Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1/2017

01-01-2017 | Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Neonatal complications in vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery: are they associated with number of pulls, cup detachments, and duration of vacuum application?

Authors: Alessandro Ghidini, Daniel Stewart, John C. Pezzullo, Anna Locatelli

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To explore whether the characteristics of vacuum delivery are associated with the occurrence of head injury and neonatal complications.

Methods

Retrospectively cohort study of vacuum-assisted attempted vaginal deliveries of singletons. We studied the association of total duration of vacuum application and number of pulls and cup dislodgement with (1) primary outcome: the occurrence of major (subgaleal hemorrhage, skull fracture, and intracranial hemorrhage) or minor (cephalohematoma, scalp laceration more extensive than simple abrasions) neonatal head injuries and (2) secondary outcome: the occurrence of neonatal complications, including 5-min Apgar score <7, umbilical artery pH < 7.10, shoulder dystocia, or need for neonatal intensive care unit admission. Logistic regression analysis was used to control for confounders.

Results

Vacuum-assisted delivery was attempted in 555 women. It was successful in 515 cases, and it failed in 40 (7.2 %). Head injury occurred in 32 (6.2 %) of vaginally delivered neonates, and it was related to duration of vacuum application (P = 0.004) and birth weight (P = 0.048). However, the associations lost a statistical significance at the multivariate analysis. Neonatal complications occurred in 25 cases (5 %), and they were associated with meconium-stained amniotic fluid (P < 0.001) and duration of vacuum application (P = 0.03) at the multivariate analysis. However, most of the complications were actually associated with the need for vacuum delivery rather than the procedure itself.

Conclusion

Neonatal head injury after vacuum application is not independently related to total duration of vacuum application, number of pulls, or cup dislodgements.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Gei AF (2012) Prevention of the first cesarean delivery: the role of operative vaginal delivery. Semin Perinatol 36:365–373CrossRefPubMed Gei AF (2012) Prevention of the first cesarean delivery: the role of operative vaginal delivery. Semin Perinatol 36:365–373CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Chenoy R, Johanson R (1992) A randomized prospective study comparing delivery with metal and silicone rubber vacuum extractor cups. Br J ObstetGynaecol 99(5):360–363CrossRef Chenoy R, Johanson R (1992) A randomized prospective study comparing delivery with metal and silicone rubber vacuum extractor cups. Br J ObstetGynaecol 99(5):360–363CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Attilakos G, Sibanda T, Winter C, Johnson N, Draycott T (2005) A randomized controlled trial of a new handheld vacuum extraction device. BJOG 112:1510–1515CrossRefPubMed Attilakos G, Sibanda T, Winter C, Johnson N, Draycott T (2005) A randomized controlled trial of a new handheld vacuum extraction device. BJOG 112:1510–1515CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Plauche’ WC (1979) Fetal cranial injuries related to delivery with the Malmstroem vacuum extractor. Obstet Gynecol 53:750–757 Plauche’ WC (1979) Fetal cranial injuries related to delivery with the Malmstroem vacuum extractor. Obstet Gynecol 53:750–757
9.
go back to reference Bofill JA, Rust OA, Devidas M, Roberts WE, Morrison JC, Martin JN Jr (1997) Neonatal cephalohematoma from vacuum extraction. J Reprod Med 42:565–569PubMed Bofill JA, Rust OA, Devidas M, Roberts WE, Morrison JC, Martin JN Jr (1997) Neonatal cephalohematoma from vacuum extraction. J Reprod Med 42:565–569PubMed
10.
go back to reference Vayssiere C, Beucher G, Dupuis O, Feraud O, Simon-Toulza C, Sentilhes L et al (2011) Instrumental delivery: clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 159:43–48CrossRefPubMed Vayssiere C, Beucher G, Dupuis O, Feraud O, Simon-Toulza C, Sentilhes L et al (2011) Instrumental delivery: clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 159:43–48CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Simonson C, Barlow P, Dehennin N, Sphel M, Toppet V, Murillo D, Rozenberg S (2007) Neonatal complications of vacuum-assisted delivery. Obstet Gynecol 109:626–633CrossRefPubMed Simonson C, Barlow P, Dehennin N, Sphel M, Toppet V, Murillo D, Rozenberg S (2007) Neonatal complications of vacuum-assisted delivery. Obstet Gynecol 109:626–633CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Teng FY, Sayre JW (1997) Vacuum extraction: does duration predict scalp injury? Obstet Gynecol 89:281–285CrossRefPubMed Teng FY, Sayre JW (1997) Vacuum extraction: does duration predict scalp injury? Obstet Gynecol 89:281–285CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Murphy DJ, Liebling RE, Patel R, Verity L, Swingler R (2003) Cohort study of operative delivery in the second stage of labour and standard of obstetric care. BJOG 110:610–615CrossRefPubMed Murphy DJ, Liebling RE, Patel R, Verity L, Swingler R (2003) Cohort study of operative delivery in the second stage of labour and standard of obstetric care. BJOG 110:610–615CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Vacca A (2006) Vacuum-assisted delivery: an analysis of traction force and maternal and neonatal outcomes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 46:124–127CrossRefPubMed Vacca A (2006) Vacuum-assisted delivery: an analysis of traction force and maternal and neonatal outcomes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 46:124–127CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Macones GA, Hankins GD, Spong CY, Hauth J, Moore T (2008) The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring. Obstet Gynecol 112:661–666CrossRefPubMed Macones GA, Hankins GD, Spong CY, Hauth J, Moore T (2008) The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring. Obstet Gynecol 112:661–666CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Doumouchtsis SK, Arulkumaran S (2006) Head injuries after instrumental vaginal deliveries. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 18:129–134CrossRefPubMed Doumouchtsis SK, Arulkumaran S (2006) Head injuries after instrumental vaginal deliveries. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 18:129–134CrossRefPubMed
18.
19.
go back to reference Wanyonyi SZ, Achila B, Gudu N (2011) Factors contributing to failure of vacuum delivery and associated maternal/neonatal morbidity. Int J Obstet Gynecol 115:157–160CrossRef Wanyonyi SZ, Achila B, Gudu N (2011) Factors contributing to failure of vacuum delivery and associated maternal/neonatal morbidity. Int J Obstet Gynecol 115:157–160CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Ducarme G, Hamel JF, Bouet PE, Legendre G, Vandenbroucke L, Sentilhes L (2015) Maternal and neonatal morbidity after attempted operative vaginal delivery according to fetal station. Obstet Gynecol 126:521–529CrossRefPubMed Ducarme G, Hamel JF, Bouet PE, Legendre G, Vandenbroucke L, Sentilhes L (2015) Maternal and neonatal morbidity after attempted operative vaginal delivery according to fetal station. Obstet Gynecol 126:521–529CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2015) Operative vaginal delivery. Practice Bulletin Nr. 154, November 2015 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2015) Operative vaginal delivery. Practice Bulletin Nr. 154, November 2015
Metadata
Title
Neonatal complications in vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery: are they associated with number of pulls, cup detachments, and duration of vacuum application?
Authors
Alessandro Ghidini
Daniel Stewart
John C. Pezzullo
Anna Locatelli
Publication date
01-01-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 1/2017
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-016-4206-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1/2017 Go to the issue