Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 4/2016

01-10-2016 | Gynecologic Oncology

Introducing a new scoring system for pap smear in the detection of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in pregnancy (The Luebeck Score)

Authors: Kay Neumann, Claudia Barop, Christoph Cirkel, Achim Rody, Daniel A. Beyer

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 4/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To construct a scoring system for pap smears to objectify cytological appraisal and to enhance the accuracy and comparability of pap smear interpretation in pregnancy.

Materials and methods

For development of a scoring system for cell appraisal of pap smears the style of the Modified Masood’s Scoring Index for appraisal of cells from fine needle aspirations of breast lesions was used. Cohort analysis of n = 54 dysplastic pap smears for polymorphology of cells, anisonucleosis, structure of the nucleus, signs of tissue destruction, nucleus/plasma relation and signs of tumordiathesis. Each criteria was classified into three stages: The first with little evidence for dysplasia (one point), second stage with sporadic evidence (two points) or third stage with frequent evidence (three points). To further evaluate if pregnancy associated cells changes interfere with this scoring system we compared the results of pregnant and non-pregnant women. Histological result was used as an indicator of correctness of the score.

Results

Statistical analysis showed a good correlation of the scoring system with histological results. Especially in pregnancy statistical analysis shows promising results (sensitivity 86.67 %, Specificity 100 %, receiver operating characteristic analysis p ≤ 0.05).

Conclusion

The Luebeck Score seems to be a useful approach for appraisal of pap smears in pregnancy. Further studies containing high numbers of cases are needed for further evaluation of potential benefits of the scoring system compared to conventional evaluation of pap smears.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Robert Koch Institut (Hrsg.) (2010) Verbreitung von Krebserkrankungen in Deutschland. Entwicklungen der Prävalenzen zwischen 1990 und 2010. Beiträge zur Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes RKI, Berlin, pp 83–87 Robert Koch Institut (Hrsg.) (2010) Verbreitung von Krebserkrankungen in Deutschland. Entwicklungen der Prävalenzen zwischen 1990 und 2010. Beiträge zur Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes RKI, Berlin, pp 83–87
2.
go back to reference Arbyn M, Anttila A, Jordan J, Ronco G, Schenck U, Segnan N, Wiener H, Herbert A, von Karsa L (2010) European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening. Second edition—summary document. Ann Oncol 21(3):448–458CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Arbyn M, Anttila A, Jordan J, Ronco G, Schenck U, Segnan N, Wiener H, Herbert A, von Karsa L (2010) European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening. Second edition—summary document. Ann Oncol 21(3):448–458CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Yobs AR, Swanson RA, Lamotte LC Jr (1985) Laboratory reliability of the Papanicolaou smear. Obstet Gynecol 65(2):235–244PubMed Yobs AR, Swanson RA, Lamotte LC Jr (1985) Laboratory reliability of the Papanicolaou smear. Obstet Gynecol 65(2):235–244PubMed
4.
go back to reference Nandini NM, Rekha TS, Manjunath GV (2011) Evaluation of scoring system in cytological diagnosis and management of breast lesion with review of literature. Indian J Cancer 48:240–245CrossRefPubMed Nandini NM, Rekha TS, Manjunath GV (2011) Evaluation of scoring system in cytological diagnosis and management of breast lesion with review of literature. Indian J Cancer 48:240–245CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Michael CW, Esfahani FM (1997) Pregnancy-related changes: a retrospective review of 278 cervical smears. Diagn Cytopathol 17(2):99–107CrossRefPubMed Michael CW, Esfahani FM (1997) Pregnancy-related changes: a retrospective review of 278 cervical smears. Diagn Cytopathol 17(2):99–107CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Nauth HF (2013) Gynäkologische Zytodiagnostik, Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 187–90 Nauth HF (2013) Gynäkologische Zytodiagnostik, Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 187–90
7.
go back to reference Soost HJ (1974) Zytologische Diagnostik der bösartigen Geschwülste und ihrer Vorstadien. In: Soost HJ (ed) Lehrbuch der klinischen Zytodiagnostik. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 171–173 Soost HJ (1974) Zytologische Diagnostik der bösartigen Geschwülste und ihrer Vorstadien. In: Soost HJ (ed) Lehrbuch der klinischen Zytodiagnostik. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 171–173
9.
go back to reference Goodman A (2015) HPV testing as a screen for cervical cancer. BMJ 30:350 Goodman A (2015) HPV testing as a screen for cervical cancer. BMJ 30:350
10.
go back to reference Simoes E, Brucker S, Beckmann MW, Ortmann O, Albring C, Wallwiener D (2013) Screening for cervical cancer—minimise risks—maximise benefits. Need for adaptation in Germany in Light of the European guidelines and their objectives. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 73:623–639CrossRef Simoes E, Brucker S, Beckmann MW, Ortmann O, Albring C, Wallwiener D (2013) Screening for cervical cancer—minimise risks—maximise benefits. Need for adaptation in Germany in Light of the European guidelines and their objectives. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 73:623–639CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ikenberg H, Bergeron C, Schmidt D, Griesser H, Alameda F, Angeloni C, Bogers J, Dachez R, Denton K, Hariri J, Keller T, von Knebel Doeberitz M, Neumann HH, Puig-Tintore LM, Sideri M, Rehm S, Ridder R, PALMS Study Group (2013) Screening for cervical cancer precursors with p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology: results of the PALMS study. J Natl Cancer Inst 105:1550–1557CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ikenberg H, Bergeron C, Schmidt D, Griesser H, Alameda F, Angeloni C, Bogers J, Dachez R, Denton K, Hariri J, Keller T, von Knebel Doeberitz M, Neumann HH, Puig-Tintore LM, Sideri M, Rehm S, Ridder R, PALMS Study Group (2013) Screening for cervical cancer precursors with p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology: results of the PALMS study. J Natl Cancer Inst 105:1550–1557CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Ikenberg H (2011) Computer-assisted diagnostics in cervical cytology. Der Pathol 32:476–483CrossRef Ikenberg H (2011) Computer-assisted diagnostics in cervical cytology. Der Pathol 32:476–483CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kitchener HC, Blanks R, Dunn G, Gunn L, Desai M, Albrow R, Mather J, Rana DN, Cubie H, Moore C, Legood R, Gray A, Moss S (2011) Automation-assisted versus manual reading of cervical cytology (MAVARIC): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 12(1):56–64. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70264-3 CrossRefPubMed Kitchener HC, Blanks R, Dunn G, Gunn L, Desai M, Albrow R, Mather J, Rana DN, Cubie H, Moore C, Legood R, Gray A, Moss S (2011) Automation-assisted versus manual reading of cervical cytology (MAVARIC): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 12(1):56–64. doi:10.​1016/​S1470-2045(10)70264-3 CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Introducing a new scoring system for pap smear in the detection of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in pregnancy (The Luebeck Score)
Authors
Kay Neumann
Claudia Barop
Christoph Cirkel
Achim Rody
Daniel A. Beyer
Publication date
01-10-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 4/2016
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-016-4113-y

Other articles of this Issue 4/2016

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 4/2016 Go to the issue

Correspondence

Reply