Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2/2018

01-02-2018 | News and Views

Changes in classification of genetic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2

Authors: Karin Kast, Pauline Wimberger, Norbert Arnold

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 2/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Classification of variants of unknown significance (VUS) in the breast cancer genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 changes with accumulating evidence for clinical relevance. In most cases down-staging towards neutral variants without clinical significance is possible.

Methods

We searched the database of the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (GC-HBOC) for changes in classification of genetic variants as an update to our earlier publication on genetic variants in the Centre of Dresden. Changes between 2015 and 2017 were recorded.

Results

In the group of variants of unclassified significance (VUS, Class 3, uncertain), only changes of classification towards neutral genetic variants were noted. In BRCA1, 25% of the Class 3 variants (n = 2/8) changed to Class 2 (likely benign) and Class 1 (benign). In BRCA2, in 50% of the Class 3 variants (n = 16/32), a change to Class 2 (n = 10/16) or Class 1 (n = 6/16) was observed. No change in classification was noted in Class 4 (likely pathogenic) and Class 5 (pathogenic) genetic variants in both genes. No up-staging from Class 1, Class 2 or Class 3 to more clinical significance was observed.

Conclusion

All variants with a change in classification in our cohort were down-staged towards no clinical significance by a panel of experts of the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (GC-HBOC). Prevention in families with Class 3 variants should be based on pedigree based risks and should not be guided by the presence of a VUS.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Meisel C, Sadowski CE, Kohlstedt D, Keller K, Staritz F, Grubling N, Becker K, Mackenroth L, Rump A, Schrock E et al (2017) Spectrum of genetic variants of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in a German single center study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 295(5):1227–1238CrossRefPubMed Meisel C, Sadowski CE, Kohlstedt D, Keller K, Staritz F, Grubling N, Becker K, Mackenroth L, Rump A, Schrock E et al (2017) Spectrum of genetic variants of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in a German single center study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 295(5):1227–1238CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, Grody WW, Hegde M, Lyon E, Spector E et al (2015) Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med Off J Am Coll Med Genet 17(5):405–424 Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, Grody WW, Hegde M, Lyon E, Spector E et al (2015) Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med Off J Am Coll Med Genet 17(5):405–424
3.
go back to reference Plon SE, Eccles DM, Easton D, Foulkes WD, Genuardi M, Greenblatt MS, Hogervorst FB, Hoogerbrugge N, Spurdle AB, Tavtigian SV (2008) Sequence variant classification and reporting: recommendations for improving the interpretation of cancer susceptibility genetic test results. Hum Mutat 29(11):1282–1291CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Plon SE, Eccles DM, Easton D, Foulkes WD, Genuardi M, Greenblatt MS, Hogervorst FB, Hoogerbrugge N, Spurdle AB, Tavtigian SV (2008) Sequence variant classification and reporting: recommendations for improving the interpretation of cancer susceptibility genetic test results. Hum Mutat 29(11):1282–1291CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Eccles DM, Mitchell G, Monteiro AN, Schmutzler R, Couch FJ, Spurdle AB, Gomez-Garcia EB (2015) BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing-pitfalls and recommendations for managing variants of uncertain clinical significance. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol ESMO 26(10):2057–2065CrossRef Eccles DM, Mitchell G, Monteiro AN, Schmutzler R, Couch FJ, Spurdle AB, Gomez-Garcia EB (2015) BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing-pitfalls and recommendations for managing variants of uncertain clinical significance. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol ESMO 26(10):2057–2065CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Waha A, Versmold B, Kast K, Kiechle M, Ditsch N, Meindl A, Niederacher D, Hahnen E, Arnold N, Mundhenke C, Horvath J, Auber B, Dikow N, Hauke J, Wappenschmidt B, Riess O, Schott S, Speiser D, Faust U, Sutter C, Rhiem K, Schmutzler RK (2017) Konsensusempfehlung des Deutschen Konsortiums Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs zum Umgang mit Ergebnissen der Multigenanalyse. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 77:733–739. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-108531CrossRef Waha A, Versmold B, Kast K, Kiechle M, Ditsch N, Meindl A, Niederacher D, Hahnen E, Arnold N, Mundhenke C, Horvath J, Auber B, Dikow N, Hauke J, Wappenschmidt B, Riess O, Schott S, Speiser D, Faust U, Sutter C, Rhiem K, Schmutzler RK (2017) Konsensusempfehlung des Deutschen Konsortiums Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs zum Umgang mit Ergebnissen der Multigenanalyse. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 77:733–739. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1055/​s-0043-108531CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Changes in classification of genetic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2
Authors
Karin Kast
Pauline Wimberger
Norbert Arnold
Publication date
01-02-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4631-2

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2/2018 Go to the issue