CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Mendivil AA, Rettenmaier MA, Abaid LN et al (2015) A comparison of open surgery, robotic-assisted surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of morbidly obese endometrial cancer patients. JSLS 19(1):e2014.00001. https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2014.00001 (PMID: 25848196) CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Wright JD, Burke WM, Wilde ET et al (2012) Comparative effectiveness of robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. J Clin Oncol 30(8):783–791. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.36.7508 (PMID: 22291073) CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Lerner MA, Ayalew M, Peine WJ, Sundaram CP (2010) Does training on a virtual reality robotic simulator improve performance on the da Vinci surgical system? J Endourol 24(3):467–472. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2009.0190 (PMID: 20334558) CrossRefPubMed

Stegemann AP, Ahmed K, Syed JR et al (2013) Fundamental skills of robotic surgery: a multi-institutional randomized controlled trial for validation of a simulation-based curriculum. Urology 81(4):767–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2012.12.033 (PMID: 23484743) CrossRefPubMed

Sun AJ, Aron M, Hung AJ (2014) Novel training methods for robotic surgery. Indian J Urol 30(3):333–338. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.128506 (PMID: 25097322) CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Schreuder HWR, Wolswijk R, Zweemer RP, Schijven MP, Verheijen RHM (2012) Training and learning robotic surgery, time for a more structured approach: a systematic review. BJOG 119(2):137–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03139.x (PMID: 21981104) CrossRefPubMed

Goh AC, Goldfarb DW, Sander JC, Miles BJ, Dunkin BJ (2012) Global evaluative assessment of robotic skills: validation of a clinical assessment tool to measure robotic surgical skills. J Urol 187(1):247–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.09.032 (PMID: 22099993) CrossRefPubMed

Sanchez R, Rodriguez O, Rosciano J et al (2016) Robotic surgery training: construct validity of Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS). J Robot Surg 10(3):227–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-016-0572-1 (PMID: 27039189) CrossRefPubMed

10.

Flin R, Yule S, Paterson-Brown S, Maran N, Rowley D, Youngson G (2006) Experimental evaluation of a behavioural marker system for surgeons’ non-technical skills (NOTSS). Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet 50(10):969–972. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120605001036 CrossRef

11.

Yule S, Flin R, Maran N, Rowley D, Youngson G, Paterson-Brown S (2008) Surgeons’ non-technical skills in the operating room: reliability testing of the NOTSS behavior rating system. World J Surg 32(4):548–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-007-9320-z (PMID: 18259809) CrossRefPubMed

12.

Tanaka A, Graddy C, Simpson K, Perez M, Truong M, Smith R (2016) Robotic surgery simulation validity and usability comparative analysis. Surg Endosc 30(9):3720–3729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4667-y (PMID: 26581619) CrossRefPubMed

13.

Hung AJ, Jayaratna IS, Teruya K, Desai MM, Gill IS, Goh AC (2013) Comparative assessment of three standardized robotic surgery training methods. BJU Int 112(6):864–871. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12045 (PMID: 23470136) CrossRefPubMed

14.

Culligan P, Gurshumov E, Lewis C, Priestley J, Komar J, Salamon C (2014) Predictive validity of a training protocol using a robotic surgery simulator. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 20(1):48–51. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000045 (PMID: 24368489) CrossRefPubMed

15.

Volpe A, Ahmed K, Dasgupta P et al (2015) Pilot validation study of the european association of urology robotic training curriculum. Eur Urol 68(2):292–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.025 (PMID: 25454612) CrossRefPubMed

16.

Shamim Khan M, Ahmed K, Gavazzi A et al (2013) Development and implementation of centralized simulation training: evaluation of feasibility, acceptability and construct validity. BJU Int 111(3):518–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11204.x (PMID: 22928639) CrossRefPubMed

17.

Frank JR, Snell L, Sherbino J (eds) (2015) CanMEDS 2015 physician competency framework. Ottawa: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada

18.

Bandiera G, Sherbino J, Frank JR (2006) The CanMEDS assessment tools handbook. An introductory guide to assessment methods for the CanMEDS competencies. Ottawa: The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada

19.

Rocha R, Fiorelli RKA, Buogo G et al (2016) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP): a new way to training. J Robot Surg 10(1):19–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-015-0550-z (PMID: 26661411) CrossRefPubMed

20.

van der Poel H, Brinkman W, van Cleynenbreugel B et al (2016) Training in minimally invasive surgery in urology: European Association of Urology/International Consultation of Urological Diseases consultation. BJU Int 117(3):515–530. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13320 (PMID: 26352342) CrossRefPubMed

Title: The Society of European Robotic Gynaecological Surgery (SERGS) Pilot Curriculum for robot assisted gynecological surgery
Authors: Peter Rusch
Rainer Kimmig
Fabrice Lecuru
Jan Persson
Jordi Ponce
Michel Degueldre
René Verheijen
Publication date: 01-02-2018
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4612-5

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

The Society of European Robotic Gynaecological Surgery (SERGS) Pilot Curriculum for robot assisted gynecological surgery

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

Changes in classification of genetic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2

Clinical characteristics of acute pancreatitis in pregnancy: experience based on 121 cases

Hyperandrogenemia and ovarian reserve in patients with Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser syndrome type 1 and 2: potential influences on ovarian stimulation

Successful treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia in pregnancy with single-agent all-trans retinoic acid

Diagnostic performance of HPV E6/E7 mRNA assay for detection of cervical high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer among women with ASCUS Papanicolaou smears

Reducing the spread of occult uterine sarcoma at the time of minimally invasive gynecologic surgery