Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2/2016

01-08-2016 | Gynecologic Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine

Hysteroscopic adhesiolysis: efficacy and safety

Authors: Ahmad Sameer Sanad, Mahmoud Elmorsi Aboulfotouh

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 2/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of hysteroscopic adhesiolysis in patients with intrauterine adhesions (IUAs).

Setting

Minia Maternity University Hospital, Egypt.

Design

Prospective cohort study.

Patients

This study included 61 patients presented with infertility (primary or secondary) or recurrent pregnancy losses caused by IUAs.

Intervention(s)

The adhesions were divided by semi-rigid scissors introduced under direct vision through hysteroscopy. Three months later, second-look hysteroscopy was performed.

Primary outcome parameters

Primary outcome parameters were reproductive parameters (pregnancy rate, duration of pregnancies, life births rate, time lag between the intervention and diagnosis of pregnancy).

Secondary outcome parameters

Secondary outcome parameters were the changes in post-operative menstrual pattern, number and duration of intervention and type of intra- and post-operative complications.

Result(s)

Pregnancy rate changed from 18 to 65.5 %, while live birth rate improved from 14.7 to 36 %. The mean time until the first conception was 10.2 months (range 2–60 months) after the operation. There was significant negative correlation between the degree of IUAs and the improvement in reproductive performance. Hysteroscopic adhesiolysis significantly improved menstrual pattern in 60.7 % of patients complaining of hypomenorrhea or amenorrhea. (p = 0.0017). The average operative time was 29 ± 10.2 (10–52) min and the hospital stay was 12.5 ± 2.1 (9–24) h. Uterine perforation occurred on 3 (4.9 %), and cervical laceration occurred in one case (1.6 %).

Conclusion(s)

Hysteroscopic adhesiolysis of IUAs is safe and effective in terms of reproductive outcome. The outcome is significantly affected by degree of intrauterine adhesions rather than the main complaint before the procedure.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Dawood A, Al-Talib A, Tulandi T (2010) Predisposing factors and treatment outcome of different stages of intrauterine adhesions. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 32(8):767–770CrossRefPubMed Dawood A, Al-Talib A, Tulandi T (2010) Predisposing factors and treatment outcome of different stages of intrauterine adhesions. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 32(8):767–770CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Roy KK, Baruah J, Sharma JB, Kumar S, Kachawa G, Singh N (2010) Reproductive outcome following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis in patients with infertility due to Asherman’s syndrome. Arch Gynecol Obstet 281(2):355–361CrossRefPubMed Roy KK, Baruah J, Sharma JB, Kumar S, Kachawa G, Singh N (2010) Reproductive outcome following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis in patients with infertility due to Asherman’s syndrome. Arch Gynecol Obstet 281(2):355–361CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Myers EM, Hurst BS (2012) Comprehensive management of severe Asherman syndrome and amenorrhea. Fertil Steril 97(1):160–164CrossRefPubMed Myers EM, Hurst BS (2012) Comprehensive management of severe Asherman syndrome and amenorrhea. Fertil Steril 97(1):160–164CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Orhue AA, Aziken ME, Igbefoh JO (2003) A comparison of two adjunctive treatments for intrauterine adhesions following lysis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 82(1):49–56CrossRefPubMed Orhue AA, Aziken ME, Igbefoh JO (2003) A comparison of two adjunctive treatments for intrauterine adhesions following lysis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 82(1):49–56CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Roy KK, Singla S, Baruah J, Sharma JB, Kumar S, Singh N (2010) Reproductive outcome following hysteroscopic myomectomy in patients with infertility and recurrent abortions. Arch Gynecol Obstet 282(5):553–560CrossRefPubMed Roy KK, Singla S, Baruah J, Sharma JB, Kumar S, Singh N (2010) Reproductive outcome following hysteroscopic myomectomy in patients with infertility and recurrent abortions. Arch Gynecol Obstet 282(5):553–560CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Fernandez H, Al-Najjar F, Chauveaud-Lambling A, Frydman R, Gervaise A (2006) Fertility after treatment of Asherman’s syndrome stage 3 and 4. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 13(5):398–402 PubMed PMID: 16962521 CrossRefPubMed Fernandez H, Al-Najjar F, Chauveaud-Lambling A, Frydman R, Gervaise A (2006) Fertility after treatment of Asherman’s syndrome stage 3 and 4. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 13(5):398–402 PubMed PMID: 16962521 CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Valle RF, Sciarra JJ (1988) Intrauterine adhesions: hysteroscopic diagnosis, classification, treatment, and reproductive outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 158(6 Pt 1):1459–1470CrossRefPubMed Valle RF, Sciarra JJ (1988) Intrauterine adhesions: hysteroscopic diagnosis, classification, treatment, and reproductive outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 158(6 Pt 1):1459–1470CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Chen FP, Soong YK, Hui YL (1997) Successful treatment of severe uterine synechiae with transcervical resectoscopy combined with laminaria tent. Hum Reprod 12(5):943–947CrossRefPubMed Chen FP, Soong YK, Hui YL (1997) Successful treatment of severe uterine synechiae with transcervical resectoscopy combined with laminaria tent. Hum Reprod 12(5):943–947CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Al-Inany H (2001) Intrauterine adhesions. An update. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80(11):986–993PubMed Al-Inany H (2001) Intrauterine adhesions. An update. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80(11):986–993PubMed
10.
go back to reference Yu D, Li TC, Xia E, Huang X, Liu Y, Peng X (2008) Factors affecting reproductive outcome of hysteroscopic adhesiolysis for Asherman’s syndrome. Fertil Steril 89(3):715–722CrossRefPubMed Yu D, Li TC, Xia E, Huang X, Liu Y, Peng X (2008) Factors affecting reproductive outcome of hysteroscopic adhesiolysis for Asherman’s syndrome. Fertil Steril 89(3):715–722CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Fernandez H, Peyrelevade S, Legendre G, Faivre E, Deffieux X, Nazac A (2012) Total adhesions treated by hysteroscopy: must we stop at two procedures? Fertil Steril 98(4):980–985CrossRefPubMed Fernandez H, Peyrelevade S, Legendre G, Faivre E, Deffieux X, Nazac A (2012) Total adhesions treated by hysteroscopy: must we stop at two procedures? Fertil Steril 98(4):980–985CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Sanfilippo JS, Fitzgerald MR, Badawy SZ, Nussbaum ML, Yussman MA (1982) Asherman’s syndrome. A comparison of therapeutic methods. J Reprod Med 27(6):328–330PubMed Sanfilippo JS, Fitzgerald MR, Badawy SZ, Nussbaum ML, Yussman MA (1982) Asherman’s syndrome. A comparison of therapeutic methods. J Reprod Med 27(6):328–330PubMed
13.
go back to reference Capella-Allouc S, Morsad F, Rongieres-Bertrand C, Taylor S, Fernandez H (1999) Hysteroscopic treatment of severe Asherman’s syndrome and subsequent fertility. Hum Reprod 14(5):1230–1233CrossRefPubMed Capella-Allouc S, Morsad F, Rongieres-Bertrand C, Taylor S, Fernandez H (1999) Hysteroscopic treatment of severe Asherman’s syndrome and subsequent fertility. Hum Reprod 14(5):1230–1233CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Pabuccu R, Onalan G, Kaya C, Selam B, Ceyhan T, Ornek T et al (2008) Efficiency and pregnancy outcome of serial intrauterine device-guided hysteroscopic adhesiolysis of intrauterine synechiae. Fertil Steril 90(5):1973–1977CrossRefPubMed Pabuccu R, Onalan G, Kaya C, Selam B, Ceyhan T, Ornek T et al (2008) Efficiency and pregnancy outcome of serial intrauterine device-guided hysteroscopic adhesiolysis of intrauterine synechiae. Fertil Steril 90(5):1973–1977CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Worldwide AAMIG (2010) AAGL practice report: practice guidelines for management of intrauterine synechiae. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17(1):1–7. (PubMed PMID: 20129325)CrossRef Worldwide AAMIG (2010) AAGL practice report: practice guidelines for management of intrauterine synechiae. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17(1):1–7. (PubMed PMID: 20129325)CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Roge PCL, D’Ercole C, Broussse M, Boubli L, Blanc B (1997) Intrauterine adhesions and fertility: results of hysteroscopic treatment. Gynaecol Endosc 6:225–228CrossRef Roge PCL, D’Ercole C, Broussse M, Boubli L, Blanc B (1997) Intrauterine adhesions and fertility: results of hysteroscopic treatment. Gynaecol Endosc 6:225–228CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Johary J, Xue M, Zhu X, Xu D, Velu PP (2014) Efficacy of estrogen therapy in patients with intrauterine adhesions: systematic review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 21(1):44–54 (PubMed PMID: 23933351)CrossRefPubMed Johary J, Xue M, Zhu X, Xu D, Velu PP (2014) Efficacy of estrogen therapy in patients with intrauterine adhesions: systematic review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 21(1):44–54 (PubMed PMID: 23933351)CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Bosteels J, Kasius J, Weyers S, Broekmans FJ, Mol BW, D’Hooghe TM (2015) Hysteroscopy for treating subfertility associated with suspected major uterine cavity abnormalities. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD009461 (PubMed PMID: 25701429)PubMed Bosteels J, Kasius J, Weyers S, Broekmans FJ, Mol BW, D’Hooghe TM (2015) Hysteroscopy for treating subfertility associated with suspected major uterine cavity abnormalities. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD009461 (PubMed PMID: 25701429)PubMed
Metadata
Title
Hysteroscopic adhesiolysis: efficacy and safety
Authors
Ahmad Sameer Sanad
Mahmoud Elmorsi Aboulfotouh
Publication date
01-08-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 2/2016
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-016-4107-9

Other articles of this Issue 2/2016

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2/2016 Go to the issue